Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X3 Plus v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1060) Xotic PC Edition
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 73 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 Sharp SHP1401, IGZO TFT, 13.9", 3200x1800 | Alienware 13 R3 JJT6C_133KL05 (SDCA029), OLED, 13.3", 2560x1440 | Gigabyte Aero 14 LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Razer Blade (2017) LP140WF3-SPD1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F5 IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 Panasonic MEI96A2 / VVX16T028J00, , 15.6", 2880x1620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -2% | -9% | -26% | 5% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 64.4 -3% | 65.2 -1% | 64.5 -2% | 48.21 -27% | 71.7 8% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 96.5 | 91.8 -5% | 92.5 -4% | 83 -14% | 72.6 -25% | 97.6 1% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.5 | 65.5 -3% | 66.5 -1% | 60.7 -10% | 49.81 -26% | 72.1 7% | ||
| Response Times | 54% | -5% | 3511% | 4251% | -8% | 200% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 41 ? -8% | 25.2 ? 34% | 42.8 ? -13% | 33.6 ? 12% | 28 ? 26% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.4 ? | 2.8 ? 89% | 25 ? -2% | 24.8 ? -2% | 32 ? -31% | 31.2 ? -28% | 23.6 ? 3% | |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 240 ? 19% | 21370 10500% | 26000 ? 12797% | 1351 ? 570% | |||
| Screen | 10% | -32% | -30% | -40% | -35% | -89% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 348 | 313 -10% | 290 -17% | 272 -22% | 320 -8% | 315.8 -9% | 274.2 -21% | 350 1% |
| Brightness | 359 | 310 -14% | 257 -28% | 277 -23% | 316 -12% | 310 -14% | 263 -27% | 296 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 73 | 87 19% | 79 8% | 84 15% | 90 23% | 90 23% | 92 26% | 79 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.3 -3% | 0.26 10% | 0.36 -24% | 0.33 -14% | 0.44 -52% | 0.4 -38% | |
| Contrast | 1200 | 967 -19% | 1046 -13% | 889 -26% | 957 -20% | 623 -48% | 875 -27% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.54 -6% | 4.59 -91% | 4.59 -91% | 4.62 -93% | 5 -108% | 8 -233% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 3.94 23% | 8.68 -70% | 8.49 -66% | 9.75 -91% | 10.1 -98% | 14.6 -186% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.43 38% | 4.32 -88% | 4.28 -86% | 6 -161% | 4.2 -83% | 9.1 -296% | |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.12 104% | 2.24 98% | |
| CCT | 6206 105% | 6337 103% | 7320 89% | 6848 95% | 6761 96% | 6107 106% | 5020 129% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 78 26% | 59 -5% | 55 -11% | 60 -3% | 54.5 -12% | 45.7 -26% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 97 1% | 92 -4% | 83 -14% | 92 -4% | 83 -14% | 72.1 -25% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 32% /
19% | -14% /
-23% | 1741% /
787% | 1403% /
772% | -17% /
-26% | 28% /
-23% | -5% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5966 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3266 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4278 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4605 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware 13 R3 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Gigabyte Aero 14 LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Razer Blade (2017) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 LiteOn CX2-8B256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -23% | -14% | -38% | -6% | 12% | 7% | -12% | |
| Read Seq | 1498 | 1373 -8% | 1584 6% | 1122 -25% | 1769 18% | 2145 43% | 2141 43% | 1605 7% |
| Write Seq | 1324 | 789 -40% | 795 -40% | 311 -77% | 1133 -14% | 1724 30% | 1621 22% | 767 -42% |
| Read 512 | 966 | 1070 11% | 985 2% | 682 -29% | 891 -8% | 715 -26% | 499.7 -48% | 952 -1% |
| Write 512 | 1221 | 405.6 -67% | 814 -33% | 310 -75% | 1069 -12% | 967 -21% | 1531 25% | 724 -41% |
| Read 4k | 44.8 | 37.65 -16% | 44.93 0% | 34.8 -22% | 44.7 0% | 55.9 25% | 54.2 21% | 46.13 3% |
| Write 4k | 156 | 140.2 -10% | 131.2 -16% | 134.3 -14% | 123.3 -21% | 180.6 16% | 158.2 1% | 143.2 -8% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 700 | 593 -15% | 602 -14% | 565 -19% | 645 -8% | 744 6% | 632 -10% | 644 -8% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 517 | 311.2 -40% | 441 -15% | 308 -40% | 490.5 -5% | 634 23% | 527 2% | 486.2 -6% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Alienware 13 R3 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 33625 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20785 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10361 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5532 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 109 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 82 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 42 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 40 | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 77 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 65 | |||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 50 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 97 | |||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 45 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 37 / 40.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 50 / 53.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware 13 R3 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Gigabyte Aero 14 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Razer Blade (2017) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Eurocom Tornado F5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, LiteOn CX2-8B256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 15% | 9% | 10% | 10% | 6% | 11% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 29.1 | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 31 -7% | 29.4 -1% | 28.8 1% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 29 8% | 31 1% | 30 4% | 32 -2% | 33.3 -6% | 33.1 -5% | 33.4 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 37 | 30 19% | 32 14% | 30 19% | 33 11% | 33.5 9% | 33.1 11% | 34.2 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40.8 | 31 24% | 33 19% | 30 26% | 34 17% | 33.5 18% | 34 17% | 35 14% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 36 28% | 42 16% | 51 -2% | 39 22% | 44.2 12% | 37.2 26% | 53.3 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.6 | 45 16% | 43 20% | 46.1 14% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 53.6 | 49 9% | 53 1% | 51 5% | 50 7% | 52.5 2% | 47.1 12% | 57 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Aorus x3 Plus v7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware 13 R3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 12.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.1 / 15.8 / 16.7 Watt |
| Carga |
110.9 / 170.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IGZO TFT, 3200x1800, 13.9" | Alienware 13 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, OLED, 2560x1440, 13.3" | Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, , 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 18% | 29% | 9% | -46% | 2% | -70% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.1 | 7 54% | 8 47% | 7.5 50% | 12 21% | 21.2 -40% | 14.5 4% | 23.3 -54% |
| Idle Average * | 15.8 | 12 24% | 13 18% | 12.1 23% | 15 5% | 25.1 -59% | 17.3 -9% | 30.1 -91% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.7 | 18 -8% | 20 -20% | 14.3 14% | 20 -20% | 26.3 -57% | 17.4 -4% | 31 -86% |
| Load Average * | 110.9 | 76 31% | 78 30% | 73.5 34% | 82 26% | 169.4 -53% | 93 16% | 195.8 -77% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 135 | 110 19% | 108 20% | 111 18% | 128.8 5% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 170.4 | 161 6% | 146 14% | 110.2 35% | 161 6% | 202.4 -19% | 242 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh | Alienware 13 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94 Wh | Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Aorus X5 v6 AO-S107W516-PL-002 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | 66% | 86% | 30% | -33% | -22% | -49% | |
| Reader / Idle | 477 | 524 10% | 909 91% | 638 34% | 291 -39% | 386 -19% | 242 -49% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 293 | 320 9% | 524 79% | 545 86% | 422 44% | 216 -26% | 232 -21% | |
| Load | 100 | 90 -10% | 129 29% | 112 12% | 67 -33% | 75 -25% | ||
| WiFi | 182 |
Pro
Contra
O X3 Plus v7 é um aparelho ambicioso. Ele continua com o objetivo da Aorus de colocar hardware poderoso em uma carcaça compacta. Infelizmente, o X3 tenta ter seu bolo e comê-lo também, e o resultado final é um portátil com compromissos. Embora existam alguns destaques definitivos, houve recortes para atingir esse nível de desempenho, e a Aorus pode ter cortado as bordas erradas.
O design do X3 é excelente. O acabamento atraente combinado com os acentos sutis cria um chassi muito bonito, e o uso de metal ao redor do corpo faz com que o dispositivo se sinta caro. A tela QHD+ também é impressionante. As imagens e o texto são muito nítidos, as cores são vibrantes e precisas, e a tela permanece clara e legível mesmo sob a luz solar direta. Também ficamos impressionados pelo desempenho nos jogos. É incrível que os usuários agora possam obter o nível de desempenho de desktop (ou melhor!) em um portátil tão compacto. Além disso, a opção de overclockar a CPU e a GPU são adições agradáveis; mais flexibilidade aumenta o valor.
Infelizmente, este desempenho vem com um custo. O chassi é muito pequeno para gerenciar proficientemente o calor gerado pelos poderosos componentes internos, o que força as ventoinhas a acelerar com frequência e agressividade enquanto tentam despejar calor suficiente para manter as coisas em andamento. O resultado final é um portátil barulhento que esquenta e pode se afogar termicamente sob uso intenso. Além disso, o imenso consumo de energia que suga mais do que o PSU pode fornecer é motivo de preocupação. Novamente, os usuários devem ter cuidado ao empurrar o portátil até seus limites.
No geral, nós gostamos do Aorus X3 Plus v7. É um excelente aparelho, mas comparado com a dura concorrência como o Gigabyte Aero 14 e Alienware 13, o X3 fica curto em outras áreas. O teclado médio, o touchpad frustrante e os problemas de calor e ruído mantêm o X3 embaixo do escalão superior de portáteis de jogos finos e leves.
Embora o Aorus X3 Plus v7 ofereça desempenho impressionante em um pequeno pacote, há muitos compromissos para que nós recomendarmos o aparelho. Existem opções mais equilibradas para os gamers em busca de um aparelho portátil.
Aorus x3 Plus v7
- 05/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
