Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus 5 KB: A Gigabyte equipa o Clevo barebone com a RTX 2060
Aorus 5 KB (5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 960 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, NVIDIA 451.67, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4 2666 dual-channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT), 512 GB
, M.2 SSD, 430 GB livre
peso
2.122 kg, Suprimento de energia: 498 g
Preço
1.2 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 28 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 30 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.1 % v7 (old) | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
26.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 298 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 318 cd/m²
Contraste: 1060:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.211
| Aorus 5 KB LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng LG Philips LP156WFG-SPK1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -38% | -38% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.4 | 66.7 5% | 38.92 -39% | 38.8 -39% | 64.9 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.8 | 94.4 2% | 58.5 -37% | 57.8 -38% | 93.1 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.8 | 68.1 5% | 40.22 -38% | 40.09 -38% | 65.9 2% |
| Response Times | -10% | -125% | -67% | -5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.4 ? | 17.2 ? -19% | 34 ? -136% | 26 ? -81% | 16 ? -11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 11.2 ? -0% | 24 ? -114% | 17 ? -52% | 11 ? 2% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -29% | -69% | -54% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 318 | 346 9% | 280 -12% | 301 -5% | 363 14% |
| Brightness | 298 | 346 16% | 254 -15% | 277 -7% | 327 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 88 1% | 77 -11% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.28 7% | 0.15 50% | 0.26 13% | 0.185 38% |
| Contrast | 1060 | 1236 17% | 1867 76% | 1158 9% | 1962 85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.49 | 4.62 -86% | 5.89 -137% | 5.12 -106% | 2.69 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.06 | 8.93 -76% | 19 -275% | 8.86 -75% | 5.06 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 1.58 -3% | 4.79 -213% | 4.88 -219% | 1.7 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 4.95 -209% | 4.08 -155% | 3.47 -117% | 2.77 -73% |
| Gamma | 2.211 100% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.37 93% | 2.56 86% |
| CCT | 6714 97% | 7733 84% | 7303 89% | 7062 92% | 6385 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 61 -6% | 37 -43% | 37 -43% | 60.3 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 94 6% | 58 -35% | 57 -36% | 92.8 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-21% | -77% /
-70% | -53% /
-53% | 0% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø896 (889.24-899.4)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1848 (1812.42-1883.86)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5452 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus 5 KB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT) | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Average ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -1% | -24% | -26% | -35% | -6% | |
| Write 4K | 162.1 | 120.6 -26% | 219.8 36% | 145.4 -10% | 110 -32% | 149.5 ? -8% |
| Read 4K | 60.7 | 46.13 -24% | 50.2 -17% | 51.6 -15% | 52.8 -13% | 53.6 ? -12% |
| Write Seq | 2366 | 2900 23% | 979 -59% | 1007 -57% | 983 -58% | 2346 ? -1% |
| Read Seq | 2633 | 2929 11% | 1990 -24% | 1145 -57% | 1608 -39% | 2501 ? -5% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 428.2 | 372.2 -13% | 516 21% | 468.4 9% | 461.3 8% | 419 ? -2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 582 | 422.2 -27% | 298.3 -49% | 528 -9% | 345.4 -41% | 520 ? -11% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2480 | 3245 31% | 982 -60% | 1381 -44% | 982 -60% | 2463 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3121 | 3565 14% | 1907 -39% | 2291 -27% | 1820 -42% | 2997 ? -4% |
| AS SSD | 40% | -21% | -31% | -32% | -5% | |
| Seq Read | 2795 | 2975 6% | 1682 -40% | 2012 -28% | 1553 -44% | 2688 ? -4% |
| Seq Write | 2172 | 2597 20% | 904 -58% | 1261 -42% | 868 -60% | 1888 ? -13% |
| 4K Read | 53.3 | 62.3 17% | 60.2 13% | 43.66 -18% | 56.6 6% | 53.3 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 121.3 | 150.9 24% | 164.8 36% | 109.3 -10% | 153.6 27% | 124.8 ? 3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 714 | 1508 111% | 472.5 -34% | 851 19% | 325.3 -54% | 714 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1376 | 2239 63% | 845 -39% | 780 -43% | 762 -45% | 1114 ? -19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.049 | 0.038 22% | 0.087 -78% | 0.117 -139% | 0.07 -43% | 0.05575 ? -14% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.025 31% | 0.02 44% | 0.036 -0% | 0.046 -28% | 0.03125 ? 13% |
| Score Total | 3279 | 5463 67% | 2143 -35% | 2643 -19% | 1802 -45% | 2968 ? -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
21% | -23% /
-22% | -29% /
-29% | -34% /
-33% | -6% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3121 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2480 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
582 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
428.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2633 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2366 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
60.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
162.1 MB/s
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance | |
| Average of class Gaming (1227 - 51757, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (15612 - 20404, n=40) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18491 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15034 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6258 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (76 - 90, n=9) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (52 - 67.5, n=7) | |
| Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 5 KB | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (98.7 - 138, n=10) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng | |
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø55.8 (51-60)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 57 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 140 | 128 | 121 | 115 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 66.1 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 93.1 | 79.1 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 84 | |||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 129 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 26 / 30 / 34 dB |
| Carga |
| 53 / 56 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 5 KB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (60.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.2 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 12 / 21 Watt |
| Carga |
128 / 217 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -32% | 20% | 31% | 38% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 15 -88% | 5.4 32% | 3.2 60% | 3.8 52% | 13.6 ? -70% |
| Idle Average * | 12 | 19 -58% | 10 17% | 8.3 31% | 7.7 36% | 19 ? -58% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21 | 26 -24% | 10.5 50% | 8.7 59% | 9.5 55% | 26.8 ? -28% |
| Load Average * | 128 | 101 21% | 135 -5% | 82 36% | 90 30% | 106.3 ? 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 138 | 177 -28% | 144 -4% | 151 -9% | 99 28% | |
| Load Maximum * | 217 | 245 -13% | 147 32% | 195 10% | 156 28% | 249 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | 46% | 52% | 29% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 538 | 312 -42% | 587 9% | 848 58% | 565 ? 5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 285 | 208 -27% | 370 30% | 433 52% | 367 29% | 375 ? 32% |
| Load | 58 | 72 24% | 116 100% | 84 45% | 85.6 ? 48% |
Pro
+ Muito boas opções de manutenção
+ Sem PWM
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Carcaça estável
+ Bateria trocável
Contra
- Duração de bateria moderada
- A retroiluminação somente oferece cores fixas
Veredicto - Barebone sólido e bem-equipado
Com o Aorus 5 KB, a Gigabyte entrega um portátil para jogos comparativamente econômico que brilha com suas extensas opções de manutenção. Especialmente as opções de expansão para os dispositivos de armazenamento são diversos, mas também é possível acessar a RAM e os ventiladores. O desempenho está no nível esperado para o hardware e também pode ser mantido sob uso intenso. Além disso, a possibilidade de influir no desempenho e no comportamento do ventilador através do software também fornece aos usuários bons mecanismos de controle.
O Aorus 5 KB oferece muitas opções de manutenção e podem manter o desempenho, inclusive sob uso intenso.
Ao usar um Clevo barebone, a Aorus não colocou seus próprios acentos. Além disso, o controle da retro iluminação do teclado se limita a cores pré determinados. No entanto, o acabamento, o painel de 144 Hz, e a seleção de portas são muito sólidos e deveriam agradar a maioria de usuários.
Aorus 5 KB
- 10/06/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
