Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus 5 KB: A Gigabyte equipa o Clevo barebone com a RTX 2060

Com potencial para atualizações.

Com o Aorus 5 KB, a Gigabyte optou por uma carcaça barebone da Clevo. Isto tem algumas vantagens como uma bateria trocável e muito boas opções de manutenção. Em nossa análise vamos esclarecer quão bem isto funciona com o hardware instalado e o desempenho que pode se esperar.
Windows Gaming Laptop / Notebook Comet Lake Geforce
Aorus 5 KB (5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 960 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, NVIDIA 451.67, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4 2666 dual-channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT), 512 GB 
, M.2 SSD, 430 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC293 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 cpnexão para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 conexão para microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 28 x 361 x 258
Bateria
48.96 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0,9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2W, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.122 kg, Suprimento de energia: 498 g
Preço
1.2 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.7 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.1 kg28 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.5 kg30 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
v7 (old)
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.1 %
v7 (old)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q		2 kg23.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB
Aorus 5 KB

Size comparison

❌
363.1 mm 259.6 mm 26.1 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 28 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 257 mm 23.5 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: Kensington lock, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x 3.5 mm microphone, 1x 3.5 mm headphone
Left side: Kensington lock, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x 3.5 mm microphone, 1x 3.5 mm headphone
Right side: 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x MiniDP 1.2, SD card reader
Right side: 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x MiniDP 1.2, SD card reader
Back: 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (including DisplayPort 1.4), 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x Gigabit LAN, power supply
Back: 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (including DisplayPort 1.4), 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x Gigabit LAN, power supply
Front: No ports
Front: No ports
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s +168%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +26%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.7 MB/s -53%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s +160%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +39%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.8 MB/s -57%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s +1%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s -52%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (635min - 674max) MBit/s -52%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s -36%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
637 (626min - 648max) MBit/s -54%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s -54%
ColorChecker
26.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 5 KB: 22.26 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 35.1 ∆E
298
cd/m²		302
cd/m²		304
cd/m²
309
cd/m²		318
cd/m²		306
cd/m²
278
cd/m²		276
cd/m²		291
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 298 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 318 cd/m²
Contraste: 1060:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.211
Aorus 5 KB
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPK1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
4%
-38%
-38%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.4
66.7
5%
38.92
-39%
38.8
-39%
64.9
2%
sRGB Coverage
92.8
94.4
2%
58.5
-37%
57.8
-38%
93.1
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.8
68.1
5%
40.22
-38%
40.09
-38%
65.9
2%
Response Times
-10%
-125%
-67%
-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
17.2 ?(8, 9.2)
-19%
34 ?(16, 18)
-136%
26 ?(12, 14)
-81%
16 ?(9, 7)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-0%
24 ?(13, 11)
-114%
17 ?(8, 9)
-52%
11 ?(7, 4)
2%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-29%
-69%
-54%
4%
Brightness middle
318
346
9%
280
-12%
301
-5%
363
14%
Brightness
298
346
16%
254
-15%
277
-7%
327
10%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
88
1%
77
-11%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.3
0.28
7%
0.15
50%
0.26
13%
0.185
38%
Contrast
1060
1236
17%
1867
76%
1158
9%
1962
85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.49
4.62
-86%
5.89
-137%
5.12
-106%
2.69
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.06
8.93
-76%
19
-275%
8.86
-75%
5.06
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.53
1.58
-3%
4.79
-213%
4.88
-219%
1.7
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
4.95
-209%
4.08
-155%
3.47
-117%
2.77
-73%
Gamma
2.211 100%
2.36 93%
2.33 94%
2.37 93%
2.56 86%
CCT
6714 97%
7733 84%
7303 89%
7062 92%
6385 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65
61
-6%
37
-43%
37
-43%
60.3
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
94
6%
58
-35%
57
-36%
92.8
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -21%
-77% / -70%
-53% / -53%
0% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Aorus 5 KB - CPUz
Aorus 5 KB - CPUz
Aorus 5 KB - CPUz
Aorus 5 KB - CPUz
Aorus 5 KB - GPUz
Aorus 5 KB - HWiNFO
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800Tooltip
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø896 (889.24-899.4)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1848 (1812.42-1883.86)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +52%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
491 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points +2%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
476 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
459 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points -12%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +168%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4369 Points +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4257 Points +38%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
3075 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
2217 Points -28%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +36%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
203 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
187 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +184%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1884 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1850 Points +55%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points +6%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1194 (1045.12min - 1193.85max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
898 Points -25%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
485.9 Seconds * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
450 Seconds * -16%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
388 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262.5 Seconds * +32%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
257.8 Seconds * +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +56%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +20%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
5253 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4903 MIPS -7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4725 MIPS -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
4622 MIPS -12%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +136%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
52152 MIPS +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
45679 MIPS +28%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
35797 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
33899 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
24635 MIPS -31%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +43%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1316 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
1220 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1196 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1166 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1141 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +133%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7984 Points +25%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
6397 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
6068 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5920 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4640 Points -27%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +145%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.3 fps +40%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10.8 fps +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps +1%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.1 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.69 fps -19%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
68 s * -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
52.6 s * -7%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
49 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
28.6 s * +42%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.664 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.634 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.603 sec * -0%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.602 sec *
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1194 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
203 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3075 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
476 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +43%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5602 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4984 - 6268, n=9)
5455 Points 0%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
5452 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5013 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points -10%
PCMark 10 Score
5452 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
1218 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
797 μs * +35%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
790 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
723 μs * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Aorus 5 KB
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU		HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Average ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-1%
-24%
-26%
-35%
-6%
Write 4K
162.1
120.6
-26%
219.8
36%
145.4
-10%
110
-32%
149.5 ?(131.7 - 162.1, n=4)
-8%
Read 4K
60.7
46.13
-24%
50.2
-17%
51.6
-15%
52.8
-13%
53.6 ?(37.6 - 60.7, n=4)
-12%
Write Seq
2366
2900
23%
979
-59%
1007
-57%
983
-58%
2346 ?(2273 - 2378, n=4)
-1%
Read Seq
2633
2929
11%
1990
-24%
1145
-57%
1608
-39%
2501 ?(2141 - 2696, n=4)
-5%
Write 4K Q32T1
428.2
372.2
-13%
516
21%
468.4
9%
461.3
8%
419 ?(355 - 475, n=4)
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
582
422.2
-27%
298.3
-49%
528
-9%
345.4
-41%
520 ?(362 - 590, n=4)
-11%
Write Seq Q32T1
2480
3245
31%
982
-60%
1381
-44%
982
-60%
2463 ?(2373 - 2526, n=4)
-1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3121
3565
14%
1907
-39%
2291
-27%
1820
-42%
2997 ?(2556 - 3242, n=4)
-4%
AS SSD
40%
-21%
-31%
-32%
-5%
Seq Read
2795
2975
6%
1682
-40%
2012
-28%
1553
-44%
2688 ?(2241 - 2873, n=4)
-4%
Seq Write
2172
2597
20%
904
-58%
1261
-42%
868
-60%
1888 ?(1017 - 2240, n=4)
-13%
4K Read
53.3
62.3
17%
60.2
13%
43.66
-18%
56.6
6%
53.3 ?(52.3 - 53.9, n=4)
0%
4K Write
121.3
150.9
24%
164.8
36%
109.3
-10%
153.6
27%
124.8 ?(116.2 - 140.2, n=4)
3%
4K-64 Read
714
1508
111%
472.5
-34%
851
19%
325.3
-54%
714 ?(713 - 716, n=4)
0%
4K-64 Write
1376
2239
63%
845
-39%
780
-43%
762
-45%
1114 ?(827 - 1376, n=4)
-19%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.038
22%
0.087
-78%
0.117
-139%
0.07
-43%
0.05575 ?(0.043 - 0.077, n=4)
-14%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.025
31%
0.02
44%
0.036
-0%
0.046
-28%
0.03125 ?(0.027 - 0.036, n=4)
13%
Score Total
3279
5463
67%
2143
-35%
2643
-19%
1802
-45%
2968 ?(2659 - 3279, n=4)
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 21%
-23% / -22%
-29% / -29%
-34% / -33%
-6% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3121 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2480 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 582 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 428.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2633 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2366 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 162.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +91%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20762 Points +27%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16362 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18358, n=43)
16301 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15967 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15609 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
13659 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +113%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7662 Points +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5660 - 6910, n=41)
6206 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6164 Points +1%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6123 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6043 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
5017 Points -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Average of class Gaming
  (1227 - 51757, n=186, last 2 years)
34082 Points +84%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20935 Points +13%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
18491 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (15612 - 20404, n=40)
18064 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
17390 Points -6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
17319 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
17255 Points -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
18491 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15034 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6258 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Dota 2 Reborn | Doom Eternal
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +123%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
74.4 (62min) fps +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
68.3 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (50.6 - 74, n=40)
61.1 fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
60.5 (51min - 68max) fps +6%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
57 (47min) fps
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H
53.2 fps -7%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +55%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
85 fps +1%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
84 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (76 - 90, n=9)
83.3 fps -1%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +80%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
66.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps -7%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.6 - 244, n=189, last 2 years)
160 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
130 (113.1min) fps +7%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
121 (106.1min) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
118.8 (104.4min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (85.4 - 128, n=18)
112.9 fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
85.4 (77.3min) fps -29%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years)
170 fps +32%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
129 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
126.1 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.7 - 138, n=10)
121.7 fps -6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H
93.4 fps -28%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø55.8 (51-60)
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 57
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 140 128 121 115
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 66.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 93.1 79.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 84
Doom Eternal (2020) 129

Barulho

Ocioso
26 / 30 / 34 dB
Carga
53 / 56 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.439.636.838.437.52534.240.438.235.5393145.544.546.544.345.34035.332.13229.943.15040.64242.541.840.26341.136.827.326.833.88038.927.519.9244710028.120.418.616.631.412528.920.418.415.929.716027.822.221.721.129.120031.225.319.818.931.825032.5221915.735.231534.421.218.213.936.340035.524.123.91240.250036.922.623.911.539.363039.122.419.611.24180040.225.619.911.242.710004223.9211145.1125043.423.321.211.146.3160041.121.317.811.444.2200040.72015.811.444.5250043.919.516.311.547.3315044.518.617.112.947.6400041.51715.413.146.1500036.915.415.414.342630034.61515.614.439.7800029.414.314.513.535.1100002613.713.912.832.21250020.413.714.112.326.11600017.513.513.711.820.4SPL52.932.930.52556.4N8.31.71.40.610.7median 35.5median 20.4median 18.2median 12.8median 39.7Delta6.23.32.61.66.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 5 KB
Carga Máxima
 49 °C50 °C47 °C 
 46 °C46 °C46 °C 
 38 °C35 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 43.2 °C
45 °C42 °C48 °C
42 °C42 °C49 °C
30 °C38 °C40 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.440.22535.535.83144.3434029.931.45041.841.46326.837.5802436.210016.622.312515.923.416021.127.720018.940.925015.761.431513.967.7400126650011.561.463011.266.480011.270.710001172.4125011.174.5160011.474.4200011.474.8250011.576.1315012.978.2400013.181.2500014.374.6630014.474.7800013.573.61000012.876.51250012.374.21600011.875SPL2587.8N0.672.4median 12.8median 73.6Delta1.68.629.928.229.935.232.335.23534.13528.825.828.83027.1302325.52321.120.721.125.718.525.732.718.832.736.31836.335.517.135.529.916.229.937.114.937.150.614.650.65614.85657.314.357.353.514.353.555.61455.658.813.958.85714.15760.714.160.757.414.657.454.914.654.95814.75860.914.860.955.714.855.755.715.155.752.215.252.246.216.446.245.915.445.969.426.769.424.40.824.4median 54.9median 14.8median 54.98.40.88.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 5 KBHP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 5 KB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (60.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.2 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 8 / 12 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 128 / 217 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-32%
20%
31%
38%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
8
15
-88%
5.4
32%
3.2
60%
3.8
52%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
-69%
Idle Average *
12
19
-58%
10
17%
8.3
31%
7.7
36%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
21
26
-24%
10.5
50%
8.7
59%
9.5
55%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
-27%
Load Average *
128
101
21%
135
-5%
82
36%
90
30%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
138
177
-28%
144
-4%
151
-9%
99
28%
Load Maximum *
217
245
-13%
147
32%
195
10%
156
28%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 58min
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh		HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
46%
52%
29%
28%
Reader / Idle
538
312
-42%
587
9%
848
58%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
5%
WiFi v1.3
285
208
-27%
370
30%
433
52%
367
29%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
32%
Load
58
72
24%
116
100%
84
45%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
47%

Pro

+ Muito boas opções de manutenção
+ Sem PWM
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Carcaça estável
+ Bateria trocável

Contra

- Duração de bateria moderada
- A retroiluminação somente oferece cores fixas

Veredicto - Barebone sólido e bem-equipado

In review: Gigabyte Aorus 5 KB. Test device provided by: Gigabyte Germany
In review: Gigabyte Aorus 5 KB. Test device provided by: Gigabyte Germany

Com o Aorus 5 KB, a Gigabyte entrega um portátil para jogos comparativamente econômico que brilha com suas extensas opções de manutenção. Especialmente as opções de expansão para os dispositivos de armazenamento são diversos, mas também é possível acessar a RAM e os ventiladores. O desempenho está no nível esperado para o hardware e também pode ser mantido sob uso intenso. Além disso, a possibilidade de influir no desempenho e no comportamento do ventilador através do software também fornece aos usuários bons mecanismos de controle.

O Aorus 5 KB oferece muitas opções de manutenção e podem manter o desempenho, inclusive sob uso intenso.

Ao usar um Clevo barebone, a Aorus não colocou seus próprios acentos.  Além disso, o controle da retro iluminação do teclado se limita a cores pré determinados. No entanto, o acabamento, o painel de 144 Hz, e a seleção de portas são muito sólidos e deveriam agradar a maioria de usuários.

Aorus 5 KB - 10/06/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
77 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
65 / 80 → 82%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Bateria
62 / 95 → 65%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
80%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Médio
74%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Aorus 5 KB (5 Serie)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus 5 KB: A Gigabyte equipa o Clevo barebone com a RTX 2060
Mike Wobker, 2020-10-12 (Update: 2020-10-20)