Breve Análise do Portátil Alienware Area-51m (i9-9900K, RTX 2080)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 508:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.17
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG G703GX AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K AU Optronics B173HAN03.1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Alienware 17 R5 JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 23% | -3% | -4% | 29% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 90.9 37% | 64.1 -3% | 64.7 -2% | 88.9 34% | 63.4 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 100 3% | 93.3 -4% | 89.1 -8% | 100 3% | 86.1 -11% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 86.2 30% | 65.6 -1% | 65.2 -2% | 99.7 50% | 62.9 -5% |
Response Times | 44% | 28% | -18% | -309% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.2 ? | 8 ? 39% | 7.2 ? 45% | 18 ? -36% | 60.8 ? -361% | 20.8 ? -58% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 5.6 ? 48% | 9.6 ? 11% | 10.8 ? -0% | 38.4 ? -256% | 6 ? 44% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | 204.9 ? | ||||
Screen | 19% | -9% | -18% | -8% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 335.2 | 240 -28% | 296 -12% | 276.1 -18% | 230 -31% | 398 19% |
Brightness | 297 | 248 -16% | 279 -6% | 260 -12% | 207 -30% | 367 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 83 1% | 85 4% | 85 4% | 83 1% | 86 5% |
Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.22 67% | 0.25 62% | 0.36 45% | 0.2 70% | 0.51 23% |
Contrast | 508 | 1091 115% | 1184 133% | 767 51% | 1150 126% | 780 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.02 | 2.14 -6% | 4.77 -136% | 3.51 -74% | 5.62 -178% | 5.45 -170% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.23 | 5.04 30% | 9.08 -26% | 6.84 5% | 10.24 -42% | 10.36 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.17 | 1.54 -32% | 1.46 -25% | 3.56 -204% | 2.56 -119% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.62 49% | 5.83 -82% | 2.7 16% | 4.54 -42% | 5.4 -69% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.47 89% | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6746 96% | 6846 95% | 8076 80% | 6947 94% | 6625 98% | 7453 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.3 | 77 26% | 60 -2% | 57.8 -6% | 88 44% | 56 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.9 | 100 3% | 93 -4% | 88.8 -8% | 100 3% | 86 -11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 29% /
23% | 5% /
-3% | -13% /
-16% | -96% /
-41% | -14% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Notebookcheck Desktop PC 2018 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (203 - 218, n=9) | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Alienware 15 R3 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Notebookcheck Desktop PC 2018 | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (1623 - 2040, n=9) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Alienware 15 R3 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (2.33 - 2.44, n=5) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Alienware 15 R3 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (17.4 - 21.8, n=5) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Alienware 15 R3 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (36683 - 49142, n=4) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (7786 - 8042, n=4) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (85.6 - 98.7, n=3) | |
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Essentials | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Productivity | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5607 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6140 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7006 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Asus ROG G703GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 11% | 4% | 20% | -11% | |
Seq Read | 2082 | 3058 47% | 1632 -22% | 2323 12% | 2599 25% |
Seq Write | 2335 | 2196 -6% | 1767 -24% | 2887 24% | 588 -75% |
4K Read | 24.14 | 38.37 59% | 50.4 109% | 30.51 26% | 37.57 56% |
4K Write | 91.8 | 97.7 6% | 101.9 11% | 131.8 44% | 104.4 14% |
4K-64 Read | 1561 | 1347 -14% | 1196 -23% | 1507 -3% | 1116 -29% |
4K-64 Write | 1350 | 1236 -8% | 1631 21% | 1483 10% | 513 -62% |
Access Time Read * | 0.121 | 0.056 54% | 0.061 50% | 0.032 74% | 0.051 58% |
Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.038 3% | 0.037 5% | 0.028 28% | 0.036 8% |
Score Read | 1793 | 1691 -6% | 1410 -21% | 1770 -1% | 1414 -21% |
Score Write | 1675 | 1553 -7% | 1910 14% | 1904 14% | 676 -60% |
Score Total | 4390 | 4066 -7% | 4057 -8% | 4602 5% | 2715 -38% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2175 | 2048 -6% | 3044 40% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 582 | 428.5 -26% | 574 -1% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1479 | 1173 -21% | 1489 1% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
1200 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (31826 - 38809, n=17) | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Notebookcheck Desktop PC 2018 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
MSI GE75 8SF | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Notebookcheck Desktop PC 2018 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (9038 - 18934, n=17) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GE75 8SF | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
1200 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29759 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 59224 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23195 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10704 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
i7-7740X Asus X299 Prime | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 447.6 | 380.6 | 348 | 213.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 382.5 | 273.3 | 194.4 | 101.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 317 | 224.3 | 188.8 | 158.8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 171 | 140 | 134 | 123 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 165 | 120.1 | 91.5 | 76.1 |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Asus ROG G703GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | HP Omen X 17-ap002ng GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -1% | 7% | 7% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 28.1 | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 28.9 -3% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 32 -14% | 30 -7% | 29.7 -6% | 31.6 -12% | 30 -7% |
Idle Average * | 28.6 | 34 -19% | 35 -22% | 29.7 -4% | 31.6 -10% | 31 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 51 | 37 27% | 41 20% | 30 41% | 31.7 38% | 33 35% |
Load Average * | 51 | 43 16% | 44 14% | 36.5 28% | 38.4 25% | 43 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 57 -12% | 51 -0% | 49 4% | 47.2 7% | 55 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 62 -22% | 52 -2% | 57 -12% | 48.1 6% | 58 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.1 / 28.6 / 51 dB |
Carga |
| 51 / 51 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.8 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 1.98 Watt |
Ocioso | 23.3 / 33.5 / 38.4 Watt |
Carga |
114.1 / 485.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 25% | -12% | 6% | 14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 31 -33% | 5 79% | 41.3 -77% | 31 -33% | 28 -20% |
Idle Average * | 33.5 | 35 -4% | 24 28% | 41.8 -25% | 36 -7% | 32 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 38.4 | 45 -17% | 42 -9% | 46.1 -20% | 44 -15% | 37 4% |
Load Average * | 114.1 | 130 -14% | 112 2% | 116.6 -2% | 107 6% | 112 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 339.5 | 268 21% | 284 16% | 245.9 28% | 212 38% | 192 43% |
Load Maximum * | 485.1 | 374 23% | 320 34% | 352.6 27% | 258 47% | 231 52% |
* ... smaller is better
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh | Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 20% | 66% | -6% | 47% | 47% | |
Reader / Idle | 155 | 225 45% | 301 94% | 253 63% | 268 73% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 127 | 238 87% | 120 -6% | 197 55% | 218 72% | |
Load | 66 | 63 -5% | 78 18% | 81 23% | 64 -3% |
Pro
Contra
Do ponto de vista “geração a geração”, o Area-51m é um respeitável sucessor do Alienware 17 R5. Ele mantém o que amamos do modelo antigo (teclado chanfrado, design robusto, fácil manutenção) enquanto atualiza vários aspectos que consideramos mais necessários (resfriamento mais potente, marcos mais estreitos, desempenho mais rápido). A duração da bateria é ruim, mas se essa for uma prioridade real, sugerimos que você dê uma olhada no Alienware m17.
Não é uma surpresa que o desempenho seja o verdadeiro destaque do portátil. O fato de a máquina esteja apenas a meros pontos percentuais por trás de nossa referência interna de PC de desktop é impressionante por si só. O ruído do ventilador durante os jogos permanece quase idêntico ao do Alienware 17 R5, o que é bom, considerando o enorme aumento no desempenho, mas também é uma decepção para aqueles que esperavam por uma máquina mais silenciosa.
O que torna a Área-51m tão especial também parece ser responsável por suas principais desvantagens. A placa de vídeo DGFF atualizável e supostamente preparada para o futuro, por exemplo, é um conceito muito genial. Até que um sucessor RTX 2080 chegue, no entanto, se sente quase experimental na atualidade. Em segundo lugar, o salto para um Core i9-9900K de 95+ W certamente aumenta o desempenho da CPU em relação à tradicional solução Coffee Lake-H de 45 w, mas nos prejudica ver as temperaturas do núcleo de 99+ C em plena utilização.
Embora essas altos temperaturas não sejam intrinsecamente inseguras, achamos que não há uma desculpa para isso. O Eurocom Sky X7C aloja a mesma CPU Core i9 e ainda assim atinge 84 C quando submetido ao mesmo teste de estresse sem precisar limitar as velocidades.
Se o Clevo consegue, não há motivo para que a Dell também não consiga.
A próxima desvantagem é algo que não estávamos esperando. A relação de contraste não é tão profunda quanto no Alienware 17 R5 do ano passado ou o MSI GT75. Este pode ser um dos portáteis de jogos mais rápidos disponíveis, mas não tem a melhor tela em todas as frentes.
As desvantagens, embora aparentes, não diminuem o fato de que o Area-51m ainda é um grande salto em relação à envelhecida série Alienware 17. Se a Dell continuar com a rota da CPU e DGFF da estação de trabalho, esperamos ter uma ventoinha mais silenciosa e temperaturas mais baixas em futuras revisões.
Exagero da melhor maneira possível. Definitivamente há espaço para melhorias em relação às temperaturas do núcleo e ao ruído do ventilador quando comparado ao Eurocom Sky X7C. Mas como um sucessor do Alienware 17, ele atinge todas as notas certas para ser um forte substituto de desktop.
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
-
09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo