Breve Análise do Portátil Acer TravelMate X514: Uma pequena máquina de 14 polegadas destinada para profissionais
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 980 g | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.2 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.5 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v6 (old) | Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T i5-8265U, GeForce MX230 | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84.8 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | Dell Latitude 14 5495 R7 2700U, Vega 10 | 1.7 kg | 22.45 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 1372:1 (Preto: 0.215 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Chi mei CMN14D5, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 B140HAN05.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V Chi Mei CMN14D5, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T AU Optronics AUO403D B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5495 CMN14C9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 0% | -40% | -38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 67 0% | 67.3 0% | 39.71 -41% | 40.94 -39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 96.8 -2% | 98.9 0% | 59.6 -40% | 61.4 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 68.3 0% | 69.5 1% | 41.04 -40% | 42.32 -38% |
| Response Times | -46% | -1% | -4% | 3295% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 60.8 ? -52% | 40 ? -0% | 40 ? -0% | 41 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 37.6 ? -39% | 28 ? -4% | 29 ? -7% | 30 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 250 0% | 25000 ? 9900% | ||
| Screen | 1% | -14% | -12% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle | 295 | 380 29% | 323 9% | 267 -9% | 212 -28% |
| Brightness | 276 | 381 38% | 299 8% | 257 -7% | 200 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 87 6% | 87 6% | 91 11% | 89 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.215 | 0.22 -2% | 0.35 -63% | 0.2 7% | 0.23 -7% |
| Contrast | 1372 | 1727 26% | 923 -33% | 1335 -3% | 922 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 4 -54% | 3.13 -20% | 3.79 -46% | 4.34 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.6 | 5.7 -2% | 6.96 -24% | 8.18 -46% | 9.01 -61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 4.4 -29% | 4.32 -27% | 1.49 56% | 2.81 17% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.54 87% | 2.29 96% | 2.48 89% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7192 90% | 6963 93% | 7436 87% | 6659 98% | 6286 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 62.2 -1% | 64 2% | 38 -40% | 39 -38% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 96.6 -2% | 99 0% | 59 -40% | 61 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.9 | 4.71 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-6% | -5% /
-9% | -19% /
-16% | 1077% /
594% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3170 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4698 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3725 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ | Dell Latitude 14 5495 Intel SSDSCKKF256G8 | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 51% | 37% | -55% | -52% | 14% | |
| Write 4K | 122.3 | 142.3 16% | 185.5 52% | 55 -55% | 48.45 -60% | 141.1 ? 15% |
| Read 4K | 45.51 | 46.69 3% | 50.2 10% | 28.79 -37% | 25.11 -45% | 82.4 ? 81% |
| Write Seq | 667 | 1175 76% | 307.5 -54% | 341.2 -49% | 722 ? 8% | |
| Read Seq | 713 | 1132 59% | 430 -40% | 521 -27% | 974 ? 37% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 411.8 | 268.3 -35% | 472.6 15% | 149.5 -64% | 202 -51% | 418 ? 2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 559 | 359.6 -36% | 642 15% | 207.2 -63% | 243.5 -56% | 571 ? 2% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 892 | 3033 240% | 1453 63% | 389.2 -56% | 320.8 -64% | 717 ? -20% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1639 | 3561 117% | 1738 6% | 497.1 -70% | 555 -66% | 1413 ? -14% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1491 | 247.5 | 483 ? | |||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1499 | 253.4 | 684 ? | |||
| AS SSD | 93% | 42% | -139% | -73% | -20% | |
| Seq Read | 1222 | 2661 118% | 1438 18% | 487.6 -60% | 507 -59% | 1195 ? -2% |
| Seq Write | 775 | 2314 199% | 1352 74% | 392.7 -49% | 286.5 -63% | 668 ? -14% |
| 4K Read | 54.8 | 45.52 -17% | 47.35 -14% | 36.4 -34% | 19.76 -64% | 33.6 ? -39% |
| 4K Write | 114.4 | 105.3 -8% | 167.9 47% | 26.46 -77% | 34.58 -70% | 82.6 ? -28% |
| 4K-64 Read | 896 | 1806 102% | 1051 17% | 325.4 -64% | 238.4 -73% | 667 ? -26% |
| 4K-64 Write | 604 | 1650 173% | 1211 100% | 87.2 -86% | 225.2 -63% | 561 ? -7% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.432 | 0.128 | 0.117 ? | ||
| Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.041 7% | 0.03 32% | 0.4 -809% | 0.101 -130% | 0.05571 ? -27% |
| Score Read | 1073 | 2118 97% | 1242 16% | 411 -62% | 309 -71% | 820 ? -24% |
| Score Write | 796 | 1986 149% | 1514 90% | 153 -81% | 288 -64% | 710 ? -11% |
| Score Total | 2411 | 5169 114% | 3397 41% | 782 -68% | 751 -69% | 1931 ? -20% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1131 | 441.3 | 773 ? | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 267.1 | 152.1 | 375 ? | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 691 | 260 | 509 ? | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 72% /
77% | 40% /
40% | -97% /
-102% | -63% /
-64% | -3% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (999 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1917 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7933 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1035 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.5 - 17, n=176) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| Anno 1800 | |
| 1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (19.9 - 23.8, n=2) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5.7 - 8, n=2) | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.9 | 34.3 | 30.26 | 8.98 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73.9 | 46.7 | 20 | 17.7 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 19.9 | 5.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.1 / 34.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.17 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.3 / 4.6 / 5.8 Watt |
| Carga |
22.4 / 29 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5495 R7 2700U, Vega 10, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -75% | -109% | -68% | -49% | -58% | -94% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.3 | 4.7 -104% | 7.4 -222% | 3.7 -61% | 4.3 -87% | 3.81 ? -66% | 4.49 ? -95% |
| Idle Average * | 4.6 | 7.28 -58% | 9.9 -115% | 6.1 -33% | 6.6 -43% | 6.94 ? -51% | 7.66 ? -67% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 9.48 -63% | 11.7 -102% | 8.3 -43% | 7.7 -33% | 8.75 ? -51% | 9.56 ? -65% |
| Load Average * | 22.4 | 35.3 -58% | 29 -29% | 43 -92% | 32 -43% | 35 ? -56% | 46.6 ? -108% |
| Load Maximum * | 29 | 55.5 -91% | 52 -79% | 61.6 -112% | 40 -38% | 47.5 ? -64% | 68.6 ? -137% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, 57 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50.7 Wh | Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, 37 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 5495 R7 2700U, Vega 10, 61 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 79% | 12% | -12% | 35% | 62% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1075 | 968 -10% | 1089 1% | 1750 ? 63% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 378 | 675 79% | 484 28% | 331.3 -12% | 562 49% | 719 ? 90% |
| Load | 88 | 104 18% | 136 55% | 116.6 ? 33% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um bom portátil de escritório para uso em movimento
O TravelMate X514 faz jus ao seu preço e, provavelmente, às intenções da Acer também. O laptop alcança um bom equilíbrio entre ser compacto e leve, com energia suficiente para todas as tarefas gerais do escritório. O dispositivo também possui uma duração de bateria adequada, sem ser sobrecarregado por uma bateria de alta capacidade que aumentaria seu peso total.
No entanto, a tela deixa uma impressão confusa. Por um lado, reproduz cores vivas, mantendo a precisão das cores, algo que deve impressionar os criadores de conteúdo ou aqueles que gostam de fazer stream em movimento. Por outro lado, seu brilho máximo é muito baixo para um dispositivo projetado para ser usado em movimento, o que é uma pena.
O Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q é um portátil comercial leve e compacto competente, que se sai bem na maioria das áreas.
No entanto, existem algumas desvantagens em ter um design tão compacto. Em primeiro lugar, a Acer omitiu recursos empresariais, como uma porta Ethernet, portanto, você precisará de um adaptador se precisar de uma conexão de Internet com fio. Além disso, a Acer equipou o dispositivo com uma bateria relativamente pequena, que não aguentará um dia inteiro de uso intensivo longe da rede elétrica. Embora a célula de 36 Wh ajude a manter o dispositivo abaixo de 1 kg (~2,2 lb), a LG conseguiu equipar sua série Gram de 14 polegadas com baterias consideravelmente maiores, mantendo-se abaixo desse limite de peso.
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
- 11/11/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
