Breve Análise do Portátil Acer TravelMate TMX349-G2-M-5625
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 774:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.26% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.81% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 ChiMei CN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | -1% | 3% | -12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.81 | 37.6 -10% | 41.23 -1% | 42.88 3% | 36.97 -12% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.3 | 56.6 -9% | 61.4 -1% | 64.1 3% | 55.6 -11% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.26 | 38.85 -10% | 42.67 -1% | 44.3 2% | 38.2 -12% |
Response Times | 12% | 5% | -29% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 43.2 ? -0% | 40.8 ? 5% | 45 ? -5% | 42 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 24.4 ? 24% | 30.4 ? 5% | 26 ? 19% | 28 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 50 ? -100% | |||
Screen | -31% | -6% | 14% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 271 | 216 -20% | 244 -10% | 257 -5% | 230 -15% |
Brightness | 253 | 203 -20% | 231 -9% | 263 4% | 226 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 83 0% | 89 7% | 90 8% | 86 4% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.47 -34% | 0.37 -6% | 0.24 31% | 0.2 43% |
Contrast | 774 | 460 -41% | 659 -15% | 1071 38% | 1150 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 8.98 -78% | 6.41 -27% | 5.44 -8% | 5.07 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.74 | 14.07 -20% | 13.4 -14% | 10.93 7% | 10.07 14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 9.61 -123% | 5.94 -38% | 3.95 8% | 3.64 15% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.63 84% | 2.28 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6726 97% | 11265 58% | 6101 107% | 6896 94% | 6521 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42 | 35.9 -15% | 39.3 -6% | 40 -5% | 35 -17% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 39 | 56.7 45% | 61.1 57% | 64 64% | 55 41% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-21% | -1% /
-4% | -4% /
4% | 2% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3668 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4531 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4574 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -47% | -37% | -26% | -28% | |
Read Seq | 1818 | 491.2 -73% | 476.5 -74% | 510 -72% | 484.1 -73% |
Write Seq | 582 | 322.2 -45% | 458.7 -21% | 458.8 -21% | 449.8 -23% |
Read 512 | 1134 | 310.1 -73% | 346.4 -69% | 399.7 -65% | 399.1 -65% |
Write 512 | 586 | 276 -53% | 291.1 -50% | 299.3 -49% | 355.1 -39% |
Read 4k | 34.93 | 19.57 -44% | 35.15 1% | 35.27 1% | 33.44 -4% |
Write 4k | 133.4 | 77.8 -42% | 78.8 -41% | 90.2 -32% | 67.5 -49% |
Read 4k QD32 | 373.7 | 146.3 -61% | 276 -26% | 397.7 6% | 368.5 -1% |
Write 4k QD32 | 210.8 | 241.4 15% | 178.3 -15% | 257.3 22% | 280.6 33% |
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57937 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6262 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 |
Battlefield 4 - 1024x768 Low Preset | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61 | 30.8 | 26.5 | 7.69 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 38.7 | 25.5 | 18.4 | 6.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.3 | 12 | 6 | 4.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.8 dB |
Carga |
| 31.6 / 33.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.1 / 7 / 8.8 Watt |
Carga |
36.6 / 33.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -7% | 8% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3 27% | 2.7 34% | 3.9 5% | 4.9 -20% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 5.4 23% | 5.5 21% | 7.1 -1% | 7.3 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 6.3 28% | 6.5 26% | 8.8 -0% | 9.4 -7% |
Load Average * | 36.6 | 37.5 -2% | 44.2 -21% | 27.6 25% | 26 29% |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 61.1 -81% | 65.2 -93% | 30.2 11% | 36 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48.9 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 30% | 12% | -9% | -4% | |
Reader / Idle | 829 | 1083 31% | 1043 26% | 638 -23% | 675 -19% |
WiFi v1.3 | 456 | 414 -9% | 326 -29% | 384 -16% | 392 -14% |
Load | 90 | 151 68% | 124 38% | 100 11% | 109 21% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer TravelMate TMX349 é um subportátil de gama média, para escritórios pequenos, bem como para estudantes. Graças ao seu peso conveniente e boa duração da bateria, é ideal para o uso móvel. A tela contribui à sua noção, embora o brilho máximo pudesse ser um pouco mais alto. Com 8 GB de RAM e 256 GB de armazenamento, está bem preparado para o seu propósito pretendido. Em contraste com a Alemanha, atualmente não há uma opção de 512 GB nos EUA
Para aqueles de vocês que gostam de abrir janelas múltiplas e navegas em abas, 8 GB de RAM definitivamente ajudam a que sua experiência seja mais fluida. A qualidade de construção é boa e sólida graças à carcaça de alumínio. O desempenho do processador foi aumentado e está quase no mesmo nível que o do modelo top do ano passado, apenas com um preço 200-300 Euros mais barato (~$220-$330). Durante a operação Wi-Fi, a bateria quase todo um dia de trabalho. A tela mate permite o uso em exteriores. No geral, a Acer fez um trabalho competente com este aparelho - por um preço atraente.
A Acer foi capaz de melhorar um produto que já era convincente no ano passado, com novos processadores e um SSD turbo.
Existem apenas alguns detalhes, como o leitor de cartões que não convence, ou a ventoinha bastante audível durante tarefas intensas da CPU, que estragam a boa impressão geral do TravelMate.
Se você deseja economizar dinheiro e não se importa muito em ter 20 abas do navegador abertas, e você armazena todas as suas fotos em um HD externo, você pode ser bem aconselhado a optar por um dos modelos mais baratos com um processador i3. Estes estão a partir de cerca de 600 Euros (~$660).
Se você estiver procurando por uma máquina de alto desempenho, fino e robusto para o trabalho em movimento, com reservas suficientes para os próximos anos, você pode facilmente optar por este por cerca de $ 780 (SSD de 256 GB).
Acer TravelMate X349-G2
- 04/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar