Breve Análise do Portátil Acer TravelMate P2510 (i5-7200U, 256 GB SSD, IPS)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 15-bs103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 15-bs103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 216 cd/m²
Contraste: 672:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.44% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.61
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ Chi Mei CMN15D3 / N156HCE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 BOE NV15N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-bs103ng AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -14% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.44 | 41.57 -2% | 36.55 -14% | 38.8 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 63.2 | 60.7 -4% | 55 -13% | 58.1 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.94 | 42.94 -2% | 37.76 -14% | 40.12 -9% |
| Response Times | -32% | 17% | -0% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 43 ? 4% | 44 ? 2% | 39 ? 13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 33 ? -3% | 22 ? 31% | 30 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 1020 ? -96% | 20000 ? -20% | |
| Screen | 18% | -57% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 215 | 234 9% | 241 12% | 256 19% |
| Brightness | 198 | 224 13% | 235 19% | 252 27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 84 8% | 84 8% | 87 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.18 44% | 0.43 -34% | 0.3 6% |
| Contrast | 672 | 1300 93% | 560 -17% | 853 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.15 | 5.3 -3% | 13.62 -164% | 5.4 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.89 | 9.09 17% | 22.81 -109% | 9.36 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.25 | 4 6% | 15.19 -257% | 5.37 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.61 84% | 2.46 89% | 2.13 103% | 2.58 85% |
| CCT | 6603 98% | 6441 101% | 17407 37% | 6795 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 39 -2% | 35 -12% | 37 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 60 -5% | 55 -13% | 58 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
5% | -18% /
-38% | -1% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3715 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4592 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP 15-bs103ng Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 23% | 24% | |
| Read Seq | 498.1 | 504 1% | 532 7% |
| Write Seq | 260.1 | 466.2 79% | 511 96% |
| Read 512 | 328.5 | 443.7 35% | 414.8 26% |
| Write 512 | 260.9 | 398.4 53% | 307.7 18% |
| Read 4k | 32.59 | 38.81 19% | 39.51 21% |
| Write 4k | 84.2 | 94.6 12% | 108.1 28% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 359.7 | 295.2 -18% | 361.6 1% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 262 | 266.6 2% | 253 -3% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| HP 15-bs103ng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1692 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6501 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 938 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.9 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.9 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 85.5 | 55.4 | 22.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.6 / 36.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.9 °C / 75 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.7 °C / 6.7 F).
Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 5580 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP 15-bs103ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
38 / 32 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-bs103ng i5-8250U, Radeon 520, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -3% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 4.3 -26% | 3.2 6% | 4 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 10.1 -74% | 5.8 -0% | 9.6 -66% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 11.8 -48% | 6.3 21% | 9.7 -21% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 32 16% | 34 11% | 27.7 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 32 | 29 9% | 49 -53% | 38.4 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | HP 15-bs103ng i5-8250U, Radeon 520, 41.6 Wh | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 32 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | -7% | -57% | |
| Reader / Idle | 910 | 890 -2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 525 | 613 17% | 473 -10% | 225 -57% |
| Load | 111 | 100 -10% | ||
| H.264 | 454 |
Pro
Contra
Se os problemas com a carcaça deformada dizem respeito apenas à nossa unidade de teste ou não, sempre devemos avaliar o que nos é fornecido. A sub-avaliação resulta correspondentemente ruim.
Se deixar de lado a carcaça, resulta uma impressão muito positiva, considerando o preço muito baixo do modelo de nível de entrada em particular. Os compradores de orçamento com ambições de escritório certamente ignorarão os pontos fracos da tela, bem como o lento leitor de cartões. As vantagens da lista de aspectos positivos, como os bons dispositivos de entrada, a WLAN rápida, TPM e a duração da bateria muito decente, provavelmente serão mais importantes aqui. Do ponto de vista técnico, tudo parece bom, e o TravelMate oferece um desempenho constante enquanto permanece silencioso e frio.
Com o TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ, a Acer realmente apresenta um portátil de escritório bem sucedido com uma boa relação preço-desempenho, no entanto, devido a defeitos de qualidade consideráveis da carcaça do nosso modelo de teste, devemos reter nossa recomendação de compra.
Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ
- 03/03/2018 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
