Breve Análise do Portátil Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 (Core i5, Full HD)

Name: Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Brand: Acer

Companheiro empresarial de nível de entrada. Este modelo da Acer de 14-polegadas tem muito a oferecer: opções de atualização simples, boa duração da bateria, SSD veloz e um teclado confiável. A tela é o único ponto fraco deste pacote: um painel TN com ângulos de visão pobres.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 (TravelMate P249 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 950 MHz, Dual-Channel, 20.19.15.4501

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, two memory slots (both occupied)

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA, TN LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB

, 180 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30.4 x 346 x 248

Bateria

41 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64 Bit) + Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (avaliação), MS Office (avaliação), 36 Meses Garantia

peso

2.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 267 g

Preço

749 Euro

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Dell Latitude 14 3470 Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 HP ProBook 440 G3 Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power outlet, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 (Type A)

Right side: audio-combo jack, USB 2.0 (Type A), DVD burner, cable-lock slot

A memory-card reader (SD) is placed on the front.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000	73.2 MB/s +323%
HP ProBook 440 G3	72.3 MB/s +318%
Dell Latitude 14 3470	23.5 MB/s +36%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	19.1 MB/s +10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452	17.3 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 440 G3	86.4 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000	85.1 MB/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470	27.6 MB/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	26.1 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	563 MBit/s +512%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	165 MBit/s +79%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	92 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	547 MBit/s +501%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	143 MBit/s +57%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	91 MBit/s


247 cd/m²	256 cd/m²	246 cd/m²
235 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	234 cd/m²
225 cd/m²	226 cd/m²	222 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 256 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 237.8 cd/m² Minimum: 22.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 257 cd/m²
Contraste: 607:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 TN LED, 1920x1080, 14"	HP ProBook 440 G3 TN, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 14 3470 TN LED, 1366x768, 14"	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display		4%	3%	6%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	38.15	39.6 4%	39.1 2%	40.21 5%	36.97 -3%
sRGB Coverage	56.7	59.1 4%	58.8 4%	60.5 7%	55.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.48	40.94 4%	40.41 2%	41.55 5%	38.2 -3%
Response Times		-39%	-18%	-35%	-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 ?(23, 21)	46 ?(24, 22) -5%	40 ?(17, 23) 9%	47 ?(25, 22) -7%	42 ?(15, 27) 5%
Response Time Black / White *	16 ?(10, 6)	27.6 ?(11.2, 16.4) -73%	23.2 ?(6.8, 16.4) -45%	26 ?(18, 8) -63%	28 ?(8, 20) -75%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(10)
Screen		-4%	18%	-14%	26%
Brightness middle	249	246 -1%	233 -6%	206 -17%	230 -8%
Brightness	238	215 -10%	221 -7%	193 -19%	226 -5%
Brightness Distribution	87	84 -3%	88 1%	87 0%	86 -1%
Black Level *	0.41	0.5 -22%	0.3 27%	0.48 -17%	0.2 51%
Contrast	607	492 -19%	777 28%	429 -29%	1150 89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.09	8.6 5%	4.43 51%	11 -21%	5.07 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.64			19.57 -34%	10.07 31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.92	9.36 6%	3.78 62%	11.51 -16%	3.64 63%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.39 ^92%	2.31 ^95%	2.23 ^99%	2.46 ^89%
CCT	11177 ^58%	11226 ^58%	7171 ^91%	13671 ^48%	6521 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.5	37.8 4%	37.3 2%	38.46 5%	35 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	56.7	59.1 4%	58.7 4%	60.61 7%	55 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-13% / -7%	1% / 10%	-14% / -13%	-4% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7845

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

10003

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4396

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

34.78 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.24 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.33 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

40.56 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

294 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

117 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points +10%
Dell Vostro 5468 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points +10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points -3%
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel Core i3-6100U	97 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points +13%
Dell Vostro 5468 Intel Core i5-7200U	327 Points +11%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	324 Points +10%
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel Core i3-6100U	250 Points -15%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	11301 Points +13%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	11042 Points +10%
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U	10048 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	10003 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	9926 Points -1%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	5022 Points +14%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	4911 Points +12%
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U	4441 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	4396 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	4396 Points

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	3191 Points +8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	2952 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	2888 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	2576 Points -13%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	6723 Points +10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	6370 Points +5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	6088 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	5530 Points -9%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	3906 Points +8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	3626 Points +1%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	3601 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	7303 Points +8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	6780 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	6760 Points 0%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	220.8 Points +14%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	213.8 Points +11%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	193.4 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	97.6 Points -50%
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U	189.1 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	174.3 Points -10%

PCMark 7 Score		4603 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3472 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3760 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4463 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512	3545 Points +2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3472 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	3415 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	3074 Points -11%
HP ProBook 440 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2871 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4463 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4415 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512	4361 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	3982 Points -11%
HP ProBook 440 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3840 Points -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A

Sequential Read: 510 MB/s

Sequential Write: 267.2 MB/s

512K Read: 347.6 MB/s

512K Write: 267.5 MB/s

4K Read: 33.12 MB/s

4K Write: 95.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 392.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 266.4 MB/s

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	HP ProBook 440 G3 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-87%	-44%	-90%	10%
Read Seq	510	124.8 -76%	497.6 -2%	108.9 -79%	484.1 -5%
Write Seq	267.2	123.6 -54%	180 -33%	103.2 -61%	449.8 68%
Read 512	347.6	42.34 -88%	297.1 -15%		399.1 15%
Write 512	267.5	61.9 -77%	169.1 -37%		355.1 33%
Read 4k	33.12	0.559 -98%	18.91 -43%	0.362 -99%	33.44 1%
Write 4k	95.9	1.277 -99%	37.13 -61%	0.946 -99%	67.5 -30%
Read 4k QD32	392.8	1.179 -100%	95.7 -76%	0.721 -100%	368.5 -6%
Write 4k QD32	266.4	1.304 -100%	37.26 -86%	0.901 -100%	280.6 5%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		9061 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1503 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		53902 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5329 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		736 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U	1989 Points +48%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1481 Points +10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1343 Points
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1143 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	1063 Points -21%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7407 Points +7%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6924 Points
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5600 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U	5330 Points -23%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	5238 Points -24%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U	1109 Points +41%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	864 Points +10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	786 Points
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	625 Points -20%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	569 Points -28%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	76.4	38.4	23.8	11.1
BioShock Infinite (2013)	50.9	26.8	22.2	6.6
Battlefield 4 (2013)	31.2	23.3	10.6	4.2
Battlefield 1 (2016)	30.1	15.7	7.3	6.5
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	82.1	52.2	20.6	12
Titanfall 2 (2016)	33.1	23.9	8.5

Barulho

Ocioso		31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB
DVD		35.9 / dB
Carga		35.7 / 36 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.8 dB(A)

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520	HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360	Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520
Noise		6%	7%	3%	4%
off / environment *	31.8			29.2 8%	31.15 2%
Idle Minimum *	31.8	29.7 7%	29 9%	32.3 -2%	31.5 1%
Idle Average *	31.8	29.7 7%	29 9%	32.3 -2%	31.5 1%
Idle Maximum *	31.8	29.7 7%	29 9%	32.3 -2%	31.5 1%
Load Average *	35.7	32.7 8%	33.1 7%	33.3 7%	31.7 11%
Load Maximum *	36	35.1 2%	35.6 1%	33.4 7%	34.1 5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.7 °C	29.6 °C	26 °C
34.8 °C	32.8 °C	26.9 °C
3.9 °C	31.6 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 27.4 °C


28.8 °C	30 °C	42.8 °C
30.4 °C	29.8 °C	41 °C
28.6 °C	31.6 °C	36.2 °C

Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520	HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360	Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520
Heat		-24%	-19%	-18%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	34.8	41.4 -19%	47.8 -37%	38.9 -12%	38.6 -11%
Maximum Bottom *	42.8	50.2 -17%	48.3 -13%	37.7 12%	39.5 8%
Idle Upper Side *	24.6	34 -38%	28.6 -16%	35.1 -43%	24.8 -1%
Idle Bottom *	27.8	33.3 -20%	30.6 -10%	35.5 -28%	25.4 9%

* ... smaller is better

Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.15 / 0.19 Watt
Ocioso	3.8 / 7.6 / 8 Watt
Carga	30.5 / 32.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520	HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360	Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520
Power Consumption		-11%	-23%	-3%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	3.8	5.2 -37%	4.1 -8%	5 -32%	4.9 -29%
Idle Average *	7.6	8.2 -8%	8 -5%	6.8 11%	7.3 4%
Idle Maximum *	8	9 -13%	8.9 -11%	8.9 -11%	9.4 -18%
Load Average *	30.5	28.8 6%	39.3 -29%	26.2 14%	26 15%
Load Maximum *	32.5	34 -5%	52.2 -61%	31.8 2%	36 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		13h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (IE 11)		6h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 01min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 27min

	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh	Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh
Battery Runtime		-14%	3%	5%	5%
Reader / Idle	791	537 -32%	736 -7%	668 -16%	675 -15%
H.264	361	321 -11%	425 18%		400 11%
WiFi v1.3	400	293 -27%	292 -27%	278 -30%	392 -2%
Load	87	101 16%	112 29%	140 61%	109 25%

Pro

+ Painel mate

+ SSD veloz

+ Silencioso

+ Teclado confiável

+ Retro-iluminação do teclado

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Escotilha de manutenção

+ 3 anos de garantia

Contra

- Sem tela IPS

- Tela escura com ângulos de visão pobres

- Sem USB Type-C

- Lento leitor de cartões de memória

In review: Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452. Test model provided by Acer Germany.

A Acer deseja servir a usuários empresariais de nível de entrada com o TravelMate P249-M. O grupo de usuários inclui empresas, freelancers e estudantes. Típicos recursos empresariais como um leitor de digitais, porta docking ou modem LTE, não estão incluídos. O processador fornece suficiente desempenho para tarefas do dia a dia e o portátil funciona de forma silenciosa e quase não esquenta. Um SSD veloz garante que o sistema funcione fluentemente. Substituir o SSD via a escotilha de manutenção não é um problema. A duração da bateria e os dispositivos de entrada também são bons. O fabricante completa o pacote com uma garantia de três anos. Somente podemos criticar a tela, dado que a Acer escolheu um painel TN, que oferece bom contraste, mas ângulos de visão e brilho pobres.

O Acer TravelMate P249-M é um aparelho de trabalho confiável, que merece uma tela melhor.

Nosso modelo de teste é o modelo top desta série, dado que está equipado com uma tela FHD, CPU Core-i5 e SSD. Se você preferir preços mais baixos, confira a configuração de nível de entrada (P249-M-3895). O preço para os modelos mais econômicos está em cerca de 560-580 Euros (~$618-~$639). Vamos publicar uma análise desta configuração em um futuro próximo na Notebookcheck.com.

Se você não gosta do visual do P249-M, nós recomendamos dar uma olhada no Acer TravelMate X349-M, que é uma opção mais elegante. O X349-M está equipado com uma carcaça e de alumínio fina, um painel IPS (P249-M: TN LED), um sensor de digitais e um slot USB Type-C. O P249-M oferece um teclado melhore opções de atualização.

Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 - 2016-11-01 11/01/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

44 / 80 → 55%

Peso

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Bateria

87%

Pantalha

79%

Desempenho do jogos

54 / 68 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

81 / 92 → 88%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

90%

Audio

53%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

72%

82%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 (Core i5, Full HD)

Sascha Mölck, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-26)