Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Core i7-7Y75, 256 GB, FHD, Touch)
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Swift 7 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7Y75 2 x 1.3 - 3.6 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 615, Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 23.20.16.5038
Memória
8 GB
, DDR3L-1333, soldada.
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Multi-Touch, AUO B140HAN05.1, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, 256 GB
, M.2, 218 GB livre
peso
1.179 kg, Suprimento de energia: 291 g
Preço
1699 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B140HAN05.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 337 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 308.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 232 cd/m²
Contraste: 1169:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.36
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T AUO B140HAN05.1, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 SHARP LQ133M1JW15, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, 3840x2160, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 4% | 4% | -1% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.6 2% | 67.5 6% | 67.8 7% | 64 1% | 68.9 9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.2 | 89.1 -5% | 94.5 0% | 91.6 -3% | 90.7 -4% | 98.4 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 64.8 0% | 68.7 6% | 69.8 8% | 65.1 1% | 69.5 8% |
| Response Times | 25% | 10% | 12% | 34% | -36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 31 ? 39% | 43 ? 16% | 39.6 ? 22% | 27 ? 47% | 67.2 ? -32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 27 ? 10% | 29 ? 3% | 29.3 ? 2% | 24 ? 20% | 41.6 ? -39% |
| PWM Frequency | 217 ? | 220 ? | 2500 ? | |||
| Screen | -4% | 5% | -19% | 5% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 304 | 359 18% | 344 13% | 370 22% | 304 0% | 496.4 63% |
| Brightness | 309 | 344 11% | 320 4% | 355 15% | 287 -7% | 469 52% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 92 11% | 77 -7% | 90 8% | 80 -4% | 84 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.25 4% | 0.31 -19% | 0.23 12% | 0.21 19% | 0.5 -92% |
| Contrast | 1169 | 1436 23% | 1110 -5% | 1609 38% | 1448 24% | 993 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 4.57 -15% | 2.72 32% | 6.9 -73% | 3.66 8% | 2.9 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.47 | 9.25 -69% | 5.92 -8% | 12.2 -123% | 5.66 -3% | 5.26 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.36 | 1.4 -3% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 5.2 -20% | 2.74 37% | 7.4 -71% | 3.51 19% | 3.9 10% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.47 89% | 2.38 92% | 1.76 125% | 2.55 86% | 2.066 106% |
| CCT | 7261 90% | 6887 94% | 6794 96% | 7529 86% | 6955 93% | 7169 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 58 -2% | 61 3% | 59 0% | 63.9 8% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 89 -5% | 94 0% | 91 -3% | 98.2 4% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
0% | 6% /
5% | -1% /
-10% | 13% /
8% | -8% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11845 - 82102, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-7Y75 () | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13726 - 68857, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-7Y75 () | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2933 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3614 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3970 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2068 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Apple MacBook 12 2017 Apple SSD AP0256 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre 13-af033ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Average SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -36% | -41% | -14% | 25% | 12% | -5% | ||
| Read Seq | 976 | 431.2 -56% | 464.9 -52% | 955 -2% | 1288 32% | 907 -7% | 1055 ? 8% | |
| Write Seq | 758 | 401 -47% | 401 -47% | 899 19% | 1160 53% | 878 16% | 753 ? -1% | |
| Read 512 | 647 | 283.7 -56% | 320.2 -51% | 658 2% | 751 16% | 515 -20% | 811 ? 25% | |
| Write 512 | 506 | 313.6 -38% | 335.2 -34% | 579 14% | 843 67% | 546 8% | 492 ? -3% | |
| Read 4k | 45.47 | 36.62 -19% | 26.45 -42% | 9.721 -79% | 59.2 30% | 60 32% | 41.5 ? -9% | |
| Write 4k | 130.6 | 76.1 -42% | 79.8 -39% | 12.78 -90% | 146.9 12% | 144 10% | 106 ? -19% | |
| Read 4k QD32 | 428.3 | 329.4 -23% | 246.5 -42% | 521 22% | 425.9 -1% | 543 27% | 328 ? -23% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 358.2 | 325.6 -9% | 277.2 -23% | 370.1 3% | 325 -9% | 476 33% | 307 ? -14% |
SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
Sequential Read:
976 MB/s
Sequential Write:
758 MB/s
512K Read:
647 MB/s
512K Write:
506 MB/s
4K Read:
45.47 MB/s
4K Write:
130.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
428.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
358.2 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1474 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 53841 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5601 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 861 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 409 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.6 | 28.3 | 24.4 | 7.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 37.3 | 26.9 | 19.1 | 6.4 |
| Sims 4 (2014) | 155.1 | 94.2 | 43.5 | 29.6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14.2 | 9.1 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Apple MacBook 12 2017 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 2% | -8% | -10% | -13% | -14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.7 | 45.7 -2% | 39.3 12% | 38.9 13% | 50 -12% | 41.2 8% | 43.2 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.8 | 48.7 -14% | 43.1 -1% | 42.5 1% | 47 -10% | 44.2 -3% | 46.2 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.5 | 25.5 -0% | 25.4 -0% | 30.6 -20% | 27 -6% | 32.1 -26% | 29.8 -17% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 25.6 -3% | 30.8 -24% | 28 -13% | 32.8 -32% | 32.8 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.7 / 1.9 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.8 / 5.5 / 7.9 Watt |
| Carga |
18.4 / 20 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Average Intel HD Graphics 615 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -19% | 5% | -76% | -38% | -81% | -21% | -101% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 2.4 14% | 2 29% | 3.9 -39% | 2.8 -0% | 4.3 -54% | 4.12 ? -47% | 4.44 ? -59% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 6.4 -16% | 5.5 -0% | 5.4 2% | 7 -27% | 6.2 -13% | 8 -45% | 7.02 ? -28% | 7.55 ? -37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 6.8 14% | 6 24% | 6.6 16% | 7.5 5% | 9.4 -19% | 8.1 -3% | 7.89 ? -0% | 9.45 ? -20% |
| Load Average * | 18.4 | 16 13% | 31 -68% | 22 -20% | 44.4 -141% | 32.2 -75% | 46.6 -153% | 20 ? -9% | 45.8 ? -149% |
| Load Maximum * | 20 | 18.7 6% | 32.6 -63% | 20 -0% | 55.1 -176% | 36.6 -83% | 49.8 -149% | 23.8 ? -19% | 68.4 ? -242% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Wh | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 39 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -3% | 19% | -24% | -3% | -22% | 47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1176 | 792 -33% | 1167 -1% | 779 -34% | 869 -26% | 1750 ? 49% | ||
| H.264 | 450 | 410 -9% | 433 -4% | 477 6% | 649 44% | 911 ? 102% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 452 | 438 -3% | 506 12% | 540 19% | 368 -19% | 352 -22% | 408 -10% | 726 ? 61% |
| Load | 154 | 182 18% | 123 -20% | 77 -50% | 104 -32% | 106 -31% | 115.4 ? -25% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 81 |
Pro
+ Carcaça elegante e ultrafina
+ Tela multi-touch sem bleeding da luz de fundo
+ Tela IPS com ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Sem PWM
+ Bom desempenho Wi-Fi
+ Módulo LTE
+ Sensor de digitais
+ SSD NVMe veloz
+ Capa Acer e hub USB Type-C incluídos
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Energeticamente eficiente
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Funciona silenciosamente
Contra
- Caro
- Apenas duas portas USB 3.1 Type-C
- Carcaça suscetível a impressões digitais
- Touchpad sem botões dedicados
- Sem leitor de cartões de memória
- Sem opções de configuração
O Acer Swift 7 SF714 é um subportátil ultracompacto que é bem adequado para uso móvel. O Swift 7 melhora ligeiramente o seu antecessor em todas as áreas; a maior diferença é a maior tela multi-touch de 14 polegadas. A Acer também revisou o chassi para tornar o novo Swift 7 ainda mais fino do que seu antecessor. Infelizmente, isso compromete a estabilidade.
A Acer manteve a seleção limitada de portas com o seu mais recente Swift 7, mas agradecemos a inclusão de um modem LTE. Desejamos apenas que a Acer tenha incluído um leitor de cartões de memória, pois isso aumentaria a flexibilidade do dispositivo.
Elogiamos muito os acessórios incluídos. A capa tem uma sensação premium e é bem feita. Isso também se aplica ao hub USB Type-C, que expande a seleção de portas do Swift 7 para uma porta USB tipo A e uma única porta HDMI.
O Acer Swift 7 SF714 melhora o seu antecessor em todas as áreas, particularmente com sua tela multi-touch maior. O preço também mudou, ou seja, subiu. No entanto, a Acer esqueceu um truque a este respeito?
Uma grande crítica ao Swift 7 é seu preço. O Acer Swift 7 SF714 custa uns impressionantes 1.699 Euros (~$1.973), o que é uma relação de preço-desempenho significativamente mais baixa do que com o seu antecessor. Em última análise, os potenciais compradores devem decidir por si mesmos se as inovações e o desempenho levemente aumentado justificam esse aumento acentuado no preço.
Não podemos dar ao Acer Swift 7 SF714 uma recomendação de compra clara apenas devido ao seu elevado preço avulso.
Outra queixa menor que temos é com o touchpad. A ausência de um mecanismo de clique torna o uso do dispositivo muito mais difícil no uso diário.
No geral, o Acer Swift 7 SF714 é um dispositivo inteligente e ultra móvel com uma duração de bateria impressionante que é manchado pelo seu preço elevado.
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T
- 08/28/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
