Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 7 SF713-51

Fino, mais fino, Acer Swift 7! A tendência para aparelhos mais finos continua. A Acer agora criou o portátil mais fino do mundo: menos de 10 mm (~0,4 pol.) de espessura. Vamos verificar quão bem se sai o SoC Kaby Lake dual-core.
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 (Swift 7 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7Y54 2 x 1.2 - 3.2 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 615, Análises do: 950 MHz, 21.20.16.4494
Memória
8 GB 
, LPDDR3, 1866 MHz, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, IPS, WLED, CineCrystal, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, 256 GB 
, 256GB SSD Serial ATA/300, 202 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Combinação de fones e microfone, 3,5mm, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.98 x 324.6 x 229.6
Bateria
41.58 Wh, 2700 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 1.3M
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Adaptador USB Type C para USB 3.0, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 293 g
Preço
1299 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

324 mm 226 mm 12.3 mm 1.2 kg324.6 mm 229.6 mm 10.98 mm 1.3 kg325 mm 229 mm 10.4 mm 1.2 kg324.6 mm 229.6 mm 9.98 mm 1.1 kg292 mm 209 mm 12.4 mm 979 g280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 927 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
673 MBit/s
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
638 MBit/s -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
609 MBit/s -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s -15%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)
482 MBit/s -28%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
642 MBit/s
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)
596 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
500 MBit/s -22%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
421 MBit/s -34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s -38%
347
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 344.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 359 cd/m²
Contraste: 1436:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
IPS, 2304x1440, 12"
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display
5%
-29%
-6%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
64.6
66.8
3%
44.45
-31%
59.1
-9%
61.5
-5%
sRGB Coverage
89.1
95.4
7%
65.2
-27%
85.5
-4%
89.1
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.8
68
5%
45.96
-29%
61
-6%
62.9
-3%
Response Times
-23%
4%
-12%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31 ?(14, 17)
41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6)
-33%
32 ?(14.8, 17.2)
-3%
38 ?(24, 14, Spikes in between)
-23%
51 ?(13, 38)
-65%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(7, 20)
30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6)
-13%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
11%
27 ?(13, 14, Spikes in between)
-0%
26 ?(6, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
1429 ?(20)
Screen
8%
-12%
-15%
-47%
Brightness middle
359
387
8%
289
-19%
390
9%
344
-4%
Brightness
344
358
4%
298
-13%
352
2%
292
-15%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
87
-5%
81
-12%
72
-22%
Black Level *
0.25
0.47
-88%
0.27
-8%
0.69
-176%
0.26
-4%
Contrast
1436
823
-43%
1070
-25%
565
-61%
1323
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.57
1.6
65%
4.82
-5%
3.04
33%
12.65
-177%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.25
4
57%
10.73
-16%
7.01
24%
17.8
-92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
1
81%
3.84
26%
2.88
45%
12.95
-149%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.26 97%
2.41 91%
2.43 91%
1.33 165%
CCT
6887 94%
6680 97%
6492 100%
6848 95%
6441 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
61.6
6%
42.03
-28%
55
-5%
58
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
82.2
-8%
64.8
-27%
85
-4%
89
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / 3%
-12% / -13%
-11% / -12%
-27% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

Grey levels
Grey levels
Color accuracy
Color accuracy
Saturation
Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the Acer Swift 7.
The viewing angles of the Acer Swift 7.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latency
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz
111 Points 0%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
111 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
111 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
100 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
91 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
90 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz
250 Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
218 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
214 Points +3%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
207 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
205 Points -1%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
1.28 Points +1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
1.27 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
1.27 Points 0%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
1 Points -21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
0.95 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
2.47 Points +6%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
2.35 Points +1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
2.29 Points -1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
2.32 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
2.27 Points -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
5646 Points +2%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
5545 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
9681 Points +11%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
8756 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
198.2 Points +7%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
188 Points +2%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
184.5 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
143 Points -22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
130.7 Points -29%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz
115 Points -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
29889 Points +16%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
27627 Points +7%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
25796 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz
23217 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
21739 Points -16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
18464 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
1770 ms * -35%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz
1663 ms * -27%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
1309 ms *
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz
1286 ms * +2%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz
1255 ms * +4%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz
1161 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7323
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6854
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4392
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7445 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
8756 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5545 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.19 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.27 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
207 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
111 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
31.67 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 7
PCMark 7
PCMark Vantage
PCMark Vantage
 
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
3064 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3037 Points -1%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
2979 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2614 Points -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points -17%
Storage Score v2
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
4885 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
4876 Points 0%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3430 Points 0%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
3429 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3298 Points -4%
PCMark Vantage Result
12765 pontos
PCMark 7 Score
4857 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3064 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3429 pontos
Ajuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
34%
144%
6%
4%
Read Seq
431.2
754
75%
1482
244%
475.2
10%
472.6
10%
Write Seq
401
638
59%
1232
207%
423.7
6%
407.7
2%
Read 512
283.7
616
117%
1191
320%
404.8
43%
309.5
9%
Write 512
313.6
678
116%
1220
289%
396.2
26%
368.5
18%
Read 4k
36.62
14.6
-60%
46.96
28%
28.57
-22%
37.57
3%
Write 4k
76.1
20.5
-73%
100.7
32%
90.7
19%
75.5
-1%
Read 4k QD32
329.4
464
41%
464
41%
288.9
-12%
324.8
-1%
Write 4k QD32
325.6
315
-3%
292.1
-10%
242.3
-26%
307.4
-6%
Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
Sequential Read: 431.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 401 MB/s
512K Read: 283.7 MB/s
512K Write: 313.6 MB/s
4K Read: 36.62 MB/s
4K Write: 76.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 329.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 325.6 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
3DMark 2001SE
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
7035 Points +27%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6078 Points +10%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
5541 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
5478 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
4286 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
844 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
735 Points +14%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
647 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
507 Points -22%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
41566 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
37865 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
35580 Points -14%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1254 Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1186 Points +14%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1083 Points +4%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1039 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1032 Points -1%
1280x720 Performance
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1360 Points +19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1277 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1188 Points +4%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1143 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1141 Points 0%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6921 Points +10%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6299 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
5860 Points -7%
3DMark 2001SE Standard
19381 pontos
3DMark 03 Standard
16620 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard
8649 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score
6299 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
4081 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1143 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41566 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4113 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
582 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
274 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
239 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 88.9 83.2 60.9 7.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 40.6 22.4 17.8 6
Battlefield 4 (2013) 29.4 18.3 17.6
Sims 4 (2014) 147.3 90 41.5 28.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 59.1 52.7 27.4 25.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 13 8
Stress test with Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test with Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test with FurMark
Stress test with FurMark
Stress test with Prime95
Stress test with Prime95
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
Heat
-7%
-10%
8%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.7
39
15%
42.7
7%
39.1
14%
46.5
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
48.7
44
10%
45.8
6%
38.7
21%
45
8%
Idle Upper Side *
25.5
32
-25%
32.1
-26%
26
-2%
27.6
-8%
Idle Bottom *
25.2
32
-27%
32.3
-28%
25.7
-2%
27.1
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 35.9 °C45.7 °C41.8 °C 
 29.6 °C34.2 °C31.2 °C 
 27.4 °C26.2 °C28.2 °C 
Máximo: 45.7 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
38 °C48.7 °C37.9 °C
32.1 °C34.6 °C31.5 °C
28.9 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C
Máximo: 48.7 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  44.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).
The two speakers are placed ...
The two speakers are placed ...
... to the left and the right of the battery.
... to the left and the right of the battery.
The bottom has an opening for the speakers.
The bottom has an opening for the speakers.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.834.634.82543.239.643.23142.939.942.94034.735.234.75034.432.334.46330.628.230.68036.12636.110039.92639.91254425.44416045.423.345.420041.223.841.225050.622.750.631557.921.657.940063.420.263.450063.419.663.463063.318.663.380068.118.668.1100065.41865.4125061.317.461.3160063.217.963.2200062.317.562.3250058.417.858.4315059.817.959.8400062.11862.1500057.918.357.9630061.418.461.4800055.218.455.21000053.618.453.6125005418.2541600048.618.448.6SPL74.230.574.2N34.61.434.6median 58.4median 18.4median 58.4Delta7.21.17.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift 7 SF713-51Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.1 / 6.4 / 6.8 Watt
Carga midlight 16 / 18.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
8%
-20%
-17%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
4.1
2.7
34%
4.3
-5%
4.2
-2%
4.3
-5%
Idle Average *
6.4
2.7
58%
6
6%
8.4
-31%
7.4
-16%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
7.2
-6%
6.4
6%
8.9
-31%
8
-18%
Load Average *
16
22
-38%
22.7
-42%
15.9
1%
22.1
-38%
Load Maximum *
18.7
20.5
-10%
31.2
-67%
22.5
-20%
21.7
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Maximum battery life.
Maximum battery life.
Minimum battery life.
Minimum battery life.
WLAN battery life.
WLAN battery life.
H.264 run time.
H.264 run time.
AufladezeitaCharging time.
Charging time.
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 02min
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
22%
-17%
6%
-9%
Reader / Idle
792
526
-34%
1013
28%
748
-6%
H.264
410
512
25%
413
1%
418
2%
WiFi v1.3
438
501
14%
355
-19%
402
-8%
391
-11%
Load
182
231
27%
152
-16%
182
0%
163
-10%

Pro

+ 9,98 mm são bastante finos
+ Design elegante com boas cores
+ Relativamente leve
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Touchpad grande
+ Tela IPS com ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Silencioso no modo inativo
+ Adaptador para USB 3.1 Type C para USB 3.0

Contra

- Apenas 2 portas USB 3.1 Type-C
- Fácil de manchar
- Sem teclado iluminado
In review: Acer Swift 7. Test model provided by Acer Germany.
In review: Acer Swift 7. Test model provided by Acer Germany.

Com 9,98 mm de espessura (~0,4 pol.), o Acer Swift 7 é o modelo mais fino do mundo. O esquema de cores preto-dourado tem um bom visual e a carcaça tem uma sensação ótima. A construção super plana é fácil de manusear. No geral, a Acer produziu um bom portátil. O acabamento é impecável e o desempenho é bom (considerando as limitações da carcaça). No momento do teste o preço deste portátil era de 1300 Euros (~$ 1359).

O Acer Swift 7 é um portátil de alta qualidade, que foi confiável em nossos testes e em uso. O hardware é bom e garante que o sistema rode fluentemente.

 Os compradores devem estar cientes que o desempenho é um fator decisivo para o Acer Swift 7. Os jogos 3D são difíceis de rodar neste portátil. A edição de vídeo também não é possível. Estas são as pequenas fraquezas do nosso modelo de teste. No entanto, este não é o objetivo do Acer Swift 7. O ótimo painel IPS e o baixo consumo/relativamente longa duração da bateria (até 7 horas) fornecem ao usuário um portátil portável e com bom visual.

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 - 12/19/2016 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
92 /  98 → 94%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
35 / 80 → 44%
Peso
74 / 35-78 → 91%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
53 / 68 → 78%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 87 → 90%
Temperatura
91 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Médio
74%
86%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Sebastian Bade, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-18)