Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 (jseb) | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 (jseb) | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (jseb) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 359 cd/m²
Contraste: 1436:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -29% | -6% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.6 | 66.8 3% | 44.45 -31% | 59.1 -9% | 61.5 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 89.1 | 95.4 7% | 65.2 -27% | 85.5 -4% | 89.1 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.8 | 68 5% | 45.96 -29% | 61 -6% | 62.9 -3% |
Response Times | -23% | 4% | -12% | -31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31 ? | 41.2 ? -33% | 32 ? -3% | 38 ? -23% | 51 ? -65% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 30.4 ? -13% | 24 ? 11% | 27 ? -0% | 26 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 1429 ? | ||||
Screen | 8% | -12% | -15% | -47% | |
Brightness middle | 359 | 387 8% | 289 -19% | 390 9% | 344 -4% |
Brightness | 344 | 358 4% | 298 -13% | 352 2% | 292 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 87 -5% | 81 -12% | 72 -22% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.47 -88% | 0.27 -8% | 0.69 -176% | 0.26 -4% |
Contrast | 1436 | 823 -43% | 1070 -25% | 565 -61% | 1323 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 1.6 65% | 4.82 -5% | 3.04 33% | 12.65 -177% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.25 | 4 57% | 10.73 -16% | 7.01 24% | 17.8 -92% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 1 81% | 3.84 26% | 2.88 45% | 12.95 -149% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.26 97% | 2.41 91% | 2.43 91% | 1.33 165% |
CCT | 6887 94% | 6680 97% | 6492 100% | 6848 95% | 6441 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 61.6 6% | 42.03 -28% | 55 -5% | 58 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 82.2 -8% | 64.8 -27% | 85 -4% | 89 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
3% | -12% /
-13% | -11% /
-12% | -27% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Storage Score v2 | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T |
PCMark Vantage Result | 12765 pontos | |
PCMark 7 Score | 4857 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3064 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3429 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 34% | 144% | 6% | 4% | |
Read Seq | 431.2 | 754 75% | 1482 244% | 475.2 10% | 472.6 10% |
Write Seq | 401 | 638 59% | 1232 207% | 423.7 6% | 407.7 2% |
Read 512 | 283.7 | 616 117% | 1191 320% | 404.8 43% | 309.5 9% |
Write 512 | 313.6 | 678 116% | 1220 289% | 396.2 26% | 368.5 18% |
Read 4k | 36.62 | 14.6 -60% | 46.96 28% | 28.57 -22% | 37.57 3% |
Write 4k | 76.1 | 20.5 -73% | 100.7 32% | 90.7 19% | 75.5 -1% |
Read 4k QD32 | 329.4 | 464 41% | 464 41% | 288.9 -12% | 324.8 -1% |
Write 4k QD32 | 325.6 | 315 -3% | 292.1 -10% | 242.3 -26% | 307.4 -6% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
1280x720 Performance | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D |
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T |
3DMark 2001SE Standard | 19381 pontos | |
3DMark 03 Standard | 16620 pontos | |
3DMark 05 Standard | 8649 pontos | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6299 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 4081 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1143 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 41566 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4113 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 582 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 274 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 239 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
World of Warcraft (2005) | 88.9 | 83.2 | 60.9 | 7.9 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.6 | 22.4 | 17.8 | 6 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 29.4 | 18.3 | 17.6 | |
Sims 4 (2014) | 147.3 | 90 | 41.5 | 28.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.1 | 52.7 | 27.4 | 25.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 13 | 8 |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -10% | 8% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.7 | 39 15% | 42.7 7% | 39.1 14% | 46.5 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.7 | 44 10% | 45.8 6% | 38.7 21% | 45 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.5 | 32 -25% | 32.1 -26% | 26 -2% | 27.6 -8% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.2 | 32 -27% | 32.3 -28% | 25.7 -2% | 27.1 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.5 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.1 / 6.4 / 6.8 Watt |
Carga |
16 / 18.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | -20% | -17% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 2.7 34% | 4.3 -5% | 4.2 -2% | 4.3 -5% |
Idle Average * | 6.4 | 2.7 58% | 6 6% | 8.4 -31% | 7.4 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 7.2 -6% | 6.4 6% | 8.9 -31% | 8 -18% |
Load Average * | 16 | 22 -38% | 22.7 -42% | 15.9 1% | 22.1 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 18.7 | 20.5 -10% | 31.2 -67% | 22.5 -20% | 21.7 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 22% | -17% | 6% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 792 | 526 -34% | 1013 28% | 748 -6% | |
H.264 | 410 | 512 25% | 413 1% | 418 2% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 438 | 501 14% | 355 -19% | 402 -8% | 391 -11% |
Load | 182 | 231 27% | 152 -16% | 182 0% | 163 -10% |
Pro
Contra
Com 9,98 mm de espessura (~0,4 pol.), o Acer Swift 7 é o modelo mais fino do mundo. O esquema de cores preto-dourado tem um bom visual e a carcaça tem uma sensação ótima. A construção super plana é fácil de manusear. No geral, a Acer produziu um bom portátil. O acabamento é impecável e o desempenho é bom (considerando as limitações da carcaça). No momento do teste o preço deste portátil era de 1300 Euros (~$ 1359).
O Acer Swift 7 é um portátil de alta qualidade, que foi confiável em nossos testes e em uso. O hardware é bom e garante que o sistema rode fluentemente.
Os compradores devem estar cientes que o desempenho é um fator decisivo para o Acer Swift 7. Os jogos 3D são difíceis de rodar neste portátil. A edição de vídeo também não é possível. Estas são as pequenas fraquezas do nosso modelo de teste. No entanto, este não é o objetivo do Acer Swift 7. O ótimo painel IPS e o baixo consumo/relativamente longa duração da bateria (até 7 horas) fornecem ao usuário um portátil portável e com bom visual.
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
- 12/19/2016 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade