Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T (i7-8565U, SSD, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 1100:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -5% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 68.3 2% | 64.3 -4% | 65.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 94.9 -3% | 89.7 -8% | 96.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.8 | 69.3 2% | 65.1 -4% | 66.3 -2% |
| Response Times | -3% | 0% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 40 ? -5% | 39.6 ? -4% | 34.3 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 25 ? -0% | 24 ? 4% | 23.7 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -0% | -80% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 298 -13% | 332.8 -2% | 349 2% |
| Brightness | 319 | 287 -10% | 310 -3% | 331 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 87 0% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.2 35% | 0.29 6% | 0.32 -3% |
| Contrast | 1100 | 1490 35% | 1148 4% | 1091 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.01 | 2.19 -9% | 5.14 -156% | 3.1 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.74 | 4.39 7% | 11.88 -151% | 6.6 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 1.67 -50% | 3.61 -225% | 1.5 -35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.01 | 1.97 2% | 8.8 -338% | 3.3 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.52 87% | 2.43 91% | 2.33 94% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6704 97% | 6571 99% | 8227 79% | 6973 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 62 -2% | 58.1 -8% | 61.46 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 95 -3% | 89.2 -9% | 96.05 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-0% | -28% /
-56% | -4% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6304 - 10300, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (2682 - 8906, n=16) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (27647 - 56242, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (13806 - 23118, n=16) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (10521 - 13703, n=12) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (3340 - 4820, n=12) | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (11576 - 14655, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (4701 - 4791, n=3) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (730 - 2622, n=43) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 (Edge 44) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35801 - 106359, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 (Edge 44) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (13935 - 49795, n=42) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (215 - 476, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 (Edge 44) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (107.6 - 277, n=37) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 6240 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4093 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5013 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5181 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4006 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF) | Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -20% | -51% | -16% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 490.1 | 184.7 -62% | 224.2 -54% | 330 ? -33% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 571 | 306.1 -46% | 251.5 -56% | 353 ? -38% |
| Write 4k | 149.1 | 94.1 -37% | 71.1 -52% | 116.2 ? -22% |
| Read 4k | 48.68 | 34.87 -28% | 23.6 -52% | 43.6 ? -10% |
| Write 512 | 678 | 243.3 -64% | 413.8 -39% | 617 ? -9% |
| Read 512 | 875 | 1227 40% | 367 -58% | 824 ? -6% |
| Write Seq | 763 | 479 -37% | 446.7 -41% | 745 ? -2% |
| Read Seq | 1089 | 1880 73% | 488.2 -55% | 1011 ? -7% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 12132 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2087 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9036 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1199 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 103.7 | 51.8 | 34.4 | 15.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 76.5 | 39.9 | 33.5 | 9.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16.9 | 10.9 | 6.1 | 3.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.9 / 35 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 30.25 1% | 28.8 6% | 29.7 3% | 29 ? 5% | 24.3 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30.25 1% | 28.8 6% | 30.3 1% | 29.1 ? 5% | 24.4 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 30.25 1% | 28.8 6% | 30.3 1% | 29.1 ? 5% | 24.7 ? 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 30.25 2% | 29.1 6% | 31.1 -1% | 29.7 ? 4% | 26.1 ? 16% |
| Load Average * | 34.9 | 31.3 10% | 36.1 -3% | 34.9 -0% | 33.5 ? 4% | 35 ? -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 35 | 31.3 11% | 41.2 -18% | 34.9 -0% | 36.1 ? -3% | 41.6 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-10.6 °C / -19.1 F).
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | -9% | -1% | -1% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.4 | 40.7 8% | 42.4 5% | 43 3% | 41.1 ? 7% | 42.2 ? 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.7 | 41.6 9% | 45 2% | 41 10% | 44.3 ? 3% | 44.6 ? 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 28 -10% | 31 -22% | 28 -10% | 26.8 ? -6% | 27.4 ? -8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 27.4 -6% | 30.8 -19% | 27 -5% | 27.7 ? -7% | 27.9 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.25 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 7.7 / 11.6 Watt |
| Carga |
34 / 35 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -6% | -13% | -6% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 4.7 -57% | 3.9 -30% | 3.7 -23% | 3.81 ? -27% | 4.47 ? -49% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 7.3 5% | 5.9 23% | 8.5 -10% | 6.94 ? 10% | 7.6 ? 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.6 | 9.4 19% | 8.8 24% | 10 14% | 8.75 ? 25% | 9.51 ? 18% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 28 18% | 41.7 -23% | 36 -6% | 35 ? -3% | 46.2 ? -36% |
| Load Maximum * | 35 | 28.2 19% | 44 -26% | 48.7 -39% | 47.5 ? -36% | 68.4 ? -95% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 103% | 31% | 33% | 60% | |
| Reader / Idle | 970 | 1468 51% | 1146 18% | 1750 ? 80% | |
| H.264 | 434 | 950 119% | 657 51% | 911 ? 110% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 430 | 805 87% | 621 44% | 630 47% | 726 ? 69% |
| Load | 145 | 111 -23% | 196 35% | 115.1 ? -21% |
Pro
Contra
O Swift 5 SF515-51T da Acer é um portátil muito leve que é feito para viajantes frequentes que não querem abrir mão de uma grande tela de 15,6 polegadas.
Pesando pouco menos de um quilograma, o dispositivo é dificilmente perceptível em sua bolsa - sem ombros tensos com este!
A fim de alcançar este baixo peso, a Acer escolheu uma carcaça de magnésio e várias limitações. Os módulos de RAM, SSD e Wi-Fi estão todos soldados na placa-mãe, o que significa que nenhum desses componentes pode ser trocado ou expandido. Portanto, você deve estar ciente de quanto armazenamento precisará ao longo dos próximos anos antes de comprar um Swift 5. Pelo menos há um slot M.2 2280 livre, então você pode adicionar algum armazenamento NVMe mais tarde.
O dispositivo é alimentado por um processador Core i7 Whiskey Lake que oferece capacidade de processamento suficiente para aplicativos de escritório e internet. Infelizmente, o Swift 5 não pode tirar o máximo proveito de sua CPU ao trabalhar por um longo tempo, particularmente durante a operação multi-thread. Se você precisar de desempenho máximo contínuo, é melhor procurar em outro lugar.
O Swift 5 oferece um teclado decente com luz de fundo de um nível, além de durações de bateria relativamente boas. A tela táctil IPS também nos deu uma boa impressão. Tem valores normais de contraste e brilho e suas cores são agradáveis. No entanto, esteja ciente de que esta é uma tela reflexiva. O ideal seria que a Acer oferecesse alternadamente uma tela mate sem o recurso de tela táctil.
O Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T compete com o LG Gram 15Z980. O Acer é claramente o vencedor em termos de peso - o Gram, no entanto, oferece durações de bateria significativamente mais longas e uma melhor seleção de portas. Esses dois fatores podem inclinar a balança em favor do dispositivo LG para muitos compradores em potencial. Se a Acer conseguir manter o peso em futuras reencarnações do Swift 5 enquanto melhora a duração da bateria e a seleção de portas, as coisas poderiam ficar apertadas para o Gram.
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
- 02/11/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
