Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T (jseb) | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV (jseb) | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV (jseb) | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T (jseb) | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE |
|
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 393 cd/m²
Contraste: 1355:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV AU Optronics B140HAN3.2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE LG Philips LP133WF2-SPL1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 LG Philips LP133QD1-SPA3, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T AUO B125HAN03.0 AUO306D, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -38% | -1% | -21% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.8 | 38.61 -39% | 64.6 3% | 48.94 -22% | 64.7 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.3 | 57.9 -37% | 87.3 -4% | 73.3 -20% | 89.6 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.3 | 39.92 -38% | 63.8 -1% | 50.5 -21% | 65.4 2% |
Response Times | 19% | 22% | 9% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 39 ? 24% | 34 ? 33% | 32.8 ? 36% | 30 ? 41% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 24 ? 14% | 25 ? 11% | 33.2 ? -19% | 26 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 50 ? | |||
Screen | -10% | -10% | 4% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 393 | 259 -34% | 295 -25% | 351.2 -11% | 355 -10% |
Brightness | 338 | 253 -25% | 283 -16% | 325 -4% | 341 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 82 4% | 88 11% | 89 13% | 87 10% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.65 -124% | 0.195 33% | 0.3 -3% |
Contrast | 1355 | 785 -42% | 454 -66% | 1801 33% | 1183 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.17 | 5.12 17% | 4 35% | 7.4 -20% | 5.97 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.21 | 10.12 10% | 7.26 35% | 9.08 19% | 10.55 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 3.8 44% | 3.38 50% | 6.71 1% | 6.45 5% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.39 92% | 2.38 92% | 2.74 80% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6873 95% | 7405 88% | 6520 100% | 7222 90% | 7694 84% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 51 | 37 -27% | 57 12% | 50.48 -1% | 58 14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 58 -36% | 85 -7% | 73.31 -19% | 89 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-12% | 4% /
-4% | -3% /
-0% | 9% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 31 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
PCMark 7 Score | 5367 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3370 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Phison S10C-512G | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 15% | 25% | 87% | 15% | |
Read Seq | 517 | 494.5 -4% | 522 1% | 1233 138% | 508 -2% |
Write Seq | 258.1 | 494.1 91% | 384.4 49% | 733 184% | 454.4 76% |
Read 512 | 355 | 383.9 8% | 412 16% | 1036 192% | 335.5 -5% |
Write 512 | 258.5 | 155.5 -40% | 395.5 53% | 439.9 70% | 413.9 60% |
Read 4k | 29.65 | 36.08 22% | 34.07 15% | 29.31 -1% | 28.13 -5% |
Write 4k | 77.3 | 96.4 25% | 100.9 31% | 116.9 51% | 69.8 -10% |
Read 4k QD32 | 277.1 | 403.3 46% | 316.3 14% | 479.2 73% | 245.7 -11% |
Write 4k QD32 | 242.5 | 176.4 -27% | 286.4 18% | 218.3 -10% | 277.6 14% |
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1684 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6378 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 51 | 30.9 | 25.6 | 8.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.1 | 8.4 | 4.2 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.23 | 11.42 | 6.42 | 4.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
Carga |
| 32.25 / 32.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.19 / 0.28 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.6 / 7 / 9.3 Watt |
Carga |
37 / 32.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Phison S10C-512G, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | -11% | 24% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 3.3 8% | 4.2 -17% | 4.1 -14% | 3.3 8% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 5.8 17% | 9 -29% | 4.2 40% | 6.2 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 7.4 20% | 10.6 -14% | 5.1 45% | 10.4 -12% |
Load Average * | 37 | 29.2 21% | 34 8% | 22.1 40% | 28 24% |
Load Maximum * | 32.6 | 28.6 12% | 33 -1% | 29.4 10% | 25.7 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -24% | -35% | 36% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 1014 | 650 -36% | 722 -29% | 1295 28% | 844 -17% |
H.264 | 555 | 330 -41% | 243 -56% | 383 -31% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 549 | 340 -38% | 278 -49% | 677 23% | 397 -28% |
Load | 100 | 118 18% | 96 -4% | 157 57% | 105 5% |
Pro
Contra
Successful mixture: Acer combines elegant design with sufficient performance, but does not forget the important emissions. We liked the elegant chassis design with the extremely thin bezels in particular. But that's not all: Acer uses solid metal elements and convinces with good build quality, only the keyboard unit can be pushed in. The key travel is also rather short, but the keys can convince with a firm pressure point and low noise development during typing. The glossy IPS display features the Full HD resolution and manages decent results for both the luminance and the contrast. The hardware equipment of the Swift 5 is very balanced, and the processor can almost utilize its maximum performance under load, which cannot be said for the comparison devices. The temperature development is also okay when you consider the performance. The last important aspect for a subnotebook is the battery runtime. The Swift 5 does not last as long as the Dell XPS 13, but you can still manage a full business day without a socket.
The new Acer Swift 5 combines almost all the important aspects for a subnotebook and is available for a fair entry-level price of 900 Euros (~$947).
You should definitely have a look at the Dell XPS 13 9360 if you are on the road most of the time. It convinces with a matte display and very long battery runtimes. Even lighter and slimmer: the rival from Asus for 1,500 Euros (~$1610).
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV
- 12/22/2016 v6 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi