Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 3 SF313 (Core i5-8250U, 8 GB, 256 SSD, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.47
ΔE Greyscale 7.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ BOE NV133FHM-N62, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB InfoVision M133NWF4R0, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T N133HCE-EAA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA AU Optronics B133HAN05.C, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Honor Magicbook BEO0764 (TV140FHM-NH0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 5% | -32% | 7% | -32% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 66.2 -1% | 66.3 -1% | 42.16 -37% | 67.9 1% | 43.09 -36% |
sRGB Coverage | 88 | 98.3 12% | 97.4 11% | 63.2 -28% | 97.4 11% | 63.1 -28% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.3 | 67.8 5% | 68.1 6% | 43.59 -32% | 69.2 8% | 44.52 -31% |
Response Times | 1641% | -26% | 1711% | -14% | -17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 41 ? 7% | 56.8 ? -29% | 40.8 ? 7% | 54.4 ? -24% | 44.4 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 30 ? 17% | 31.6 ? 12% | 29.6 ? 18% | 37.6 ? -4% | 32.8 ? 9% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | 25000 ? 4900% | 198.4 ? -60% | 26040 ? 5108% | 200 ? -60% | |
Screen | 10% | 25% | -16% | 13% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 300 | 291 -3% | 330 10% | 280 -7% | 276 -8% | 287 -4% |
Brightness | 277 | 276 0% | 304 10% | 265 -4% | 263 -5% | 273 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 88 1% | 89 2% | 89 2% | 86 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.27 -4% | 0.25 4% | 0.24 8% | 0.21 19% | 0.21 19% |
Contrast | 1154 | 1078 -7% | 1320 14% | 1167 1% | 1314 14% | 1367 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.96 | 3.86 35% | 1.8 70% | 5.6 6% | 4.85 19% | 5 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.6 | 8.26 22% | 4.3 59% | 20.7 -95% | 8.24 22% | 20.1 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.47 | 4.3 -74% | 1.6 35% | 4.5 -82% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.64 | 5.33 30% | 2.5 67% | 4.1 46% | 5.7 25% | 2.7 65% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.25 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.44 90% | 2.08 106% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6877 95% | 7426 88% | 6588 99% | 6614 98% | 7424 88% | 6653 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 62 9% | 61.8 8% | 40.1 -30% | 63 11% | 40.59 -29% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 98 11% | 97.3 11% | 63 -28% | 98 11% | 62.66 -29% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 552% /
315% | 1% /
12% | 554% /
286% | 2% /
9% | -20% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
SPECviewperf 12 | |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (18 - 24.4, n=3) | |
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (2.56 - 3.08, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (6.61 - 13.2, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3.49 - 10.3, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (4.27 - 26.2, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (0.22 - 0.81, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (7.9 - 12.4, n=3) | |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (7.38 - 16.4, n=3) | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (13 - 22, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ |
SPECviewperf 13 | |
Solidworks (sw-04) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (31.9 - 32.1, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Siemens NX (snx-03) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (4.89 - 5.28, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Showcase (showcase-02) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (6.68 - 6.87, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Medical (medical-02) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (1.96 - 2.09, n=2) | |
Maya (maya-05) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (19.6 - 20, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Energy (energy-02) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (1.79 - 2.85, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Creo (creo-02) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (16.9 - 17.1, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Catia (catia-05) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (19.6 - 20.3, n=2) | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (13.1 - 13.4, n=2) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (813 - 1209, n=8) | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=60, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3.02 - 4.78, n=8) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3773 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4759 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4845 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3668 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Honor Magicbook Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 7% | 124% | -40% | 32% | -31% | |
Write 4K | 113.7 | 96.8 -15% | 170.9 50% | 64.5 -43% | 113.7 0% | 82.1 -28% |
Read 4K | 40.6 | 36.99 -9% | 46.43 14% | 24.91 -39% | 43.18 6% | 21.11 -48% |
Write Seq | 845 | 463.1 -45% | 996 18% | 453.4 -46% | 970 15% | 451.7 -47% |
Read Seq | 1137 | 794 -30% | 942 -17% | 424.9 -63% | 1085 -5% | 477.7 -58% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 868 | 291.7 -66% | 469.1 -46% | 257.8 -70% | 396.8 -54% | 242.2 -72% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 1580 | 352 -78% | 540 -66% | 200.4 -87% | 317.8 -80% | 257.4 -84% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 345.6 | 468.1 35% | 1582 358% | 504 46% | 518 50% | 526 52% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 411.7 | 1489 262% | 3218 682% | 459.6 12% | 1741 323% | 550 34% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 647 | 284.4 -56% | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 685 | 301.2 -56% | ||||
AS SSD | -43% | 64% | -63% | 11% | -37% | |
Seq Read | 1403 | 1201 -14% | 2310 65% | 485.5 -65% | 1186 -15% | 481.6 -66% |
Seq Write | 836 | 434.5 -48% | 1479 77% | 351 -58% | 809 -3% | 458.5 -45% |
4K Read | 42.19 | 40.9 -3% | 50.3 19% | 30.94 -27% | 39.69 -6% | 32.46 -23% |
4K Write | 99.7 | 90 -10% | 127.6 28% | 61.6 -38% | 114 14% | 84.5 -15% |
4K-64 Read | 738 | 425.5 -42% | 1226 66% | 323.8 -56% | 618 -16% | 378.6 -49% |
4K-64 Write | 606 | 390.9 -35% | 1236 104% | 439.9 -27% | 510 -16% | 279.8 -54% |
Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.184 -149% | 0.063 15% | 0.108 -46% | 0.068 8% | 0.07 5% |
Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.048 -7% | 0.029 36% | 0.174 -287% | 0.032 29% | 0.04 11% |
Score Read | 921 | 586 -36% | 1508 64% | 403 -56% | 776 -16% | 459 -50% |
Score Write | 789 | 524 -34% | 1512 92% | 537 -32% | 705 -11% | 410 -48% |
Score Total | 2163 | 1386 -36% | 3757 74% | 1150 -47% | 1870 -14% | 1114 -48% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 586 | 310.1 -47% | 1717 193% | 546 -7% | 1090 86% | 333 -43% |
Copy Program MB/s | 315.2 | 88.4 -72% | 448.5 42% | 106.2 -66% | 714 127% | 163.8 -48% |
Copy Game MB/s | 478.5 | 166.4 -65% | 588 23% | 151 -68% | 413 -14% | 259.6 -46% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-25% | 94% /
86% | -52% /
-53% | 22% /
19% | -34% /
-35% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 2021 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 76685 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8769 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1122 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 512 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 400 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 68.2 | 37.5 | 31.4 | 10.2 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.2 | 14.6 | 7.5 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 78.4 | 35.8 | 23.2 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.7 dB |
Carga |
| 33.7 / 34 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Honor Magicbook GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -1% | 6% | 3% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.3 -0% | 29.4 3% | 29 5% | 28.6 6% | 30.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30.3 -0% | 30 1% | 29 5% | 28.6 6% | 30.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 30.3 -0% | 30 1% | 29 5% | 28.6 6% | 30.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 30.3 1% | 30 2% | 29 6% | 28.6 7% | 30 2% |
Load Average * | 33.7 | 31 8% | 32.2 4% | 29.9 11% | 28.6 15% | 40.4 -20% |
Load Maximum * | 34 | 31.4 8% | 38.8 -14% | 33.3 2% | 42.4 -25% | 43.8 -29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.2 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.7 °C / 96.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7.4 °C / -13.4 F).
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Honor Magicbook GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 5% | -3% | 5% | 2% | -14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 40.2 -0% | 45 -11% | 41.3 -2% | 37 8% | 52.3 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.1 | 40 5% | 47 -12% | 43 -2% | 44 -5% | 56.1 -33% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 24.4 7% | 24.9 5% | 23 12% | 26 1% | 25.1 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 24.1 7% | 24.7 5% | 23.2 11% | 25.6 2% | 25.7 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (60.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.29 / 0.45 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.8 / 8.8 Watt |
Carga |
34 / 42 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Honor Magicbook i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | -13% | -9% | 15% | -29% | -9% | -36% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 2.9 15% | 3.4 -0% | 2.8 18% | 1.6 53% | 3.9 -15% | 3.81 ? -12% | 4.54 ? -34% |
Idle Average * | 5.8 | 5.6 3% | 6.1 -5% | 5 14% | 4.6 21% | 7.3 -26% | 6.94 ? -20% | 7.75 ? -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 6.1 31% | 7.7 12% | 8.3 6% | 7.3 17% | 8 9% | 8.75 ? 1% | 9.65 ? -10% |
Load Average * | 34 | 29 15% | 44.2 -30% | 42.8 -26% | 37.9 -11% | 55.4 -63% | 35 ? -3% | 46.7 ? -37% |
Load Maximum * | 42 | 35.3 16% | 60.3 -44% | 65.8 -57% | 44.8 -7% | 63.6 -51% | 47.5 ? -13% | 68.8 ? -64% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 45.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48.8 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 50.7 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh | Asus VivoBook S13 S330UA-EY034T i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Asus ZenBook 13 UX333FA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Honor Magicbook i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 56 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -38% | -13% | 16% | 37% | 33% | |
Reader / Idle | 1117 | 736 -34% | 1668 49% | 1740 56% | 1599 ? 43% | ||
H.264 | 495 | 346 -30% | 729 47% | 896 ? 81% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 573 | 614 7% | 344 -40% | 501 -13% | 593 3% | 613 7% | 710 ? 24% |
Load | 137 | 73 -47% | 132 -4% | 116 ? -15% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Swift 3 SF313 é um subportátil compacto que nos impressionou em nossos testes. O dispositivo oferece muita potência a um preço razoável para um subportátil de 13,3 polegadas. O SSD também deveria ser grande o suficiente, mas isso pode ser atualizado mais tarde. Infelizmente, você não pode atualizar a RAM, mas isso agora é raro para subportáteis.
Ficamos confusos com a tela, que só atinge todo o seu potencial quando a calibramos corretamente. Também não temos certeza sobre a carcaça, que parece elegante, mas o uso de plástico da Acer torna a carcaça bastante instável.
O Acer Swift 3 SF313 é um subportátil compacto que possui muitos recursos, boa duração da bateria e poucos comprometimentos.
O SF313 não possui uma porta Thunderbolt 3, mas está bem equipado para um subportátil. Outra característica positiva é a inclusão do USB Type-C com suporte para DisplayPort para controlar telas de 4K a 60 Hz. O módulo LTE também é útil, pois fornece conectividade à Internet quando não há Wi-Fi.
No geral, a Acer levou o Swift 3 SF313 na direção certa, sem fazer muitos sacrifícios. Uma melhor escolha de materiais e uma maneira de expandir a RAM resultariam um subportátil ainda melhor. No entanto, podemos recomendar de todo coração o Acer Swift 3 SF313, porque ele é um subportátil de 13,3 polegadas com preço razoável, potente e bem equipado.
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
-
01/28/2019 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade