Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 700 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1080 Max-Q, Full-HD)

Name: Acer Predator Triton 700
Brand: Acer

Corajosamente novo. O novo portátil de jogos Predator Triton 700 ultrafino de 15 polegadas da Acer é nada menos que inovador. Junto com o seu teclado mecânico, a posição incomum e o design do touchpad permitem um visual novo e interessante. Será que o Triton 700 em sua elegante carcaça, combinada com uma GTX 1080 Max-Q consegue enfrentar o Asus ROG Zephyrus?

Florian Glaser, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/05/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator Triton 700 (Predator Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1290 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 382.64

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, both slots occupied, max. 32 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 120 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175

Disco rígido

2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), 1024 GB

, NVMe PCIe-SSDs M.2 Typ 2280

Placa de Som

Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 Kopfhörer, 1 Line-in

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 393 x 266

Bateria

54 Wh, 4670 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3 Zellen, 11.55V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1280x720

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230-watts power adapter, Quick Start Guide, warranty booklet, various manufacturer tools, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.39 kg, Suprimento de energia: 926 g

Preço

3500 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

left side: Kensington Lock, USB-A 2.0, 2x USB-A 3.0, microphone, headphones

right side: power button, Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, RJ-45

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	594 MBit/s +8%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	551 MBit/s
Aorus X5 v7 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	496 MBit/s -10%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	491 MBit/s -11%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	413 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	683 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	682 MBit/s
Eurocom Q5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	669 MBit/s -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s -3%
Aorus X5 v7 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	441 MBit/s -35%


267 cd/m²	266 cd/m²	247 cd/m²
294 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	279 cd/m²
290 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	273 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 294 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 276.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.59 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6"	Eurocom Q5 ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), 3840x2160, 15.6"	MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160, 15.6"
Display		4%	2%	4%	-21%
Display P3 Coverage	62.5	64.8 4%	63 1%	65.3 4%	48.21 -23%
sRGB Coverage	88.7	91.8 3%	92.7 5%	91.9 4%	72.6 -18%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.5	65.9 4%	64.4 1%	66.3 4%	49.81 -22%
Response Times		15%	16%	7%	29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6)	40.4 ?(23.2, 17.2) 10%	32.4 ?(16, 16.4) 28%	44 ?(21.2, 22.8) 2%	28 ?(15.6, 12.4) 37%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(15.6, 14)	24 ?(11.6, 12.4) 19%	28.8 ?(18.8, 10) 3%	26.4 ?(14, 12.4) 11%	23.6 ?(15.2, 8.4) 20%
PWM Frequency					1351 ?(39)
Screen		1%	-19%	4%	-31%
Brightness middle	291	328 13%	287.5 -1%	307 5%	274.2 -6%
Brightness	277	305 10%	279 1%	297 7%	263 -5%
Brightness Distribution	84	83 -1%	87 4%	92 10%	92 10%
Black Level *	0.22	0.25 -14%	0.65 -195%	0.3 -36%	0.44 -100%
Contrast	1323	1312 -1%	442 -67%	1023 -23%	623 -53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.52	6.02 -9%	4.5 18%	4.72 14%	8 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.72	10.14 5%	8.9 17%	8.07 25%	14.6 -36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.59	6.32 4%	4.6 30%	4.79 27%	9.1 -38%
Gamma	2.44 ^90%	2.28 ^96%	2.39 ^92%	2.42 ^91%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	7816 ^83%	8194 ^79%	7393 ^88%	7690 ^85%	5020 ^129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	58	60 3%	59 2%	60 3%	45.7 -21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	89	92 3%	92.3 4%	92 3%	72.1 -19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 4%	-0% / -10%	5% / 4%	-8% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.6 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.82 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.13 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

60.9 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

7.52 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

1.61 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

156 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

734 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7 Intel Core i7-7820HK	174 Points +12%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	162 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7 Intel Core i7-7820HK	827 Points +13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points +1%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7 Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.98 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points 0%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.77 Points -3%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.73 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7 Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.18 Points +13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.18 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points 0%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.13 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5160 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5057 Points -2%
Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4718 Points -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4141 Points -20%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	3829 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5289 Points +1%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5268 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5211 Points
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	4891 Points -6%

PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5277 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5125 Points -3%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	5119 Points -3%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5160 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5211 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5277 pontos
Ajuda

	Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	Asus Zephyrus GX501 Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	Eurocom Q5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-15%	10%
Read Seq Q32T1	3417	3445 1%	3381 -1%
Write Seq Q32T1	2771	1848 -33%	2075 -25%
Read 4K Q32T1	564	547 -3%	575 2%
Write 4K Q32T1	460.6	463 1%	498.7 8%
Read Seq	2664	954 -64%	2763 4%
Write Seq	2631	1049 -60%	2073 -21%
Read 4K	45.45	45 -1%	57.2 26%
Write 4K	109.2	149 36%	202.6 86%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3417 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2771 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 564 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 460.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2664 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2631 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.45 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 109.2 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18219 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18120 Points
Aorus X5 v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16349 Points -10%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14557 Points -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11261 Points -38%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23694 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23540 Points -1%
Aorus X5 v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22241 Points -6%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18684 Points -21%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14450 Points -39%

3DMark 11 Performance		17113 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		140229 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		28416 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14287 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
GTA V (2015)	167	159	129	72	64
The Witcher 3 (2015)			117.3	62.9
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)				195	126
Resident Evil 7 (2017)			171	142
For Honor (2017)			154	115
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)			92.1	54.5
Prey (2017)			138	134
Rocket League (2017)			228
Dirt 4 (2017)			149	85.3
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	137	136	132	132	130
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)			103	81.8
F1 2017 (2017)			135	101
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)			56.6	38.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	82.3	79.2	68.8		60.4

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 40 dB
Carga		41 / 48 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Noise		5%	2%	-6%	4%
off / environment *	31	31 -0%	29 6%	30 3%	28.8 7%
Idle Minimum *	33	32 3%	31.5 5%	35 -6%	33.1 -0%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	33.8 1%	36 -6%	33.1 3%
Idle Maximum *	40	34 15%	33.8 15%	40 -0%	34 15%
Load Average *	41	39 5%	41.7 -2%	43 -5%	37.2 9%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	42 2%	41.7 3%	49 -14%	46.1 -7%
Load Maximum *	48	46 4%	54.2 -13%	55 -15%	47.1 2%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


61 °C	57 °C	50 °C
53 °C	52 °C	44 °C
40 °C	38 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 47.6 °C


57 °C	69 °C	63 °C
50 °C	68 °C	58 °C
39 °C	42 °C	44 °C

Máximo: 69 °C
Médio: 54.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	27 °C	25 °C
28 °C	29 °C	25 °C
28 °C	27 °C	24 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 26.8 °C


27 °C	31 °C	31 °C
27 °C	31 °C	32 °C
25 °C	28 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 29 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


58 °C	55 °C	49 °C
50 °C	49 °C	40 °C
39 °C	38 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 45.7 °C


52 °C	67 °C	60 °C
46 °C	65 °C	55 °C
37 °C	41 °C	43 °C

Máximo: 67 °C
Médio: 51.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 69 °C / 156 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Heat		6%	8%	5%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	61	57 7%	56.2 8%	64 -5%
Maximum Bottom *	69	54 22%	61.2 11%	56 19%
Idle Upper Side *	29	32 -10%	27.8 4%	29 -0%	28.4 2%
Idle Bottom *	32	31 3%	29.6 7%	30 6%	29.6 7%

* ... smaller is better

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	2.6 / 3.6 Watt
Ocioso	28 / 33 / 41 Watt
Carga	94 / 222 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Power Consumption		21%	42%	1%	35%
Idle Minimum *	28	18 36%	9 68%	26 7%	14.5 48%
Idle Average *	33	23 30%	13.5 59%	31 6%	17.3 48%
Idle Maximum *	41	31 24%	13.7 67%	36 12%	17.4 58%
Load Average *	94	79 16%	87.8 7%	93 1%	93 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	160	148 7%	129 19%	176 -10%	128.8 19%
Load Maximum *	222	196 12%	158.6 29%	240 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		2h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		1h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 10min

	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 50 Wh	Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 55 Wh	Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 94 Wh	MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime		1%	86%	30%	75%
Reader / Idle	150	188 25%	466 211%	208 39%	386 157%
H.264	106	132 25%		163 54%
WiFi v1.3	144	130 -10%	258 79%	151 5%	232 61%
Load	70	44 -37%	47 -33%	84 20%	75 7%

Pro

+ sturdy, slim and high quality case

+ handy software (OC, fan controls)

+ high-contrast IPS screen with 120 Hz

+ easy maintenance access

+ mechanical keyboard

+ superb performance

+ well-made design

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ 2x PCIe-SSDs

+ G-Sync

Contra

- annoying start-up sound (can be muted in BIOS)

- some sharpedged case elements

- high temperatures during 3D workloads

- flawed touchpad solution

- very short battery runtime

- moderate display reaction times

- no card reader

- shallow sound

- very expensive

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

Acer Predator Triton 700 (PT715-51-77JM), Test device supplied by Acer Germany.

O Acer Predator Triton 700 confronta brutalmente com o ROG Zephyrus e e difícil definir um vencedor. O Triton 700 assume a liderança em termos de carcaça, teclado mecânico, seleção de portas e manutenção, enquanto o Zephyrus ganha pontos com seu touchpad melhor, uma temperatura geral mais baixa e um ruído do sistema mais baixo.

Além disso, ambos os rivais têm mais ou menos os mesmos prós e contras. Uma bateria grande e um touchpad normalmente posicionado, foram trocados por uma carcaça fina. A má qualidade do alto-falante, apesar da marca prestigiada Dolby Atmos, não combina bem com o preço alto. Estamos impressionados com a tela IPS de 120 Hz de alto contraste, porém refletiva, mas com ângulos de visão estáveis, com suporte para G-Sync.

Em conclusão, o Triton 700 e o ROG Zephyrus parecem muito caros e a Nvidia Max-Q policy tem sua parte nisso. Os caçadores de pechinchas que ainda preferem carcaças finas precisam procurar em outro lugar - não há nada para ver aqui. Para os entusiastas dos jogos que pretendem deixar seu portátil na sua mesa de qualquer maneira, recomendamos portáteis mais grossos com uma GTX 1070 ou 1080 regular. No final, o Triton 700 não é aceito na nossa lista "Top 10 de Portáteis para Jogos", mas entra no "Top 10 de Portáteis Finos y Leves para Jogos".

Acer Predator Triton 700 - 2017-09-21 09/21/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

88 / 98 → 90%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

58%

Conectividade

63 / 81 → 77%

Peso

61 / 10-66 → 90%

Bateria

61%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

97%

Desempenho da aplicação

96%

Temperatura

67 / 95 → 71%

Ruído

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

70%

Médio

75%

84%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 700 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1080 Max-Q, Full-HD)

Florian Glaser, 2017-10- 5 (Update: 2017-10-19)

Size comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison