Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 700 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1080 Max-Q, Full-HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Aorus X5 v7 |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.59 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eurocom Q5 ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 2% | 4% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.5 | 64.8 4% | 63 1% | 65.3 4% | 48.21 -23% |
sRGB Coverage | 88.7 | 91.8 3% | 92.7 5% | 91.9 4% | 72.6 -18% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 65.9 4% | 64.4 1% | 66.3 4% | 49.81 -22% |
Response Times | 15% | 16% | 7% | 29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 40.4 ? 10% | 32.4 ? 28% | 44 ? 2% | 28 ? 37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 24 ? 19% | 28.8 ? 3% | 26.4 ? 11% | 23.6 ? 20% |
PWM Frequency | 1351 ? | ||||
Screen | 1% | -19% | 4% | -31% | |
Brightness middle | 291 | 328 13% | 287.5 -1% | 307 5% | 274.2 -6% |
Brightness | 277 | 305 10% | 279 1% | 297 7% | 263 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 83 -1% | 87 4% | 92 10% | 92 10% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.25 -14% | 0.65 -195% | 0.3 -36% | 0.44 -100% |
Contrast | 1323 | 1312 -1% | 442 -67% | 1023 -23% | 623 -53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.52 | 6.02 -9% | 4.5 18% | 4.72 14% | 8 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.72 | 10.14 5% | 8.9 17% | 8.07 25% | 14.6 -36% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.59 | 6.32 4% | 4.6 30% | 4.79 27% | 9.1 -38% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.28 96% | 2.39 92% | 2.42 91% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7816 83% | 8194 79% | 7393 88% | 7690 85% | 5020 129% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 60 3% | 59 2% | 60 3% | 45.7 -21% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 92 3% | 92.3 4% | 92 3% | 72.1 -19% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
4% | -0% /
-10% | 5% /
4% | -8% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Eurocom Q5 |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Eurocom Q5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5160 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5211 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5277 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus GX501 Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Eurocom Q5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Aorus X5 v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -15% | 10% | |||
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3417 | 3445 1% | 3381 -1% | ||
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2771 | 1848 -33% | 2075 -25% | ||
Read 4K Q32T1 | 564 | 547 -3% | 575 2% | ||
Write 4K Q32T1 | 460.6 | 463 1% | 498.7 8% | ||
Read Seq | 2664 | 954 -64% | 2763 4% | ||
Write Seq | 2631 | 1049 -60% | 2073 -21% | ||
Read 4K | 45.45 | 45 -1% | 57.2 26% | ||
Write 4K | 109.2 | 149 36% | 202.6 86% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17113 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 140229 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28416 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14287 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 167 | 159 | 129 | 72 | 64 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 117.3 | 62.9 | |||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 195 | 126 | |||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 171 | 142 | |||
For Honor (2017) | 154 | 115 | |||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 92.1 | 54.5 | |||
Prey (2017) | 138 | 134 | |||
Rocket League (2017) | 228 | ||||
Dirt 4 (2017) | 149 | 85.3 | |||
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 137 | 136 | 132 | 132 | 130 |
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 103 | 81.8 | |||
F1 2017 (2017) | 135 | 101 | |||
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 56.6 | 38.6 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 82.3 | 79.2 | 68.8 | 60.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 40 dB |
Carga |
| 41 / 48 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 2% | -6% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 31 | 31 -0% | 29 6% | 30 3% | 28.8 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 32 3% | 31.5 5% | 35 -6% | 33.1 -0% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 33.8 1% | 36 -6% | 33.1 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 34 15% | 33.8 15% | 40 -0% | 34 15% |
Load Average * | 41 | 39 5% | 41.7 -2% | 43 -5% | 37.2 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 42 2% | 41.7 3% | 49 -14% | 46.1 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 46 4% | 54.2 -13% | 55 -15% | 47.1 2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 69 °C / 156 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | 8% | 5% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 61 | 57 7% | 56.2 8% | 64 -5% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 69 | 54 22% | 61.2 11% | 56 19% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 32 -10% | 27.8 4% | 29 -0% | 28.4 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 31 3% | 29.6 7% | 30 6% | 29.6 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 2.6 / 3.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 28 / 33 / 41 Watt |
Carga |
94 / 222 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | 42% | 1% | 35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 18 36% | 9 68% | 26 7% | 14.5 48% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 23 30% | 13.5 59% | 31 6% | 17.3 48% |
Idle Maximum * | 41 | 31 24% | 13.7 67% | 36 12% | 17.4 58% |
Load Average * | 94 | 79 16% | 87.8 7% | 93 1% | 93 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 160 | 148 7% | 129 19% | 176 -10% | 128.8 19% |
Load Maximum * | 222 | 196 12% | 158.6 29% | 240 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 50 Wh | Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 55 Wh | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 94 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 86% | 30% | 75% | |
Reader / Idle | 150 | 188 25% | 466 211% | 208 39% | 386 157% |
H.264 | 106 | 132 25% | 163 54% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 144 | 130 -10% | 258 79% | 151 5% | 232 61% |
Load | 70 | 44 -37% | 47 -33% | 84 20% | 75 7% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Predator Triton 700 confronta brutalmente com o ROG Zephyrus e e difícil definir um vencedor. O Triton 700 assume a liderança em termos de carcaça, teclado mecânico, seleção de portas e manutenção, enquanto o Zephyrus ganha pontos com seu touchpad melhor, uma temperatura geral mais baixa e um ruído do sistema mais baixo.
Além disso, ambos os rivais têm mais ou menos os mesmos prós e contras. Uma bateria grande e um touchpad normalmente posicionado, foram trocados por uma carcaça fina. A má qualidade do alto-falante, apesar da marca prestigiada Dolby Atmos, não combina bem com o preço alto. Estamos impressionados com a tela IPS de 120 Hz de alto contraste, porém refletiva, mas com ângulos de visão estáveis, com suporte para G-Sync.
Em conclusão, o Triton 700 e o ROG Zephyrus parecem muito caros e a Nvidia Max-Q policy tem sua parte nisso. Os caçadores de pechinchas que ainda preferem carcaças finas precisam procurar em outro lugar - não há nada para ver aqui. Para os entusiastas dos jogos que pretendem deixar seu portátil na sua mesa de qualquer maneira, recomendamos portáteis mais grossos com uma GTX 1070 ou 1080 regular. No final, o Triton 700 não é aceito na nossa lista "Top 10 de Portáteis para Jogos", mas entra no "Top 10 de Portáteis Finos y Leves para Jogos".
Acer Predator Triton 700
- 09/21/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser