Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Name: Acer Predator Triton 500
Brand: Acer

Hardly anything wrong with it.

Com o Predator Triton 500, a Acer apresenta um portátil para jogos extremamente compacto que oferece componentes poderosos, apesar das suas pequenas dimensões. Além de um processador Intel hexa-core, a novíssima GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q da Nvidia também está flexionando seus músculos.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/16/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator Triton 500 (Predator Triton Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 417.71

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0), 512 GB

, NVMe SSDs; slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek Unknown @ Intel Cannon Point PCH

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fones, 1x microfone

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 359 x 255

Bateria

82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 watts, Várias ferramentas do fabricante, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.144 kg

Preço

2600 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Triton 500 MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microphone, headphones

Right side: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	655 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	671 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -2%


280 cd/m²	298 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
296 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	306 cd/m²	314 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 314 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 298.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304 cd/m²
Contraste: 1126:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 5.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-1%	2%	1%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	64.2	63.5 -1%	65.3 2%	66.2 3%	66.7 4%
sRGB Coverage	92.6	93.1 1%	94.9 2%	92.1 -1%	91.2 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.7	64.5 -2%	66.3 1%	67.2 2%	66.7 2%
Response Times		-63%	-57%	-67%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8 ?(4, 4)	16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6) -105%	16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6) -110%	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) -120%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6, 5.2)	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) -21%	11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4) -4%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -14%	10 ?(4.4, 5.6) 11%
PWM Frequency
Screen		15%	7%	14%	11%
Brightness middle	304	250 -18%	314.7 4%	254 -16%	294 -3%
Brightness	299	235 -21%	312 4%	262 -12%	275 -8%
Brightness Distribution	89	85 -4%	90 1%	89 0%	84 -6%
Black Level *	0.27	0.29 -7%	0.38 -41%	0.22 19%	0.24 11%
Contrast	1126	862 -23%	828 -26%	1155 3%	1225 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.66	1.46 69%	2.56 45%	2.37 49%	2.57 45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.65	2.47 74%	4.89 49%	4.71 51%	4.88 49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.72		1.71 1%	1.84 -7%	2.14 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.53	1.27 77%	3.4 39%	1.58 71%	2.41 56%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.4 ^92%	2.3 ^96%	2.48 ^89%	2.5 ^88%
CCT	8028 ^81%	6749 ^96%	6435 ^101%	6785 ^96%	6370 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	60.7 1%	60 0%	59 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	93 0%	94.6 2%	92 -1%	91 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / 1%	-16% / -2%	-17% / 2%	7% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

10.98 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

176 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1019 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)	276 Points +57%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)	3387 Points +232%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1120 Points +10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1019 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	999 Points -2%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +68%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1.89 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +239%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	12.44 Points +13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	11.82 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	10.98 Points

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years)	7770 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	5883 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5416 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5170 Points -12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points -13%

	Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD		-16%	1%	-3%	-21%
Score Total	3770	2722 -28%	4079 8%	4122 9%	3294 -13%
Seq Write	2492	1471 -41%	1822 -27%	1834 -26%	1261 -49%
Seq Read	2913	2113 -27%	1840 -37%	1266 -57%	903 -69%
4K Write	107.2	107.1 0%	110.7 3%	107.2 0%	103.6 -3%
4K Read	38.7	55 42%	52.3 35%	48.94 26%	40.02 3%
Score Write	1435	957 -33%	2010 40%	2051 43%	1515 6%
Score Read	1558	1180 -24%	1362 -13%	1346 -14%	1161 -25%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2902 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 298.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2455 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.82 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 93.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)	43480 Points +55%
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28083 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22723 Points -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points -21%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points -33%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18296 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		20149 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø49.5 (46-53)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø50.3 (45-54)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=126, last 2 years)	238 fps +75%
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	136 (104^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	130.1 fps -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	95.5 fps -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	90.4 fps -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	86.5 fps -36%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	126.6 fps +65%
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	76.5 (63^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	68.9 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	58.3 (48^min) fps -24%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	52.7 fps -31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	49.2 fps -36%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	136	76.5
Battlefield 1 (2016)	134	129
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	65	62

Barulho

Ocioso		30 / 32 / 34 dB
Carga		44 / 47 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-2%	9%	2%	-9%	8%
off / environment *	29	30 -3%	28.8 1%	30 -3%	29 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=158, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	30	32 -7%	28.8 4%	30 -0%	33 -10%	25.4 ?(22.8 - 35, n=159, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	32	34 -6%	28.8 10%	31 3%	34 -6%	27.1 ?(23 - 37.5, n=159, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	34	36 -6%	29.4 14%	34 -0%	40 -18%	30.1 ?(23 - 47, n=159, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	44	42 5%	35.7 19%	43 2%	47 -7%	42.4 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=159, last 2 years) 4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46	44 4%	42.5 8%	42 9%	51 -11%
Load Maximum *	47	48 -2%	45 4%	44 6%	53 -13%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=159, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


44 °C	48 °C	47 °C
45 °C	49 °C	45 °C
38 °C	39 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 43.7 °C


58 °C	58 °C	44 °C
55 °C	56 °C	44 °C
44 °C	43 °C	41 °C

Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 49.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


33 °C	33 °C	33 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C


33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
28 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 26 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


43 °C	48 °C	46 °C
45 °C	47 °C	43 °C
37 °C	38 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C


56 °C	59 °C	46 °C
55 °C	57 °C	46 °C
43 °C	43 °C	41 °C

Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 49.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		2%	14%	11%	1%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	56 -14%	49 -0%	49 -0%	54 -10%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=158, last 2 years) 6%
Maximum Bottom *	58	66 -14%	49 16%	63 -9%	60 -3%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=158, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Upper Side *	33	27 18%	25.4 23%	24 27%	30 9%	31.1 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=158, last 2 years) 6%
Idle Bottom *	33	27 18%	27.2 18%	25 24%	30 9%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=158, last 2 years) 2%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Ocioso	16 / 22 / 32 Watt
Carga	89 / 173 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		11%	18%	23%	-7%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	16	16 -0%	10.4 35%	7 56%	17 -6%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	22	18 18%	14.6 34%	11 50%	20 9%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	32	23 28%	16.3 49%	20 37%	29 9%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) 17%
Load Average *	89	88 1%	88.5 1%	98 -10%	112 -26%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years) -20%
Witcher 3 ultra *	147	120 18%	155.4 -6%	132 10%	152 -3%
Load Maximum *	173	167 3%	182.4 -5%	182 -5%	211 -22%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 35min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 21min

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		93%	72%	47%	-34%	57%
Reader / Idle	335	549 64%	682 104%	507 51%	213 -36%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 69%
WiFi v1.3	190	382 101%	387 104%	362 91%	157 -17%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years) 97%
Load	81	174 115%	88 9%	81 0%	42 -48%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 5%
H.264		364		356		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Carcaça compacta

+ Muito bom desempenho

+ Superfícies mecânicas

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Marcos finos

+ G-Sync

+ 144 Hz

Contra

- Som de inicialização irritante (pode ser desativado no BIOS)

- Manutenção limitada

- Duração da bateria medíocre

- Sem Optimus

Predator Triton 500, test unit provided by Acer Germany

O Acer Predator Triton 500 perde uma avaliação "muito boa". O portátil de 15 polegadas preenche quase todos os critérios que distinguem um portátil moderno para jogos. Além da tela com marcos finos e carcaça fina, devemos também mencionar o painel de 144 Hz aqui, que ganha pontos com G-Sync.

O Triton 500 também não apresenta falta de desempenho. Nossa versão testada com um Core i7-8750H e GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q pode lidar sem esforço com qualquer jogo atual com resolução Full HD.

No entanto, é incompreensível para nós a razão pela qual a Acer não utilizou a comutação de gráficos. Em termos de mobilidade, o +Optimus absolutamente se ofereceria como uma vantagem. Vemos fraquezas adicionais em termos de manutenção. O design do interior é tal que os compradores dificilmente podem acessar qualquer componente (palavras-chave: solução de armazenamento e RAM).

Apesar de tudo isso, o Triton 500 é significativamente mais bem sucedido em nossa opinião do que o antigo Triton 700.

Acer Predator Triton 500 - 2019-02-14 02/14/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

62 / 81 → 76%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%