Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Triton 500: Superstar
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 (Predator Triton 500 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 815 MHz, Memoría: 1353 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, Máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB
, NVMe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280
peso
2.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 736 g
Preço
2500 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 04/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.8 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 335 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 318.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 1333:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -4% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.3 | 67.6 -4% | 66.9 -5% | 65.3 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 97.5 -2% | 98.1 -1% | 95.1 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.2 | 68.9 -5% | 68.5 -5% | 65.9 -9% |
| Response Times | -5% | 6% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.4 ? | 13.6 ? 6% | 12.8 ? 11% | 16.4 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 12 ? -15% | 10.4 ? -0% | 8.8 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 23260 ? | 23810 ? | 23810 ? | |
| Screen | 10% | 7% | -26% | |
| Brightness middle | 320 | 282.3 -12% | 293 -8% | 324.2 1% |
| Brightness | 318 | 269 -15% | 270 -15% | 304 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 87 -1% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.32 -33% | 0.29 -21% | 0.38 -58% |
| Contrast | 1333 | 882 -34% | 1010 -24% | 853 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.03 | 1.17 71% | 1.69 58% | 5.01 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.43 | 3.29 61% | 3.37 60% | 12.7 -51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.98 | 1.06 -8% | 1.24 -27% | 1.64 -67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.94 | 1.3 78% | 2.3 61% | 7.9 -33% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6751 96% | 6643 98% | 6758 96% | 8455 77% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66 | 63.8 -3% | 63 -5% | 60.8 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 97.5 -2% | 98.5 -1% | 95.5 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
5% | 3% /
5% | -11% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -21% | -11% | 1% | |
| Write 4K | 131.7 | 91.3 -31% | 137.2 4% | 108.8 -17% |
| Read 4K | 47.34 | 40.73 -14% | 46.82 -1% | 45.41 -4% |
| Write Seq | 2884 | 1915 -34% | 1221 -58% | 2467 -14% |
| Read Seq | 2303 | 2051 -11% | 1217 -47% | 2456 7% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 423.9 | 308.3 -27% | 527 24% | 532 26% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 487.7 | 417.4 -14% | 614 26% | 590 21% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2822 | 1922 -32% | 1986 -30% | 2801 -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3478 | 3395 -2% | 3234 -7% | 3172 -9% |
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3478 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2822 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
487.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
423.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2303 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2884 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
47.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
131.7 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38265 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 60306 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22730 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38107 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18678 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8043 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 179 | 172 | 153 | 85.8 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 236 | 143 | 83.4 | 58.2 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 146 | 134 | 123 | 118 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 121 | 114 | 99.5 | 80.3 | 44.5 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 103 | 80.8 | 37.6 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 119 | 100 | 72 | 56.1 | 31.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 93.4 | 79.5 | |||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 105 | 97.7 | 90 | 63.3 | 31.9 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 111 | 105 | 97 | 72 | 39 | |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 92 | 78 | 58 | 53 | 32 | |
| Hitman 2 (2018) | 86.7 | 78.6 | 77 | 76 | 46.1 | |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 139 | 127 | 119 | 96.1 | 58.7 | |
| Darksiders III (2018) | 112 | 109 | 103 | 82.1 | 43.2 | |
| Just Cause 4 (2018) | 152 | 113 | 105 | 73.9 | 41.3 | |
| Apex Legends (2019) | 194 | 165 | 163 | 118 | 65 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 103 | 97 | 87 | 71 | 48 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 101 | 77.8 | 63.4 | 51.2 | 31.6 | |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 166 | 162 | 98.8 | 76.4 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 129 | 112 | 80 | 59 | 31 | |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 94 | 74.4 | 44.9 | 38.8 | 23.2 | |
| Rage 2 (2019) | 126 | 106 | 103 | 68.4 | 34.1 | |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 174 | 141 | 138 | 122 | 74 | |
| Control (2019) | 107 | 79.8 | 48.4 | 24.9 | ||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 107 | 84.3 | 68.1 | 49.1 | 26.6 | |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 251 | 241 | 240 | 239 | 190 | |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 102 | 92 | 70 | 53 | 31 | |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 85.9 | 77.7 | 72 | 66.4 | 46.9 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 134 | 129 | 107 | 78.9 | 44.5 | |
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 93 | 86.6 | 83.3 | 66.9 | 40.9 | |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 95.7 | 93.1 | 89.9 | 76.2 | 42.7 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 98 | 67.4 | 43.7 | 37 | 23.8 | |
| Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 121 | 119 | 83.1 | 39.7 | |
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 119 | 101 | 68.8 | 32.4 | ||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 164 | 150 | 147 | 108 | 58 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 33 / 36 dB |
| Carga |
| 50 / 50 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 13% | -3% | 13% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.3 6% | 28.3 6% | 28.3 6% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 30.4 -1% | 28.8 4% | 28.5 5% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 30.5 8% | 28.8 13% | 28.5 14% | 27.2 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 30.6 15% | 29 19% | 49 -36% | 30.2 ? 16% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 37.6 25% | 33.5 33% | 49 2% | 42.5 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 46 4% | 45 6% | 49 -2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 55.1 -10% | 45.2 10% | 55 -10% | 53.4 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -1% | -11% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 45.6 -4% | 47 -7% | 53.8 -22% | 46.1 ? -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 53.8 -8% | 49.2 2% | 58 -16% | 49.2 ? 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 28.6 1% | 28.6 1% | 29.8 -3% | 31.2 ? -8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31 | 33.2 -7% | 31.4 -1% | 32.2 -4% | 32.2 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11 / 15 / 25 Watt |
| Carga |
95 / 211 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -2% | -71% | -17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11 | 18.3 -66% | 12.5 -14% | 19 -73% | 13.5 ? -23% |
| Idle Average * | 15 | 22 -47% | 15.3 -2% | 40.5 -170% | 18.9 ? -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 28.8 -15% | 20.7 17% | 52 -108% | 26.7 ? -7% |
| Load Average * | 95 | 93 2% | 90.2 5% | 132.3 -39% | 106.6 ? -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 140 | 142.6 -2% | 162 -16% | 183.3 -31% | |
| Load Maximum * | 211 | 215.9 -2% | 209.3 1% | 217.2 -3% | 249 ? -18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | 43% | -15% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 495 | 953 93% | 554 12% | 565 ? 14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 378 | 362 -4% | 393 4% | 332 -12% | 376 ? -1% |
| Load | 78 | 102 31% | 44 -44% | 85.3 ? 9% |
Pro
+ Carcaça leve e estável
+ Painel responsivo de 300 Hz
+ G-Sync e Optimus
+ Muito bom desempenho
+ Thunderbolt 3
Contra
- Alto desenvolvimento de ruído do sob uso de 3D
- Som de inicialização irritante (pode ser desativado)
- Manutenção limitada
Em 2020, o Predator Triton 500 continua impressionando com sua combinação de baixo peso, dimensões compactas e potência generosa.
O chassi de 15 polegadas relativamente leve e plano pode ter colegas significativamente mais grossos em muitos benchmarks, mas a versão Max-Q da RTX 2080 Super não é exatamente a melhor escolha do ponto de vista de preço-desempenho. De qualquer forma, a GPU rápida garante taxas de quadros Full HD uniformes, mesmo com títulos modernos (nas configurações máximas, é claro). Um outro destaque seria a tela de 300 Hz, que não é apenas responsiva, mas rica em contraste também.
Em suma, quase não há nada a criticar sobre a nova versão do Triton 500. O maior ponto de crítica é, como tantas vezes, o ruído de fundo sob uso intenso.
Price comparison
