Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Helios 700: Portátil para jogos inovador com muitos recursos
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 1440:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.89
ΔE Greyscale 6.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080 | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -3% | -1% | 31% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 63.7 -1% | 61.5 -5% | 62.3 -3% | 86.3 34% | 66.3 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 96 4% | 92 0% | 93.4 1% | 100 9% | 96.9 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 65.8 0% | 63.5 -3% | 64.3 -2% | 99.1 51% | 66.5 2% |
| Response Times | -1% | 50% | 33% | -117% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 17.6 ? -5% | 7.2 ? 57% | 8 ? 52% | 41.6 ? -148% | 13.2 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.6 ? | 11.2 ? 3% | 6.6 ? 43% | 10 ? 14% | 21.6 ? -86% | 10.8 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 26040 ? | 26040 ? | |||
| Screen | 26% | 22% | 23% | 11% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 288 | 360 25% | 400.7 39% | 396 38% | 343 19% | 335.2 16% |
| Brightness | 271 | 342 26% | 372 37% | 373 38% | 328 21% | 297 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 89 5% | 89 5% | 82 -4% | 82 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.26 -30% | 0.34 -70% | 0.33 -65% | 0.31 -55% | 0.66 -230% |
| Contrast | 1440 | 1385 -4% | 1179 -18% | 1200 -17% | 1106 -23% | 508 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.79 | 1.91 67% | 1.33 77% | 2.04 65% | 5.03 13% | 2.02 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.89 | 4.08 66% | 3.51 70% | 3.85 68% | 7.91 33% | 7.23 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.89 | 0.78 59% | 1.39 26% | 0.82 57% | 0.86 54% | 1.17 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.92 | 2.72 61% | 1.3 81% | 2.83 59% | 6.29 9% | 3.2 54% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% | 2.49 88% | 2.38 92% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8433 77% | 6692 97% | 6735 97% | 7113 91% | 6389 102% | 6746 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 58.2 -3% | 59 -2% | 88 47% | 61.3 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 96 4% | 92.1 0% | 94 2% | 100 9% | 96.9 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
18% | 23% /
21% | 18% /
19% | -25% /
-1% | 4% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0) | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | -17% | -15% | 6% | 1% | |
| Write 4K | 115.3 | 103.8 -10% | 116.1 1% | 101.4 -12% | 183.2 59% | 111.1 -4% |
| Read 4K | 41.79 | 41.67 0% | 44.98 8% | 40.57 -3% | 52.4 25% | 45.47 9% |
| Write Seq | 2841 | 2639 -7% | 2370 -17% | 2229 -22% | 1790 -37% | 2454 -14% |
| Read Seq | 2547 | 2702 6% | 1465 -42% | 2528 -1% | 1743 -32% | 2212 -13% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 498.6 | 487.3 -2% | 337.5 -32% | 379.6 -24% | 550 10% | 622 25% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 555 | 555 0% | 453.6 -18% | 421.9 -24% | 648 17% | 695 25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3123 | 2967 -5% | 2399 -23% | 2439 -22% | 3236 4% | 2675 -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3476 | 3102 -11% | 3087 -11% | 3199 -8% | 3538 2% | 3184 -8% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26029 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42055 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21258 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9875 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing | |
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 187 | 105 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 117 | 78.6 | ||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 138 | 112 | ||
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 301 | 256 | ||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 144 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 106 | 94 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 93.4 | 77.4 | ||
| Anthem (2019) | 108 | 104 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 171 | 114 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 134 | 108 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 74.8 | 43.6 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 125 | 124 | ||
| F1 2019 (2019) | 155 | 152 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 34 / 45 dB |
| Carga |
| 40 / 60 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 9% | -2% | 3% | 2% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 34 -13% | 30.4 -1% | 33 -10% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 35 -3% | 30.4 11% | 34 -0% | 33 3% | 28.6 16% | 27.2 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 45 | 36 20% | 33.4 26% | 44 2% | 35 22% | 51 -13% | 30.4 ? 32% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 51 -28% | 37.1 7% | 47 -18% | 44 -10% | 51 -28% | 42.8 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 47 18% | 54.2 5% | 53 7% | 55 4% | 51 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 60 | 51 15% | 56.4 6% | 59 2% | 58 3% | 51 15% | 53.4 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -10% | -23% | -9% | -8% | -16% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 37 | 47 -27% | 48.8 -32% | 51 -38% | 45 -22% | 47 -27% | 46.2 ? -25% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 40 | 54 -35% | 52 -30% | 57 -43% | 45 -13% | 58.8 -47% | 49.1 ? -23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 32 6% | 36.2 -6% | 26 24% | 36 -6% | 31 9% | 31.3 ? 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36 | 30 17% | 44.4 -23% | 28 22% | 33 8% | 35 3% | 32.3 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 5.7 / 6.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 34 / 45 Watt |
| Carga |
98 / 307 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 24% | 13% | -21% | -12% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 26 7% | 13.9 50% | 14 50% | 39 -39% | 23.3 17% | 13.6 ? 51% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 29 15% | 18.8 45% | 18 47% | 45 -32% | 33.5 1% | 19 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 45 | 38 16% | 23.1 49% | 23 49% | 55 -22% | 38.4 15% | 26.9 ? 40% |
| Load Average * | 98 | 106 -8% | 112.3 -15% | 114 -16% | 122 -24% | 114.1 -16% | 106.1 ? -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 263 | 228 13% | 231 12% | 283 -8% | 259 2% | 339.5 -29% | |
| Load Maximum * | 307 | 287 7% | 291.5 5% | 443 -44% | 346 -13% | 485.1 -58% | 250 ? 19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 72 Wh | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 75% | 52% | -13% | -15% | 110% | |
| Reader / Idle | 213 | 250 17% | 409 92% | 165 -23% | 155 -27% | 574 ? 169% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 168 | 196 17% | 294 75% | 302 80% | 135 -20% | 127 -24% | 378 ? 125% |
| Load | 63 | 63 0% | 52 -17% | 65 3% | 66 5% | 85.8 ? 36% | |
| H.264 | 135 | 413 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Predator Helios 700 é um portátil para jogos muito interessante da Acer que apresenta muitas ideias e inovações - de teclas WASD trocáveis a um mecanismo deslizante para os dispositivos de entrada - embora a Acer não use este sistema de resfriamento aprimorado para limitar as emissões de ruído, mas para melhorar o desempenho.
O fabricante faz overclock de sua GPU GeForce para tirar o máximo proveito dela. O dispositivo permanece confortavelmente frio, mesmo durante o overclock, mas fica muito barulhento. Não foi tanto o nível geral de ruído que nos incomodou, mas mais as taxas de RPM flutuantes, que muitas vezes eram infundadas. Em resumo: A Acer definitivamente deve trabalhar em seu sistema de resfriamento.
Outras fraquezas são o fato de que o touchpad é muito afundado na unidade base, o leitor de cartões ausente e a bateria com pouca duração. A carcaça nos deu uma impressão mista. Enquanto os gamers ficarão satisfeitos com as muitas portas, o bom teclado, os alto-falantes potentes e as muitas opções de iluminação de fundo, a construção pesada (sem marcos finos) e o alto peso não estão mais atualizados em 2019. Ficamos satisfeitos com a tela de 144 Hz de alto contraste, apesar de algumas fraquezas (precisão de cores, brilho e distribuição de brilho).
Em suma, os ventiladores da Acer que estão interessados em jogar todos os jogos modernos com altos detalhes e têm o dinheiro necessário disponível definitivamente devem dar uma olhada neste dispositivo de 17 polegadas. Qualquer pessoa pode preferir um portátil topo de linha mais clássico (e provavelmente mais barato) sem todos os sinos e assobios do Predator Helios 700 (por exemplo, o Helios 300 ou o Triton 500).
Cuidado: O Predator Helios 700 é um dos primeiros portáteis para jogos avaliado com base nas classificações estendidas (e mais difíceis) da v7 e, portanto, parece ter resultados piores do que sua concorrência de ponta testada recentemente. No futuro, todos os novos dispositivos gamers terão que passar na classificação v7.
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
