Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Helios 300 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, Full-HD)

Portátil de orçamento para gamers. Portáteis poderosos geralmente vêm com um preço elevado. Este não é o caso do Acer Predator Helios 300. A versão com capacidade de jogos deste portátil custa apenas 1100 euros ($1296). Você pode aprender nesta análise como o dispositivo de 17 polegadas se compara à concorrência.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 (Predator Helios 300 PH317 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8300H 4 x 2.3 - 4 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, 2x 4 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, todos os slots ocupados, 32 GB máx
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Hynix HFS128G39TND, 128 GB 
, SATA-III-SSD + Western Digital WD10SPZX, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. slots: 1x M.2-2280 & 1x 2,5-polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: headphone/microphone combo 3.5-mm jack, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29 x 432 x 290
Bateria
48 Wh, 3220 mAh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Dolby Audio), Teclado: chiclet-style, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de CA de 135 watts, Guia de Início rápido, panfleto de garantia, Diversa ferramentas do fabricante, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.91 kg, Suprimento de energia: 458 g
Preço
1100 EUR
Links
Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300

Size Comparison

❌
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg423 mm 296 mm 27.62 mm 3.1 kg415 mm 280 mm 34 mm 3.2 kg414 mm 272 mm 33 mm 3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
66.1 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
58 MB/s -24%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.7 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +40%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
92.3 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
91 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s -2%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s -71%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
670 MBit/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
638 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
545 MBit/s -15%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
497 MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
696 MBit/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
632 MBit/s -9%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
618 MBit/s -11%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
594 MBit/s -14%
324
cd/m²		332
cd/m²		344
cd/m²
339
cd/m²		365
cd/m²		360
cd/m²
335
cd/m²		332
cd/m²		342
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 365 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 341.4 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 365 cd/m²
Contraste: 1141:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 7.65 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.64
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Helios 300
LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
AU Optronics, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus GL753VE-DS74
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
0%
-2%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
67.1
66.8
0%
63.1
-6%
65.4
-3%
sRGB Coverage
86.1
85.8
0%
86.5
0%
82.6
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63
62.8
0%
63.3
0%
60.4
-4%
Response Times
2%
-15%
0%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(18.8, 17.2)
36 ?(18, 18)
-0%
38 ?(20, 18)
-6%
36 ?(18.4, 17.6)
-0%
36 ?(18, 18)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
22 ?(10.4, 11.6)
20 ?(8.4, 11.6)
9%
27 ?(16, 11)
-23%
22 ?(12.4, 9.6)
-0%
23 ?(14, 9)
-5%
PWM Frequency
122000 ?(95)
119000 ?(85)
-2%
Screen
9%
6%
10%
5%
Brightness middle
365
384
5%
301
-18%
366
0%
415
14%
Brightness
341
373
9%
270
-21%
348
2%
365
7%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
79
-11%
90
1%
82
-8%
Black Level *
0.32
0.35
-9%
0.38
-19%
0.35
-9%
0.42
-31%
Contrast
1141
1097
-4%
792
-31%
1046
-8%
988
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.51
4.81
26%
3.49
46%
4.4
32%
4.95
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.32
8.69
29%
7.49
39%
9.7
21%
9.34
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.9
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.65
5.33
30%
1.88
75%
3
61%
4.69
39%
Gamma
2.64 83%
2.45 90%
2.35 94%
2.1 105%
2.33 94%
CCT
8066 81%
7137 91%
6587 99%
6362 102%
6485 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
56
0%
56
0%
56
0%
54
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
86
0%
86
0%
86
0%
82
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 6%
-4% / 2%
5% / 8%
-1% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122000 Hz ≤ 95 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 122000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 122000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Latenzen
 
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +61%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points -8%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
141 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
140 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3421 Points +324%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1129 Points +40%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points -9%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
515 Points -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +70%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -8%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1.55 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +323%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12.5 Points +42%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points -7%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points -8%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.79 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
807 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4874 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4186 Points -2%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
3596 Points -15%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3570 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5171 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5116 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4988 Points -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
4486 Points -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4253 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5347 pontos
Ajuda
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND		Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035		Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
AS SSD
141%
142%
Seq Read
513
1558
204%
1500
192%
Seq Write
128.2
552
331%
558
335%
4K Read
26.5
29.02
10%
32.5
23%
4K Write
62.7
111.3
78%
119.7
91%
Score Read
414
690
67%
681
64%
Score Write
196
588
200%
575
193%
Score Total
811
1588
96%
1566
93%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Hynix HFS128G39TND
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 553 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 136 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 208.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 136.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 490.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 136.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 22.78 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 61.9 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +313%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
12009 Points +58%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
11512 Points +51%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7883 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7610 Points
Asus GL753VE-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7531 Points -1%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +379%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15607 Points +71%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15182 Points +66%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10270 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9147 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
9101 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85238 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22710 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6685 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +393%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.9 (31min - 45max) fps +50%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
36 fps +38%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
32 fps +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
26 fps
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
25 fps -4%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)
242 fps +418%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
71.7 (62min - 81max) fps +54%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
68.9 fps +48%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ
46.7 fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
46.7 fps
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 46.7 26
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 62.4 41.4
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 31.5 30.7
ELEX (2017) 43.4 32.7
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 56.9 52.5
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 63.4 47.9
Fortnite (2018) 76.7 54.6
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 38.9 28.8

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 31 / 33 dB
HDD
31 dB
Carga
45 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
R5 1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
8%
-2%
-3%
8%
off / environment *
29
31
-7%
29.7
-2%
29.1
-0%
30.2
-4%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
31
-7%
30.2
-4%
33.3
-15%
30.6
-6%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
31
32
-3%
30.2
3%
33.3
-7%
32.7
-5%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
33
33
-0%
30.6
7%
33.4
-1%
32.7
1%
30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
45
44
2%
33.8
25%
42.6
5%
38.9
14%
42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years)
5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
46
-2%
39.5
12%
46.8
-4%
53.4
-19%
Load Maximum *
51
50
2%
42.6
16%
46.8
8%
50.6
1%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 50 °C50 °C42 °C 
 47 °C49 °C33 °C 
 31 °C30 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 40 °C
51 °C52 °C43 °C
31 °C43 °C42 °C
29 °C26 °C26 °C
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
R5 1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-10%
9%
29%
-8%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
57
-14%
48
4%
35.8
28%
54.3
-9%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years)
8%
Maximum Bottom *
52
59
-13%
40.8
22%
36.4
30%
51
2%
49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Upper Side *
33
36
-9%
29.9
9%
22.2
33%
36
-9%
31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years)
5%
Idle Bottom *
30
31
-3%
29.8
1%
22.2
26%
34.3
-14%
32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.6432537.239.7312830.34035.335.75028.128.96326.129.98026.83510025.547.412522.346.816022.143.920022.353.325022.164.131519.768.74001970.250018.472.263017.37780017.878.110001775.2125016.968.1160017.166.320001763.725001761.731501755.9400017.257.850001760.263001757.4800017.156.91000017.159.11250016.966.81600016.860.2SPL29.581.9N1.348.5median 17.1median 61.7Delta16.139.936.239.939.832.239.842.131.742.145.12945.145.528.845.546.730.846.749.728.349.752.228.952.253.724.553.755.62455.658.624.658.660.522.160.564.92264.962.820.862.864.420.364.470.319.370.371.918.671.969.417.969.469.517.769.572.61772.665.917.165.965.116.965.164.11764.165.116.965.166.616.966.662.71762.764.217.264.262.317.162.357.517.257.553.517.453.579.83079.848.51.448.5median 64.2median 17.7median 64.24.424.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 9 / 13 Watt
Carga midlight 95 / 134 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
R5 1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-12%
-2%
-329%
-88%
Idle Minimum *
6
7
-17%
8.7
-45%
7.5
-25%
49
-717%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years)
-125%
Idle Average *
9
13
-44%
12.4
-38%
11.3
-26%
60
-567%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-110%
Idle Maximum *
13
20
-54%
15.4
-18%
11.8
9%
68
-423%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years)
-105%
Load Average *
95
81
15%
73
23%
82.1
14%
150
-58%
106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years)
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
102
127
-25%
98
4%
96.3
6%
214
-110%
Load Maximum *
134
162
-21%
130
3%
116.6
13%
262
-96%
249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years)
-86%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 40min
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh		Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh		Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
R5 1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 74 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-27%
-21%
-38%
-77%
-9%
Reader / Idle
710
611
-14%
520
-27%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)
-20%
WiFi v1.3
354
279
-21%
278
-21%
235
-34%
80
-77%
375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years)
6%
Load
100
54
-46%
47
-53%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years)
-14%
H.264
281
409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Nvidia Optimus
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ Painel IPS

Contra

- Não muitas portas
- Pobre qualidade do som
- Opções limitadas de manutenção
- SSD lenta com ruído de bobina
- Bleeding da tela
Predator Helios 300, review device provided courtesy of: Acer Germany
Predator Helios 300, review device provided courtesy of: Acer Germany

Mesmo que a Acer tenha cortado muitos cantos para baixar o preço (SSD lento, poucas portas, baixa qualidade de som), o Predator Helios 300 ainda é um excelente dispositivo.

Os dispositivos de entrada e a qualidade de construção definitivamente não são de alto nível. Dito isto, algumas falhas são esperadas de um dispositivo de 1000 euros ($1178).

Os compradores não ficarão desapontados quando se tratar do desempenho. Até mesmo a configuração básica com o Core i5 2430M e a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti pode rodar quase todos os títulos a 1080p. No entanto, a tela IPS, que possui alto brilho e boa relação de contraste, sofre com o bleeding da tela e a reprodução de cores inadequada. O gerenciamento térmico e o ruído do sistema não são relevantes.

Em suma, o dispositivos de 17 polegadas é uma oferta interessante para os jogadores conscientes dos preços. A duração da bateria também fala em favor do dispositivo.

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 - 06/02/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
55 / 81 → 68%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
90%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
60%
Médio
77%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Helios 300 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, Full-HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-06-22 (Update: 2018-07- 2)