Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Helios 300 (7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)

Um gamer fino! O Acer Predator Helios 300 é um portátil de jogos que pesa menos de 3 kg (~106 oz.). Será que o seu sistema de resfriamento pode acompanhar a construção relativamente compacta e fornecer o dispositivo com ar fresco suficiente? Descubra em nossa análise.
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Helios 300 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 384.94, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400, 2 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), AH-IPS, WLED, 262K, 60Hz, LCM, a-Si TFT-LCD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
HM175
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 conector de áudio de 3.5 mm, Card Reader: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4 (a/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29 x 432 x 290
Bateria
48 Wh, 3220 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chicklet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180-Watts, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.876 kg, Suprimento de energia: 584 g
Preço
1800 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg423 mm 304 mm 33 mm 3.8 kg420 mm 288 mm 32 mm 3 kg423 mm 296 mm 27.62 mm 3.1 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.4 kg414 mm 272 mm 33 mm 3 kg419 mm 289 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: Kensington lock, RJ45, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Left: Kensington lock, RJ45, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Right: combined audio jack (Mic-In, Line-Out), 2x USB 2.0, LED lights, power supply
Right: combined audio jack (Mic-In, Line-Out), 2x USB 2.0, LED lights, power supply
Front: no ports
Front: no ports
Back: no ports
Back: no ports
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s -1%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s -4%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
66.1 MB/s -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s -71%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
92.3 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s +8%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s -72%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s -76%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
626 MBit/s +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
545 MBit/s
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
497 MBit/s -9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
443 MBit/s -19%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s -29%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
299 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
702 MBit/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
696 MBit/s
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
638 MBit/s -8%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
618 MBit/s -11%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s -36%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
308 MBit/s -56%
377
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 373.4 cd/m² Minimum: 33 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 1097:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Acer Predator Helios 300
LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus GL753VE-DS74
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"
HP Omen 17-an014ng
AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
34%
28%
3%
35%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
66.8
85.4
28%
90.2
35%
64.6
-3%
87.8
31%
66.7
0%
sRGB Coverage
85.8
100
17%
99.8
16%
92.9
8%
100
17%
91
6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.8
97.8
56%
83.9
34%
66.1
5%
98.9
57%
66.4
6%
Response Times
-8%
-5%
41%
-39%
-96%
-55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(18, 18)
29 ?(14, 15)
19%
36 ?(18.4, 17.6)
-0%
28 ?(12, 16)
22%
45.2 ?(20.8, 24.4)
-26%
55.6 ?(18.4, 37.2)
-54%
45 ?(20, 25)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
20 ?(8.4, 11.6)
27 ?(16, 11)
-35%
22 ?(12.4, 9.6)
-10%
8 ?(5, 3)
60%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-52%
46.8 ?(10.4, 36.4)
-134%
28 ?(7, 21)
-40%
PWM Frequency
119000 ?(85)
1000 ?(29)
-99%
450 ?(90)
-100%
Screen
7%
2%
10%
6%
5%
7%
Brightness middle
384
380
-1%
366
-5%
270
-30%
314
-18%
441.3
15%
312
-19%
Brightness
373
336
-10%
348
-7%
254
-32%
309
-17%
408
9%
304
-18%
Brightness Distribution
93
81
-13%
90
-3%
86
-8%
88
-5%
86
-8%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.35
0.32
9%
0.35
-0%
0.26
26%
0.34
3%
0.44
-26%
0.23
34%
Contrast
1097
1188
8%
1046
-5%
1038
-5%
924
-16%
1003
-9%
1357
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.81
5.32
-11%
4.4
9%
3.33
31%
3.19
34%
5.1
-6%
4.19
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.69
7.63
12%
9.7
-12%
6.07
30%
6.1
30%
9.8
-13%
8.7
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.33
4.9
8%
3
44%
3.46
35%
3.49
35%
4.3
19%
3.72
30%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.61 84%
2.1 105%
2.13 103%
2.34 94%
2.08 106%
2.29 96%
CCT
7137 91%
6558 99%
6362 102%
7419 88%
7261 90%
7345 88%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
87.2
56%
56
0%
75
34%
60
7%
87
55%
59
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
100
16%
86
0%
100
16%
93
8%
100
16%
91
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 11%
-2% / 1%
26% / 18%
-10% / -0%
-19% / -8%
-15% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119000 Hz ≤ 85 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 85 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (benchmark)
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points +1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points +1%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points -9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points +1%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points -6%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points -1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points -9%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
272.1 Points +9%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
268 Points +7%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
258.9 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
250.7 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
221.5 Points -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
213.9 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1179 ms * -22%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1114 ms * -16%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
963 ms *
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
960 ms * -0%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
919 ms * +5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
41110 Points +13%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
40882 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36449 Points
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
32512 Points -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
30722 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6821
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22143
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5874
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6821 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28891 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7651 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.1 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
735 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
159 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
99.9 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4989 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4874 Points
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3985 Points -18%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3570 Points -27%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points -27%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3444 Points -29%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5289 Points +3%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points +2%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5171 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5116 Points
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4831 Points -6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points -18%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4207 Points -18%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4874 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7411 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5116 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4861 pontos
Ajuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskInfo
CrystalDiskInfo
ATTO
ATTO
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-3%
-21%
-39%
66%
-36%
64%
Read Seq
899
880
-2%
1049
17%
510
-43%
1736
93%
517
-42%
1666
85%
Write Seq
569
581
2%
584
3%
274.6
-52%
1212
113%
305.7
-46%
1192
109%
Read 512
580
725
25%
583
1%
427.2
-26%
1044
80%
315
-46%
857
48%
Write 512
425.9
429.3
1%
458
8%
247.2
-42%
854
101%
306.1
-28%
827
94%
Read 4k
34.29
10.46
-69%
14.1
-59%
21.23
-38%
59.1
72%
26.04
-24%
60.7
77%
Write 4k
125.5
123.4
-2%
108
-14%
86.8
-31%
144.9
15%
82.3
-34%
154.5
23%
Read 4k QD32
457.7
459.2
0%
57.8
-87%
335.4
-27%
582
27%
281.3
-39%
636
39%
Write 4k QD32
404.5
496.9
23%
264
-35%
178.1
-56%
523
29%
296
-27%
544
34%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Sequential Read: 899 MB/s
Sequential Write: 569 MB/s
512K Read: 580 MB/s
512K Write: 425.9 MB/s
4K Read: 34.29 MB/s
4K Write: 125.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 457.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 404.5 MB/s
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
108657 Points +31%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
82678 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
75190 Points -9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
66406 Points -20%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
51987 Points -37%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
47807 Points -42%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17289 Points +44%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17170 Points +43%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
12009 Points
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11617 Points -3%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11546 Points -4%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8027 Points -33%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7531 Points -37%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23243 Points +49%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21918 Points +40%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15607 Points
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15019 Points -4%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14556 Points -7%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10008 Points -36%
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
12812 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
135605 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26341 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10144 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5349 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3854 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
58 fps +49%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.9 (31min - 45max) fps
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
37.2 (25min - 45max) fps -4%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
32 fps -18%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
27.6 fps -29%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
130 fps +49%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
108 fps +23%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98 (11.6min - 188.3max) fps +12%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
97 fps +11%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
87.5 fps
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.5 fps -17%
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.4 (33.5min - 42.9max) fps
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
36.2 fps -6%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
83.6 (75min - 89max) fps
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.8 fps -39%
Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
62 (50min - 75max) fps
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
62 (50min - 75max) fps 0%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
58 fps -6%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
31.2 (24.4min - 39.8max) fps
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
30.1 (23.4min - 38.6max) fps -4%
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.3 (54.3min - 99.8max) fps
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
71.3 fps -1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
46.1 fps -36%
baixomédiaaltoultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 255.5 204.6 194.7 87.5
Battlefield 4 (2013) 199.9 198.6 195.9 106 49.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 198.3 135 71.7 38.9 26.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 203.1 135.3 77.8 65.7 27.2
Far Cry Primal (2016) 122 92 82 62 26
The Division (2016) 217.3 146.3 73.3 57.4 26.9
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 140.4 109.1 59.9 31.2 19.1
Battlefield 1 (2016) 177.8 142.5 93.2 83.6 32.8
For Honor (2017) 226 107.1 101.1 72.3 30.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 140 73.6 67.2 38.4 25.3
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 131.4 85.7 59.3 53.8 21.5

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga
44 / 50 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Noise
5%
0%
-4%
-6%
1%
-2%
off / environment *
31
30.8
1%
29.1
6%
31
-0%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.4
-1%
33.3
-7%
34
-10%
30
3%
30.4
2%
31
-0%
Idle Average *
32
31.4
2%
33.3
-4%
35
-9%
37
-16%
32.1
-0%
32
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
31.4
5%
33.4
-1%
36
-9%
39
-18%
32.1
3%
38
-15%
Load Average *
44
38.6
12%
42.6
3%
40
9%
44
-0%
45.6
-4%
44
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
46.8
-2%
47
-2%
Load Maximum *
50
44.3
11%
46.8
6%
51
-2%
55
-10%
51.5
-3%
50
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
 56 °C57 °C50 °C 
 56 °C56 °C36 °C 
 35 °C32 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 45.1 °C
59 °C55 °C53 °C
33 °C50 °C52 °C
28 °C30 °C30 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 43.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Heat
9%
35%
13%
2%
10%
15%
Maximum Upper Side *
57
56
2%
35.8
37%
48.8
14%
48
16%
51.2
10%
50.6
11%
Maximum Bottom *
59
48.7
17%
36.4
38%
48.2
18%
54
8%
56.8
4%
50.8
14%
Idle Upper Side *
36
30.9
14%
22.2
38%
30.1
16%
35
3%
29.2
19%
28.7
20%
Idle Bottom *
31
30.6
1%
22.2
28%
30.4
2%
37
-19%
29.2
6%
27.1
13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.542.22535.737.73132.530.24031.735.2502829.16328.330.78029.730.310026.938.312524.440.716022.436.920022.351.825022.462.731520.869.340019.970.750019.871.663018.975.880018.476.4100018.473.6125018.268.4160018.367.5200018.565.3250018.862.8315019.360.6400019.860.8500020.366.9630021.162.8800021.6601000022.261.9125002367.11600023.763SPL3281.3N1.650.5median 20.3median 63Delta25.442.636.242.640.432.240.443.931.743.945.22945.246.428.846.45030.85051.428.351.453.428.953.454.824.554.857.62457.658.724.658.761.222.161.265.32265.363.720.863.765.820.365.870.819.370.870.118.670.168.517.968.570.317.770.371.81771.86417.16466.116.966.163.31763.360.616.960.657.616.957.663.11763.168.617.268.66717.16754.717.254.751.317.451.379.53079.5481.448median 63.7median 17.7median 63.75.525.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Helios 300Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Acer Predator Helios 300 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7 / 13 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 81 / 162 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Power Consumption
-25%
16%
-35%
-79%
-79%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
7
10.5
-50%
7.5
-7%
13
-86%
22
-214%
15.7
-124%
7
-0%
Idle Average *
13
20.5
-58%
11.3
13%
20
-54%
28
-115%
23.4
-80%
14
-8%
Idle Maximum *
20
22
-10%
11.8
41%
26
-30%
35
-75%
23.5
-18%
23
-15%
Load Average *
81
91
-12%
82.1
-1%
83
-2%
93
-15%
184.6
-128%
82
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
127
96.3
24%
157
-24%
Load Maximum *
162
155
4%
116.6
28%
169
-4%
208
-28%
233.1
-44%
163
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
4h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 54min
Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
Time needed for recharging
Time needed for recharging
Acer Predator Helios 300
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh
Asus GL753VE-DS74
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh
HP Omen 17-an014ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh
Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-15%
-48%
0%
-7%
39%
Reader / Idle
611
520
-15%
196
-68%
349
-43%
256
-58%
613
0%
H.264
281
140
-50%
255
-9%
322
15%
WiFi v1.3
279
277
-1%
235
-16%
142
-49%
267
-4%
155
-44%
288
3%
Load
54
47
-13%
40
-26%
84
56%
98
81%
128
137%

Pro

+ Facilmente reconhecível
+ Peso leve
+ Design fino
+ GeForce GTX 1060 com 6 GB de VRAM
+ Veloz Intel Core i7-7700HQ
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ SSD de 512 GB
+ Painel mate com bons ângulos de visão
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Ótima distribuição das portas
+ Preço justo

Contra

- O sistema de som está abaixo das expectativas
- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso
- As ventoinha de resfriamento produzem ruído de alta frequência sob uso intenso
- As ventoinhas de resfriamento são difíceis de limpar
- Apenas um slot de 2,5 polegadas livre
- Poderia oferecer mais portas
The Acer Predator Helios 300, provided by Acer Germany
The Acer Predator Helios 300, provided by Acer Germany

O Acer Predator Helios 300 é um excelente aparelho de nível de entrada para gamers. O aparelho de 17 polegadas está equipado com um veloz Intel Core i7-7700HQ, e o Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 é uma base sólida para jogar títulos atuais na resolução nativa de 1080p. As taxas de quadros ainda são boas, inclusibe com os detalhes no máximo. O modelo de $1800 também está equipado com 16 GB de RAM DDR4, bem como um veloz SSD NVMe de 512-GB. O Acer Predator Helios cumpre todos os requisitos para um portátil de jogos.

O Acer Predator Helios 300 oferece um desempenho sólido dos jogos para o seu preço. No entanto, o fabricante desperdiçou alguns pontos importantes com o sistema de som, que não é adequado para um portátil de jogos.

No geral, o Acer Predator Helios 300 nos deixou uma boa impressão. A carcaça é muito estável apesar do seu design plano e a combinação de cores torna o dispositivo reconhecível como Predator mesmo de longe. Nós realmente gostamos dos dispositivos de entrada que quase não precisamos criticar e a Acer também escolheu bem a tela.

Ficamos um pouco decepcionados com o sistema de som, que esperávamos encontrar em um aparelho de escritório de gama média, não em um aparelho de jogos. A manutenção pode ser um pouco difícil devido às pequenas escotilhas de manutenção. Uma escotilha maior teria sido mais favorável para o cliente.

Os compradores do Acer Predator Helios 300 serão recompensados com um bom desempenho por um preço justo.

Acer Predator Helios 300 - 06/01/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 65%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
79%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
79 / 95 → 83%
Ruído
77 / 90 → 85%
Audio
55%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Médio
74%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator Helios 300 (7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
Sebastian Bade, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 2)