Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 17 X (7820HK, FHD, GTX 1080)

Name: Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Brand: Acer

Está esquentando! O Acer Predator X é a "edição de luxo" extremamente poderosa do Predator 17 regular. Será que os componentes estão bem balanceados e o desempenho é suficiente para ganhar uma posição em nosso ranking dos Top 10?

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR) Windows

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Predator 17X Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7820HK 4 x 2.9 - 3.9 GHz @ 4.3 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1732 MHz, Memoría: 2700 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 378.66

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/4 Slots em uso, até 64 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175

Disco rígido

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB

, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Söots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 (PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones, Microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 45 x 423 x 322

Bateria

88.8 Wh, 6000 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD (1280x720)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 4.2 (Dolby Audio), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU: 330 Watts, Acer Care Center, Predator Sense, Killer Network Manager, MS Office 365 teste, XSplit Gamecaster teste, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

4.346 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.306 kg

Preço

3000 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Asus G701VIK-BA049T Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Aorus X7 v6 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power, 2x USB 3.0, microphone, headphones, SD-card reader

Right side: 2x USB-C 3.1, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, Ethernet, Kensington lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T	168 MB/s +113%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	166 MB/s +110%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433	125 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL	79 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6	78 MB/s -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T	246 MB/s +176%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	224 MB/s +152%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433	205 MB/s +130%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL	89 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6	87 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	628 MBit/s
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	624 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	618 MBit/s -2%
Aorus X7 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	554 MBit/s -12%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	354 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	682 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	675 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	672 MBit/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	496 MBit/s -27%

The maintenance hatch reveals the memory and storage device. — The maintenance hatch reveals...


360 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	366 cd/m²
362 cd/m²	380 cd/m²	366 cd/m²
350 cd/m²	379 cd/m²	345 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 380 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 362 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1027:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus G701VIK-BA049T B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"	Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440, 17.3"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3"
Display		31%	5%	2%	4%	-2%	38%
Display P3 Coverage	66	90.6 37%	68.8 4%	66.9 1%	68.3 3%	60.9 -8%	86.9 32%
sRGB Coverage	83.7	99.9 19%	87.7 5%	85.2 2%	86.7 4%	84.2 1%	100 19%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.2	84.7 38%	64.1 5%	62.3 2%	63.4 4%	61.2 0%	99.4 62%
Response Times		59%	23%	19%	56%	48%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	45 ?(18, 27)	26 ?(12, 14) 42%	38 ?(13, 25) 16%	38 ?(14, 24) 16%	29 ?(13, 16) 36%	31 ?(11, 20) 31%	37 ?(13, 24) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(6, 22)	7 ?(4, 3) 75%	20 ?(4, 16) 29%	22 ?(4, 18) 21%	7 ?(4, 3) 75%	10 ?(3, 7) 64%	24 ?(5, 19) 14%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-33%	2%	3%	-33%	-31%	13%
Brightness middle	380	307 -19%	306 -19%	328 -14%	299 -21%	343 -10%	336 -12%
Brightness	362	284 -22%	299 -17%	317 -12%	277 -23%	312 -14%	320 -12%
Brightness Distribution	91	85 -7%	91 0%	88 -3%	87 -4%	80 -12%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.37	0.25 32%	0.27 27%	0.3 19%	0.27 27%	0.5 -35%	0.25 32%
Contrast	1027	1228 20%	1133 10%	1093 6%	1107 8%	686 -33%	1344 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.12	9.65 -134%	3.98 3%	3.74 9%	9.65 -134%	7.33 -78%	3.61 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.19	16.36 -100%	7.29 11%	8.97 -10%	15.43 -88%	10.79 -32%	6.02 26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.95	10.07 -155%	4.15 -5%	2.67 32%	9.68 -145%	7.6 -92%	4.78 -21%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.12 ^104%	2.45 ^90%	2.41 ^91%	1.89 ^116%	2.19 ^100%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6539 ^99%	12145 ^54%	7386 ^88%	6861 ^95%	11652 ^56%	9024 ^72%	6185 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	75 36%	58 5%	56 2%	75 36%	55 0%	88 60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84	100 19%	89 6%	85 1%	100 19%	84 0%	100 19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		19% / -8%	10% / 5%	8% / 5%	9% / -14%	5% / -15%	22% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	184 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	184 Points 0%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	172 Points -7%
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	170 Points -8%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points -13%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	159 Points -14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	899 Points +3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	874 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	864 Points -1%
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	807 Points -8%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points -10%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points -16%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points -25%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	2.08 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	2.08 Points 0%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.95 Points -6%
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.93 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points -13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.91 Points +4%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.6 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.55 Points
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.88 Points -7%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points -10%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.17 Points -14%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	7023 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	6038 Points -14%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5733 Points -18%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	27705 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	23393 Points -16%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22270 Points -20%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	300.8 Points
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	255.5 Points -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	247.6 Points -18%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	49518 Points
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	38782 Points -22%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	37923 Points -23%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8465

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

27705

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7023

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

9160 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

35490 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8465 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

9.55 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

85.4 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.08 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

874 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

184 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

120.8 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5975 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)	5662 Points -5%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	5009 Points -16%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6123 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)	5846 Points -5%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points -6%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	5404 Points -12%

PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)	7903 Points +3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	7667 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	7635 Points 0%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6803 Points -11%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	6618 Points -14%
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5946 Points -22%

PCMark Vantage Result		31085 pontos
PCMark 7 Score		7667 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5975 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		9309 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6123 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	Asus G701VIK-BA049T 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		49%	55%	9%	-52%	-1%
Read Seq	1494	3219 115%	3487 133%	1718 15%	521 -65%	1499 0%
Write Seq	1371	2572 88%	2690 96%	1305 -5%	311.8 -77%	1411 3%
Read 512	898	1776 98%	1499 67%	1250 39%	403.1 -55%	966 8%
Write 512	1273	2445 92%	2493 96%	1438 13%	332.3 -74%	1103 -13%
Read 4k	43.82	51.1 17%	53.7 23%	44.42 1%	33.35 -24%	44.33 1%
Write 4k	161.6	141.3 -13%	133.2 -18%	154.4 -4%	111.1 -31%	155.5 -4%
Read 4k QD32	669	658 -2%	795 19%	744 11%	331.1 -51%	696 4%
Write 4k QD32	552	554 0%	699 27%	578 5%	318.3 -42%	531 -4%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7

Sequential Read: 1494 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1371 MB/s

512K Read: 898 MB/s

512K Write: 1273 MB/s

4K Read: 43.82 MB/s

4K Write: 161.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 669 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 552 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VIK-BA049T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	23091 Points +2%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	22566 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	21026 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17625 Points -22%
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17068 Points -24%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16757 Points -26%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15718 Points -30%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VIK-BA049T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	31412 Points +10%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	28675 Points 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	28595 Points
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23591 Points -17%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23170 Points -19%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22282 Points -22%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21228 Points -26%

3DMark 03 Standard		181125 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard		37669 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		39711 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		50346 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		20303 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		192504 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		33540 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17463 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		9502 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6606 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	324.3	284.5	273.7	176.8
GTA V (2015)	170.8	162.5	130.3	106.8	75.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	270.8	197.5	125.8	68.5	46.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	260.9	218.3	153.8	126.1	61.2
Far Cry Primal (2016)	157	138	125	107	49
The Division (2016)	258.8	201.6	122.4	97.2	48.4
Doom (2016)	179.9	170.2	149.1	147.8	70.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	145.9	136.9	98.9	54.9	34.4
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	462.9	353.4	269.3	234.1	78.5
For Honor (2017)	265.6	190.1	177.5	134.9	59.4

The cooling system consists of a total of three fans. — The cooling system...

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 35 / 37 dB
HDD		33 dB
Carga		40 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise		-2%	-1%	5%	2%	-4%	-3%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	30 -0%	31 -3%	30 -0%	31 -3%
Idle Minimum *	33	34 -3%	30 9%	31 6%	34 -3%	33 -0%	33 -0%
Idle Average *	35	35 -0%	31 11%	32 9%	35 -0%	35 -0%	34 3%
Idle Maximum *	37	37 -0%	36 3%	33 11%	37 -0%	40 -8%	40 -8%
Load Average *	40	39 2%	47 -18%	40 -0%	37 7%	43 -8%	44 -10%
Load Maximum *	50	56 -12%	56 -12%	47 6%	44 12%	54 -8%	50 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (normal operation)

Stress test: only Prime95 (normal operation)

Stress test: only FurMark (normal operation)

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)

Stress test: only Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)

Stress test: only FurMark (Overclocking stage 2)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.1 °C	44.2 °C	42.8 °C
36.9 °C	39.8 °C	38.7 °C
31.1 °C	31.9 °C	31.4 °C

Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C


43 °C	41.2 °C	41.1 °C
34.9 °C	34.5 °C	28.5 °C
30.7 °C	27.7 °C	26.9 °C

Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat		8%	0%	5%	8%	-3%	3%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.2	39.8 10%	50.9 -15%	42.9 3%	41.5 6%	47.5 -7%	42.6 4%
Maximum Bottom *	43	47.8 -11%	44.6 -4%	41.5 3%	50.6 -18%	54.5 -27%	44.9 -4%
Idle Upper Side *	32.4	27.1 16%	29.9 8%	31.6 2%	26.4 19%	28.6 12%	33.1 -2%
Idle Bottom *	32.8	27.4 16%	28.8 12%	29.5 10%	25.4 23%	28.8 12%	28.9 12%

* ... smaller is better

Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Ocioso	27 / 32 / 41 Watt
Carga	102 / 248 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption		-7%	-1%	10%	22%	-2%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	27	29 -7%	24 11%	24 11%	20 26%	29 -7%	25 7%
Idle Average *	32	35 -9%	31 3%	31 3%	27 16%	31 3%	35 -9%
Idle Maximum *	41	40 2%	38 7%	36 12%	31 24%	38 7%	46 -12%
Load Average *	102	94 8%	98 4%	94 8%	86 16%	111 -9%	103 -1%
Load Maximum *	248	315 -27%	320 -29%	204 18%	184 26%	253 -2%	223 10%

* ... smaller is better

The 88.8 Wh lithium-ion battery is secured by screws.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)		4h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 30min

	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh	Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 93 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh
Battery Runtime		-33%	-1%	-8%	2%	-27%	-11%
Reader / Idle	313		342 9%	311 -1%	316 1%		278 -11%
H.264	204	145 -29%		186 -9%	228 12%
WiFi v1.3	251	160 -36%	241 -4%	210 -16%	230 -8%	182 -27%	200 -20%
Load	90		83 -8%	84 -7%	91 1%		89 -1%

Pro

+ Teclado iluminado (4 zonas)

+ Bom layout das portas

+ Tela IPS com G-Sync

+ USB 3.1 Gen. 2 com Thunderbolt 3

+ Muito alto desempenho do sistema

+ Desempenho de jogos convincente

+ Boa qualidade de construção

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Teclas macro

+ SSD PCIe

Contra

- A bateria é esgotada sob uso intenso (tomada)

- Afogamento da CPU e GPU sob carga máxima

- Sem drive ótico

- Adaptador de força pesado

In review: Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL. Test model courtesy of Acer Germany.

O Predator 17 X é uma boa alternativa ao Predator 17 "regular", embora a Acer não tenha resolvido todas as falhas. Definitivamente não há críticas para o desempenho: O Intel Core i7-7820HK é uma boa combinação para a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080. Podemos ver recordes em alguns benchmarks, portanto, esta é realmente uma máquina de jogos poderosa. O design é similar ao dos outros modelos Predator.

A Acer tem um novo contendor para o segmento de jogos de gama alta. O Predator 17 X é uma poderosa máquina de jogos e um rival para os sistemas familiares.

Gostamos dos bons dispositivos de entrada, bem como da qualidade do chassi, mas a tela deixa impressões confusas. A luminância é boa, mas os tempos de resposta são longos. Outro aspecto positive é o recurso de overclock, que melhora o desempenho de forma significante. O processador alcança o seu limite térmico bastante rápido, mas o desempenho ainda é mais alta em comparação com as configurações padrão.

Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL - 2017-03-01 03/01/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

70 / 81 → 86%

Peso

46 / 10-66 → 64%

Bateria

73%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

99%

Desempenho da aplicação

100%

Temperatura

89 / 95 → 94%

Ruído

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

78%

Médio

80%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 17 X (7820HK, FHD, GTX 1080)

Sebastian Bade, 2017-03-22 (Update: 2017-03-26)