Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 17 G9-791
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 337 cd/m²
Contraste: 1296:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469) | MSI GE72-6QF8H11 LG Phillips LP173WF4-SPF1 | SCHENKER XMG P706 LG LP173WF4-SPD1 | Alienware 17 R2 LG Philips LGD0459 / 173WF4 (Dell P/N: CV69H) | SCHENKER XMG U716 AU B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | -0% | 36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 67.2 1% | 66.9 0% | 66.6 0% | 86.5 30% |
sRGB Coverage | 84.7 | 85.5 1% | 84.6 0% | 84.3 0% | 100 18% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62 | 62.5 1% | 61.8 0% | 61.6 -1% | 99 60% |
Response Times | -31% | ||||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 45 ? -22% | |||
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 28 ? -40% | |||
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 6% | -1% | 4% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 337 | 315 -7% | 306 -9% | 331 -2% | 374 11% |
Brightness | 303 | 297 -2% | 302 0% | 307 1% | 356 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 90 6% | 84 -1% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.3 -15% | 0.34 -31% | 0.3 -15% | 0.4 -54% |
Contrast | 1296 | 1050 -19% | 900 -31% | 1103 -15% | 935 -28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.92 | 4.34 27% | 5.49 7% | 4.88 18% | 4.23 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.55 | 2.87 62% | 3.97 47% | 3.63 52% | 5.48 27% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.15 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 7270 89% | 6969 93% | 6163 105% | 6325 103% | 6686 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 56 0% | 55.5 -1% | 55 -2% | 88 57% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 85 0% | 84.5 -1% | 84.2 -1% | 100 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
4% | -1% /
-1% | 2% /
3% | 5% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
PCMark 7 Score | 5991 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3880 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4810 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
3DMark 06 1024x768 Score | 25463 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9529 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 87812 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21651 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6708 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Alienware 17 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
Dirt Rally | |
1920x1080 High Preset (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
Star Wars Battlefront | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
Rainbow Six Siege | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti |
Just Cause 3 | |
1920x1080 High / On AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
1920x1080 Very High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
MSI GE72 965M Ti |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 125.6 | 76 | 30.5 | |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 120.1 | 95.2 | 60.9 | |
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 145.8 | 72.3 | 61.5 | |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 170.1 | 89.5 | 64.3 | |
Just Cause 3 (2015) | 102.6 | 61.3 | 52.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 37 dB |
HDD |
| 34 dB |
Carga |
| 44 / 49 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GE72-6QF8H11 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R2 GeForce GTX 980M, 4980HQ | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 7% | 3% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 30.9 3% | 29.4 8% | 33 -3% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 30.2 8% | 31.2 5% | 30.8 7% | 35 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 33 11% | 31.2 16% | 35 5% | 38 -3% |
Load Average * | 44 | 40.4 8% | 40.5 8% | 43.4 1% | 45 -2% |
Load Maximum * | 49 | 46.2 6% | 47 4% | 51.6 -5% | 48 2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GE72-6QF8H11 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R2 GeForce GTX 980M, 4980HQ | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -41% | -11% | -20% | -34% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 50.3 -21% | 44 -6% | 50.8 -22% | 48.8 -17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.6 | 49.9 -20% | 42.3 -2% | 48.7 -17% | 55.8 -34% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 40.9 -50% | 31.7 -17% | 30.9 -14% | 36.7 -35% |
Idle Bottom * | 25 | 42.8 -71% | 29.9 -20% | 31.7 -27% | 37.3 -49% |
* ... smaller is better
desligado | 0.3 / 0.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 11 / 17 / 22 Watt |
Carga |
96 / 164 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GE72-6QF8H11 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R2 GeForce GTX 980M, 4980HQ | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -24% | -7% | -5% | -126% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11 | 16.7 -52% | 12 -9% | 8.9 19% | 35 -218% |
Idle Average * | 17 | 23 -35% | 17.9 -5% | 16 6% | 44 -159% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 31.7 -44% | 19.3 12% | 26.6 -21% | 51 -132% |
Load Average * | 96 | 97.4 -1% | 97.7 -2% | 124 -29% | 134 -40% |
Load Maximum * | 164 | 141.4 14% | 213 -30% | 165.8 -1% | 298 -82% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GE72-6QF8H11 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R2 GeForce GTX 980M, 4980HQ | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -56% | -40% | -2% | -48% | |
Reader / Idle | 702 | 403 -43% | 297 -58% | 729 4% | 158 -77% |
H.264 | 456 | 139 -70% | 220 -52% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 358 | 154 -57% | 220 -39% | ||
Load | 109 | 49 -55% | 97 -11% | 100 -8% | 88 -19% |
WiFi | 345 |
Pro
Contra
Os dois novos portáteis de jogos da Acer, o Predator 15 e o nosso modelo de teste Predator 17, são muito similares em muitos aspectos, portanto, nosso veredicto também é similar. Além do design, em particular, você notará o tamanho e o peso do aparelho de 17-polegadas. Os rivais oferecem o mesmo tipo de desempenho com carcaças mais leves e mais compactas. Isto é causado parcialmente pelo resfriamento, mas não conseguiu nos convencer completamente. Ele sim mantém os componentes frios, mas pode ser muito barulhento. É um dos portáteis mais barulhentos entre nossos aparelhos comparados em cenários de uso médio. A ventoinha FrostCore adicional soa bem no papel, mas não ajuda nada os componentes, na prática. Ela esfria o lado esquerdo do pousa palmas.
Outras desvantagens são a limitada utilização do Turbo, bem como o afogamento da GPU sob uso intenso, os medíocres alto falantes e o "bleeding" da retro iluminação. A capacidade de manutenção também é limitada. Se a Acer puder consertar esses problemas para a seguinte iteração, deveríamos obter um aparelho muito bom, porque inclusive as primeiras tentativas são ótimas em algumas categorias. Isto inclui o chassi sólido, a tela brilhante e de alto contraste, as muito boas durações da bateria, o moderno equipamento de portas e as úteis ferramentas.
A Acer apresenta uma primeira tentativa bem-sucedida para um portátil de jogos, embora ainda precise um afinamento em algumas áreas.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
-
02/29/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff