Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1070, UHD)

Name: Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Brand: Acer

Jogos em 4K. A série Acer Predator significa portáteis de jogos clássicos, que - ao contrário de alguns de seus irmãos finos - são feito unicamente para o desempenho. Depois de testar a versão de Skylake do Predator 17 em setembro de 2016, agora o modelo Kaby-Lake, que é construído de forma similar no exterior, deve provar a si mesmo.

Florian Glaser, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/02/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Predator 17 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 381.78

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2133, dual channel, 2 de 4 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, UHD, G-Sync, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175

Disco rígido

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB

, m.2-SSD type 2280 + Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB HDD @ 5400 rpm

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: fones, microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 40 x 423 x 322

Bateria

88 Wh, 6000 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 4 alto falantes+ subwoofer, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de energia: 230 watts, ventoinha adicional, guia de configuração, guia de início rápido, garantia, MS Office 365 trial, Killer Network Manager, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, PredatorSense, Dolby Audio, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

4.34 kg, Suprimento de energia: 930 g

Preço

2800 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017	166 MB/s +110%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433	125 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL	79 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ	79 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017	207 MB/s +133%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433	205 MB/s +130%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL	89 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ	89 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	628 MBit/s +1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	624 MBit/s
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	618 MBit/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	584 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	694 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	683 MBit/s -2%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s -2%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	672 MBit/s -3%


336 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	336 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	348 cd/m²
306 cd/m²	292 cd/m²	306 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 348 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 328.3 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1183:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160
Display		-23%	-25%	-26%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	86.4	68.3 -21%	66.9 -23%	66 -24%	86.6 0%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	86.7 -13%	85.2 -15%	83.7 -16%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.1	63.4 -36%	62.3 -37%	61.2 -38%	99.5 0%
Response Times		58%	19%	1%	2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50 ?(24.4, 25.6)	29 ?(13, 16) 42%	38 ?(14, 24) 24%	45 ?(18, 27) 10%	44 ?(14, 30) 12%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(11.2, 14.4)	7 ?(4, 3) 73%	22 ?(4, 18) 14%	28 ?(6, 22) -9%	28 ?(6, 22) -9%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-44%	-6%	-9%	8%
Brightness middle	343	299 -13%	328 -4%	380 11%	362 6%
Brightness	328	277 -16%	317 -3%	362 10%	344 5%
Brightness Distribution	84	87 4%	88 5%	91 8%	85 1%
Black Level *	0.29	0.27 7%	0.3 -3%	0.37 -28%	0.35 -21%
Contrast	1183	1107 -6%	1093 -8%	1027 -13%	1034 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.01	9.65 -141%	3.74 7%	4.12 -3%	2.46 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.03	15.43 -156%	8.97 -49%	8.19 -36%	4.26 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.7	9.68 -106%	2.67 43%	3.95 16%	2.9 38%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	1.89 ^116%	2.41 ^91%	2.47 ^89%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6451 ^101%	11652 ^56%	6861 ^95%	6539 ^99%	6120 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	88	75 -15%	56 -36%	55 -37%	88 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	100 0%	85 -15%	84 -16%	100 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -26%	-4% / -7%	-11% / -11%	3% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.2 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24.4 ms rise
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.81 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.09 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

157 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

732 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	193 Points +23%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	184 Points +17%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +2%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	159 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	157 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	958 Points +31%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	874 Points +19%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +8%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	732 Points

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	2.18 Points +20%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	2.08 Points +15%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	10.59 Points +31%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.55 Points +18%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.17 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.09 Points

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5975 Points +36%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +27%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	5009 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	4902 Points +12%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4395 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6123 Points +35%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +27%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	5404 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	4972 Points +9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4541 Points

PCMark 7 - Score
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	7864 Points +18%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	7667 Points +15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6803 Points +2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6692 Points
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	6618 Points -1%

PCMark 7 Score		6692 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4395 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4541 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		-45%	5%	38%
Seq Read	2237	509 -77%	2261 1%	2746 23%
Seq Write	1230	282.1 -77%	1338 9%	1445 17%
4K Read	37.51	40.04 7%	39.52 5%	56.8 51%
4K Write	120.8	95.8 -21%	133.8 11%	175.9 46%
Score Total	2547	1142 -55%	2581 1%	3938 55%

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7

Sequential Read: 2237MB/s

Sequential Write: 1230MB/s

4K Read: 37.51MB/s

4K Write: 120.8MB/s

4K-64 Read: 851MB/s

4K-64 Write: 646MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.052ms

Access Time Write: 0.033ms

Score Read: 1112Points

Score Write: 890Points

Score Total: 2547Points

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	22566 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	21534 Points +28%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17625 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16847 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16757 Points -1%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	7140 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	6927 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5389 Points +3%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5303 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	5238 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	29426 Points +31%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	28595 Points +27%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23170 Points +3%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22510 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22282 Points -1%

3DMark 11 Performance		16430 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		27050 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13353 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		5059 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	alto	ultra	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)	104	59.4	38.7
For Honor (2017)	142	106	43.6
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	84.6	49.5	32.3
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)	77.7	68.9	31.6
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	57.8	51.4	18.2
Prey (2017)	134	129	46.7

The Witcher 3 ultra

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 35 / 38 dB
HDD		35 dB
Carga		42 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Noise		4%	7%	1%	-2%
off / environment *	31	31 -0%	30 3%	30 3%	30 3%
Idle Minimum *	32	34 -6%	31 3%	33 -3%	31 3%
Idle Average *	35	35 -0%	32 9%	35 -0%	34 3%
Idle Maximum *	38	37 3%	33 13%	37 3%	37 3%
Load Average *	42	37 12%	40 5%	40 5%	44 -5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44				51 -16%
Load Maximum *	50	44 12%	47 6%	50 -0%	52 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


36.5 °C	39.1 °C	38.1 °C
30.9 °C	39 °C	36.8 °C
26 °C	31 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 33.9 °C


37 °C	42.1 °C	41 °C
37.3 °C	37 °C	24.1 °C
23.2 °C	24.8 °C	22.6 °C

Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


22.5 °C	25.6 °C	25.5 °C
23.2 °C	26 °C	27.6 °C
25.7 °C	27.9 °C	24.1 °C

Máximo: 27.9 °C
Médio: 25.3 °C


24.3 °C	22.2 °C	23.6 °C
25.9 °C	26.1 °C	21.2 °C
21.8 °C	22.3 °C	20.9 °C

Máximo: 26.1 °C
Médio: 23.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 24.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35.1 °C	38.2 °C	37.2 °C
29.9 °C	37.1 °C	36.2 °C
26.6 °C	31.8 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C


36.8 °C	42.9 °C	41 °C
37.6 °C	37 °C	23.4 °C
25.4 °C	26.1 °C	23.1 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Heat		-5%	-9%	-14%	-27%
Maximum Upper Side *	39.1	41.5 -6%	42.9 -10%	44.2 -13%	47.5 -21%
Maximum Bottom *	42.1	50.6 -20%	41.5 1%	43 -2%	56 -33%
Idle Upper Side *	27.9	26.4 5%	31.6 -13%	32.4 -16%	34.5 -24%
Idle Bottom *	26.1	25.4 3%	29.5 -13%	32.8 -26%	33.6 -29%

* ... smaller is better

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	23 / 33 / 40 Watt
Carga	94 / 228 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Power Consumption		16%	5%	-7%	-43%
Idle Minimum *	23	20 13%	24 -4%	27 -17%	32 -39%
Idle Average *	33	27 18%	31 6%	32 3%	43 -30%
Idle Maximum *	40	31 22%	36 10%	41 -3%	51 -28%
Load Average *	94	86 9%	94 -0%	102 -9%	138 -47%
Witcher 3 ultra *	177				279 -58%
Load Maximum *	228	184 19%	204 11%	248 -9%	350 -54%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 31min

	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh	MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh	SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 89 Wh
Battery Runtime		1%	-5%	4%	-16%
Reader / Idle	323	316 -2%	311 -4%	313 -3%	222 -31%
WiFi v1.3	218	230 6%	210 -4%	251 15%	168 -23%
Load	91	91 0%	84 -8%	90 -1%	97 7%
H.264		228	186	204

Pro

+ Recursos preparados para o futuro (quantidade de RAM, etc.)

+ Unidade ótica ou ventoinha adicional

+ Teclado iluminado com teclas grandes

+ Overclock opcional da GPU

+ Excelente tela UHD

+ Desempenho muito alto

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ SSD NVMe

+ G-Sync

Contra

- Touchpad colocado muito fundo na carcaça

- O design é definitivamente uma questão de gosto.

- Manutenção limitada

- Duração pobre da bateria

- Peso alto

- Carcaça grossa

Acer Predator 17 G9-793, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de.

Desde o nosso teste Skylake, nosso veredicto sobre o Predator visualmente extravagante permanece quase inalterado.

Com o equipamento destacado, a versão Kaby-Lake também ganha pontos com um excelente painel UHD, que está no topo da maioria das disciplinas (como nos ângulos de visão, contraste e espaço de cores).

Além disso, está um desempenho de primeira classe que pode ser aumentado ainda mais através do PredatorSense (overclock da GPU opcional). A proteção para o futuro também é atendida, seja na forma dos 32 GB de RAM, a alta capacidade das unidades (combinação SSD-HD) ou a porta Thunderbolt-3.

Vemos as desvantagens no tamanho e peso. Qualquer pessoa que costuma transportar seu portátil deve comprar um dispositivo mais compacto, que suporte Optimus (dado que tende a ter uma melhor duração de bateria). No entanto, os jogadores que jogam principalmente em um lugar fixo, dificilmente devem ser incomodados por isso.

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ - 05/20/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

70 / 81 → 87%

Peso

46 / 10-66 → 64%

Bateria

73%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

96%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

90 / 95 → 95%

Ruído

70 / 90 → 77%

Audio

80%

Médio

79%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1070, UHD)

Florian Glaser, 2017-06- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ audio analysis

MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison