Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 15

Predador. Seguindo o extremamente bem-sucedido V 15 Nitro, a Acer apresenta sua seguinte plataforma de jogos. Em vez de uma GPU de gama média-alta, um genuíno modelo premium está no Predator 15. Será que o GTX 980M consegue se enfrentar com a concorrência de 15-polegadas?
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV (Predator 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1038 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 354.00, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-RAM (2133 MHz), 2 de 4 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LG LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Disco rígido
Lite-On CV1-8B256, 256 GB 
, M.2-SSD + Western Digital Blue WDC WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, 1000 GB HDD @5400 rpm
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: fones, microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, USB 3.1 Type-C (inc. Thunderbolt 3)
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 39 x 391 x 300
Bateria
Lítio-Ion, 6000 mAh, 8 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1 (Dolby Audio), Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU: 180 watts, ventoinha (FrostCore), guia de configuração, folheto de garantia, material de informação adicional, MS Office 365 trial, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 586 g
Preço
2200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Left: power-in, 2x USB 3.0, microphone, headphone, card reader, FrostCore or optical drive
Left: power-in, 2x USB 3.0, microphone, headphone, card reader, FrostCore or optical drive
Right: USB 3.1 (inc. Thunderbolt 3), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, RJ45-LAN, Kensington lock slot
Right: USB 3.1 (inc. Thunderbolt 3), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, DisplayPort, RJ45-LAN, Kensington lock slot
290
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 310 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 286.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 310 cd/m²
Contraste: 861:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
LG LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5)
SCHENKER XMG U506
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F)
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
Samsung 4NDDJ_156HL (SDC4C48)
SCHENKER XMG P506
Samsung 156HL01-102 (SDC324C)
Gigabyte P55 V4
LG Philips, ID: LGD040E, Name: 156WF4
Display
-3%
-34%
7%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
66
63.8
-3%
40.3
-39%
66.4
1%
64
-3%
sRGB Coverage
85.8
83.4
-3%
60.2
-30%
96
12%
80.6
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.7
61
-3%
41.67
-34%
68.6
9%
58.9
-6%
Response Times
-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31 ?(10, 21)
48.8 ?(15.6, 33.2)
-57%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(7, 18)
28 ?(6.8, 21.2)
-12%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(25)
Screen
-20%
-35%
-11%
1%
Brightness middle
310
298
-4%
180
-42%
310
0%
262.3
-15%
Brightness
287
276
-4%
179
-38%
299
4%
265
-8%
Brightness Distribution
86
85
-1%
83
-3%
84
-2%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.42
-17%
0.19
47%
0.35
3%
0.259
28%
Contrast
861
710
-18%
947
10%
886
3%
1013
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.83
5.26
-37%
6.74
-76%
4.1
-7%
4.29
-12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.53
5
-98%
6.44
-155%
5.7
-125%
2.28
10%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.46 89%
2.29 96%
2.53 87%
2.31 95%
CCT
6934 94%
6965 93%
6465 101%
7454 87%
6350 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
55
-2%
38
-32%
63
13%
53
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
83
-3%
60
-30%
96
12%
80.3
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -16%
-35% / -35%
-2% / -6%
-2% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5240
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19831
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6836
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.27 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
49.14 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
659 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
64.6 fps
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P506
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points +2%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG U506
Intel Core i5-6600K
166 Points +16%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
659 Points
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
721 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG P506
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points +3%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG U506
Intel Core i5-6600K
601 Points -9%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.62 Points
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.54 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P506
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points +4%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.67 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG U506
Intel Core i5-6600K
1.88 Points +16%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.27 Points
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
6.89 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P506
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points +3%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.43 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG U506
Intel Core i5-6600K
6.93 Points -5%
PCMark 7 Score
6021 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4045 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4965 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5069 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
6021 Points
SCHENKER XMG U506
GeForce GTX 980M, 6600K, Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL
7064 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG P506
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6228 Points +3%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
5846 Points -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
GeForce GTX 970M, 5700HQ, Lite-On LMT-128L9M
5737 Points -5%
Lite-On CV1-8B256
Sequential Read: 516 MB/s
Sequential Write: 352.7 MB/s
512K Read: 349.8 MB/s
512K Write: 352.1 MB/s
4K Read: 31.88 MB/s
4K Write: 80.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 274.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 295.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
10977 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
88214 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22733 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8306 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
8306 Points
SCHENKER XMG U506
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
8246 Points -1%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
8107 Points -2%
Gigabyte P55 V4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
6746 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG P506
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
6672 Points -20%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Score (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2279 Points
SCHENKER XMG U506
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
2312 Points +1%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
10977 Points
SCHENKER XMG U506
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
11079 Points +1%
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
10623 Points -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
8699 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG P506
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9627 Points -12%
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
59.1 fps
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
58.1 fps -2%
baixomédiaaltoultra4K
Anno 2205 (2015) 127.3 116.4 63.1 22.7 23.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) 122.7 117.6 76.2 65.7 23.4
Fallout 4 (2015) 137.1 122.4 70.1 56 23.3
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 195.1 167.6 89.4 76.1 28.2
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 76.2 74.2 58.9 24.9 20.5
Assassin's Creed Syndicate
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
58.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
78.4 fps +33%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
57.4 (52min) fps -3%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
48.3 (42min) fps -18%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:4x MSAA + FX (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
24.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
32.3 fps +30%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
24.2 (19min) fps -3%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
18.9 (15min) fps -24%
Star Wars Battlefront
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
89.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
118.6 fps +33%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
88.3 (71min) fps -1%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
70.8 (61min) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
76.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
102.1 fps +34%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
73.1 (61min) fps -4%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
59 (50min) fps -22%
Fallout 4
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
70.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
96.6 fps +38%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
65.3 (53min) fps -7%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
49.4 (38min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
56 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
78 fps +39%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
55 (42min) fps -2%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
43.4 (33min) fps -22%
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3
1920x1080 High / On AA:FX (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
76.2 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
98.7 fps +30%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
74.4 (63min) fps -2%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
59.4 (49min) fps -22%
1920x1080 Extra / On AA:T2x SM (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
65.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
88.3 fps +34%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
66.7 (52min) fps +2%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
53 (43min) fps -19%
Anno 2205
1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
63.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
86.1 fps +36%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
52.2 (43min) fps -17%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
44.2 (34min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:8x (sort by value)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG U716
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700
30.7 fps +35%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
22.7 (19min) fps 0%
Schenker W504
GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
16.8 (14min) fps -26%

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 42 dB
HDD
33 dB
DVD
0 / dB
Carga
47 / 48 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância)
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG U506
GeForce GTX 980M, 6600K
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG P506
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55 V4
GeForce GTX 970M, 5700HQ
Noise
9%
3%
3%
11%
Idle Minimum *
31
31
-0%
33.6
-8%
30.8
1%
28.8
7%
Idle Average *
32
32.4
-1%
33.8
-6%
32.8
-3%
28.9
10%
Idle Maximum *
42
33.8
20%
34
19%
35.9
15%
29
31%
Load Average *
47
37.6
20%
39.3
16%
42.2
10%
39
17%
Load Maximum *
48
44.8
7%
51.4
-7%
51
-6%
52.3
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 44.3 °C49.8 °C45.6 °C 
 35.8 °C46.9 °C44.8 °C 
 25.5 °C36.4 °C35.2 °C 
Máximo: 49.8 °C
Médio: 40.5 °C
59.2 °C52.5 °C48.1 °C
45.8 °C45.7 °C28.9 °C
29.6 °C28 °C28.7 °C
Máximo: 59.2 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  48.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.2 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG U506
GeForce GTX 980M, 6600K
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG P506
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55 V4
GeForce GTX 970M, 5700HQ
Heat
-16%
-4%
-5%
-12%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.8
49.7
-0%
48
4%
49.3
1%
48.2
3%
Maximum Bottom *
59.2
62.1
-5%
57.3
3%
60.4
-2%
50.2
15%
Idle Upper Side *
32.2
36.8
-14%
31.9
1%
31.4
2%
35.6
-11%
Idle Bottom *
26.9
38.7
-44%
33.4
-24%
32.3
-20%
41.2
-53%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 12 / 16 / 22 Watt
Carga midlight 100 / 162 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG U506
GeForce GTX 980M, 6600K
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG P506
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55 V4
GeForce GTX 970M, 5700HQ
Power Consumption
-56%
-2%
11%
Idle Minimum *
12
23.1
-93%
11.4
5%
10.5
12%
Idle Average *
16
27.6
-73%
16.5
-3%
14.6
9%
Idle Maximum *
22
35
-59%
22
-0%
20.7
6%
Load Average *
100
110.2
-10%
94.2
6%
81.8
18%
Load Maximum *
162
237.2
-46%
192.2
-19%
146.3
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 53min
Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG U506
GeForce GTX 980M, 6600K
Alienware 15 R2 (Skylake)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
SCHENKER XMG P506
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55 V4
GeForce GTX 970M, 5700HQ
Battery Runtime
-35%
6%
-33%
-20%
Reader / Idle
670
210
-69%
769
15%
314
-53%
517
-23%
H.264
442
456
3%
Load
113
113
0%
114
1%
98
-13%
95
-16%
WiFi v1.3
446
231

Pro

+ Tela IPS de alto contraste e com cores precisas
+ Agradável superfície do touchpad
+ USB 3.1 inc. Thunderbolt 3
+ Pousa pulsos frio
+ Unidade removível
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Muito boa duração da bateria
+ Ferramentas convenientes

Contra

- Turbo da CPU não utilizado plenamente
- GTX 980M com 4 vs. 8 GB VRAM
- Afogamento em situações extremas
- G-Sync apenas para monitores externos
- A bateria se esgota rapidamente sob uso intenso
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Opções limitadas de manutenção
- Carcaça relativamente pesada
- Design desafortunado
In review: Acer Predator 15. Review sample courtesy of Acer Germany.
In review: Acer Predator 15. Review sample courtesy of Acer Germany.

A Acer faz uma estreia de gama alta relativamente bem-sucedida no sector do portáteis para jogos. Quando desconsideramos o design chamativo e as suscetíveis superfícies de toque suave, a carcaça definitivamente tem lados bons. Além da rigidez, os dispositivos de entrada e as interfaces são atraentes. Nem todos os fabricantes usam uma porta USB 3.1. Por outro lado, o propósito maior do FrostCore pode ser questionado. Os pousa pulsos de alguns portáteis para jogos permanecem frios até mesmo sem uma ventoinha extra.

A tela IPS ganha muitos mais elogios. Comparado com uma tela TN, não apenas os ângulos de visão, mas também as cores, são superiores. Outro argumento para a compra é a exuberante duração da bateria. Quase 7,5 horas de reprodução de vídeo com brilho médio, faz com que a maioria dos portáteis de gama premium pareçam pequenos. As convenientes ferramentas PredatorSense e Care Center também não devem ser esquecidas.

Em total, o aparelho de 15-polegadas não entra no Top 10. Diríamos que o alto peso (3,6 quilogramas) e as pobres opções de manutenção, são os motivos principais. A Acer também poderia melhorar o som, a capacidade da memória de vídeo e o comportamento do Turbo da CPU. No entanto, o visual foi o que mais nos decepcionou. Uma aparência menos chamativa melhoraria a imagem de forma considerável. O atual visual do portátil faz com que pareça mais um alien que um predador.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Acer Predator 15 G9-591-74ZV - 12/05/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
74 / 81 → 91%
Peso
53 / 10-66 → 77%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
78 / 95 → 82%
Ruído
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
75%
Médio
79%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 15
Florian Glaser, 2015-12-16 (Update: 2024-11- 4)