Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 15 G9-593
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T (jseb) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U (sim) | |
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T (jseb) | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U (sim) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355 cd/m²
Contraste: 1183:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T AUO B125HAN03.0 AUO306D, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), , 2560x1440, 12.5" | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ AUO B133HAN04.1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -1% | -29% | 7% | 3% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 64.7 | 66.8 3% | 62.8 -3% | 44.45 -31% | 68.7 6% | 65.6 1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 89.6 | 95.4 6% | 89.4 0% | 65.2 -27% | 95.8 7% | 94.7 6% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.4 | 68 4% | 64.6 -1% | 45.96 -30% | 69.9 7% | 67.5 3% | |
Response Times | -27% | -29% | 1% | 83% | -41% | -49% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 41.2 ? -37% | 43.6 ? -45% | 32 ? -7% | 37 ? -23% | 50 ? -67% | 50.8 ? -69% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 30.4 ? -17% | 29.2 ? -12% | 24 ? 8% | 33.4 ? -28% | 29.6 ? -14% | 33.2 ? -28% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 200 ? 300% | |||||
Screen | 15% | 15% | -3% | 7% | 4% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 355 | 387 9% | 396.2 12% | 289 -19% | 402 13% | 375 6% | 300.5 -15% |
Brightness | 341 | 358 5% | 357 5% | 298 -13% | 382 12% | 358 5% | 305 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 88 1% | 87 0% | 76 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.47 -57% | 0.266 11% | 0.27 10% | 0.45 -50% | 0.39 -30% | 0.184 39% |
Contrast | 1183 | 823 -30% | 1489 26% | 1070 -10% | 893 -25% | 962 -19% | 1633 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.97 | 1.6 73% | 3.9 35% | 4.82 19% | 3.6 40% | 4.6 23% | 2.64 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.55 | 4 62% | 7.58 28% | 10.73 -2% | 7.5 29% | 8.8 17% | 5.06 52% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.45 | 1 84% | 4.16 36% | 3.84 40% | 4.3 33% | 4 38% | 2.8 57% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.1 105% | 2.34 94% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 7694 84% | 6680 97% | 6514 100% | 6492 100% | 6572 99% | 7304 89% | 6999 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 61.6 6% | 57.5 -1% | 42.03 -28% | 62.3 7% | 57.9 0% | 60.9 5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 82.2 -8% | 88.7 0% | 64.8 -27% | 95.7 8% | 88.7 0% | 94.3 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
7% | -5% /
6% | -10% /
-8% | 32% /
21% | -19% /
-3% | -8% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2880 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4326 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ LiteOn CV1-8B512 | HP Spectre 13 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 27% | 74% | 127% | 60% | 2% | 49% | |
Read Seq | 508 | 754 48% | 1214 139% | 1482 192% | 1178 132% | 502 -1% | 1322 160% |
Write Seq | 454.4 | 638 40% | 655 44% | 1232 171% | 305.4 -33% | 418.9 -8% | 305.5 -33% |
Read 512 | 335.5 | 616 84% | 1019 204% | 1191 255% | 638 90% | 341.3 2% | 621 85% |
Write 512 | 413.9 | 678 64% | 445.7 8% | 1220 195% | 305.7 -26% | 389.7 -6% | 306 -26% |
Read 4k | 28.13 | 14.6 -48% | 35.55 26% | 46.96 67% | 38.54 37% | 29.69 6% | 40.09 43% |
Write 4k | 69.8 | 20.5 -71% | 130 86% | 100.7 44% | 153.4 120% | 86.8 24% | 119 70% |
Read 4k QD32 | 245.7 | 464 89% | 537 119% | 464 89% | 614 150% | 301.3 23% | 513 109% |
Write 4k QD32 | 277.6 | 315 13% | 173.8 -37% | 292.1 5% | 302.7 9% | 211.2 -24% | 231.5 -17% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1704 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5989 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
HP Spectre 13 | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T | |
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA |
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
Dirt Rally - 1024x768 Ultra Low Preset | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
Doom - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 51 | 27.2 | 20.7 | |
Thief (2014) | 14 | 8.4 | ||
Dirt Rally (2015) | 119 | 34.5 | 15 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.8 | 9.4 | ||
Doom (2016) | 22.6 |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512 | HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 1% | 1% | 1% | |||
off / environment * | 30.7 | 28.8 6% | 31 -1% | 31.2 -2% | 28.5 7% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 28.8 6% | 31 -1% | 31.2 -2% | 28.5 7% | ||
Idle Average * | 30.7 | 28.8 6% | 31 -1% | 31.2 -2% | 30.9 -1% | ||
Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 30.8 -0% | 31 -0% | 31.5 -2% | 31.6 -2% | ||
Load Average * | 38.7 | 34.8 10% | 35 10% | 35.7 8% | 38.8 -0% | ||
Load Maximum * | 38.9 | 34.8 11% | 40.5 -4% | 35.8 8% | 41.4 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 30.9 dB |
Carga |
| 38.7 / 38.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.32 / 0.46 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.3 / 6.2 / 10.4 Watt |
Carga |
28 / 25.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, , 2560x1440, 12.5" | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, LiteOn CV1-8B512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 29% | -18% | 2% | -28% | -9% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 2.7 18% | 6.4 -94% | 4.3 -30% | 4.4 -33% | 4.1 -24% | 8.6 -161% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 2.7 56% | 6.6 -6% | 6 3% | 5.8 6% | 6.7 -8% | 11 -77% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 7.2 31% | 6.8 35% | 6.4 38% | 8.6 17% | 7.4 29% | 11.3 -9% |
Load Average * | 28 | 22 21% | 27.5 2% | 22.7 19% | 35.2 -26% | 32.4 -16% | 33.8 -21% |
Load Maximum * | 25.7 | 20.5 20% | 32.4 -26% | 31.2 -21% | 52 -102% | 32.4 -26% | 36.2 -41% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | HP Spectre 13 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 60% | 26% | 1% | 7% | 12% | -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 844 | 1053 25% | 526 -38% | 817 -3% | 1028 22% | 715 -15% | |
H.264 | 383 | 512 34% | 413 8% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 397 | 501 26% | 516 30% | 355 -11% | 498 25% | 472 19% | 338 -15% |
Load | 105 | 231 120% | 129 23% | 152 45% | 105 0% | 99 -6% | 78 -26% |
Pro
Contra
O ZenBook 3 UX390UA-GS041T pode facilmente garantir um lugar entre os subportáteis top – mas na parte inferior do ranking. O Apple MacBook 12 (Início de 2016), o Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7, e o HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA conseguem melhores taxas em geral, mas eles não são a melhor opção para qualquer usuário.
Além da elegância e da bastante boa estabilidade, a grande vantagem do ZenBook 3 UX390UA é o desempenho estável. O MacBook 12 e EliteBook Folio G1 com Core m fica para trás: Se estiver procurando desempenho da CPU, tanto o ZenBook 3 UX390UA quanto o XPS 13 9360 estão no topo. No entanto, a Asus teve que incluir uma ventoinha que é bastante barulhenta sob carga, mas não chega a ser inconveniente.
Todos os aparelhos de comparação são bastante similares, em termos de tela – se você ignora as diferentes resoluções dos painéis, onde o MacBook 12 (2304x1440) e o XPS 13 (3200x1800) coloca os números mais altos.
O nosso modelo de teste não pode receber a coroa nos testes de duração, porque ele simplesmente não pode alojar uma bateria tão grande quanto a do XPS 13 (60 Wh) com um peso total de apenas 914 gramas (40 Wh). O ZenBook dura 6:30 horas; o XPS dura 8:40 horas. No entanto, o último também sobe a balança em 1,3 kg e compensação. Um MacBook 12 também consegue esses tempos de duração.
O nosso ZenBook 3 UX390UA-GS041T no Royal blue se vende por 1.500 Euros (~$1595). Não é uma barganha, de jeito nenhum, mas um MacBook 12 com SSD de 512 GB custa 1.600 Euros (~$1702) e o XPS 13 9360 custa 1.850 Euros (~$1967) com esta capacidade de armazenamento. No entanto, o XPS 13 também inclui portas de tamanho completo e suporte para Thunderbolt 3, mas ele tem uma espessura de 15 mm e um sistema nao muito portável de 12,5-polegadas.
A luta pelo chassi mais fino é ganha pelo HP Spectre 13 com 10,4 milímetros, mas o chip Core i sofre de sua má utilização do Turbo (afogamento inclusive com uso leve).
Em resumo, achamos que o ZenBook 3 UX390UA é a melhor solução para todos os usuários que desejam tanto desempenho quanto seja possível em uma máquina pequena. O desempenho (de fato mensurável) em combinação com um chassi tão fino é o primeiro entre os mini-subportáteis.
Se você define "desempenho" como uma combinação de duração da bateria, ergonomia (sem ventoinha) e desempenho de aplicativos, certamente estará contente com o HP EliteBook Folio G1 ou também com o Apple MacBook 12 (Início de 2016).
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
-
12/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch