Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Nitro 5 (Core i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 238 cd/m²
Contraste: 881:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.76
ΔE Greyscale 1.78 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.23% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 1920x1080 | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 5587 LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H BOE NV156FHM-N61, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AU Optronics B156HAN06.0 (AUO60ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 56% | 0% | 61% | 61% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.97 | 63.8 68% | 38.13 0% | 65.9 74% | 63.4 67% |
sRGB Coverage | 57 | 82.4 45% | 56.8 0% | 85.5 50% | 87.4 53% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.23 | 60.3 54% | 39.47 1% | 62.5 59% | 64 63% |
Response Times | 0% | 16% | -26% | -19% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 38.4 ? 9% | 33 ? 21% | 43.2 ? -3% | 48.4 ? -15% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 29.2 ? -9% | 24 ? 10% | 40 ? -49% | 32.8 ? -22% |
PWM Frequency | 20490 ? | 21740 ? | |||
Screen | -6% | -38% | -18% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 238 | 270 13% | 229 -4% | 286.5 20% | 299 26% |
Brightness | 226 | 269 19% | 224 -1% | 269 19% | 284 26% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 86 4% | 87 5% | 84 1% | 88 6% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.32 -19% | 0.28 -4% | 0.33 -22% | 0.24 11% |
Contrast | 881 | 844 -4% | 818 -7% | 868 -1% | 1246 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.11 | 5.1 -24% | 6.1 -48% | 6.3 -53% | 4.98 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.89 | 9.25 -34% | 12.2 -77% | 10.01 -45% | 7.67 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.76 | 3.25 14% | 6.12 -63% | 4.17 -11% | 3.7 2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.78 | 4.16 -134% | 5.68 -219% | 5.6 -215% | 4.58 -157% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.53 87% | 2.4 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.55 86% |
CCT | 6311 103% | 6860 95% | 6989 93% | 6822 95% | 6397 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 54 50% | 36 0% | 55.7 55% | 57 58% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 82 44% | 57 0% | 85.1 49% | 87 53% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
6% | -7% /
-24% | 6% /
-5% | 15% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell G5 15 5587 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 SK Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -7% | -70% | -48% | -73% | |
Seq Read | 1572 | 1653 5% | 511 -67% | 736 -53% | 470.8 -70% |
Seq Write | 1374 | 1262 -8% | 243.7 -82% | 156.1 -89% | 126.8 -91% |
4K Read | 45.59 | 44.29 -3% | 24.44 -46% | 94.2 107% | 23.64 -48% |
4K Write | 115.1 | 100.9 -12% | 62.2 -46% | 45.63 -60% | 54.5 -53% |
Score Read | 1240 | 1565 26% | 240 -81% | 290 -77% | 274 -78% |
Score Write | 1550 | 762 -51% | 199 -87% | 239 -85% | 194 -87% |
Score Total | 3423 | 3113 -9% | 557 -84% | 692 -80% | 600 -82% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11828 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8073 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=126, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 61.1 | 35.4 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 48 | 44 | ||
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 57 | 53 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30 / 31 / 33 dB |
Carga |
| 46 / 49 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 30.3 -1% | 28.9 4% | 29 3% | 24 ? 20% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 29 3% | 31.1 -4% | 32.2 -7% | 29 3% | 25.4 ? 15% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 32 -3% | 31.1 -0% | 32.5 -5% | 31 -0% | 27.1 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 33 | 35 -6% | 34.2 -4% | 32.7 1% | 32 3% | 30.1 ? 9% |
Load Average * | 46 | 45 2% | 34.9 24% | 33.2 28% | 36 22% | 42.4 ? 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 47 -2% | 42.7 7% | 43.1 6% | 44 4% | |
Load Maximum * | 49 | 56 -14% | 44 10% | 45 8% | 46 6% | 53.4 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -14% | 11% | -6% | -14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 43 9% | 50.2 -7% | 30 36% | 47 -0% | 46.2 ? 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 55 -10% | 57 -14% | 40.8 18% | 44 12% | 49.2 ? 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 28 -17% | 28.6 -19% | 23.4 2% | 30 -25% | 31.1 ? -30% |
Idle Bottom * | 25 | 30 -20% | 28.9 -16% | 27.8 -11% | 28 -12% | 32.2 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 5 / 7 / 11 Watt |
Carga |
89 / 132 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -61% | -6% | -29% | -24% | -119% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 10 -100% | 4.9 2% | 8 -60% | 7 -40% | 13.5 ? -170% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 13 -86% | 8.5 -21% | 11.8 -69% | 10 -43% | 19 ? -171% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 21 -91% | 9.1 17% | 13.1 -19% | 18 -64% | 26.7 ? -143% |
Load Average * | 89 | 101 -13% | 90.7 -2% | 90.2 -1% | 79 11% | 106.7 ? -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 126 -40% | 110 -22% | 107.8 -20% | 98 -9% | |
Load Maximum * | 132 | 176 -33% | 144 -9% | 136.2 -3% | 128 3% | 251 ? -90% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, 57 Wh | Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, 56 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, 57 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, 48 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -28% | -0% | -37% | -30% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 1044 | 503 -52% | 705 -32% | 577 -45% | 565 ? -46% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 486 | 270 -44% | 391 -20% | 315 -35% | 340 -30% | 375 ? -23% |
Load | 88 | 98 11% | 133 51% | 60 -32% | 85.3 ? -3% | |
H.264 | 325 | 408 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Aspire Nitro 5 é um pacote balanceado a um preço justo. A combinação de uma CPU Coffee Lake com uma GPU Turing roda quase todos os aplicativos, a menos que você exagere com resoluções QHD ou UHD e configurações gráficas extremamente altas. Também gostamos da inclusão de um rápido SSD PCIe.
De longe o maior destaque do Nitro 5 é, no entanto, a duração da bateria. O dispositivo é perfeito para quem quer jogar durante viagens. Da mesma forma, é ainda melhor para aqueles que querem fazer tarefas mais gerais, como responder a e-mails e navegar pela web sem estarem presos a uma tomada elétrica.
O Acer Aspire Nitro 5 tem uma excelente relação qualidade-preço, apesar de sofrer alguns compromissos e fraquezas.
O design mais compacto e a qualidade dos dispositivos de entrada também são decentes para o valor. No entanto, a Acer precisaria melhorar uma infinidade de coisas para que o Nitro 5 obtenha uma pontuação geral mais alta. Em primeiro lugar, os alto-falantes não são os melhores e nem a tela. Além disso, a seleção de portas é bastante escassa e desatualizada; esperávamos ver pelo menos uma porta Thunderbolt 3 e um leitor de cartões em 2019.
No entanto, não deixe que essas fraquezas o desapontem. O Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 é um excelente portátil para jogos pelo valor. Você terá dificuldades para encontrar algo mais poderoso ou oferecer um pacote global melhor por cerca de 1.100 Euros (~$1.236).
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
-
05/11/2019 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser