Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Acer Nitro 5 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (Nitro 5 AN515 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1734 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit bus, ForceWare 385.41, Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, two RAM slots (both occupied)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB
, + WDC WD10SPZX (1 TB, 5400 rpm), 1140 GB livre
peso
2.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 563 g
Preço
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 276 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 264.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.76
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX502VM-AS73 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer X6603 AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -7% | -13% | -9% | -12% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.7 | 38.59 -7% | 38.88 -7% | 36.42 -13% | 38.28 -8% | 36.82 -12% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.2 | 58 -7% | 58.2 -6% | 54.9 -12% | 56.9 -9% | 54.9 -12% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.17 | 39.87 -8% | 40.2 -7% | 37.62 -13% | 39.47 -9% | 38.09 -12% | |
| Response Times | -24% | 16% | -34% | -66% | 9% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35 ? | 42 ? -20% | 22 ? 37% | 36 ? -3% | 58.8 ? -68% | 28.4 ? 19% | 46 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 28 ? -27% | 23 ? -5% | 36 ? -64% | 36 ? -64% | 22.4 ? -2% | 29 ? -32% |
| PWM Frequency | 21550 ? | 2174 ? | |||||
| Screen | 7% | -3% | -54% | -29% | -33% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 230 -17% | 281 2% | 246 -11% | 239 -13% | 209.5 -24% | 252 -9% |
| Brightness | 265 | 228 -14% | 257 -3% | 235 -11% | 244 -8% | 205 -23% | 246 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 85 -7% | 75 -18% | 88 -3% | 92 1% | 94 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.21 16% | 0.32 -28% | 0.55 -120% | 0.35 -40% | 0.69 -176% | 0.23 8% |
| Contrast | 1104 | 1095 -1% | 878 -20% | 447 -60% | 683 -38% | 304 -72% | 1096 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.06 | 4.01 21% | 5.16 -2% | 10.97 -117% | 7.3 -44% | 4.7 7% | 7.83 -55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.13 | 7.26 28% | 9.09 10% | 24.7 -144% | 19.7 -94% | 15.5 -53% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.25 | 3.18 49% | 4.57 27% | 14.25 -128% | 4.9 22% | 1.8 71% | 7.11 -14% |
| Gamma | 1.76 125% | 2.52 87% | 2.59 85% | 1.83 120% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6873 95% | 6814 95% | 6931 94% | 11200 58% | 7332 89% | 6975 93% | 7930 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 37 -7% | 37 -7% | 35 -12% | 35 -12% | 36.2 -9% | 35 -12% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 58 -6% | 58 -6% | 55 -11% | 55 -11% | 56.6 -9% | 55 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-0% | 2% /
-1% | -34% /
-42% | -48% /
-35% | -11% /
-22% | -20% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit - CoolBoost switched off (lower curve), CoolBoost switched on (upper curve)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | JetStream 1.1
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (Edge 38.14393.1066.0) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (EDGE 38.1439.3.00) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (Edge 40) | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6346 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4177 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5291 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5096 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4474 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Sequential Read:
945 MB/s
Sequential Write:
559 MB/s
512K Read:
639 MB/s
512K Write:
561 MB/s
4K Read:
24.24 MB/s
4K Write:
122.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
288.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
504 MB/s
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX502VM-AS73 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Medion Erazer X6603 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 75% | -95% | -30% | 64% | -40% | 63% | |
| Read Seq | 945 | 1657 75% | 101.5 -89% | 485.8 -49% | 2170 130% | 503 -47% | 2170 130% |
| Write Seq | 559 | 1208 116% | 100.6 -82% | 422.8 -24% | 1202 115% | 138.2 -75% | 1100 97% |
| Read 512 | 639 | 806 26% | 28.33 -96% | 338.9 -47% | 786 23% | 343.5 -46% | 788 23% |
| Write 512 | 561 | 807 44% | 28.31 -95% | 304 -46% | 822 47% | 137.8 -75% | 831 48% |
| Read 4k | 24.24 | 62.6 158% | 0.327 -99% | 27.11 12% | 58.9 143% | 29.36 21% | 59 143% |
| Write 4k | 122.7 | 176.9 44% | 0.846 -99% | 85.4 -30% | 146.4 19% | 70.9 -42% | 147.2 20% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 288.5 | 650 125% | 0.718 -100% | 279.6 -3% | 457.7 59% | 369.9 28% | 464 61% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 504 | 557 11% | 0.893 -100% | 255.1 -49% | 392.9 -22% | 99.7 -80% | 398.7 -21% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27190 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9084 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 124922 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22182 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6730 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3554 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2446 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
The Witcher 3 ultra
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 423.3 | 304.5 | 196.3 | 89 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 260.7 | 206.7 | 185.8 | 74.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 141.1 | 86.3 | 47.4 | 24.2 |
| Prey (2017) | 142.5 | 102.6 | 82.8 | 66.8 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 247.6 | 178.5 | 111.3 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 249.9 | 114.5 | 59.6 | 36.1 |
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 126 | 58.8 | 51.5 | 35.9 |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 178 | 91 | 71 | 44 |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 94.9 | 31.3 | 22.7 | 14.6 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 45.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 3% | -2% | 3% | -3% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.6 | 30 2% | 30.4 1% | 30.3 1% | 27.7 9% | 28.7 6% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 32 -5% | 31.4 -3% | 30.9 -1% | 30.5 -0% | 30.6 -0% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 30.7 | 34 -11% | 31.4 -2% | 30.9 -1% | 30.5 1% | 30.6 -0% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 36 -17% | 31.4 -2% | 31 -1% | 30.6 -0% | 31 -1% | 31.6 -3% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 48 -12% | 36.8 14% | 46.5 -8% | 40 7% | 46.2 -7% | 38.5 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.7 | 49 -23% | 40 -1% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 45.8 | 51 -11% | 41.3 10% | 46.8 -2% | 42.6 7% | 52.3 -14% | 40.8 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -20% | -9% | 6% | -15% | -23% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.1 | 52.4 -27% | 47 -14% | 43.4 -6% | 46.8 -14% | 53.2 -29% | 44.3 -8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 38.8 | 54.2 -40% | 47 -21% | 37.7 3% | 55.8 -44% | 56.8 -46% | 39.5 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.7 | 30.5 -6% | 28.4 1% | 24.3 15% | 27.6 4% | 28.8 -0% | 24.8 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.9 | 28.2 -5% | 27.1 -1% | 23.6 12% | 28.4 -6% | 31.4 -17% | 24.6 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 6.9 / 9.5 Watt |
| Carga |
83 / 126 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -32% | -32% | 2% | -21% | -97% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 6 -46% | 7 -71% | 4.4 -7% | 8.5 -107% | 14.9 -263% | 4.7 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 11 -59% | 10.2 -48% | 6.8 1% | 9.1 -32% | 15.1 -119% | 7.6 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 18 -89% | 14 -47% | 8.3 13% | 9.7 -2% | 15.2 -60% | 9.2 3% |
| Load Average * | 83 | 81 2% | 78 6% | 81 2% | 79.9 4% | 105.8 -27% | 81 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 108 | 90 17% | 97.7 10% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 126 | 146 -16% | 127 -1% | 127 -1% | 121.5 4% | 148.8 -18% | 112 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | -20% | 41% | -37% | -29% | -38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 893 | 765 -14% | 322 -64% | 1174 31% | 509 -43% | 363 -59% | 340 -62% |
| H.264 | 309 | 196 -37% | 455 47% | 227 -27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 400 | 428 7% | 302 -24% | 622 56% | 240 -40% | 277 -31% | 257 -36% |
| Load | 63 | 97 54% | 81 29% | 81 29% | 46 -27% | 64 2% | 46 -27% |
Pro
+ Tela de alto contraste
+ Resolução Full HD
+ SSD NVMe veloz
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Wi-Fi AC
+ USB Type-C
+ Escotilhas de manutenção
Contra
- Tela escura
"Portátil poderoso para jogos casuais" - é assim que a Acer descreve o Nitro 5 - uma descrição muito adequada. O processador Core i7 oferece poder de processamento suficiente para todas as áreas importantes de uso. Combinado com o núcleo de gráficos GeForce GTX1050 Ti, o aparelho pode exibir todos os jogos atuais sem problemas na tela Full HD mate. Mas você terá que renunciar às configurações de alta qualidade - a GPU não está feita para isso.
O Nitro 5 é um bom poli funcional com foco em jogos de computador.
Mas o aparelho também faz um bom trabalho em áreas de uso geral (escritório, internet). Dificilmente faz ruído sob baixa carga baixa e modo inativo, e dificilmente esquenta, mesmo sob uso intenso. Além disso, o dispositivo possui um teclado retro iluminado que é adequado para a digitação regular e bons tempos de duração da bateria. O SSD rápido garante um sistema rápido que pode depender do armazenamento fornecido por um disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas.
A tela IPS mate tem ângulos de visão estáveis e bom contraste. No entanto, o brilho poderia ser melhor. Também acreditamos que o fabricante poderia ter feito melhor na área de conectividade. Por um preço de $1.080, deveria incluir uma porta Thunderbolt 3 e DisplayPort. O ruído alto da ventoinha de resfriamento sob uso intenso também poderia ser melhorado.
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
- 08/07/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
