Breve Análise do Portátil Acer ConceptD 7: CPU Intel topo de linha com comportamento de limitação
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N (ConceptD 7 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, GDDR6, 25.21.14.1972 (Geforce 419.72), Intel UHD Graphics 630
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2666
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, 512 GB
, 480 GB livre
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 593 g
Preço
2069 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.7 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.4 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| MSI GL65 9SEK | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| MSI GL65 9SEK | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø571 (477-621)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø571 (351-662)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO31EB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 388 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 356.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 370 cd/m²
Contraste: 1327:1 (Preto: 0.275 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 1.29 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL65 9SEK AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | -55% | -50% | -26% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 85.7 | 64.5 -25% | 36.63 -57% | 40.13 -53% | 61.1 -29% | 65.3 -24% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 91.6 -8% | 55 -45% | 60.3 -40% | 89.4 -11% | 91.8 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99 | 65.9 -33% | 37.85 -62% | 41.48 -58% | 62.5 -37% | 66.5 -33% |
| Response Times | 75% | 23% | 31% | 79% | 70% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49 ? | 8.8 ? 82% | 26.4 ? 46% | 26 ? 47% | 6.8 ? 86% | 13.6 ? 72% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 10 ? 67% | 30 ? -0% | 25.6 ? 15% | 8.8 ? 71% | 10 ? 67% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
| Screen | -78% | -181% | -195% | -51% | -102% | |
| Brightness middle | 365 | 284 -22% | 277.3 -24% | 290.1 -21% | 300.4 -18% | 312.7 -14% |
| Brightness | 357 | 277 -22% | 256 -28% | 274 -23% | 289 -19% | 305 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 86 2% | 86 2% | 93 11% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.275 | 0.3 -9% | 0.2 27% | 0.54 -96% | 0.32 -16% | 0.27 2% |
| Contrast | 1327 | 947 -29% | 1387 5% | 537 -60% | 939 -29% | 1158 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.99 | 3.53 -257% | 5.25 -430% | 5.16 -421% | 2.32 -134% | 4.57 -362% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.89 | 6.11 -223% | 19.43 -928% | 18.09 -857% | 3.81 -102% | 6.81 -260% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 1.81 -79% | 4.39 -335% | 4.35 -331% | 2.95 -192% | 2.91 -188% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.29 | 3.56 -176% | 3.5 -171% | 4.4 -241% | 1.5 -16% | 4.3 -233% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.47 89% | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6548 99% | 7257 90% | 6895 94% | 7362 88% | 6764 96% | 7098 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 59 -33% | 35 -60% | 38.1 -57% | 57.4 -35% | 59.4 -32% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 91 -9% | 55 -45% | 60 -40% | 89 -11% | 91.3 -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-48% | -71% /
-132% | -71% /
-140% | 1% /
-30% | -18% /
-65% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø957 (950.3-1045.94)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø831 (291.42-964.09)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (9069 - 9346, n=3) | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (37188 - 44238, n=3) | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3533 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4450 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5449 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI GL65 9SEK WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | -12% | -21% | -6% | -6% | -12% | |
| Write 4K | 109 | 131.7 21% | 150.2 38% | 121.9 12% | 124.1 14% | 135 24% | 110 ? 1% |
| Read 4K | 41.33 | 48.06 16% | 43.46 5% | 53.6 30% | 44.75 8% | 41.1 -1% | 36.9 ? -11% |
| Write Seq | 2535 | 1234 -51% | 1412 -44% | 967 -62% | 1292 -49% | 1427 -44% | 1976 ? -22% |
| Read Seq | 1538 | 973 -37% | 1340 -13% | 1461 -5% | 1272 -17% | 1494 -3% | 1710 ? 11% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 396.6 | 576 45% | 482.2 22% | 431.4 9% | 514 30% | 494.9 25% | 339 ? -15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 603 | 655 9% | 535 -11% | 337.3 -44% | 596 -1% | 578 -4% | 417 ? -31% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2542 | 3012 18% | 1454 -43% | 972 -62% | 1892 -26% | 1417 -44% | 2218 ? -13% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3324 | 3481 5% | 1744 -48% | 1727 -48% | 3209 -3% | 3251 -2% | 2940 ? -12% |
| AS SSD | 19% | -31% | -24% | 2% | -23% | -12% | |
| Seq Read | 2785 | 1954 -30% | 1315 -53% | 1280 -54% | 1810 -35% | 1829 -34% | 2544 ? -9% |
| Seq Write | 2364 | 2484 5% | 1378 -42% | 905 -62% | 1797 -24% | 1315 -44% | 2034 ? -14% |
| 4K Read | 43.39 | 56.7 31% | 25.31 -42% | 48.73 12% | 48.43 12% | 51.3 18% | 36.5 ? -16% |
| 4K Write | 101.8 | 124.3 22% | 118.2 16% | 107 5% | 106 4% | 106 4% | 110.8 ? 9% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1257 | 1599 27% | 839 -33% | 321.1 -74% | 1156 -8% | 917 -27% | 1112 ? -12% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1473 | 1883 28% | 720 -51% | 761 -48% | 1748 19% | 1212 -18% | 1222 ? -17% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.039 47% | 0.116 -59% | 0.058 21% | 0.057 22% | 0.063 14% | 0.0965 ? -32% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.03 17% | 0.091 -153% | 0.046 -28% | 0.035 3% | 0.104 -189% | 0.04213 ? -17% |
| Score Read | 1579 | 1851 17% | 996 -37% | 498 -68% | 1385 -12% | 1152 -27% | 1403 ? -11% |
| Score Write | 1811 | 2256 25% | 976 -46% | 958 -47% | 2033 12% | 1450 -20% | 1536 ? -15% |
| Score Total | 4181 | 5087 22% | 2485 -41% | 1711 -59% | 4135 -1% | 3177 -24% | 3633 ? -13% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1592 | 1279 -20% | 1519 -5% | 1984 25% | 1539 -3% | 1506 ? -5% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 433.7 | 889 105% | 749 73% | 588 36% | 513 18% | 410 ? -5% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1026 | 1218 19% | 943 -8% | 835 -19% | 1150 12% | 894 ? -13% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
12% | -22% /
-24% | -23% /
-23% | -2% /
-0% | -15% /
-17% | -12% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Sequential Read:
1583 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2390 MB/s
512K Read:
1245 MB/s
512K Write:
1178 MB/s
4K Read:
35.43 MB/s
4K Write:
93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
398.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
257.7 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16394 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25480 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13724 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (124 - 160, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile () | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (83.9 - 88, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile () | |
| Doom | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile () | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (125 - 159, n=2) | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (117 - 151, n=2) | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50 - 55.7, n=2) | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø55.5 (48-63)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 251 | 182 | 107 | 57 | 38 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 144 | 131 | 123 | 117 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 202 | 160 | 107 | 88 | 39 |
| Doom (2016) | 138 | 134 | 125 | 117 | 50 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 89.4 | 83.4 | 67.2 |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -10% | -5% | 0% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 30 1% | 28.1 8% | 28.2 7% | 28.2 7% | 28.5 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 30 2% | 31.4 -3% | 28.8 6% | 28.2 8% | 30.3 1% |
| Idle Average * | 30.6 | 32 -5% | 31.5 -3% | 31.4 -3% | 28.2 8% | 30.5 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 34 -11% | 33.5 -9% | 33.3 -9% | 28.2 8% | 30.5 -0% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 44 -0% | 49.3 -12% | 46.2 -5% | 43 2% | 41 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.9 | 48 -9% | 51.3 -17% | 50.5 -15% | 48.4 -10% | 48 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 52 -18% | 58 -31% | 51.3 -16% | 53.4 -21% | 51.9 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 44 / 44.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.2 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.2 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -24% | -24% | -5% | 2% | -23% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.6 | 47 -5% | 49 -10% | 43.4 3% | 40.6 9% | 52 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 57.2 | 60 -5% | 54.2 5% | 49.2 14% | 45.4 21% | 52.2 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.4 | 37 -35% | 40.4 -47% | 30.8 -12% | 30 -9% | 38 -39% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 41 -49% | 40 -45% | 34 -23% | 31 -12% | 40.4 -46% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.03 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.6 / 13.6 / 18.2 Watt |
| Carga |
102 / 183 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -141% | -27% | -42% | -61% | -36% | -23% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.6 | 41 -439% | 10.9 -43% | 16 -111% | 18.7 -146% | 15 -97% | 11.5 ? -51% | 6.54 ? 14% |
| Idle Average * | 13.6 | 45.3 -233% | 14.7 -8% | 21.7 -60% | 30.7 -126% | 20 -47% | 16.5 ? -21% | 11.3 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18.2 | 47.1 -159% | 32.4 -78% | 26.1 -43% | 33.9 -86% | 33 -81% | 23.7 ? -30% | 13.3 ? 27% |
| Load Average * | 102 | 94.9 7% | 121.9 -20% | 105.6 -4% | 93.4 8% | 88 14% | 107.5 ? -5% | 70.7 ? 31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 144 | 149.4 -4% | 143.5 -0% | 161.8 -12% | 158.9 -10% | 128 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 183 | 214.2 -17% | 209.6 -15% | 225.3 -23% | 195.3 -7% | 213 -16% | 199.7 ? -9% | 116.1 ? 37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 84 Wh | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57 Wh | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -54% | -55% | -78% | -47% | -36% | 46% | |
| Reader / Idle | 822 | 262 -68% | 233 -72% | 1168 ? 42% | |||
| H.264 | 388 | 847 ? 118% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 230 -56% | 192 -63% | 112 -78% | 272 -47% | 330 -36% | 640 ? 24% |
| Load | 96 | 60 -37% | 67 -30% | 97.1 ? 1% |
Pro
+ Design luxuoso
+ Chassi de alumínio
+ Relativamente pequeno e muito leve
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Luz de fundo visualmente agradável
+ Tela brilhante com alta relação de contraste
+ Boa cobertura de espaço de cores
+ Bom SSD
+ Relativamente silencioso, frio e frugal
+ Bateria grande, boas durações
Contra
- Sem leitor de cartões
- Portas apertadas
- Botões do touchpad barulhentos
- Tela com tempos lentos de resposta
- A CPU se afoga significantemente
- Grande déficit de desempenho no modo bateria
- Desempenho decepcionante do sistema
Veredicto - Excelente tela, baixo desempenho
O ConceptD da Acer é anunciado como um sistema multimídia de alto desempenho para criadores. Os resultados de nossa análise apenas confirmam parcialmente essa afirmação, dado que a Acer faz alguns recortes. Por mais de 2.000 Euros (~US$ 2.204), os compradores menos sensíveis ao preço recebem um portátil multimídia elegante com aparência premium que, considerando seus fortes recursos, é bastante compacto e leve. Além disso, ele permanece frio, silencioso e o consumo de energia também é mais do que razoável.
No entanto, o último deriva de componentes com desempenho bastante ruim. A CPU, em particular, se limita bastante, o desenvolvimento de calor reduz ainda mais o desempenho devido ao chassi pequeno e no modo de bateria, e o poder da computação sofre outro grande golpe.
Aqueles que escolhem seu sistema multimídia puramente com base nas proezas do hardware são melhor atendidos por concorrentes menos dispendiosos. Com sua tela 4K brilhante, que oferece uma boa taxa de contraste e uma cobertura muito boa do espaço de cores, o ConceptD ainda tem um ás na manga, já que a maioria dos outros portáteis multimídia não pode competir nesse sentido. Aqui, precisam ser feitas compensações.
O ConceptD7 é elegante, silencioso, frio, econômico e oferece uma aparência e um toque premium. A tela 4K, que oferece alta cobertura do espaço de cores, pode ser um fator decisivo na decisão de compra de criadores. No entanto, o desempenho do Acer é decepcionante com a forte limitação da CPU, levando a um sistema significativamente mais lento em comparação com os concorrentes.
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
- 05/21/2020 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
