Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire VX5-591G (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050 Ti)

Name: Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Brand: Acer

Diversão limitada. Na verdade, o novo portátil multimídia da Acer projetado para jogos é convincente na maioria dos aspectos - só que o disco rígido convencional não combina com a tecnologia de alto desempenho e realmente retardou as coisas no teste. Recomendamos optar por outra versão ou atualizá-lo com um SSD.

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebook.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-78HD (Aspire VX5 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1620 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 376.54, Nvidia Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4, 2400 MHz, single-channel, 1 de 2 bancos de memória livre

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175

Disco rígido

Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm

Placa de Som

Intel A171

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de entrada/saída de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29 x 389 x 266

Bateria

52.5 Wh, 4605 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 0.9 MP

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 494 g

Preço

1200 EUR

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington, power, USB 2.0, SD card, audio in/out

Right: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	57.3 MB/s +147%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15	23.2 MB/s
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE	22.7 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	19.1 MB/s -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	202.8 MB/s +635%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15	27.6 MB/s
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE	27.2 MB/s -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	27 MB/s -2%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	653 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	641 MBit/s -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	618 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	674 MBit/s +26%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	541 MBit/s +2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	533 MBit/s


249 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	244 cd/m²
251 cd/m²	281 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
240 cd/m²	267 cd/m²	255 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 281 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 256.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 878:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.59

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		57%	74%	47%
Display P3 Coverage	38.88	65.8 69%	68.9 77%	61.5 58%
sRGB Coverage	58.2	85.1 46%	98.9 70%	80.4 38%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.2	62.2 55%	70.9 76%	58.8 46%
Response Times		-67%	-137%	-48%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	22 ?(10, 12)	41 ?(21, 20) -86%	54 ?(33.2, 20) -145%	40 ?(20, 20) -82%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(13, 10)	34 ?(21, 13) -48%	52.4 ?(33.2, 19.2) -128%	26 ?(6, 20) -13%
PWM Frequency
Screen		16%	27%	7%
Brightness middle	281	322 15%	400 42%	326 16%
Brightness	257	297 16%	392 53%	316 23%
Brightness Distribution	85	86 1%	89 5%	80 -6%
Black Level *	0.32	0.31 3%	0.26 19%	0.35 -9%
Contrast	878	1039 18%	1538 75%	931 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.16	4.73 8%	4.9 5%	5.49 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.09	12.37 -36%	11 -21%	11.36 -25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.57	2.99 35%	7.2 -58%	4.84 -6%
Gamma	2.59 ^85%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6931 ^94%	6905 ^94%	6911 ^94%	5971 ^109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	56 51%	64.2 74%	53 43%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	85 47%	98.9 71%	80 38%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		2% / 13%	-12% / 14%	2% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points +1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	151 Points
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	146 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	719 Points
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Intel Core i7-7700HQ	673 (660^min - 673^max) Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	508 Points -29%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	326 Points -55%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

151 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

719 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points +3%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3565 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3370 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points +10%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4442 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4341 Points -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3565 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4442 pontos
Ajuda

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	1647%	8078%
Read Seq	101.5	120.9 19%	123 21%	459.3 353%
Write Seq	100.6	101.8 1%	74.2 -26%	325.5 224%
Read 512	28.33	37.83 34%	101.7 259%	279.2 886%
Write 512	28.31	84.4 198%	42.51 50%	280.1 889%
Read 4k	0.327	0.473 45%	10.84 3215%	22.43 6759%
Write 4k	0.846	0.313 -63%	1.021 21%	74.9 8753%
Read 4k QD32	0.718	1.133 58%	69.8 9621%	149 20652%
Write 4k QD32	0.893	0.274 -69%	1.057 18%	234 26104%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 25.7 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 110.2 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 75.3 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 27.8 ms

Índice de Explosão: 103.6 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 1.8 %

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14942 Points +53%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	9768 Points
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8201 Points -16%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4826 Points -51%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	66973 Points +44%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46362 Points
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	39864 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	25986 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	11494 Points +48%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7791 Points
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	6393 Points -18%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4133 Points -47%

3DMark 11 Performance		8674 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20791 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6774 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	38.3 fps +52%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	25.2 (19^min) fps
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	24.9 fps -1%

	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)		45.8	25.2
The Division (2016)	0	42.6	34.9
For Honor (2017)	44.8	40.9	21.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)		40.9	21.2

Barulho

Ocioso		31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB
HDD		31.8 dB
Carga		36.8 / 41.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.6 °C	47 °C	41 °C
36.2 °C	46.3 °C	37.2 °C
22.4 °C	26.6 °C	29.3 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 36 °C


47 °C	41 °C	44 °C
29.2 °C	37 °C	31 °C
27.7 °C	25.5 °C	23.2 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 34 °C

alimentação elétrica 45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.31 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	7 / 10.2 / 14 Watt
Carga	78 / 127 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-9%	8%	23%
Idle Minimum *	7	7.2 -3%	6.6 6%	5 29%
Idle Average *	10.2	10.5 -3%	9 12%	8.9 13%
Idle Maximum *	14	16 -14%	10.7 24%	11.8 16%
Load Average *	78	82 -5%	77.5 1%	55 29%
Load Maximum *	127	155 -22%	130 -2%	93 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *		124

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 21min

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		51%	30%	71%
Reader / Idle	322	501 56%	565 75%	816 153%
WiFi v1.3	302	357 18%	334 11%	430 42%
Load	81	144 78%	84 4%	95 17%
H.264				428

Pro

+ Inúmeras versões

+ Carcaça sólida

+ Velocidades Wi-Fi boas a muito boas

+ Tele boa, no geral

+ CPU 8-thread veloz

+ Silencioso no modo inativo e em uso intenso

Contra

- Relativamente grande e pesado

- Lento leitor de cartões

- Sem escotilha de manutenção

- A bateria não pode ser removida desde o exterior

- Cobertura limitada do espaço de cores

- Sem SSD, sem SSD, sem SSD

In review: Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4. Test model courtesy of Notebook.de

Não espetacular, mas robusto - a Acer fez um bom trabalho com o seu novo VX5-591G-75C4.

Exceto pelo veloz processador, a maioria dos componentes se situa na gama média superior e por isso corresponde ao preço de 1000 Euros (~$1061) para a versão testada e 1200 Euros (~$1273) para o que tem um SSD. Isso nos leva ao único problema real: Nós só podemos outorgar dar ao portátil multimídia de sucesso sem um SSD uma recomendação de compra condicional. Os usuários que desejam mais poder de jogo e, portanto, precisam de uma GTX 1060 terão inevitavelmente de fazer compromissos no ruído do sistema, como a sua produção de ruído consistentemente silenciosa, é um dos pontos fortes do novo dispositivo multimídia da Acer.

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 - 04/11/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

79%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

52 / 81 → 64%

Peso

60 / 20-67 → 85%

Bateria

82%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

90 / 85 → 100%

Desempenho da aplicação

81 / 92 → 88%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

88 / 95 → 93%

Audio

66%

Camera

63 / 85 → 74%

Médio

77%

85%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire VX5-591G (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050 Ti)

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-04-21 (Update: 2017-04-24)