Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire VX5-591G (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050 Ti)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 878:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.59
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 57% | 74% | 47% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.88 | 65.8 69% | 68.9 77% | 61.5 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 85.1 46% | 98.9 70% | 80.4 38% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.2 | 62.2 55% | 70.9 76% | 58.8 46% |
Response Times | -67% | -137% | -48% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22 ? | 41 ? -86% | 54 ? -145% | 40 ? -82% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 34 ? -48% | 52.4 ? -128% | 26 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | 16% | 27% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 281 | 322 15% | 400 42% | 326 16% |
Brightness | 257 | 297 16% | 392 53% | 316 23% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 86 1% | 89 5% | 80 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.31 3% | 0.26 19% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 878 | 1039 18% | 1538 75% | 931 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.16 | 4.73 8% | 4.9 5% | 5.49 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.09 | 12.37 -36% | 11 -21% | 11.36 -25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 2.99 35% | 7.2 -58% | 4.84 -6% |
Gamma | 2.59 85% | 2.32 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6931 94% | 6905 94% | 6911 94% | 5971 109% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 56 51% | 64.2 74% | 53 43% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 85 47% | 98.9 71% | 80 38% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
13% | -12% /
14% | 2% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3565 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4442 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 1647% | 8078% | |
Read Seq | 101.5 | 120.9 19% | 123 21% | 459.3 353% |
Write Seq | 100.6 | 101.8 1% | 74.2 -26% | 325.5 224% |
Read 512 | 28.33 | 37.83 34% | 101.7 259% | 279.2 886% |
Write 512 | 28.31 | 84.4 198% | 42.51 50% | 280.1 889% |
Read 4k | 0.327 | 0.473 45% | 10.84 3215% | 22.43 6759% |
Write 4k | 0.846 | 0.313 -63% | 1.021 21% | 74.9 8753% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.718 | 1.133 58% | 69.8 9621% | 149 20652% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.893 | 0.274 -69% | 1.057 18% | 234 26104% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8674 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20791 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6774 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.8 | 25.2 | ||
The Division (2016) | 0 | 42.6 | 34.9 | |
For Honor (2017) | 44.8 | 40.9 | 21.2 | |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 40.9 | 21.2 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB |
HDD |
| 31.8 dB |
Carga |
| 36.8 / 41.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.31 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 7 / 10.2 / 14 Watt |
Carga |
78 / 127 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 8% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 7.2 -3% | 6.6 6% | 5 29% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 10.5 -3% | 9 12% | 8.9 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 14 | 16 -14% | 10.7 24% | 11.8 16% |
Load Average * | 78 | 82 -5% | 77.5 1% | 55 29% |
Load Maximum * | 127 | 155 -22% | 130 -2% | 93 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 124 |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 51% | 30% | 71% | |
Reader / Idle | 322 | 501 56% | 565 75% | 816 153% |
WiFi v1.3 | 302 | 357 18% | 334 11% | 430 42% |
Load | 81 | 144 78% | 84 4% | 95 17% |
H.264 | 428 |
Pro
Contra
Não espetacular, mas robusto - a Acer fez um bom trabalho com o seu novo VX5-591G-75C4.
Exceto pelo veloz processador, a maioria dos componentes se situa na gama média superior e por isso corresponde ao preço de 1000 Euros (~$1061) para a versão testada e 1200 Euros (~$1273) para o que tem um SSD. Isso nos leva ao único problema real: Nós só podemos outorgar dar ao portátil multimídia de sucesso sem um SSD uma recomendação de compra condicional. Os usuários que desejam mais poder de jogo e, portanto, precisam de uma GTX 1060 terão inevitavelmente de fazer compromissos no ruído do sistema, como a sua produção de ruído consistentemente silenciosa, é um dos pontos fortes do novo dispositivo multimídia da Acer.
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
-
04/11/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn