Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M)

Muito hardware por pouco dinheiro. Graças a uma GeForce GTX 950M e a um moderno processador Kaby Lake, o Acer Aspire E5-575G deve reproduzir inclusive jogos sofisticados fluentemente - e isto a um preço competitivo de apenas 600 Euros ($673). Qual é o truque?
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Aspire E15 E5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 928 MHz, Memoría: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 362.03, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 1 de 2 slots ocupado
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, Iluminação de fundo de LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, Slot M.2 vazio
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidade ótica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.2 x 382 x 259
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Linux
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Fonte de alimentação de 90-watts, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 460 g
Preço
630 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

 
 
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
293 MBit/s
164
cd/m²
167
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
176
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
177
cd/m²
178
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Chi Mei CMN15C4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 178 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 168.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 177 cd/m²
Contraste: 374:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Innolux N156HGE-EAL, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
ChiMei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
CMN15BA, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
LG LP156WF6-SPK1, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
100%
101%
26%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
38.57
84.2
118%
84.9
120%
48.96
27%
39.48
2%
sRGB Coverage
57.4
99.7
74%
99.8
74%
70.9
24%
59
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.89
82.7
107%
83.3
109%
50.3
26%
40.81
2%
Response Times
-5%
-15%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(21, 18)
44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-13%
44 ?(25, 19, short plateau)
-13%
36 ?(13, 23)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(19, 5)
23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)
4%
28 ?(11, 17, short plateau)
-17%
24 ?(8, 16)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(80)
200 ?(90)
50 ?(50)
Screen
13%
27%
51%
22%
Brightness middle
176
234
33%
249
41%
389
121%
291
65%
Brightness
169
219
30%
240
42%
353
109%
270
60%
Brightness Distribution
91
80
-12%
86
-5%
83
-9%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.47
0.48
-2%
0.48
-2%
0.31
34%
0.38
19%
Contrast
374
488
30%
519
39%
1255
236%
766
105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.83
11.8
-34%
10.15
-15%
11.53
-31%
8.6
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.01
20.69
-48%
17.39
-24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.97
13.3
-48%
12.13
-35%
13.46
-50%
8.5
5%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.47 89%
2.48 89%
2.3 96%
2.31 95%
CCT
10234 64%
17098 38%
13445 48%
12024 54%
6184 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.8
74
101%
74
101%
46
25%
32
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.3
100
75%
100
75%
71
24%
59
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
36% / 28%
38% / 37%
39% / 45%
9% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points +9%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points +9%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points -8%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points +105%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points +103%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
465 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points +5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
300 Points -9%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points -11%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points +14%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.57 Points +6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points 0%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.46 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.35 Points -9%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points +102%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points +100%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.36 Points +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.83 Points +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.33 Points -10%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points -12%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.19 Points -14%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
149 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
120.4 fps +7%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
112.1 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
101.3 fps -10%
Pass 2
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
31 fps +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
22.62 fps +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
21.68 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
19.04 fps -12%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4620
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11301
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5022
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
53.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
75 fps
Ajuda
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
5491%
29%
14969%
15639%
Read Seq
95.3
433.2
355%
108.1
13%
503
428%
509
434%
Write Seq
85.6
131.9
54%
105.6
23%
302.9
254%
459.4
437%
Read 512
29.32
250
753%
35.32
20%
424.5
1348%
413.8
1311%
Write 512
25.93
90.6
249%
46.13
78%
302.2
1065%
383.6
1379%
Read 4k
0.366
30.69
8285%
0.413
13%
33.57
9072%
45.35
12291%
Write 4k
0.726
51.2
6952%
0.9
24%
90.6
12379%
100.1
13688%
Read 4k QD32
0.647
112.2
17242%
0.895
38%
353.7
54568%
356.1
54939%
Write 4k QD32
0.722
73.2
10039%
0.884
22%
294.1
40634%
294.1
40634%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 39.8 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 111.2 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 86 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 18.1 ms
Índice de Explosão: 113.3 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 10 %
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points +7%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
3266 Points +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
4498 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3970 Points -2%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3162 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3696 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4047 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5452 Points +28%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4482 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
4350 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2759 Points -35%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
27162 Points +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21715 Points -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
20061 Points -11%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
17980 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4249 Points +19%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3238 Points -9%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
3102 Points -13%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2816 Points -21%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
18647 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
4212 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45360 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9392 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3218 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1614 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
35.8 fps +13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
31.6 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
30.6 (29min - 34max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
28.8 fps -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
29.6 fps +57%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
21.1 fps +12%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.8 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
18.2 (17min - 21max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
16.9 fps -10%
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
110 fps +27%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
GeForce GTX 950M, 6300HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
87.6 fps +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
86.7 fps
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
85.3 (14.66min - 145.45max) fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
69.5 (11.6min - 138max) fps -20%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45.8 fps +31%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
35.7 (8.8min - 109.06max) fps +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
24 (5.7min - 45.5max) fps -31%
Battlefield 4
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
63.1 fps +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
61 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
46.2 fps -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
28.5 fps +6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
26.9 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
18.9 fps -30%
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 126.8 96.8 86.7 35
Battlefield 4 (2013) 109.7 78.6 61 26.9
Dirt Rally (2015) 144.1 79.3 45.2 24.6
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 33.8 30.6 18.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 45.2 31.6 18.8 16.9
The Division (2016) 63.8 41.5 20.4 15.4
Hitman 2016 (2016) 34.6 34.1 11.6
Overwatch (2016) 152.7 107.4 71.5 32.8
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 69.3 51.6 23.6 18.3
No Man's Sky (2016) 35.6 29.4 18.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 30.9 24.5 14.2

Barulho

Ocioso
30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB
HDD
31.2 dB
Carga
33.4 / 40.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 41.6 °C41 °C33.2 °C 
 42.3 °C48.1 °C33.1 °C 
 36.7 °C41.8 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 48.1 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C
30.8 °C42.1 °C60.8 °C
31.5 °C50.7 °C44.1 °C
34.8 °C37.4 °C34.5 °C
Máximo: 60.8 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  55.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.8 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.634.62534.736.43134.335.24033.834.85034.132.66333.635.5803436.710036.934.512537.237.116031.634.420031.347.625030.157.931530.259.840030.559.250029.163.163028.266.48003074.710003172.7125031.568.1160032.464.2200032.166.1250028.963.1315026.767.440002567.4500024.667.5630024.165.8800023.7631000023.559.81250023.361.71600023.154.6SPL41.279.8N3.946.4median 30median 63.1Delta3.56.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Aspire E5-575G-549DApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.25 / 1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 8.1 / 9.8 Watt
Carga midlight 52.5 / 81.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-27%
-40%
-65%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
6
8.3
-38%
8.7
-45%
10.2
-70%
5.6
7%
Idle Average *
8.1
12.1
-49%
14.5
-79%
15.6
-93%
10.9
-35%
Idle Maximum *
9.8
15.4
-57%
15.6
-59%
17
-73%
10.6
-8%
Load Average *
52.5
56
-7%
61
-16%
79
-50%
61
-16%
Load Maximum *
81.6
70
14%
82
-0%
115.2
-41%
60
26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 15min
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 56 Wh
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
12%
-33%
-40%
-14%
-20%
Reader / Idle
767
667
-13%
521
-32%
715
-7%
535
-30%
H.264
460
335
-27%
114
-75%
241
-48%
305
-34%
WiFi v1.3
451
386
-14%
230
-49%
270
-40%
255
-43%
303
-33%
Load
75
152
103%
93
24%
108
44%
87
16%

Pro

+ Excelente razão preço-desempenho
+ Boa configuração
+ Processador veloz
+ Placa de vídeo apta para jogos
+ Resolução Full HD
+ USB Tipo C
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Slot M.2 livre
+ WiFi ac

Contra

- Brilho muito baixo da tela
- Sem sistema operacional Windows
- Disco rígido lento
- Afogamentos no teste de estresse
In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Não deveria ser uma surpresa que um aparelho de gama alta sem compromissos não possa ser esperado da categoria de portáteis da faixa dos 600-Euros (~$673). A Acer, no entanto, oferece um aparelho com uma configuração sólida e apta para jogos para o mercado mainstream com o seu Aspire E15 E5-575G-549D. O seu preço baixo envolve algumas medidas de austeridade mais ou menos dolorosas. Obviamente não havia espaço para uma carcaça de metal, SSD veloz ou painel IPS brilhante o orçamento - mas um moderno processador Kaby Lake, veloz GPU de gama média, bem como 8 GB de memória DDR 4 e um grande disco rígido ainda eram viáveis. Esta configuração torna o Aspire incondicionalmente adequado para jogos, embora a resolução nativa da tela possa ser utilizada apenas para alguns casos. No entanto, todos os jogos mais recentes são jogáveis somente com algumas perdas visuais - coisa que não é necessariamente um problema para um portátil.

Podemos dar ao Aspire uma pontuação muito boa em termos de qualidade de construção e de dispositivos de entrada. Além do muito baixo brilho da tela, no geral, o aparelho dificilmente mostra grandes fraquezas e inclusive surpreende com fortalezas inesperadas em alguns aspectos: Sete a oito horas de duração de bateria ou o veloz Wi-Fi ac (apesar de apenas 1x1 TX/RX) não são encontrados em alguns modelos ainda mais caros. Por isso, podemos resumir assim:

Os compradores à procura de um acessível portátil multimídia, com reservas de desempenho para jogos atuais, não errarão com o Acer Aspire E5-575G. No entanto, o Aspire não é adequado para exteriores devido á sua tela muito escura.

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D - 09/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Till Schönborn

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
82%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
51 / 81 → 63%
Peso
60 / 20-67 → 85%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
70%
Desempenho do jogos
74 / 85 → 87%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 92 → 85%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
91 / 95 → 96%
Audio
56%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
73%
80%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M)
Till Schönborn, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-30)