Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
Networking | |
WiFi Speed Client 1m | |
WiFi Speed Server 1m |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 213.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 608:1 (Preto: 0.351 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.59 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.01% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ AU Optronics AUO38ED / AUO B156HTN03.8, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ProBook 450 G3 AU Optronics, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng BOE, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 156AT37-T01 (SDC4141), TN, 15.6", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 1% | 19% | 8% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.21 | 38.1 2% | 37.63 1% | 44.11 19% | 40.21 8% | 36.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 56 | 57.3 2% | 56.7 1% | 66.4 19% | 60.1 7% | 55.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.44 | 39.37 2% | 38.88 1% | 45.57 19% | 41.56 8% | 37.92 -1% |
Response Times | -3% | -4% | 28% | 35% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.4 ? | 41.2 ? 3% | 50 ? -18% | 28 ? 34% | 22 ? 48% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 28 ? -9% | 23 ? 10% | 20 ? 22% | 20 ? 22% | |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? | ||||
Screen | 2% | -2% | -8% | 9% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 213.4 | 211 -1% | 241 13% | 223 4% | 245 15% | 251 18% |
Brightness | 209 | 214 2% | 226 8% | 215 3% | 230 10% | 236 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 89 3% | 83 -3% | 84 -2% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.351 | 0.43 -23% | 0.48 -37% | 0.76 -117% | 0.46 -31% | 0.44 -25% |
Contrast | 608 | 491 -19% | 502 -17% | 293 -52% | 533 -12% | 570 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 13.35 | 9.25 31% | 12.43 7% | 8.5 36% | 8.34 38% | 14.58 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.79 | 21.03 3% | 12.31 44% | 24.59 -13% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.59 | 9.83 28% | 13.24 3% | 9.35 31% | 9.48 30% | 16.8 -24% |
Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.82 78% | 2.61 84% | 2.46 89% | 2.38 92% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 18870 34% | 10890 60% | 15733 41% | 10402 62% | 10624 61% | 27039 24% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.44 | 36.4 -5% | 36 -6% | 42 9% | 38 -1% | 35 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.01 | 57.3 2% | 57 2% | 66 18% | 57 2% | 56 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
2% | -2% /
-2% | 6% /
-1% | 15% /
11% | 9% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3665 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4403 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4408 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP ProBook 450 G3 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 44% | 74% | 26% | 24% | 17% | 20297% | |
Read Seq | 100.8 | 122.8 22% | 120.4 19% | 93.4 -7% | 103.5 3% | 105.6 5% | 515 411% |
Write Seq | 57.4 | 123.5 115% | 123.1 114% | 91.1 59% | 91.1 59% | 93.4 63% | 338 489% |
Read 512 | 31.19 | 33.14 6% | 34.31 10% | 31.42 1% | 33.74 8% | 31.7 2% | 368.1 1080% |
Write 512 | 38.67 | 56.5 46% | 66.8 73% | 34.81 -10% | 38.77 0% | 27.54 -29% | 338.6 776% |
Read 4k | 0.509 | 0.341 -33% | 0.373 -27% | 0.384 -25% | 0.374 -27% | 0.374 -27% | 28.88 5574% |
Write 4k | 0.615 | 0.721 17% | 1.29 110% | 0.85 38% | 0.649 6% | 0.72 17% | 74.2 11965% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.351 | 0.897 156% | 0.976 178% | 0.729 108% | 0.818 133% | 0.694 98% | 319.9 91040% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.605 | 0.727 20% | 1.285 112% | 0.871 44% | 0.648 7% | 0.646 7% | 309.4 51040% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2567 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46105 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6995 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1083 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 35.5 | 26 | 21.8 | 13.6 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 74.2 | 44.8 | 38.2 | 8.9 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 41.2 | 26.4 | 14.6 | 11.6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31 / 31 / 31 dB |
Carga |
| 39.1 / 41 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP ProBook 450 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng GeForce 940M, 5500U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | -1% | -15% | 0% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28.8 | 31.2 -8% | 31.2 -8% | 31.3 -9% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.3 -4% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 32.1 -4% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.3 -4% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 32.1 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.5 -5% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 33.1 -7% |
Load Average * | 39.1 | 33.1 15% | 36 8% | 44.1 -13% | 33.5 14% | 37.8 3% |
Load Maximum * | 41 | 34.2 17% | 38.8 5% | 52.5 -28% | 33.5 18% | 37.7 8% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 2.2 / 2.29 Watt |
Ocioso | 11.84 / 14.16 / 14.46 Watt |
Carga |
51.69 / 46.56 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng 5500U, GeForce 940M, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 41% | 49% | 26% | 56% | 44% | 37% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.84 | 4.9 59% | 5.2 56% | 4.8 59% | 4.8 59% | 4.2 65% | 3.4 71% |
Idle Average * | 14.16 | 8.2 42% | 7.25 49% | 8.1 43% | 7.5 47% | 6.6 53% | 6.5 54% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.46 | 9 38% | 7.9 45% | 8.3 43% | 9.2 36% | 7.5 48% | 7 52% |
Load Average * | 51.69 | 30.1 42% | 25.1 51% | 42.5 18% | 16 69% | 36.3 30% | 44.5 14% |
Load Maximum * | 46.56 | 36.1 22% | 25.1 46% | 61.1 -31% | 15.4 67% | 36.5 22% | 49.5 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 37 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng 5500U, GeForce 940M, 41 Wh | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, 44 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 77% | 198% | 66% | 15% | 104% | 215% | |
Reader / Idle | 273 | 575 111% | 885 224% | 563 106% | 1035 279% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 180 | 309 72% | 566 214% | 267 48% | 207 15% | 367 104% | 412 129% |
Load | 61 | 90 48% | 157 157% | 88 44% | 206 238% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ é um sistema de bom desempenho, com boa qualidade de construção - porém a tampa da tela é um pouco instável - e boa ergonomia geral. Ele é retido por duas falhas principais: em primeiro lugar, a tela é muito imprecisa, a menos calibrado e carece de brilho suficiente para uso ao ar livre. Em segundo lugar, a duração da bateria é medíocre. Não estamos certos de porquê o consumo de energia é tão alto em comparação com outros, mas a Acer precisa voltar para os planos de design e trabalhar em reduzi-lo completamente. Como um substituto de desktop para o processamento de textos e navegação pela web, bem como ocasionais sessões de jogos, o E5 não é necessariamente uma má escolha.
Usuário à procura de um sistema acessível provavelmente estarão satisfeitos com o Aspire E5 - desde que a mobilidade não seja uma prioridade.
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
- 09/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Bernhard Pechlaner