Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 7 (Core i7, GTX 1060)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 382 cd/m²
Contraste: 1005:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY LG Philips LGD056D / LP173WF4-SPF5, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN AUO B173HAN01.0, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 67.2 2% | 64 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.2 | 93.1 9% | 90.2 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.3 | 67.4 8% | 65.4 5% |
| Response Times | -32% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 38 ? 7% | 36 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 26 ? -4% | 26 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 125000 ? | 200 ? -100% | |
| Screen | 14% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 382 | 318 -17% | 346 -9% |
| Brightness | 357 | 295 -17% | 307 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 79 -8% | 84 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.25 34% | 0.26 32% |
| Contrast | 1005 | 1272 27% | 1331 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 4.7 32% | 4.32 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.14 | 8.8 33% | 8.05 39% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.22 | 5 39% | 5.76 30% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 7580 86% | 7374 88% | 6447 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 61 9% | 59 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 93 9% | 90 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
4% | 8% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 125000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 125000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 125000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3687 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4636 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 24522% | 13109% | |
| Read Seq | 108.7 | 1606 1377% | 493.1 354% |
| Write Seq | 100.7 | 1176 1068% | 270.2 168% |
| Read 512 | 29.74 | 846 2745% | 325.8 995% |
| Write 512 | 28.06 | 805 2769% | 267.8 854% |
| Read 4k | 0.345 | 59.9 17262% | 28.4 8132% |
| Write 4k | 0.78 | 155.6 19849% | 76.2 9669% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.688 | 588 85365% | 344.6 49987% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.767 | 505 65741% | 267 34711% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11276 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24048 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9743 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69.9 | 38.5 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 52.5 | |||
| For Honor (2017) | 70.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.7 dB |
| HDD |
| 31.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.2 / 43.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w206ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 12.3 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
72.6 / 153 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 11 -57% | 7.8 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 12.3 | 18 -46% | 13.3 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.2 | 24 -69% | 16.6 -17% |
| Load Average * | 72.6 | 84 -16% | 73 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 125 | 101 19% | 118 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 153 | 146 5% | 140 8% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 29% | 28% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 552 | 795 44% | 618 12% | 301 -45% |
| H.264 | 284 | 315 11% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 336 | 380 13% | 374 11% | 163 -51% |
| Load | 74 | 96 30% | 130 76% | 55 -26% |
Pro
Contra
Embora nossa lista de contras seja maior do que o esperado quando começamos a analisar este portátil, o veredicto geral permanece inalterado. O novo Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY pode ser visto como um portátil multimídia com grandes ambições de jogos ou como um portátil de jogos com recursos multimídia viáveis. De qualquer forma: pelo seu preço atual de 1400 Euros (~$1651, um modelo melhor equipado com SSD+HDD é vendido por $1400 nos EUA) você recebe a essência de um portátil de jogos de $2000 sem os detalhes extras como G-Sync, teclas macro programáveis, um teclado com iluminação de fundo RGB de vários setores, ferramentas para monitoramento, afinação e overclocking, e uma seleção melhorada de portas.
A única gafe real é a ausência de armazenamento SSD em nossa unidade de análise. O desempenho, no entanto, é impecável, e o armazenamento SSD pode ser adaptado. A solução de resfriamento muito silenciosa e eficiente do portátil foi particularmente impressionante.
Assim, a partir de um ponto de vista de jogador consciente do preço, os únicos itens restantes na nossa lista de contras são a configuração RAM, a desmontagem muito complexa e os tempos de resposta inferiores da tela. Se você está procurando um portátil de escritório ou um aparelho portátil de edição de fotos, procure outro. Caso contrário, não vemos por que não devemos outorgar uma recomendação de compra para o novo Aspire 7, especialmente considerando o seu baixo preço.
Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY
- 08/17/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
