Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 7 A715 (7300HQ, GTX 1050)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 267 cd/m²
Contraste: 861:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.65 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU BOE NV156FHM-N42 , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 BOE NV156FHM-N48, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T BOE, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 AU Optronics, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -4% | -6% | 50% | 51% | 54% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.53 | 39.86 -2% | 38.59 -5% | 37.98 -6% | 63.1 56% | 66.3 64% | 66.5 64% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.9 | 58.7 -2% | 58 -3% | 57.1 -5% | 86.5 44% | 84.2 41% | 86.9 45% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.87 | 41.18 -2% | 39.87 -5% | 39.24 -6% | 63.3 51% | 61.6 47% | 63.5 52% |
| Response Times | 10% | 18% | 41% | 24% | 180% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49 ? | 42 ? 14% | 42 ? 14% | 43 ? 12% | 38 ? 22% | 41 ? 16% | 47.9 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 32 ? 11% | 28 ? 22% | 11 ? 69% | 27 ? 25% | 31 ? 14% | 33.7 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 21000 ? 5% | 122000 ? 510% | 21800 ? 9% | |||
| Screen | -2% | 4% | -9% | 14% | 25% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 267 | 248 -7% | 230 -14% | 225 -16% | 301 13% | 397 49% | 296 11% |
| Brightness | 250 | 237 -5% | 228 -9% | 215 -14% | 270 8% | 364 46% | 288 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 79 -4% | 88 7% | 91 11% | 79 -4% | 84 2% | 89 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.21 32% | 0.21 32% | 0.46 -48% | 0.38 -23% | 0.29 6% | 0.32 -3% |
| Contrast | 861 | 1181 37% | 1095 27% | 489 -43% | 792 -8% | 1369 59% | 925 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.65 | 4.98 -7% | 4.01 14% | 3.94 15% | 3.49 25% | 3.88 17% | 4.3 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 8.41 -3% | 7.26 11% | 6.83 17% | 7.49 9% | 8.22 -0% | 8.7 -6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.65 | 4.26 -61% | 3.18 -20% | 2.68 -1% | 1.88 29% | 3.1 -17% | 3 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.37 93% | 2.52 87% | 2.35 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6820 95% | 7149 91% | 6814 95% | 6709 97% | 6587 99% | 6570 99% | 7100 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 38 0% | 37 -3% | 36 -5% | 56 47% | 55 45% | 56.83 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 58 -2% | 58 -2% | 57 -3% | 86 46% | 84 42% | 86.86 47% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
0% | 6% /
4% | 9% /
-2% | 29% /
23% | 85% /
59% | 24% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4055 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4890 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4908 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4092 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -3% | 236% | -2% | -80% | 25% | 217% | |
| Read Seq | 456 | 481.5 6% | 1657 263% | 504 11% | 117.6 -74% | 480.1 5% | 1260 176% |
| Write Seq | 245 | 131.5 -46% | 1208 393% | 136.2 -44% | 109.1 -55% | 385.6 57% | 1241 407% |
| Read 512 | 328.4 | 324.8 -1% | 806 145% | 340.9 4% | 39.93 -88% | 295.6 -10% | 1039 216% |
| Write 512 | 146.3 | 130.6 -11% | 807 452% | 136.9 -6% | 98.6 -33% | 302.5 107% | 827 465% |
| Read 4k | 31.72 | 30.81 -3% | 62.6 97% | 29.74 -6% | 0.435 -99% | 27.58 -13% | 60 89% |
| Write 4k | 69.3 | 84.8 22% | 176.9 155% | 76.8 11% | 3.152 -95% | 81.4 17% | 154 122% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 263.7 | 345 31% | 650 146% | 348.2 32% | 1.008 -100% | 247.4 -6% | 526 99% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 165.7 | 131.6 -21% | 557 236% | 136.4 -18% | 4.705 -97% | 237.7 43% | 435 163% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7466 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 123908 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14777 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5346 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2639 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 230.2 | 172.6 | 156.9 | 64.3 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 195.5 | 167.4 | 131.4 | 52.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124.8 | 69.4 | 38.5 | 31.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.6 / 43.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -15% | -11% | 1% | 5% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 30 1% | 30.8 -1% | 29.7 2% | 29.4 3% | 31 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 32 -5% | 32.9 -8% | 30.2 1% | 30.1 1% | 31 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 30.8 | 30.5 1% | 34 -10% | 32.9 -7% | 30.2 2% | 30.1 2% | 31 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 30.9 -0% | 36 -17% | 33.5 -9% | 30.6 1% | 29.7 4% | 32.6 -6% |
| Load Average * | 33.6 | 35.7 -6% | 48 -43% | 43.7 -30% | 33.8 -1% | 34.4 -2% | 41.6 -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 35.6 18% | 51 -18% | 47 -8% | 42.6 2% | 34.4 21% | 44.7 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 46.2 | 39.5 | 41.6 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | -13% | 7% | -3% | 12% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 43.4 -4% | 52.4 -26% | 44.2 -6% | 48 -15% | 40.4 3% | 43.8 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.5 | 38.1 10% | 54.2 -28% | 40 6% | 40.8 4% | 37 13% | 44.9 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.7 | 24.8 16% | 30.5 -3% | 25.1 15% | 29.9 -1% | 25.3 15% | 25.9 13% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 25.2 14% | 28.2 4% | 25.8 12% | 29.8 -1% | 24.7 16% | 26.3 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.35 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 6.9 / 9.4 Watt |
| Carga |
72.6 / 122 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -46% | 0% | -54% | 3% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.8 5% | 6 -50% | 4 -0% | 8.7 -118% | 4.1 -3% | 3.7 7% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.5 6% | 11 -59% | 6.7 3% | 12.4 -80% | 9.3 -35% | 7.5 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 9.1 3% | 18 -91% | 9.6 -2% | 15.4 -64% | 9.8 -4% | 8 15% |
| Load Average * | 72.6 | 53.4 26% | 81 -12% | 81 -12% | 73 -1% | 64 12% | 49 33% |
| Load Maximum * | 122 | 55.6 54% | 146 -20% | 107 12% | 130 -7% | 66.4 46% | 55.2 55% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 90 | 98 | 50.6 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 49.7 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | 6% | -11% | -17% | 2% | 72% | |
| Reader / Idle | 592 | 765 29% | 587 -1% | 560 -5% | |||
| H.264 | 306 | 196 -36% | 321 5% | 632 107% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 336 | 511 52% | 428 27% | 360 7% | 278 -17% | 377 12% | 597 78% |
| Load | 94 | 97 3% | 56 -40% | 89 -5% | 122 30% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 83 |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Aspire 7 A715 é um portátil multimídia com um bom desempenho do sistema para dominar tarefas diárias. Além disso, o dispositivo é adequado como um portátil de jogos acessível, dado que a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 possui reservas suficientes. A combinação de SSD e disco rígido convencional também faz sentido, combinando velocidade e muito espaço de armazenamento. Juntamente com os 8 GB de RAM DDR4 e o painel Full HD IPS, a Acer cobra 899 Euros (~$1070) pelo dispositivo.
Como um pacote completo sem preocupações, o Acer Aspire 7 A715 deve ser capaz de convencer alguns compradores, já que você pode jogar até mesmo alguns dos jogos mais exigentes com a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050.
Você pode ver a primeira vista que o dispositivo é da Acer. Os dispositivos da série Aspire são muito semelhantes entre si, e quase não há características únicas. Dado que o acabamento não está no nível que esperamos, o caso da nossa unidade de teste não se encaixa no conceito, que é basicamente bom. Mas, os ruídos de rangido, uma tampa que pode ser torcida e as bordas afiadas, são grandes obstáculos. Os resultados da tela são similarmente decepcionantes. Os ângulos de visão do painel IPS incorporado, são estáveis, tem uma superfície mate e os desvios DeltaE-2000 são muito baixos. Mas, isso é tudo em termos de características positivas. A cobertura do espaço de cores e o brilho da tela são baixos demais. As conexões são boas, mas não estão preparadas para o futuro. É louvável que a Acer inclua uma conexão USB-3.1 Tipo-C. No entanto, o fabricante deveria ter deixado de lado a porta Gen-1 e, em vez disso, ter usado uma porta Gen-2.
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
- 11/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
