Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G (i7-8550U, MX 150, Full-HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 397 cd/m²
Contraste: 1369:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.59
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 AU Optronics, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN AUO B173HAN01.0, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD AUO119B, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 37% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 63.1 -5% | 67.2 1% | 69.7 5% | 64 -3% | 87.1 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.2 | 86.5 3% | 93.1 11% | 91.2 8% | 90.2 7% | 99.9 19% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.6 | 63.3 3% | 67.4 9% | 66.8 8% | 65.4 6% | 99.4 61% |
| Response Times | 10% | -26% | -24% | 14% | -16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 38 ? 7% | 38 ? 7% | 43 ? -5% | 36 ? 12% | 50.8 -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 27 ? 13% | 26 ? 16% | 21 ? 32% | 26 ? 16% | 33.2 -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 122000 ? | 200 ? -100% | 1000 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | -7% | -11% | -60% | -10% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 397 | 301 -24% | 318 -20% | 339 -15% | 346 -13% | 325.7 -18% |
| Brightness | 364 | 270 -26% | 295 -19% | 315 -13% | 307 -16% | 309 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 79 -6% | 79 -6% | 84 0% | 84 0% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.38 -31% | 0.25 14% | 0.35 -21% | 0.26 10% | 0.37 -28% |
| Contrast | 1369 | 792 -42% | 1272 -7% | 969 -29% | 1331 -3% | 880 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.88 | 3.49 10% | 4.7 -21% | 10.4 -168% | 4.32 -11% | 6.5 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.22 | 7.49 9% | 8.8 -7% | 15.96 -94% | 8.05 2% | 9.6 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.88 39% | 5 -61% | 11.67 -276% | 5.76 -86% | 5.6 -81% |
| Gamma | 2.59 85% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% |
| CCT | 6570 99% | 6587 99% | 7374 88% | 13081 50% | 6447 101% | 5860 111% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 56 2% | 61 11% | 60 9% | 59 7% | 87 58% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 86 2% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 90 7% | 100 19% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-3% | -10% /
-10% | -26% /
-41% | 2% /
-4% | 1% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 122000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 122000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 122000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3910 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5055 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5193 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3916 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -87% | 156% | -91% | 3% | 48% | |
| Read Seq | 480.1 | 117.6 -76% | 1606 235% | 107.1 -78% | 493.1 3% | 1076 124% |
| Write Seq | 385.6 | 109.1 -72% | 1176 205% | 103.1 -73% | 270.2 -30% | 263.2 -32% |
| Read 512 | 295.6 | 39.93 -86% | 846 186% | 28.89 -90% | 325.8 10% | 695 135% |
| Write 512 | 302.5 | 98.6 -67% | 805 166% | 27.34 -91% | 267.8 -11% | 472.3 56% |
| Read 4k | 27.58 | 0.435 -98% | 59.9 117% | 0.331 -99% | 28.4 3% | 20.09 -27% |
| Write 4k | 81.4 | 3.152 -96% | 155.6 91% | 0.831 -99% | 76.2 -6% | 116.2 43% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 247.4 | 1.008 -100% | 588 138% | 0.666 -100% | 344.6 39% | 282.7 14% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 237.7 | 4.705 -98% | 505 112% | 0.828 -100% | 267 12% | 405.2 70% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 17583 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4732 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 44475 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13140 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3207 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1668 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 162.1 | 93.3 | 78.9 | 31 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 121 | 88.4 | 63.6 | 28.6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 67.1 | 37.2 | 20.6 | 17.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 29.7 dB |
| HDD |
| 29.7 dB |
| DVD |
| 34.2 / dB |
| Carga |
| 34.4 / 34.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -23% | -2% | -5% | -24% | |
| off / environment * | 29.4 | 29.7 -1% | 30 -2% | 30 -2% | 30.7 -4% | 29.6 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 30.2 -0% | 34 -13% | 31.5 -5% | 30.7 -2% | 34.5 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 30.1 | 30.2 -0% | 35 -16% | 31.5 -5% | 30.7 -2% | 34.5 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 30.6 -3% | 36 -21% | 31.6 -6% | 31.4 -6% | 36.6 -23% |
| Load Average * | 34.4 | 33.8 2% | 47 -37% | 31.7 8% | 32.1 7% | 46.6 -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 42.6 -24% | 52 -51% | 34.5 -0% | 42.8 -24% | 52.3 -52% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.5 | 48 | 31.4 | 42.8 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.3 °C / 5.9 F).
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -17% | -33% | -22% | -11% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 48 -19% | 55.6 -38% | 41.9 -4% | 48.4 -20% | 48.8 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37 | 40.8 -10% | 57.7 -56% | 55.8 -51% | 44.2 -19% | 38.4 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.3 | 29.9 -18% | 32.2 -27% | 33.4 -32% | 25.8 -2% | 24.2 4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.7 | 29.8 -21% | 27.2 -10% | 25.1 -2% | 25.5 -3% | 22.8 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w206ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 9.3 / 9.8 Watt |
| Carga |
64 / 66.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -62% | -112% | -28% | -65% | -102% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 8.7 -112% | 11 -168% | 6.9 -68% | 7.8 -90% | 13.3 -224% |
| Idle Average * | 9.3 | 12.4 -33% | 18 -94% | 13.6 -46% | 13.3 -43% | 18.5 -99% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 15.4 -57% | 24 -145% | 14.8 -51% | 16.6 -69% | 19 -94% |
| Load Average * | 64 | 73 -14% | 84 -31% | 41 36% | 73 -14% | 78 -22% |
| Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 130 -96% | 146 -120% | 75 -13% | 140 -111% | 113.4 -71% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 98 | 101 | 33 | 118 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | 17% | -18% | 13% | -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 560 | 795 42% | 429 -23% | 618 10% | 533 -5% | |
| H.264 | 321 | 315 -2% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 377 | 278 -26% | 380 1% | 268 -29% | 374 -1% | 286 -24% |
| Load | 89 | 96 8% | 87 -2% | 130 46% | 82 -8% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G é um portátil multimídia bastante bem adequado para tarefas diárias. Com a chegada da 8ª geração da série Core da Intel, o desempenho da CPU aumentou significativamente. O Intel Core i7-8550U tem reservas de desempenho suficientes para não se tornar um pedaço de hardware obsoleto no futuro próximo. 8 GB de RAM é suficiente para a maioria dos cenários de uso, além de que uma atualização para 20 GB, não deve apresentar nenhum problema. Uma combinação de um SSD e um HD resulta em um sistema muito responsivo. Por 1089 Euros, os consumidores recebem um elegante e elegante portátil de 17 polegadas, que pesa pouco menos dos 3 quilos (6,6 lbs).
Acima de tudo, o Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G ganha pontos com um muito bom desempenho da CPU enquanto consome (relativamente) pouca energia. Além disso, com a Nvidia GeForce MX150, o Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G oferece uma placa gráfica de nível básico, que pode rodar uma grande variedade de jogos, bastante bem.
A tela IPS completa o pacote relativamente bom e ganha pontos com seu alto brilho. Pode-se descrever o adaptador de CA como um pouco subdimensionado, porque a bateria não deveria se descarregar sob uso intenso. Os dispositivos de entrada, da mesma forma, deixam uma impressão bastante ambivalente. No entanto, o touchpad faz um ótimo trabalho, enquanto o conforto de digitação do teclado sofre um pouco.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
- 10/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
