Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (8250U, MX130, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 246 cd/m²
Contraste: 482:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 11.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.91
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Chi Mei (CMN15D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 BOE NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE Chi Mei CMN15D5, N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 39.86 | 42.04 | 66.6 | 66.3 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 58.7 | 62.8 | 86.9 | 84.2 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 41.18 | 43.44 | 63.5 | 61.6 | |
| Response Times | -57% | -49% | -7% | -68% | 83% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.3 ? | 47.9 ? -11% | 42 ? 3% | 45.6 ? -5% | 41.2 ? 5% | 41 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.8 ? | 33.7 ? -144% | 32 ? -132% | 16 ? -16% | 29.6 ? -114% | 31 ? -125% |
| PWM Frequency | 25970 ? | 21800 ? -16% | 21000 ? -19% | 25770 ? -1% | 1000 -96% | 122000 ? 370% |
| Screen | 49% | 50% | 3% | 59% | 71% | |
| Brightness middle | 246 | 296 20% | 248 1% | 220 -11% | 338.7 38% | 397 61% |
| Brightness | 225 | 288 28% | 237 5% | 194 -14% | 325 44% | 364 62% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 79 -2% | 84 4% | 91 12% | 84 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.32 37% | 0.21 59% | 0.43 16% | 0.28 45% | 0.29 43% |
| Contrast | 482 | 925 92% | 1181 145% | 512 6% | 1210 151% | 1369 184% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11 | 4.3 61% | 4.98 55% | 11.8 -7% | 4.9 55% | 3.88 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 32.4 | 8.7 73% | 8.41 74% | 20.6 36% | 8.7 73% | 8.22 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.6 | 3 74% | 4.26 63% | 12.5 -8% | 5.5 53% | 3.1 73% |
| Gamma | 1.91 115% | 2.1 105% | 2.37 93% | 2.07 106% | 2.08 106% | 2.59 85% |
| CCT | 11807 55% | 7100 92% | 7149 91% | 14346 45% | 7498 87% | 6570 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.83 | 38 | 40.1 | 63.5 | 55 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.86 | 58 | 62.7 | 86.92 | 84 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
20% | 1% /
23% | -2% /
0% | -5% /
24% | 77% /
74% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25970 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25970 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25970 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3903 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4924 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4775 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3175 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND | Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 157% | -19% | 5% | 183% | -0% | -8% | |
| Read Seq | 499.5 | 1260 152% | 481.5 -4% | 530 6% | 1248 150% | 480.1 -4% | 482 ? -4% |
| Write Seq | 265.8 | 1241 367% | 131.5 -51% | 497.5 87% | 1476 455% | 385.6 45% | 246 ? -7% |
| Read 512 | 314.3 | 1039 231% | 324.8 3% | 392 25% | 849 170% | 295.6 -6% | 328 ? 4% |
| Write 512 | 266.3 | 827 211% | 130.6 -51% | 253.7 -5% | 1118 320% | 302.5 14% | 243 ? -9% |
| Read 4k | 29.24 | 60 105% | 30.81 5% | 29.67 1% | 58.8 101% | 27.58 -6% | 28 ? -4% |
| Write 4k | 78.4 | 154 96% | 84.8 8% | 78.3 0% | 155.2 98% | 81.4 4% | 74.8 ? -5% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 402.5 | 526 31% | 345 -14% | 282.8 -30% | 645 60% | 247.4 -39% | 323 ? -20% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 264.9 | 435 64% | 131.6 -50% | 149.8 -43% | 547 106% | 237.7 -10% | 220 ? -17% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3159 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9860 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2179 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 725 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rocket League | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| F1 2017 | |
| 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:4x | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP501UQ-FZ119T | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP501UQ-FZ119T | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket League (2017) | 94 | 40.9 | 28.9 | |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 50 | 25 | 20 | 13 |
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 54.1 | 43.6 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 43 | 19 | 11 | |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 29 | 13 | 10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 22.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.9 / 32.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 46.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.1 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.19 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.1 / 7.6 / 8.2 Watt |
| Carga |
49.4 / 68 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 8% | 6% | -62% | -10% | 0% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 3.7 27% | 3.8 25% | 4.03 21% | 11.6 -127% | 4.1 20% | 4.54 ? 11% | 6.78 ? -33% |
| Idle Average * | 7.6 | 7.5 1% | 6.5 14% | 6.81 10% | 13.8 -82% | 9.3 -22% | 6.98 ? 8% | 11.3 ? -49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 8 2% | 9.1 -11% | 8.34 -2% | 14.2 -73% | 9.8 -20% | 9.08 ? -11% | 13.4 ? -63% |
| Load Average * | 49.4 | 49 1% | 53.4 -8% | 37.3 24% | 67.9 -37% | 64 -30% | 54.1 ? -10% | 71.1 ? -44% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.1 | 50.6 -20% | 52 -24% | 59 -40% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 68 | 55.2 19% | 55.6 18% | 65.5 4% | 76.9 -13% | 66.4 2% | 66.4 ? 2% | 117.3 ? -73% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 49.7 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 30 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 46% | -31% | 13% | -28% | 33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 867 | 631 -27% | 934 8% | 560 -35% | 1168 ? 35% | ||
| H.264 | 525 | 632 20% | 300 -43% | 321 -39% | 821 ? 56% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 597 71% | 511 46% | 270 -23% | 511 46% | 377 8% | 625 ? 79% |
| Load | 162 | 122 -25% | 110 -32% | 136 -16% | 89 -45% | 97.8 ? -40% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 83 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
Contra
Olhando para o pacote, o Acer Aspire 5 poderia ter sido um sólido portátil multimídia se a tela não tivesse estragado a avaliação. Teríamos superado as pequenas deficiências, como ter apenas uma única conexão USB Tipo-A 3.0 ou as taxas de transferência de dados WLAN medíocres. Com a sua carcaça ligeiramente volumosa, com duas escotilhas de manutenção na parte inferior, o Aspire não parece ter sido construído com muita negligência. Apesar do preço do dispositivo, o teclado e o touchpad estão em um nível aceitável.
O significativo "porém" é claramente baseado na tela, o que faz com que a Acer caia em nossa avaliação. Infelizmente, os valores ruins de brilho, contraste, valor de preto e ColorChecker são irrefutáveis, assim como a falta de estabilidade dos ângulos de visão.
Isso também faz com que o Aspire perca alguns pontos em termos de mobilidade, já que ao sol direto em exteriores é difícil ver qualquer coisa na tela mate mesmo com o brilho no máximo. No desempenho gráfico, podemos dizer que, por um lado, uma placa gráfica dedicada é, naturalmente, sempre uma vantagem, mas, por outro lado, você não deve esperar muito do Uma GeForce MX130?, uma vez que seu desempenho claramente permanece atrás do MX150, e basicamente é apenas um novo GeForce 940MX. Os jogadores não devem, portanto, flertar demais com a ideia de adquirir o Aspire 5. No entanto, qualquer pessoa que ocasionalmente jogue alguns jogos e esteja procurando um dispositivo de 15 polegadas com um desempenho de sistema estável para uso doméstico que também ofereça um slot vazio de 2,5 polegadas para um disco rígido adicional pode encontrar um portátil acessível no Acer Aspire 5.
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
- 05/04/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Puschina
Price comparison
