Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 5 A514: Não o Intel Comet Lake na sua melhor forma
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.7 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.9 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
74.5 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
77.7 % v7 (old) | Walmart Motile M142 R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.1 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 237.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 743:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.12
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 Chi Mei N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Chi Mei N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Walmart Motile M142 Chi Mei N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE BOE CQ NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 53% | 1% | 1% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.39 | 40.85 -1% | 64.2 55% | 41.84 1% | 41.95 1% | 39.63 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.2 | 61.1 -2% | 94.8 52% | 62.3 0% | 62.5 0% | 58.6 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.78 | 42.25 -1% | 65.4 53% | 43.33 1% | 43.43 2% | 40.94 -4% |
Response Times | 9% | 1% | -25% | 16% | -31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 40.8 ? 27% | 39.2 ? 29% | 41 ? 26% | 35.2 ? 37% | 43 ? 23% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 27.2 ? 1% | 35.6 ? -29% | 31 ? -12% | 25.2 ? 9% | 32 ? -16% |
PWM Frequency | 24510 ? | 24510 ? 0% | 25000 ? 2% | 2500 ? -90% | 25000 ? 2% | 208 ? -99% |
Screen | -16% | 37% | -17% | -13% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 237.8 | 250 5% | 324.1 36% | 226 -5% | 240.3 1% | 285 20% |
Brightness | 231 | 236 2% | 301 30% | 214 -7% | 233 1% | 273 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 78 -5% | 87 6% | 92 12% | 82 0% | 87 6% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.27 16% | 0.22 31% | 0.17 47% | 0.27 16% | 0.4 -25% |
Contrast | 743 | 926 25% | 1473 98% | 1329 79% | 890 20% | 713 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.41 | 5 -47% | 1.63 52% | 5.21 -53% | 4.22 -24% | 5.62 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.73 | 20.7 -32% | 4.25 73% | 22.15 -41% | 23.32 -48% | 17.22 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.12 | 4.3 -38% | 1.42 54% | 4.43 -42% | 3.76 -21% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.4 -100% | 2.2 -83% | 3.27 -173% | 2.3 -92% | 3.97 -231% |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.05 107% | 2.26 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.39 92% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6395 102% | 6697 97% | 6887 94% | 6538 99% | 6585 99% | 6848 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.5 | 38.9 -2% | 60.2 52% | 40 1% | 39.9 1% | 38 -4% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.2 | 61 -2% | 95 53% | 62 0% | 62.1 0% | 58 -7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-9% | 30% /
33% | -14% /
-15% | 1% /
-6% | -22% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
↘ 31.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 24510 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 24510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 24510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (1.71 - 1.91, n=4) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (5.69 - 8.66, n=4) |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (15037 - 22164, n=3) | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (6410 - 6613, n=3) | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3182 - 4284, n=21) | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4286 - 5114, n=21) | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3182 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4642 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3752 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 23% | -14% | -19% | 66% | |
Seq Read | 1244 | 2357 89% | 1147 -8% | 2465 98% | 2642 112% |
Seq Write | 1393 | 1235 -11% | 752 -46% | 1318 -5% | 2433 75% |
4K Read | 46.86 | 43.29 -8% | 41.52 -11% | 42.97 -8% | 58 24% |
4K Write | 135.1 | 99.7 -26% | 149.7 11% | 81.9 -39% | 145.3 8% |
4K-64 Read | 650 | 1020 57% | 605 -7% | 1025 58% | 1431 120% |
4K-64 Write | 789 | 1502 90% | 453.2 -43% | 338.6 -57% | 1753 122% |
Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.07 -56% | 0.073 -62% | 0.077 -71% | 0.072 -60% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.039 -44% | 0.025 7% | 0.046 -70% | 0.027 -0% |
Score Read | 821 | 1299 58% | 761 -7% | 1314 60% | 1753 114% |
Score Write | 1064 | 1726 62% | 678 -36% | 552 -48% | 2142 101% |
Score Total | 2326 | 3640 56% | 1821 -22% | 2488 7% | 4790 106% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1637 | 2145 31% | 1093 -33% | 700 -57% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 496.6 | 565 14% | 775 56% | 167.2 -66% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1161 | 1320 14% | 1196 3% | 370.4 -68% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 17% | -16% | -4% | 23% | |
Write 4K | 166.6 | 93.6 -44% | 149.9 -10% | 116 -30% | 170.7 2% |
Read 4K | 46.72 | 41.87 -10% | 46.13 -1% | 42.73 -9% | 49.51 6% |
Write Seq | 1458 | 1698 16% | 970 -33% | 1222 -16% | 1156 -21% |
Read Seq | 1387 | 1978 43% | 1085 -22% | 1608 16% | 1136 -18% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 419.5 | 383.1 -9% | 460.8 10% | 280.1 -33% | 420.5 0% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 487.8 | 326.9 -33% | 410.3 -16% | 333.6 -32% | 527 8% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1456 | 2778 91% | 662 -55% | 1291 -11% | 2984 105% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1733 | 3119 80% | 1728 0% | 3183 84% | 3550 105% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
21% | -15% /
-15% | -12% /
-14% | 45% /
48% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2023 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8289 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1136 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 442 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Walmart Motile M142 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.5 - 17, n=176) |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 50.9, n=64) | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 27.9, n=29) | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.2 - 13.5, n=17) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 67 | 35.2 | 30.1 | 9.6 |
Rocket League (2017) | 20.1 |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -5% | -7% | -14% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 29.1 | 29.3 -1% | 28 4% | 30.13 -4% | 30 -3% | 28.3 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.1 | 29.3 -1% | 28 4% | 30.13 -4% | 30 -3% | 32 -10% |
Idle Average * | 29.1 | 29.3 -1% | 28 4% | 30.13 -4% | 32 -10% | 32 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 29.8 -2% | 30 -3% | 30.13 -4% | 37 -27% | 32 -10% |
Load Average * | 33.5 | 32.4 3% | 41.4 -24% | 38.8 -16% | 41 -22% | 34.5 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 36.1 | 37.2 -3% | 41.5 -15% | 38.8 -7% | 42 -16% | 50.9 -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 39 | 39.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB |
Carga |
| 33.5 / 36.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.1 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.8 F).
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.17 / 0.32 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.7 / 3 / 4.6 Watt |
Carga |
29.3 / 45.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Walmart Motile M142 R5 3500U, Vega 8, BIWIN SSD 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | -75% | -69% | -115% | -77% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 2.7 -0% | 4.2 -56% | 4.7 -74% | 5.3 -96% | 5.1 -89% |
Idle Average * | 3 | 4.6 -53% | 5.9 -97% | 6.6 -120% | 8.6 -187% | 7.2 -140% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.6 | 5.2 -13% | 7.2 -57% | 5.9 -28% | 13.1 -185% | 9.7 -111% |
Load Average * | 29.3 | 35.9 -23% | 63.4 -116% | 56 -91% | 50.6 -73% | 40 -37% |
Load Maximum * | 45.4 | 46 -1% | 67.4 -48% | 60.2 -33% | 61.6 -36% | 49 -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | Walmart Motile M142 R5 3500U, Vega 8, 47 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE R5 3500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | -16% | -30% | -18% | -21% | |
Reader / Idle | 1360 | 2141 57% | 986 -27% | 830 -39% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 564 | 761 35% | 515 -9% | 390 -31% | 462 -18% | 448 -21% |
Load | 121 | 153 26% | 105 -13% | 98 -19% |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Aspire 5 A514 não se destaca em uma categoria em particular, o que não está mal, dado que deve ser um portátil acessível. Mesmo assim, isso não significa que possa ficar atrás em alguns aspectos chave. Os usuários que escolhem um portátil de 14 polegadas sobre um de 15,6 polegadas provavelmente valorizam mais a portabilidade do formato menor. Os marcos grossos e, portanto, o peso maior do Acer o tornam uma opção inferior para alternativas mais leves como o Asus VivoBook ou Walmart Motile. As dimensões maiores do Acer teriam sido boas se ofereceria vantagens como rigidez melhorada ou recursos adicionais, mas não vemos nada disso aqui.
O bug do desempenho da CPU que encontramos é outro ponto negativo no sistema. Afortunadamente isto não irá impactar o desempenho do dia a dia, dado que o Aspire 5 não tem como alvo cargas de trabalho exigentes, mas, finalmente, isso não é desejável. Mesmo sem considerar o bug, o desempenho bruto da CPU é mais lento do que a maioria dos outros portáteis equipados com o mesmo processador Core i5-10210U.
Existem alguns destaques no sistema que valem a pena mencionar. A tela é bem calibrada de fábrica e existem duas opções de armazenamento interno, em vez de uma só. O ruído do ventilador quase sempre é baixo durante cargas de trabalho baixas a médias e a duração da bateria é respeitável para sua categoria. Mesmo assim, o Aspire 5 A514 fica para trás quando comparado com subportáteis mais novos e com preço similar de OEMs concorrentes.
A tela pode ser boa para o preço, mas quase tudo sobre o Aspire 5 A514 se sente antigo. Pode ser a hora em que a Acer tenha que redesenhar o chassi para poder ser competitiva no mercado de portáteis de 14 polegadas.
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52
-
02/14/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo