Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire 3 (7200U, HD 620)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 241 cd/m²
Contraste: 524:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
54% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 1366x768, 15.6" | Fujitsu Lifebook A557 BOE NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 14-al103ng AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 12% | 16% | 7% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 35.97 | 40.13 12% | 41.85 16% | 38.65 7% | 36.58 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 54.1 | 60 11% | 62.9 16% | 58 7% | 54.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.17 | 41.5 12% | 43.24 16% | 39.94 7% | 37.79 2% |
Response Times | -58% | -109% | -58% | -73% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 30 ? 32% | 55 ? -25% | 44.8 ? -2% | 53 ? -20% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 29.6 ? -147% | 35 ? -192% | 25.6 ? -113% | 27 ? -125% |
PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 200 ? | |||
Screen | -113% | 17% | -2% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 241 | 238 -1% | 287 19% | 242 0% | 200 -17% |
Brightness | 229 | 216 -6% | 260 14% | 243 6% | 191 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 83 -5% | 83 -5% | 75 -14% | 90 3% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.53 -15% | 0.22 52% | 0.24 48% | 0.14 70% |
Contrast | 524 | 449 -14% | 1305 149% | 1008 92% | 1429 173% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 10.8 -218% | 4.21 -24% | 4.65 -37% | 5.06 -49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.61 | 29.3 -285% | 8.81 -16% | 9.64 -27% | 10.91 -43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 12.1 -612% | 2.68 -58% | 3.39 -99% | 3.94 -132% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.25 98% | 2.5 88% | 2.7 81% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 6750 96% | 14344 45% | 6066 107% | 6246 104% | 6159 106% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 34 | 38.3 13% | 40 18% | 36.69 8% | 35 3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 54 | 59.9 11% | 63 17% | 57.66 7% | 55 2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -53% /
-81% | -25% /
-0% | -18% /
-7% | -24% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3295 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4541 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Dell Latitude 5580 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -90% | 8% | 57% | -91% | |
Read Seq | 485.8 | 132.3 -73% | 504 4% | 1140 135% | 113.3 -77% |
Write Seq | 456.1 | 131.1 -71% | 503 10% | 468.1 3% | 110.2 -76% |
Read 512 | 328 | 27.04 -92% | 393.6 20% | 759 131% | 30.83 -91% |
Write 512 | 446.8 | 56.6 -87% | 413.6 -7% | 414 -7% | 47.13 -89% |
Read 4k | 26.95 | 0.459 -98% | 36.98 37% | 34.3 27% | 0.34 -99% |
Write 4k | 86.7 | 0.812 -99% | 92.1 6% | 123.4 42% | 0.981 -99% |
Read 4k QD32 | 245.9 | 1.1 -100% | 277.6 13% | 530 116% | 0.72 -100% |
Write 4k QD32 | 300.2 | 0.828 -100% | 250.6 -17% | 319.2 6% | 1.026 -100% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1146 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5046 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 566 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
Thief | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 34.63 | 20.7 | 16.76 | 5.46 |
Thief (2014) | 16.6 | 9.9 | 8.3 | 3.8 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 15.84 | 8.94 | 4.64 | 3.61 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 31.2 dB |
HDD |
| 0 dB |
Carga |
| 34.5 / 34.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.2 °C / 73.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+4.5 °C / 8.1 F).
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 5580 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.15 / 0.41 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.1 / 7.5 / 8.9 Watt |
Carga |
28.1 / 28.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000, a-Si TFT-LCD , LCM, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 14-al103ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 10% | -32% | -10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.5 15% | 2.9 29% | 2.8 32% | 5.5 -34% |
Idle Average * | 7.5 | 6 20% | 6.4 15% | 6.3 16% | 8.2 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 7.3 18% | 6.9 22% | 6.9 22% | 8.9 -0% |
Load Average * | 28.1 | 30.8 -10% | 31.8 -13% | 51.6 -84% | 29.1 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 28.3 | 31 -10% | 29 -2% | 69.7 -146% | 29.4 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 37 Wh | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 64% | 36% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 855 | 1104 29% | 992 16% | 883 3% |
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 697 99% | 525 50% | 462 32% |
Load | 81 | 133 64% | 115 42% | 129 59% |
H.264 | 456 |
Pro
Contra
O Aspire 3 da Acer é um bom aparelho de nível de entrada que pode gerir mais do que apenas processos simples no uso diário e sabe como lidar com multitarefas. Pode até ser usado para algum processamento de imagem simples, mas, além disso, você não deve esperar muito do portátil. Gostamos das possibilidades de atualização que as escotilhas de manutenção oferecem para o armazenamento e a RAM, mas a bateria não deve "cair" para fora da carcaça quando você remove a tampa inferior. Isso pode causar danos no ou dentro do aparelho.
O Aspire 3 é um bom aparelho de nível de entrada que é adequado para a maioria das atividades diárias.
O Aspire 3 é um candidato adequado para quem procura um portátil acessível de 15 polegadas com desempenho suficiente e potencial de atualização. Se você for usar seu aparelho muito longe de uma tomada ou ao viajar, pode ter alguns problemas com o tempo de duração da bateria.
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
- 09/06/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker