Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY (Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X, SSD, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM | |
HP 17-ca0013ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
HP 17-ca0013ng |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 322 cd/m²
Contraste: 1006:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell G3 17 3779 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF FX705GM IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 63.9 | 66.4 | 67.1 | 62.4 | |
sRGB Coverage | 86.8 | 89.8 | 84.9 | 86.1 | 88.8 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.9 | 62.1 | 63 | 63.8 | |
Response Times | -1% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 72% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 39 ? 2% | 38 ? 5% | 36.8 ? 8% | 36 ? 10% | 7.4 ? 81% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 28 ? -4% | 26 ? 4% | 24 ? 11% | 22 ? 19% | 10 ? 63% |
PWM Frequency | 122000 ? | |||||
Screen | -1% | -26% | -37% | -44% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 322 | 299 -7% | 323 0% | 328.7 2% | 365 13% | 234 -27% |
Brightness | 303 | 291 -4% | 306 1% | 318 5% | 341 13% | 228 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 89 6% | 91 8% | 89 6% | 85 1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.28 12% | 0.31 3% | 0.51 -59% | 0.32 -0% | 0.2 37% |
Contrast | 1006 | 1068 6% | 1042 4% | 645 -36% | 1141 13% | 1170 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.97 | 3.02 -2% | 4.96 -67% | 4.91 -65% | 6.51 -119% | 2.16 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.08 | 5.27 -4% | 8.25 -62% | 10.15 -100% | 12.32 -143% | 3.39 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.29 | 2.76 -21% | 4.27 -86% | 2.9 -27% | 2.02 12% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 2.18 4% | 5.65 -150% | 3.9 -73% | 7.65 -238% | 2 12% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.48 89% | 2.24 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.64 83% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6892 94% | 6392 102% | 7441 87% | 6911 94% | 8066 81% | 6394 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 57 0% | 58 2% | 55.6 -2% | 56 -2% | 58 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 87 0% | 90 3% | 84.7 -3% | 86 -1% | 89 2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-1% | -11% /
-21% | -14% /
-30% | -15% /
-35% | 40% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Turbo-Modus) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (77 - 146, n=11) | |
HP 17-ca0013ng | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Leise-Modus) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Turbo-Modus) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (635 - 769, n=11) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Leise-Modus) | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
HP 17-ca0013ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (4575 - 7893, n=4) | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (19002 - 20097, n=4) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (331 - 370, n=8) | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (1421 - 1728, n=8) |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (13474 - 15114, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (3348 - 3558, n=3) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (11183 - 13441, n=7) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (3623 - 3938, n=7) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Edge 44) | |
Dell G3 17 3779 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (1042 - 1229, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=181, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Dell G3 17 3779 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Edge 44) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (28324 - 29361, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Edge 44) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (151.3 - 174, n=5) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Gaming (29 - 465, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (Edge 44) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (42.1 - 43.5, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 7154 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4041 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4142 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4877 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4237 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | Dell G3 17 3779 SK hynix SC311 SATA | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Hynix HFS128G39TND | Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -29% | -56% | -51% | -60% | 9% | -5% | |
Write 4K | 107.7 | 90.3 -16% | 62.8 -42% | 71.4 -34% | 61.9 -43% | 104.2 -3% | 87.8 ? -18% |
Read 4K | 36.5 | 37.03 1% | 24.63 -33% | 29.98 -18% | 22.78 -38% | 41.46 14% | 33.7 ? -8% |
Write Seq | 988 | 320.3 -68% | 203.9 -79% | 129.6 -87% | 136.1 -86% | 1295 31% | 878 ? -11% |
Read Seq | 1115 | 1012 -9% | 550 -51% | 843 -24% | 490.1 -56% | 1325 19% | 949 ? -15% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 334.9 | 196.8 -41% | 160.1 -52% | 88.9 -73% | 136.2 -59% | 282.8 -16% | 356 ? 6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 360.8 | 271.5 -25% | 184.3 -49% | 196.4 -46% | 208.4 -42% | 321.3 -11% | 402 ? 11% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1008 | 268.8 -73% | 235 -77% | 130.5 -87% | 136 -87% | 1301 29% | 977 ? -3% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1609 | 1595 -1% | 554 -66% | 1037 -36% | 553 -66% | 1704 6% | 1597 ? -1% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25527 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7725 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60240 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10106 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5513 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1909 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Asus TUF FX505DY | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (6491 - 8451, n=6) | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
HP 17-ca0013ng |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
StarCraft 2 (2010) | 256.3 | 116.3 | 113.6 | 81.6 |
Diablo III (2012) | 150.2 | 133.5 | 130.8 | 105.7 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 209.3 | 188.2 | 162 | 121.7 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 188 | 158.2 | 140.9 | 53 |
Sims 4 (2014) | 145.4 | 114.8 | 73.2 | 64.8 |
GTA V (2015) | 89.3 | 83 | 48.3 | 21.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 105.5 | 67.6 | 35.9 | 21.7 |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 90 | 84 | 47 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80 | 73.1 | 65.6 | 60.7 |
World of Warships (2015) | 125.7 | 105.9 | 83.6 | 71.4 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 44.5 | 31.7 | 24.2 | |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 44.9 | 34.4 | 22.7 | |
Civilization VI (2016) | 107.6 | 76.4 | 39.3 | 33.9 |
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 90.8 | 50 | 45 | 39.4 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 95.3 | 93.8 | 84.1 | 80.5 |
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 64.3 | 18.9 | 14 | 9.7 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 77.8 | 50.8 | 46.7 | 37.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37 | 30 | 26.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 39 | 36 | 33 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 89.3 | 48.4 | 45.2 | 37.3 |
Battlefield V (2018) | 81.2 | 53.9 | 45.8 | 41.9 |
Darksiders III (2018) | 96.8 | 40.3 | 31.8 | 27.6 |
Just Cause 4 (2018) | 65.8 | 41.8 | 29.6 | 26.8 |
Apex Legends (2019) | 106.8 | 45.4 | 37.5 | 34.9 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 56 | 39 | 36 | 33 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 55.1 | 27.8 | 18.3 | 15.3 |
Anthem (2019) | 47.2 | 36.6 | 33.1 | 30.2 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 151.9 | 65.7 | 53.1 | 28.3 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 69 | 42 | 31 | 23 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX505DY | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (53 - 53.1, n=2) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
HP 17-ca0013ng |
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Gaming (168.5 - 617, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX505DY | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (67.6 - 70.3, n=3) | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (38 - 248, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Dell G3 17 3779 | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (38 - 39, n=2) |
Darksiders III - 1920x1080 Medium | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) () |
Diablo III - 1920x1080 High AA:on | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) () | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng |
StarCraft 2 - 1920x1080 ultra | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) () | |
HP Envy 17-ae143ng |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32.5 / 32.6 / 33.3 dB |
Carga |
| 38.7 / 45 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -2% | 9% | -1% | -9% | 3% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 30.7 | 30.5 1% | 30.5 1% | 28 9% | 29 6% | 29 6% | 29.3 ? 5% | 24 ? 22% |
Idle Minimum * | 32.5 | 30.5 6% | 31.2 4% | 28 14% | 29 11% | 32 2% | 29.9 ? 8% | 25.4 ? 22% |
Idle Average * | 32.6 | 31.1 5% | 32.4 1% | 28 14% | 31 5% | 33 -1% | 30.6 ? 6% | 27.1 ? 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.3 | 32.1 4% | 32.8 2% | 31.3 6% | 33 1% | 44 -32% | 31.2 ? 6% | 30.1 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 38.7 | 43.4 -12% | 43 -11% | 33.4 14% | 45 -16% | 46 -19% | 39.5 ? -2% | 42.4 ? -10% |
Load Maximum * | 45 | 39.2 13% | 48.1 -7% | 46.2 -3% | 51 -13% | 50 -11% | 47.2 ? -5% | 53.4 ? -19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 45 | 48 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.9 °C / 73.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6 °C / 10.8 F).
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -33% | -17% | -25% | -26% | -26% | -10% | -22% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.5 | 53 -28% | 53.3 -28% | 42 -1% | 50 -20% | 54 -30% | 44.2 ? -7% | 46.2 ? -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.6 | 60.5 -53% | 44.7 -13% | 51.2 -29% | 52 -31% | 53 -34% | 44.3 ? -12% | 49.2 ? -24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 30.3 -18% | 29.5 -15% | 31.8 -24% | 33 -28% | 30 -17% | 27.2 ? -6% | 31.1 ? -21% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.2 | 32 -32% | 27 -12% | 35.4 -46% | 30 -24% | 30 -24% | 27.7 ? -14% | 32.2 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.5 / 10.9 / 12.2 Watt |
Carga |
77 / 123 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -21% | 6% | -7% | -6% | -75% | -0% | -96% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.5 | 7.7 -40% | 3.8 31% | 6.3 -15% | 6 -9% | 13 -136% | 5.9 ? -7% | 13.5 ? -145% |
Idle Average * | 10.9 | 14 -28% | 9 17% | 11 -1% | 9 17% | 17 -56% | 9.47 ? 13% | 19 ? -74% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.2 | 15.5 -27% | 11.2 8% | 11.5 6% | 13 -7% | 24 -97% | 13.2 ? -8% | 26.7 ? -119% |
Load Average * | 77 | 95 -23% | 101 -31% | 89.8 -17% | 95 -23% | 106 -38% | 76.3 ? 1% | 106.7 ? -39% |
Load Maximum * | 123 | 106 14% | 119.7 3% | 130.7 -6% | 134 -9% | 179 -46% | 123.9 ? -1% | 251 ? -104% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 102 | 102 | 151 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh | Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | -20% | -14% | 19% | -36% | -17% | |
Reader / Idle | 757 | 733 -3% | 789 4% | 710 -6% | 380 -50% | 565 ? -25% | |
H.264 | 399 | 315 -21% | 260 -35% | 408 ? 2% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 430 | 345 -20% | 402 -7% | 354 -18% | 513 19% | 272 -37% | 375 ? -13% |
Load | 122 | 126 3% | 52 -57% | 100 -18% | 95 -22% | 85.3 ? -30% |
Pro
Contra
O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é um dispositivo bem equipado, considerando seu preço. Sua APU e GPU da AMD combinam bem para oferecer um desempenho decente do sistema e são poderosos o suficiente para lidar com todos os jogos modernos com taxas de quadros e configurações gráficas agradáveis.
Além disso, a máquina nem sempre é barulhento, como acontece com muitos portáteis de jogos, mas você deve primeiro ativar o modo silencioso, o que compromete o desempenho do processador. No entanto, a máquina ainda é capaz de executar tarefas de escritório e baseadas na Internet nesse modo.
O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e proporciona uma experiência de jogo decente com apenas alguns pequenos compromissos.
O SSD NVMe de 512 GB deve ser suficiente para a maioria das pessoas, mas você sempre pode adicionar um HD de 2,5 polegadas caso fique sem espaço. Infelizmente, você deve remover a carcaça inferior para acessar a baia da unidade, mas esse é geralmente o caso com os portáteis modernos.
Também gostamos da tela IPS mate. Ela é brilhante, tem bom contraste, tem ângulos de visão estáveis é reproduz cores com precisão. Da mesma forma, o dispositivo tem um teclado retro iluminado RGB decente, e a bateria deve durar até o final do dia, embora o FX705GE irá durar algumas horas a mais.
É uma pena que a ASUS tenha decidido não incluir uma porta USB Type-C ou um leitor de cartões de algum tipo. Além disso, a escolha de equipar o dispositivo com apenas uma saída de vídeo parece um passo em falso. Essas divergências à parte, o ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é uma barganha de 800 Euros (~$900) se você estiver procurando por um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas. Ele deve marcar a maioria das caixas de verificação das pessoas, mesmo que fique aquém dos concorrentes em algumas áreas.
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
-
04/17/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck