Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY (Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X, SSD, FHD)

Poder de jogos da AMD com estamina.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é um assunto totalmente vermelho com suas APU e GPU da AMD. O dispositivo lida sem problemas com todos os jogos modernos em sua tela mate de 17,3 polegadas, que carregam rapidamente graças ao seu SSD NVMe. O FX705DY ainda tem boa duração da bateria. Leia mais para descobrir se o dispositivo tem alguma deficiência e como ele se comporta em nossos testes rigorosos.
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Processador
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1223 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR5, conexão de 128-bits, Adrenalin 19.3.3, Enduro
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4-2666, single-channel, dois SO-DIMM (um ocupado)
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB 
, 512 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K17.1 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.6 x 399 x 279
Bateria
64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15,2
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Unidade de DVD, Estrutura de montagem e parafusos do HD, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 482 g
Preço
799 Euro
Links
Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg415.4 mm 279.2 mm 25 mm 3 kg413 mm 305 mm 21.95 mm 2.9 kg399 mm 279 mm 27.6 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +112%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
671 MBit/s +105%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (499min - 661max) MBit/s +97%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
579 MBit/s +77%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
327 (275min - 394max) MBit/s
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
321 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
298 MBit/s -9%
HP 17-ca0013ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
181 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +155%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +151%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
651 (547min - 681max) MBit/s +140%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s +132%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
473 MBit/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
340 MBit/s +25%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
284 MBit/s +5%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
271 (246min - 281max) MBit/s
HP 17-ca0013ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
216 MBit/s -20%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø270 (246-281)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (275-394)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)
319
cd/m²		319
cd/m²		287
cd/m²
298
cd/m²		322
cd/m²		275
cd/m²
300
cd/m²		328
cd/m²		283
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 328 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 303.4 cd/m² Minimum: 14.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 322 cd/m²
Contraste: 1006:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Dell G3 17 3779
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus TUF FX705GM
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
Display P3 Coverage
63.1
63.9
66.4
67.1
62.4
sRGB Coverage
86.8
89.8
84.9
86.1
88.8
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.5
64.9
62.1
63
63.8
Response Times
-1%
5%
10%
15%
72%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(20, 20)
39 ?(21, 18)
2%
38 ?(18, 20)
5%
36.8 ?(18.8, 18)
8%
36 ?(18.8, 17.2)
10%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
81%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(16, 11)
28 ?(16, 12)
-4%
26 ?(15, 11)
4%
24 ?(14, 10)
11%
22 ?(10.4, 11.6)
19%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
63%
PWM Frequency
122000 ?(95)
Screen
-1%
-26%
-37%
-44%
8%
Brightness middle
322
299
-7%
323
0%
328.7
2%
365
13%
234
-27%
Brightness
303
291
-4%
306
1%
318
5%
341
13%
228
-25%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
89
6%
91
8%
89
6%
85
1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.28
12%
0.31
3%
0.51
-59%
0.32
-0%
0.2
37%
Contrast
1006
1068
6%
1042
4%
645
-36%
1141
13%
1170
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.97
3.02
-2%
4.96
-67%
4.91
-65%
6.51
-119%
2.16
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.08
5.27
-4%
8.25
-62%
10.15
-100%
12.32
-143%
3.39
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.29
2.76
-21%
4.27
-86%
2.9
-27%
2.02
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.26
2.18
4%
5.65
-150%
3.9
-73%
7.65
-238%
2
12%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.48 89%
2.24 98%
2.13 103%
2.64 83%
2.46 89%
CCT
6892 94%
6392 102%
7441 87%
6911 94%
8066 81%
6394 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
57
0%
58
2%
55.6
-2%
56
-2%
58
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
87
0%
90
3%
84.7
-3%
86
-1%
89
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -1%
-11% / -21%
-14% / -30%
-15% / -35%
40% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø710 (704.34-742)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø759 (750.51-796.5)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø767 (738.02-807.05)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1050 (994.7-1115.98)
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø526 (522.29-550.6)
HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø549 (510.21-605.1)
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø645 (641.52-653)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H; Turbo-Modus: Ø739 (733.57-755.22)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H; Leise-Modus: Ø624 (616.98-673)
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Turbo mode
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Turbo mode
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Quiet mode
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Quiet mode
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4566
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19437
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7893
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
142 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
742 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
84.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1685 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
362 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +94%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points +22%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points +22%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
169 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Core i7-8550U
166 Points +17%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
142 Points
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Turbo-Modus)
142 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (77 - 146, n=11)
137.9 Points -3%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
136 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Leise-Modus)
77 Points -46%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +357%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
1230 Points +66%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1137 Points +53%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points +50%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
801 Points +8%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
798 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Turbo-Modus)
755 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (635 - 769, n=11)
717 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Leise-Modus)
673 Points -9%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
653 Points -12%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
605 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Core i7-8550U
551 Points -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
7893 Points
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
6445 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
6236 Points -21%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
5522 Points -30%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (4575 - 7893, n=4)
5413 Points -31%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points +228%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
34168 Points +76%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
24718 Points +27%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
20881 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (19002 - 20097, n=4)
19535 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
19437 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +99%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
362 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (331 - 370, n=8)
354 Points -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +389%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1685 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (1421 - 1728, n=8)
1596 Points -5%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
21635 Points +50%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
15050 Points +4%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
14437 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (13474 - 15114, n=3)
14342 Points -1%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
13343 Points -8%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
3740 Points +12%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
3734 Points +11%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
3439 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (3348 - 3558, n=3)
3420 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3353 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)
54312 Points +379%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
18068 Points +59%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
14790 Points +30%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
13488 Points +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (11183 - 13441, n=7)
12118 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
11344 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)
8126 Points +120%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52
Intel Core i5-8300H
4770 Points +29%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
4692 Points +27%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
4251 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (3623 - 3938, n=7)
3797 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3699 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
1229 ms *
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1157 ms * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (1042 - 1229, n=8)
1145 ms * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)
506 ms * +59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 115768, n=57, last 2 years)
95118 Points +229%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
33833 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
28917 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (28324 - 29361, n=4)
28827 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)
303 Points +74%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
174 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (151.3 - 174, n=5)
161.1 Points -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Gaming
  (29 - 465, n=49, last 2 years)
344 runs/min +691%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
43.5 runs/min
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (42.1 - 43.5, n=2)
42.8 runs/min -2%
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
7154 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4041 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4142 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4877 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4237 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +83%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4982 Points +18%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4975 Points +17%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4442 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (4237 - 4405, n=2)
4321 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4237 Points
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3610 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3339 Points -21%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +45%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
9110 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
8989 Points +20%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8791 Points +18%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
7888 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (7471 - 7949, n=2)
7710 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7471 Points
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
5949 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
5448 Points -27%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +59%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
7201 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
7057 Points +14%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7025 Points +13%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
6668 Points +7%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
6384 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (6209 - 6446, n=2)
6328 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6209 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
5989 Points -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +170%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6071 Points +36%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5290 Points +19%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5096 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (4451 - 4528, n=2)
4490 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4451 Points
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4342 Points -2%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3362 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3096 Points -30%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +29%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (4041 - 4560, n=2)
4301 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4230 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4148 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4041 Points
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3886 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3724 Points -8%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3666 Points -9%
HP 17-ca0013ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
3449 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +25%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5461 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5340 Points +9%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5218 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (4877 - 5223, n=2)
5050 Points +4%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4882 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4877 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
4837 Points -1%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Sequential Read: 1048 MB/s
Sequential Write: 996 MB/s
512K Read: 802 MB/s
512K Write: 1002 MB/s
4K Read: 34.49 MB/s
4K Write: 107.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 332.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 291.2 MB/s
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831		Dell G3 17 3779
SK hynix SC311 SATA		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND		Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-29%
-56%
-51%
-60%
9%
-5%
Write 4K
107.7
90.3
-16%
62.8
-42%
71.4
-34%
61.9
-43%
104.2
-3%
87.8 ?(52.1 - 130.5, n=10)
-18%
Read 4K
36.5
37.03
1%
24.63
-33%
29.98
-18%
22.78
-38%
41.46
14%
33.7 ?(27.7 - 39.7, n=10)
-8%
Write Seq
988
320.3
-68%
203.9
-79%
129.6
-87%
136.1
-86%
1295
31%
878 ?(688 - 1029, n=9)
-11%
Read Seq
1115
1012
-9%
550
-51%
843
-24%
490.1
-56%
1325
19%
949 ?(717 - 1115, n=9)
-15%
Write 4K Q32T1
334.9
196.8
-41%
160.1
-52%
88.9
-73%
136.2
-59%
282.8
-16%
356 ?(267 - 510, n=10)
6%
Read 4K Q32T1
360.8
271.5
-25%
184.3
-49%
196.4
-46%
208.4
-42%
321.3
-11%
402 ?(322 - 554, n=10)
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
1008
268.8
-73%
235
-77%
130.5
-87%
136
-87%
1301
29%
977 ?(606 - 1042, n=10)
-3%
Read Seq Q32T1
1609
1595
-1%
554
-66%
1037
-36%
553
-66%
1704
6%
1597 ?(1508 - 1612, n=10)
-1%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
25527 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
7725 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60240 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10106 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5513 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
1909 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +429%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
13722 Points +67%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
9466 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
9147 Points +11%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
8220 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
8181 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (6491 - 8451, n=6)
7970 Points -3%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
7761 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4792 Points -42%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
4631 Points -44%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3538 Points -57%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +284%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
51038 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
50732 Points +36%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
49314 Points +33%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
38306 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
37173 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (34407 - 37173, n=3)
35697 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
35511 Points -4%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
21153 Points -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19545 Points -47%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +394%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
7860 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
7791 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
7610 Points +20%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
6331 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
6327 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (6262 - 6370, n=4)
6323 Points 0%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
6228 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3698 Points -42%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
3628 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +629%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
2536 Points +42%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1790 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1789 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (1786 - 1790, n=3)
1788 Points 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
1068 Points -40%
baixomédiaaltoultra
StarCraft 2 (2010) 256.3 116.3 113.6 81.6
Diablo III (2012) 150.2 133.5 130.8 105.7
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 209.3 188.2 162 121.7
BioShock Infinite (2013) 188 158.2 140.9 53
Sims 4 (2014) 145.4 114.8 73.2 64.8
GTA V (2015) 89.3 83 48.3 21.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 105.5 67.6 35.9 21.7
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 90 84 47
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 80 73.1 65.6 60.7
World of Warships (2015) 125.7 105.9 83.6 71.4
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 44.5 31.7 24.2
Mafia 3 (2016) 44.9 34.4 22.7
Civilization VI (2016) 107.6 76.4 39.3 33.9
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 90.8 50 45 39.4
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 95.3 93.8 84.1 80.5
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 64.3 18.9 14 9.7
Destiny 2 (2017) 77.8 50.8 46.7 37.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 37 30 26.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 63 39 36 33
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 89.3 48.4 45.2 37.3
Battlefield V (2018) 81.2 53.9 45.8 41.9
Darksiders III (2018) 96.8 40.3 31.8 27.6
Just Cause 4 (2018) 65.8 41.8 29.6 26.8
Apex Legends (2019) 106.8 45.4 37.5 34.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 56 39 36 33
Metro Exodus (2019) 55.1 27.8 18.3 15.3
Anthem (2019) 47.2 36.6 33.1 30.2
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 151.9 65.7 53.1 28.3
The Division 2 (2019) 69 42 31 23
BioShock Infinite | The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Darksiders III | Diablo III | StarCraft 2
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
74.5 fps +41%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
72.2 fps +36%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
64.3 fps +21%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
53.1 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (53 - 53.1, n=2)
53.1 fps 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
53 fps
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
35 fps -34%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
19.34 fps -64%
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=102, last 2 years)
361 fps +434%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
87.3 fps +29%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
82 fps +21%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
71 (60min - 79max) fps +5%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
70.3 fps +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (67.6 - 70.3, n=3)
68.8 fps +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
67.6 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
30.4 fps -55%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 248, n=86, last 2 years)
145.6 fps +273%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
48 fps +23%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
40 (35min - 48max) fps +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
39 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  (38 - 39, n=2)
38.5 fps -1%
Darksiders III - 1920x1080 Medium
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
66.4 fps +65%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
40.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  ()
40.3 fps 0%
Diablo III - 1920x1080 High AA:on
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
165.6 fps +57%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
105.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  ()
105.7 fps 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
88.8 fps -16%
StarCraft 2 - 1920x1080 ultra
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
125.5 fps +54%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
81.6 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
  ()
81.6 fps 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
60.5 fps -26%
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø22 (20-24)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø24.9 (22-28)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831: Ø24.8 (22-27)
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)
GPU clock speeds during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU clock speeds during our The Witcher 3 test

Barulho

Ocioso
32.5 / 32.6 / 33.3 dB
Carga
38.7 / 45 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.535.633.933.433.52552.153.635.932.152.13163.165.238.632.963.14039.139.634.432.139.150353533.731.735633031.930.928.9308030.529.42832.530.510027.62827.129.627.612526.527.126.326.126.516026.427.625.925.426.420026.928.125.623.126.925026.930.124.122.226.931529.934.524.621.629.940028.734.123.72128.75002629.422.1202663025.530.421.518.625.580026.432.321.51826.4100027.132.621.617.827.1125028.3352217.628.3160027.834.521.517.527.8200028.535.222.317.328.5250027.734.221.917.927.7315029.23520.31829.2400024.532.719.918.124.5500022.131.419.718.322.1630021.328.719.718.521.3800020.525.219.918.720.51000020.22319.918.820.21250020.121.52018.920.11600020.420.720.21920.4SPL38.74533.430.638.7N2.94.81.81.32.9median 26.5median 30.4median 21.6median 18.7median 26.5Delta2.94.12.122.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
3%
-2%
9%
-1%
-9%
3%
7%
off / environment *
30.7
30.5
1%
30.5
1%
28
9%
29
6%
29
6%
29.3 ?(28.2 - 30.7, n=3)
5%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Minimum *
32.5
30.5
6%
31.2
4%
28
14%
29
11%
32
2%
29.9 ?(28.2 - 32.5, n=3)
8%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average *
32.6
31.1
5%
32.4
1%
28
14%
31
5%
33
-1%
30.6 ?(28.2 - 32.6, n=3)
6%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
33.3
32.1
4%
32.8
2%
31.3
6%
33
1%
44
-32%
31.2 ?(28.2 - 33.3, n=3)
6%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
9%
Load Average *
38.7
43.4
-12%
43
-11%
33.4
14%
45
-16%
46
-19%
39.5 ?(36 - 43.9, n=3)
-2%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
-10%
Load Maximum *
45
39.2
13%
48.1
-7%
46.2
-3%
51
-13%
50
-11%
47.2 ?(45 - 50.6, n=3)
-5%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.8
45
48

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 37.1 °C34.8 °C37.2 °C 
 26.6 °C41.5 °C29.3 °C 
 22.9 °C22 °C22.9 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C
39.6 °C32 °C34.7 °C
37 °C29.6 °C27.2 °C
22.2 °C22.4 °C21.5 °C
Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  47.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.9 °C / 73.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6 °C / 10.8 F).
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-33%
-17%
-25%
-26%
-26%
-10%
-22%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.5
53
-28%
53.3
-28%
42
-1%
50
-20%
54
-30%
44.2 ?(41.5 - 47, n=3)
-7%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
-11%
Maximum Bottom *
39.6
60.5
-53%
44.7
-13%
51.2
-29%
52
-31%
53
-34%
44.3 ?(39.6 - 49.4, n=3)
-12%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
-24%
Idle Upper Side *
25.7
30.3
-18%
29.5
-15%
31.8
-24%
33
-28%
30
-17%
27.2 ?(25.7 - 30, n=3)
-6%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Bottom *
24.2
32
-32%
27
-12%
35.4
-46%
30
-24%
30
-24%
27.7 ?(24.2 - 30.8, n=3)
-14%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
-33%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.433.435.4253332.1333135.432.935.44035.132.135.1503131.7316330.828.930.88026.632.526.610026.629.626.612529.326.129.31603525.43520035.323.135.325043.622.243.631550.221.650.240055.92155.950052.82052.863058.818.658.880060.51860.510005917.859125055.917.655.9160060.817.560.8200063.217.363.2250066.217.966.2315064.81864.8400066.818.166.8500064.718.364.763006218.562800051.818.751.81000048.818.848.81250043.318.943.31600039.31939.3SPL74.630.674.6N30.91.330.9median 55.9median 18.7median 55.9Delta10210hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.5 / 10.9 / 12.2 Watt
Carga midlight 77 / 123 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
6%
-7%
-6%
-75%
-0%
-95%
Idle Minimum *
5.5
7.7
-40%
3.8
31%
6.3
-15%
6
-9%
13
-136%
5.9 ?(5.2 - 7, n=3)
-7%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
-145%
Idle Average *
10.9
14
-28%
9
17%
11
-1%
9
17%
17
-56%
9.47 ?(7.5 - 10.9, n=3)
13%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
-73%
Idle Maximum *
12.2
15.5
-27%
11.2
8%
11.5
6%
13
-7%
24
-97%
13.2 ?(9.4 - 18, n=3)
-8%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
-119%
Load Average *
77
95
-23%
101
-31%
89.8
-17%
95
-23%
106
-38%
76.3 ?(73 - 79, n=3)
1%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
-38%
Load Maximum *
123
106
14%
119.7
3%
130.7
-6%
134
-9%
179
-46%
123.9 ?(120.7 - 128, n=3)
-1%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-102%
Witcher 3 ultra *
102
102
151

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 02min
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-10%
-20%
-14%
19%
-36%
-17%
Reader / Idle
757
733
-3%
789
4%
710
-6%
380
-50%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
-25%
H.264
399
315
-21%
260
-35%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
2%
WiFi v1.3
430
345
-20%
402
-7%
354
-18%
513
19%
272
-37%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
-13%
Load
122
126
3%
52
-57%
100
-18%
95
-22%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
-30%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate
+ Resolução Full HD
+ Carcaça compacta
+ SSD NVMe
+ HD atualizável
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso

Contra

- Seleção de portas abaixo do esperado
- Sem USB Type-C
- Sem leitor de cartões de memória
The ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY-AU072 laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY-AU072 laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é um dispositivo bem equipado, considerando seu preço. Sua APU e GPU da AMD combinam bem para oferecer um desempenho decente do sistema e são poderosos o suficiente para lidar com todos os jogos modernos com taxas de quadros e configurações gráficas agradáveis.

Além disso, a máquina nem sempre é barulhento, como acontece com muitos portáteis de jogos, mas você deve primeiro ativar o modo silencioso, o que compromete o desempenho do processador. No entanto, a máquina ainda é capaz de executar tarefas de escritório e baseadas na Internet nesse modo.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e proporciona uma experiência de jogo decente com apenas alguns pequenos compromissos.

O SSD NVMe de 512 GB deve ser suficiente para a maioria das pessoas, mas você sempre pode adicionar um HD de 2,5 polegadas caso fique sem espaço. Infelizmente, você deve remover a carcaça inferior para acessar a baia da unidade, mas esse é geralmente o caso com os portáteis modernos.

Também gostamos da tela IPS mate. Ela é brilhante, tem bom contraste, tem ângulos de visão estáveis é reproduz cores com precisão. Da mesma forma, o dispositivo tem um teclado retro iluminado RGB decente, e a bateria deve durar até o final do dia, embora o FX705GE irá durar algumas horas a mais.

É uma pena que a ASUS tenha decidido não incluir uma porta USB Type-C ou um leitor de cartões de algum tipo. Além disso, a escolha de equipar o dispositivo com apenas uma saída de vídeo parece um passo em falso. Essas divergências à parte, o ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é uma barganha de 800 Euros (~$900) se você estiver procurando por um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas. Ele deve marcar a maioria das caixas de verificação das pessoas, mesmo que fique aquém dos concorrentes em algumas áreas.

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 - 04/17/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
42 / 81 → 52%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
85%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
94 / 95 → 99%
Ruído
82 / 90 → 91%
Audio
60%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Médio
75%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 (FX705 Serie)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY (Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X, SSD, FHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-26)