Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY (Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X, SSD, FHD)

Name: Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Brand: Asus

Poder de jogos da AMD com estamina.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é um assunto totalmente vermelho com suas APU e GPU da AMD. O dispositivo lida sem problemas com todos os jogos modernos em sua tela mate de 17,3 polegadas, que carregam rapidamente graças ao seu SSD NVMe. O FX705DY ainda tem boa duração da bateria. Leia mais para descobrir se o dispositivo tem alguma deficiência e como ele se comporta em nossos testes rigorosos.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/22/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072

Processador

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1223 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR5, conexão de 128-bits, Adrenalin 19.3.3, Enduro

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2666, single-channel, dois SO-DIMM (um ocupado)

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

AMD CZ FCH

Disco rígido

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB

, 512 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K17.1 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.6 x 399 x 279

Bateria

64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15,2

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Unidade de DVD, Estrutura de montagem e parafusos do HD, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 482 g

Preço

799 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Dell G3 17 3779 Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s +112%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	671 MBit/s +105%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560	644 (499^min - 661^max) MBit/s +97%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	640 MBit/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	579 MBit/s +77%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	327 (275^min - 394^max) MBit/s
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Wireless AC 9462	321 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	298 MBit/s -9%
HP 17-ca0013ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	181 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s +155%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	681 MBit/s +151%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560	651 (547^min - 681^max) MBit/s +140%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	630 MBit/s +132%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	473 MBit/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	340 MBit/s +25%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Wireless AC 9462	284 MBit/s +5%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	271 (246^min - 281^max) MBit/s
HP 17-ca0013ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	216 MBit/s -20%

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø270 (246-281)

Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (275-394)

Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)


319 cd/m²	319 cd/m²	287 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	322 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
300 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	283 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B173HAN04.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 328 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 303.4 cd/m² Minimum: 14.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 322 cd/m²
Contraste: 1006:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.45

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Dell G3 17 3779 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF FX705GM IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
Display P3 Coverage		63.1	63.9	66.4	67.1	62.4
sRGB Coverage		86.8	89.8	84.9	86.1	88.8
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage		63.5	64.9	62.1	63	63.8
Response Times		-1%	5%	10%	15%	72%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(20, 20)	39 ?(21, 18) 2%	38 ?(18, 20) 5%	36.8 ?(18.8, 18) 8%	36 ?(18.8, 17.2) 10%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 81%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(16, 11)	28 ?(16, 12) -4%	26 ?(15, 11) 4%	24 ?(14, 10) 11%	22 ?(10.4, 11.6) 19%	10 ?(4.8, 5.2) 63%
PWM Frequency					122000 ?(95)
Screen		-1%	-26%	-37%	-44%	8%
Brightness middle	322	299 -7%	323 0%	328.7 2%	365 13%	234 -27%
Brightness	303	291 -4%	306 1%	318 5%	341 13%	228 -25%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	89 6%	91 8%	89 6%	85 1%
Black Level *	0.32	0.28 12%	0.31 3%	0.51 -59%	0.32 -0%	0.2 37%
Contrast	1006	1068 6%	1042 4%	645 -36%	1141 13%	1170 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.97	3.02 -2%	4.96 -67%	4.91 -65%	6.51 -119%	2.16 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.08	5.27 -4%	8.25 -62%	10.15 -100%	12.32 -143%	3.39 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.29	2.76 -21%		4.27 -86%	2.9 -27%	2.02 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.26	2.18 4%	5.65 -150%	3.9 -73%	7.65 -238%	2 12%
Gamma	2.45 ^90%	2.48 ^89%	2.24 ^98%	2.13 ^103%	2.64 ^83%	2.46 ^89%
CCT	6892 ^94%	6392 ^102%	7441 ^87%	6911 ^94%	8066 ^81%	6394 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	57 0%	58 2%	55.6 -2%	56 -2%	58 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87	87 0%	90 3%	84.7 -3%	86 -1%	89 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / -1%	-11% / -21%	-14% / -30%	-15% / -35%	40% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø710 (704.34-742)

Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)

Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø759 (750.51-796.5)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø767 (738.02-807.05)

Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1050 (994.7-1115.98)

Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø526 (522.29-550.6)

HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø549 (510.21-605.1)

HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø645 (641.52-653)

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H; Turbo-Modus: Ø739 (733.57-755.22)

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H; Leise-Modus: Ø624 (616.98-673)

CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop

CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Turbo mode

CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop in Quiet mode

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4566

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

19437

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7893

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

142 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

742 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

84.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1685 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

362 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +96%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	173 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H	173 Points +22%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	173 Points +22%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H	169 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	166 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Core i7-8550U	166 Points +17%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	142 Points
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Turbo-Modus)	142 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (77 - 146, n=11)	137.9 Points -3%
HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	136 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Leise-Modus)	77 Points -46%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points +363%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H	1230 Points +66%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H	1137 Points +53%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	1116 Points +50%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H	807 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	801 Points +8%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H	798 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Turbo-Modus)	755 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	742 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (635 - 769, n=11)	717 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Leise-Modus)	673 Points -9%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	653 Points -12%
HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	605 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Core i7-8550U	551 Points -26%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)	9755 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	7893 Points
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H	6445 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	6236 Points -21%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	5522 Points -30%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (4575 - 7893, n=4)	5413 Points -31%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)	63783 Points +228%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	34168 Points +76%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H	24718 Points +27%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	20881 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (19002 - 20097, n=4)	19535 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	19437 Points

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points +101%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	362 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (331 - 370, n=8)	354 Points -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8336 Points +395%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1685 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (1421 - 1728, n=8)	1596 Points -5%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	21635 Points +50%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	15050 Points +4%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	14437 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (13474 - 15114, n=3)	14342 Points -1%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	13343 Points -8%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	3740 Points +12%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	3734 Points +11%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	3439 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (3348 - 3558, n=3)	3420 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	3353 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)	54312 Points +379%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	18068 Points +59%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	14790 Points +30%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	13488 Points +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (11183 - 13441, n=7)	12118 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	11344 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)	8126 Points +120%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 Intel Core i5-8300H	4770 Points +29%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	4692 Points +27%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U	4251 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (3623 - 3938, n=7)	3797 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	3699 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)	1229 ms *
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	1157 ms * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (1042 - 1229, n=8)	1145 ms * +7%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)	502 ms * +59%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years)	95460 Points +230%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	33833 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)	28917 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (28324 - 29361, n=4)	28827 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)	304 Points +75%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)	174 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (151.3 - 174, n=5)	161.1 Points -7%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Gaming (29 - 465, n=48, last 2 years)	347 runs/min +698%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)	43.5 runs/min
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (42.1 - 43.5, n=2)	42.8 runs/min -2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		7154 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4041 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4142 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4877 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4237 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +84%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5169 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	4982 Points +18%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	4975 Points +17%
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	4442 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (4237 - 4405, n=2)	4321 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4237 Points
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3610 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	3339 Points -21%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10833 Points +45%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	9110 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	8989 Points +20%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	8791 Points +18%
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	7888 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (7471 - 7949, n=2)	7710 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7471 Points
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	5949 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	5448 Points -27%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9904 Points +60%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	7201 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	7057 Points +14%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	7025 Points +13%
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	6668 Points +7%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	6384 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (6209 - 6446, n=2)	6328 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	6209 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	5989 Points -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12134 Points +173%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	6071 Points +36%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	5290 Points +19%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	5096 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (4451 - 4528, n=2)	4490 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4451 Points
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	4342 Points -2%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3362 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	3096 Points -30%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=19, last 2 years)	5222 Points +29%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4660 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (4041 - 4560, n=2)	4301 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND	4253 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	4230 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	4148 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4041 Points
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	3886 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	3724 Points -8%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3666 Points -9%
HP 17-ca0013ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	3449 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=17, last 2 years)	6098 Points +25%
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5719 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	5461 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND	5347 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	5340 Points +9%
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA	5218 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (4877 - 5223, n=2)	5050 Points +4%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	4882 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4877 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0	4837 Points -1%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ

Sequential Read: 1048 MB/s

Sequential Write: 996 MB/s

512K Read: 802 MB/s

512K Write: 1002 MB/s

4K Read: 34.49 MB/s

4K Write: 107.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 332.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 291.2 MB/s

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831	Dell G3 17 3779 SK hynix SC311 SATA	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Hynix HFS128G39TND	Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-29%	-56%	-51%	-60%	9%	-5%
Write 4K	107.7	90.3 -16%	62.8 -42%	71.4 -34%	61.9 -43%	104.2 -3%	87.8 ?(52.1 - 130.5, n=10) -18%
Read 4K	36.5	37.03 1%	24.63 -33%	29.98 -18%	22.78 -38%	41.46 14%	33.7 ?(27.7 - 39.7, n=10) -8%
Write Seq	988	320.3 -68%	203.9 -79%	129.6 -87%	136.1 -86%	1295 31%	878 ?(688 - 1029, n=9) -11%
Read Seq	1115	1012 -9%	550 -51%	843 -24%	490.1 -56%	1325 19%	949 ?(717 - 1115, n=9) -15%
Write 4K Q32T1	334.9	196.8 -41%	160.1 -52%	88.9 -73%	136.2 -59%	282.8 -16%	356 ?(267 - 510, n=10) 6%
Read 4K Q32T1	360.8	271.5 -25%	184.3 -49%	196.4 -46%	208.4 -42%	321.3 -11%	402 ?(322 - 554, n=10) 11%
Write Seq Q32T1	1008	268.8 -73%	235 -77%	130.5 -87%	136 -87%	1301 29%	977 ?(606 - 1042, n=10) -3%
Read Seq Q32T1	1609	1595 -1%	554 -66%	1037 -36%	553 -66%	1704 6%	1597 ?(1508 - 1612, n=10) -1%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		25527 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		7725 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		60240 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		10106 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5513 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		1909 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +433%
Asus TUF FX705GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	13722 Points +67%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	9466 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	9147 Points +11%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	8220 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	8181 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (6491 - 8451, n=6)	7970 Points -3%
Dell G3 17 3779 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	7761 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	4792 Points -42%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	4631 Points -44%
HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	3538 Points -57%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points +286%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	51038 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	50732 Points +36%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	49314 Points +33%
Dell G3 17 3779 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	38306 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	37173 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (34407 - 37173, n=3)	35697 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	35511 Points -4%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	21153 Points -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	19545 Points -47%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +396%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	7860 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	7791 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	7610 Points +20%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	6331 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	6327 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (6262 - 6370, n=4)	6323 Points 0%
Dell G3 17 3779 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	6228 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	3698 Points -42%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	3628 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +633%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	2536 Points +42%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1790 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1789 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (1786 - 1790, n=3)	1788 Points 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	1068 Points -40%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
StarCraft 2 (2010)	256.3	116.3	113.6	81.6
Diablo III (2012)	150.2	133.5	130.8	105.7
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	209.3	188.2	162	121.7
BioShock Infinite (2013)	188	158.2	140.9	53
Sims 4 (2014)	145.4	114.8	73.2	64.8
GTA V (2015)	89.3	83	48.3	21.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	105.5	67.6	35.9	21.7
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	90	84	47
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	80	73.1	65.6	60.7
World of Warships (2015)	125.7	105.9	83.6	71.4
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	44.5	31.7	24.2
Mafia 3 (2016)	44.9	34.4	22.7
Civilization VI (2016)	107.6	76.4	39.3	33.9
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	90.8	50	45	39.4
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	95.3	93.8	84.1	80.5
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)	64.3	18.9	14	9.7
Destiny 2 (2017)	77.8	50.8	46.7	37.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	37	30	26.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)	63	39	36	33
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)	89.3	48.4	45.2	37.3
Battlefield V (2018)	81.2	53.9	45.8	41.9
Darksiders III (2018)	96.8	40.3	31.8	27.6
Just Cause 4 (2018)	65.8	41.8	29.6	26.8
Apex Legends (2019)	106.8	45.4	37.5	34.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	56	39	36	33
Metro Exodus (2019)	55.1	27.8	18.3	15.3
Anthem (2019)	47.2	36.6	33.1	30.2
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	151.9	65.7	53.1	28.3
The Division 2 (2019)	69	42	31	23

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	74.5 fps +41%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	72.2 fps +36%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	64.3 fps +21%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	53.1 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (53 - 53.1, n=2)	53.1 fps 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	53 fps
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	35 fps -34%
HP 17-ca0013ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	19.34 fps -64%

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (168.5 - 617, n=98, last 2 years)	365 fps +440%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	87.3 fps +29%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	82 fps +21%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	71 (60^min - 79^max) fps +5%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	70.3 fps +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (67.6 - 70.3, n=3)	68.8 fps +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	67.6 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	30.4 fps -55%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (38 - 248, n=85, last 2 years)	146 fps +274%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	48 fps +23%
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	40 (35^min - 48^max) fps +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	39 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) (38 - 39, n=2)	38.5 fps -1%

Darksiders III - 1920x1080 Medium
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	66.4 fps +65%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	40.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) ()	40.3 fps 0%

Diablo III - 1920x1080 High AA:on
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	165.6 fps +57%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	105.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) ()	105.7 fps 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	88.8 fps -16%

StarCraft 2 - 1920x1080 ultra
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	125.5 fps +54%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	81.6 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) ()	81.6 fps 0%
HP Envy 17-ae143ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	60.5 fps -26%

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø22 (20-24)

Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø24.9 (22-28)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)

Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831: Ø24.8 (22-27)

Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)

GPU clock speeds during our The Witcher 3 test

Barulho

Ocioso		32.5 / 32.6 / 33.3 dB
Carga		38.7 / 45 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Average of class Gaming
Noise		3%	-2%	9%	-1%	-9%	3%	7%
off / environment *	30.7	30.5 1%	30.5 1%	28 9%	29 6%	29 6%	29.3 ?(28.2 - 30.7, n=3) 5%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=155, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Minimum *	32.5	30.5 6%	31.2 4%	28 14%	29 11%	32 2%	29.9 ?(28.2 - 32.5, n=3) 8%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=156, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Average *	32.6	31.1 5%	32.4 1%	28 14%	31 5%	33 -1%	30.6 ?(28.2 - 32.6, n=3) 6%	27.3 ?(23 - 37.5, n=156, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Maximum *	33.3	32.1 4%	32.8 2%	31.3 6%	33 1%	44 -32%	31.2 ?(28.2 - 33.3, n=3) 6%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=156, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	38.7	43.4 -12%	43 -11%	33.4 14%	45 -16%	46 -19%	39.5 ?(36 - 43.9, n=3) -2%	42.8 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=156, last 2 years) -11%
Load Maximum *	45	39.2 13%	48.1 -7%	46.2 -3%	51 -13%	50 -11%	47.2 ?(45 - 50.6, n=3) -5%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -19%
Witcher 3 ultra *				42.8	45	48

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.1 °C	34.8 °C	37.2 °C
26.6 °C	41.5 °C	29.3 °C
22.9 °C	22 °C	22.9 °C

Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C


39.6 °C	32 °C	34.7 °C
37 °C	29.6 °C	27.2 °C
22.2 °C	22.4 °C	21.5 °C

Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 47.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.9 °C / 73.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6 °C / 10.8 F).

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-33%	-17%	-25%	-26%	-26%	-10%	-23%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.5	53 -28%	53.3 -28%	42 -1%	50 -20%	54 -30%	44.2 ?(41.5 - 47, n=3) -7%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) -11%
Maximum Bottom *	39.6	60.5 -53%	44.7 -13%	51.2 -29%	52 -31%	53 -34%	44.3 ?(39.6 - 49.4, n=3) -12%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) -24%
Idle Upper Side *	25.7	30.3 -18%	29.5 -15%	31.8 -24%	33 -28%	30 -17%	27.2 ?(25.7 - 30, n=3) -6%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Bottom *	24.2	32 -32%	27 -12%	35.4 -46%	30 -24%	30 -24%	27.7 ?(24.2 - 30.8, n=3) -14%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) -33%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.7 Watt
Ocioso	5.5 / 10.9 / 12.2 Watt
Carga	77 / 123 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Average AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-21%	6%	-7%	-6%	-75%	-0%	-96%
Idle Minimum *	5.5	7.7 -40%	3.8 31%	6.3 -15%	6 -9%	13 -136%	5.9 ?(5.2 - 7, n=3) -7%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) -147%
Idle Average *	10.9	14 -28%	9 17%	11 -1%	9 17%	17 -56%	9.47 ?(7.5 - 10.9, n=3) 13%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -74%
Idle Maximum *	12.2	15.5 -27%	11.2 8%	11.5 6%	13 -7%	24 -97%	13.2 ?(9.4 - 18, n=3) -8%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) -120%
Load Average *	77	95 -23%	101 -31%	89.8 -17%	95 -23%	106 -38%	76.3 ?(73 - 79, n=3) 1%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -38%
Load Maximum *	123	106 14%	119.7 3%	130.7 -6%	134 -9%	179 -46%	123.9 ?(120.7 - 128, n=3) -1%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -102%
Witcher 3 ultra *				102	102	151

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)		7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 02min

	Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh	Dell G3 17 3779 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh	Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh	Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-10%	-20%	-14%	19%	-36%	-16%
Reader / Idle	757	733 -3%	789 4%	710 -6%		380 -50%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) -25%
H.264	399	315 -21%				260 -35%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 3%
WiFi v1.3	430	345 -20%	402 -7%	354 -18%	513 19%	272 -37%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -13%
Load	122	126 3%	52 -57%	100 -18%		95 -22%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -30%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate

+ Resolução Full HD

+ Carcaça compacta

+ SSD NVMe

+ HD atualizável

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Teclado iluminado

+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso

Contra

- Seleção de portas abaixo do esperado

- Sem USB Type-C

- Sem leitor de cartões de memória

The ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY-AU072 laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é um dispositivo bem equipado, considerando seu preço. Sua APU e GPU da AMD combinam bem para oferecer um desempenho decente do sistema e são poderosos o suficiente para lidar com todos os jogos modernos com taxas de quadros e configurações gráficas agradáveis.

Além disso, a máquina nem sempre é barulhento, como acontece com muitos portáteis de jogos, mas você deve primeiro ativar o modo silencioso, o que compromete o desempenho do processador. No entanto, a máquina ainda é capaz de executar tarefas de escritório e baseadas na Internet nesse modo.

O ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e proporciona uma experiência de jogo decente com apenas alguns pequenos compromissos.

O SSD NVMe de 512 GB deve ser suficiente para a maioria das pessoas, mas você sempre pode adicionar um HD de 2,5 polegadas caso fique sem espaço. Infelizmente, você deve remover a carcaça inferior para acessar a baia da unidade, mas esse é geralmente o caso com os portáteis modernos.

Também gostamos da tela IPS mate. Ela é brilhante, tem bom contraste, tem ângulos de visão estáveis é reproduz cores com precisão. Da mesma forma, o dispositivo tem um teclado retro iluminado RGB decente, e a bateria deve durar até o final do dia, embora o FX705GE irá durar algumas horas a mais.

É uma pena que a ASUS tenha decidido não incluir uma porta USB Type-C ou um leitor de cartões de algum tipo. Além disso, a escolha de equipar o dispositivo com apenas uma saída de vídeo parece um passo em falso. Essas divergências à parte, o ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY é uma barganha de 800 Euros (~$900) se você estiver procurando por um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas. Ele deve marcar a maioria das caixas de verificação das pessoas, mesmo que fique aquém dos concorrentes em algumas áreas.

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 - 04/17/2019 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

42 / 81 → 52%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 87%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

85%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

94 / 95 → 99%

Ruído

82 / 90 → 91%

Audio

60%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

75%

81%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11437 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS TUF Gaming FX705DY (Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X, SSD, FHD)

Sascha Mölck, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-26)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison