Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 286 cd/m²
Contraste: 773:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 0% | 2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.9 | 65.6 1% | 64.2 -1% | 65.3 1% | 63.5 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91 | 92.2 1% | 92.6 2% | 94.9 4% | 93.1 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 66.9 2% | 65.7 0% | 66.3 1% | 64.5 -2% |
| Response Times | -3% | -19% | -83% | -92% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 7 ? 3% | 8 ? -11% | 16.8 ? -133% | 16.4 ? -128% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 9.6 ? -9% | 11.2 ? -27% | 11.6 ? -32% | 13.6 ? -55% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -3% | -24% | -2% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 286 | 323.6 13% | 304 6% | 314.7 10% | 250 -13% |
| Brightness | 275 | 315 15% | 299 9% | 312 13% | 235 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 90 0% | 85 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.29 22% | 0.27 27% | 0.38 -3% | 0.29 22% |
| Contrast | 773 | 1116 44% | 1126 46% | 828 7% | 862 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.19 | 3.31 -51% | 4.66 -113% | 2.56 -17% | 1.46 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 5.74 -30% | 9.65 -119% | 4.89 -11% | 2.47 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.27 | 2.73 -20% | 1.72 24% | 1.71 25% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.9 -32% | 5.53 -151% | 3.4 -55% | 1.27 42% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.5 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6405 101% | 6765 96% | 8028 81% | 6435 101% | 6749 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 59.7 1% | 60 2% | 60.7 3% | 60 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 91.8 1% | 93 2% | 94.6 4% | 93 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | -14% /
-19% | -28% /
-11% | -27% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -29% | 7% | -10% | -11% | |
| Write 4K | 97 | 93.9 -3% | 93.6 -4% | 93.9 -3% | 97.1 0% |
| Read 4K | 49.58 | 46.29 -7% | 38.82 -22% | 40.56 -18% | 53.7 8% |
| Write Seq | 1838 | 974 -47% | 2455 34% | 1468 -20% | 1526 -17% |
| Read Seq | 2421 | 1425 -41% | 2107 -13% | 1540 -36% | 2020 -17% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 326.9 | 259.4 -21% | 298.7 -9% | 293.5 -10% | 285.6 -13% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 372.9 | 296.5 -20% | 338.7 -9% | 346 -7% | 321.8 -14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1894 | 977 -48% | 2902 53% | 1941 2% | 1533 -19% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2828 | 1666 -41% | 3536 25% | 3266 15% | 2351 -17% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18686 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30754 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16290 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6890 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 130 | 70.2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 91.3 | 86 | 80.3 | 74.2 |
| Apex Legends (2019) | 128 | 126 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 91 | 83 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 91.1 | 82.6 | 66.3 | 54.6 |
| Anthem (2019) | 84 | 79 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 121 | 75 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 121 | 111 | 94 | 73 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 76.8 | 39.5 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 180 | 122 | 103 | 101 |
| Control (2019) | 152 | 90 | 68 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 94 | 84 | 71 | 61 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 33 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 50 / 56 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.7 4% | 29 3% | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29.8 4% | 30 3% | 28.8 7% | 32 -3% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 32.4 2% | 32 3% | 28.8 13% | 34 -3% | 27.2 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 38 -0% | 34 11% | 29.4 23% | 36 5% | 30.2 ? 21% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 38.2 24% | 44 12% | 35.7 29% | 42 16% | 42.5 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 56.6 -7% | 46 13% | 42.5 20% | 44 17% | |
| Load Maximum * | 56 | 56.6 -1% | 47 16% | 45 20% | 48 14% | 53.4 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | -3% | 12% | -1% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 47 13% | 49 9% | 49 9% | 56 -4% | 46.1 ? 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 48.6 -3% | 58 -23% | 49 -4% | 66 -40% | 49.2 ? -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 28.8 13% | 33 -0% | 25.4 23% | 27 18% | 31.2 ? 5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34 | 33.2 2% | 33 3% | 27.2 20% | 27 21% | 32.2 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 24 / 27 / 33 Watt |
| Carga |
129 / 216 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | 20% | 36% | 31% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 16.1 33% | 16 33% | 10.4 57% | 16 33% | 13.5 ? 44% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 20.9 23% | 22 19% | 14.6 46% | 18 33% | 18.9 ? 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 27 18% | 32 3% | 16.3 51% | 23 30% | 26.7 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 129 | 93.4 28% | 89 31% | 88.5 31% | 88 32% | 106.6 ? 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 176 | 168.2 4% | 147 16% | 155.4 12% | 120 32% | |
| Load Maximum * | 216 | 215.3 -0% | 173 20% | 182.4 16% | 167 23% | 249 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | 4% | 70% | 104% | 56% | |
| Reader / Idle | 353 | 335 -5% | 682 93% | 549 56% | 565 ? 60% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 220 | 181 -18% | 190 -14% | 387 76% | 382 74% | 376 ? 71% |
| Load | 62 | 81 31% | 88 42% | 174 181% | 85.3 ? 38% | |
| H.264 | 364 | 408 ? |
Pro
Contra
Na superfície, o ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW é atualmente um dos melhores portáteis de jogos que você pode comprar. Ele tem algumas fraquezas frustrantes que podem afastar as pessoas.
O dispositivo tem um design compacto e fino, mas ainda assim consegue alojar componentes incrivelmente poderosos. Suas CPU e GPU topo de gama permitem-lhe rodar facilmente todos os jogos triple-A lançados ao longo dos últimos anos, com configurações gráficas altas a máximas. Seus tempos de resposta baixos, suporte a G-Sync e taxa de atualização de 144 Hz devem fazer com que os jogos pareçam mais fluentes também. No entanto, você terá que suportar visuais de baixo contraste e uma duração de bateria terrível. Ainda assim recomendamos a ativação do Nvidia Optimus quando você não estiver jogando, já que a GPU consumirá a muita energia da bateria se estiver sempre ativada.
O ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW tem muito a oferecer. É elegante, compacto e proporciona uma excelente experiência de jogo. No entanto, é barulhento, não possui algumas portas úteis e tem uma duração de bateria horrível.
Não podemos entender algumas das decisões que a ASUS tomou. Soldar metade da RAM na placa-mãe parece tolice, assim como a decisão de não incluir um leitor de cartões, uma câmera ou uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Em última análise, o GX502GW funciona de forma muito barulhenta e quente para um portátil de jogos premium fino e leve.
Em suma, existem algumas razões para considerar a série GX502 sobre o Aero 15-X9 ou o Razer Blade 15. Uma delas pode ser sua GPU não Max-Q, mas ter um portátil completo da série RTX 20 vem com desvantagens. O GX502GW ainda é uma boa opção se estiver procurando um portátil para jogos de 15,6 polegadas, mas ele simplesmente perde o padrão que a Gigabyte e a Razer definiram.
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
