Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2070)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 985:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -4% | -2% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 64.9 -2% | 63.5 -4% | 65.2 -2% | 63.1 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.5 | 95.6 -1% | 93.1 -4% | 92.2 -4% | 94.4 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.5 | 66.3 -2% | 64.5 -4% | 66.5 -1% | 65.2 -3% |
| Response Times | 1% | -8% | -37% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.2 ? | 15.2 ? 12% | 16.4 ? 5% | 18.8 ? -9% | 9.6 ? 44% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 12.4 ? -11% | 13.6 ? -21% | 12 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 24040 ? | 971 ? -96% | 25770 ? 7% | ||
| Screen | -14% | 5% | -13% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 266 | 305.1 15% | 250 -6% | 304 14% | 370.4 39% |
| Brightness | 252 | 295 17% | 235 -7% | 289 15% | 348 38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 78 -11% | 85 -3% | 90 2% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.33 -22% | 0.29 -7% | 0.26 4% | 0.29 -7% |
| Contrast | 985 | 925 -6% | 862 -12% | 1169 19% | 1277 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 2.58 -43% | 1.46 19% | 2.65 -46% | 1.26 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.23 | 4.32 -34% | 2.47 24% | 6.11 -89% | 3.02 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.03 | 1.33 -29% | 1.5 -46% | 1.21 -17% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.44 | 3.4 -39% | 1.27 48% | 2.75 -13% | 1.4 43% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.46 89% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7005 93% | 6374 102% | 6749 96% | 6763 96% | 6747 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 60.7 -2% | 60 -3% | 60 -3% | 59.7 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 95.2 -2% | 93 -4% | 92 -5% | 94.4 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-10% | -2% /
1% | -17% /
-16% | 10% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 24040 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 24040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 24040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4578 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5919 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5826 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 1% | -40% | 21% | -9% | |
| Write 4K | 135 | 92.7 -31% | 73.3 -46% | 147.2 9% | 97.1 -28% |
| Read 4K | 54.9 | 41.4 -25% | 33.35 -39% | 63.7 16% | 53.7 -2% |
| Write Seq | 1649 | 1363 -17% | 849 -49% | 1573 -5% | 1526 -7% |
| Read Seq | 1449 | 1259 -13% | 964 -33% | 2602 80% | 2020 39% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 508 | 289.7 -43% | 236.2 -54% | 531 5% | 285.6 -44% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 559 | 337.5 -40% | 384.7 -31% | 598 7% | 321.8 -42% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1759 | 3332 89% | 867 -51% | 1592 -9% | 1533 -13% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1826 | 3477 90% | 1586 -13% | 2981 63% | 2351 29% |
| AS SSD | 109% | -14% | 32% | 31% | |
| Seq Read | 1574 | 2359 50% | 949 -40% | 1912 21% | 2113 34% |
| Seq Write | 1591 | 2469 55% | 823 -48% | 1553 -2% | 1471 -8% |
| 4K Read | 26.79 | 53.5 100% | 25.36 -5% | 56.5 111% | 55 105% |
| 4K Write | 105.1 | 117.6 12% | 67.1 -36% | 119.6 14% | 107.1 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 583 | 1579 171% | 748 28% | 869 49% | 914 57% |
| 4K-64 Write | 603 | 2048 240% | 650 8% | 584 -3% | 703 17% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.128 | 0.048 62% | 0.173 -35% | 0.049 62% | 0.114 11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.043 | 0.03 30% | 0.059 -37% | 0.031 28% | 0.034 21% |
| Score Read | 768 | 1869 143% | 869 13% | 1116 45% | 1180 54% |
| Score Write | 867 | 2413 178% | 799 -8% | 859 -1% | 957 10% |
| Score Total | 2033 | 5248 158% | 2109 4% | 2544 25% | 2722 34% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1121 | 1329 | 1864 | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 532 | 404.3 | 362.6 | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 380.5 | 1071 | 936 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 55% /
64% | -27% /
-25% | 27% /
27% | 11% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19674 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37721 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16068 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6909 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (136.9 - 187.8, n=9) | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (98.4 - 124, n=9) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 362.2 | 305.4 | 291.9 | 167.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 67 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 137.4 | 126.5 | 122.1 | 117.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 37 / 39 dB |
| Carga |
| 54 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus GL504GS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 2.4 / 2.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 29 / 32 / 37 Watt |
| Carga |
157 / 217 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 33% | 21% | 8% | 38% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 13 55% | 16.4 43% | 26 10% | 16 45% | 13.6 ? 53% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 16 50% | 21.9 32% | 30.8 4% | 18 44% | 19 ? 41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 21 43% | 25.4 31% | 34.9 6% | 23 38% | 26.8 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 157 | 96 39% | 90.7 42% | 90.7 42% | 88 44% | 106.1 ? 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 173 | 172 1% | 203.3 -18% | 175 -1% | 120 31% | |
| Load Maximum * | 217 | 191 12% | 222.9 -3% | 241.2 -11% | 167 23% | 249 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 46.74 Wh | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 20% | -46% | 99% | 64% | |
| Reader / Idle | 328 | 315 -4% | 105 -68% | 549 67% | 567 ? 73% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 177 | 224 27% | 212 20% | 95 -46% | 382 116% | 376 ? 112% |
| Load | 81 | 55 -32% | 61 -25% | 174 115% | 85.7 ? 6% |
Pro
Contra
O ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531WG é um portátil de jogos sólido. Como era de se esperar, os modernos jogos triple-A rodam sem problemas em sua tela Full HD de 240 Hz, enquanto a GPU RTX 2070 é poderosa para lidar com jogos em 4K também em monitores externos. O laptop é fácil de reparar e manter também, e somos fãs da inclusão da segurança Keystone. O teclado numérico integrado no trackpad também é um toque agradável e distingue o ROG Strix de seus concorrentes.
O ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW é um sólido portátil para jogos de15,6 polegadas. No entanto, seus ventiladores barulhentos e o baixo desempenho da RTX 2070 impedem que ele alcance as melhores avaliações.
Lamentavelmente, o ROG Strix não teve o desempenho esperado nos benchmarks e nos nossos testes de jogos. Outros portáteis simplesmente têm mais desempenho com um hardware semelhante ao da nossa unidade de análise. Além disso, a ASUS equipou o dispositivo com ventiladores barulhentos, que abafam seus impressionantes alto-falantes. Infelizmente, você só poderá apreciar os alto-falantes quando não estiver jogando. É uma pena que a ASUS também não ofereça uma opção de tela 4K, já que o ROG Strix é poderoso o suficiente para reproduzir títulos triplo A modernos nessa resolução. No geral, o ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW tem muito a seu favor, mas é prejudicado por algumas deficiências significativas.
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
- 06/03/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
