Breve Análise do Portátil AORUS X7 DT v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1080, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297 cd/m²
Contraste: 1291:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 DT v6 AUO1096, TN LED, 2560x1440 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 3840x2160 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | 32% | -8% | 30% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 59.6 -9% | 88.9 36% | 61.2 -6% | 85.9 32% | 90.8 39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.2 | 82.8 -9% | 100 10% | 82.9 -9% | 99.9 10% | 99.9 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 60.1 -9% | 99.7 50% | 60.5 -9% | 98.9 49% | 85.8 29% |
| Response Times | -15% | -229% | -37% | -126% | -35% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18 ? | 21.6 ? -20% | 60.8 ? -238% | 30 ? -67% | 44 ? -144% | 28 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 13.2 ? -10% | 38.4 ? -220% | 12.8 ? -7% | 24.8 ? -107% | 13.6 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 59.5 | 204.9 ? | 25000 ? | |||
| Screen | -86% | -51% | -69% | -46% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 297 | 339.5 14% | 230 -23% | 402.3 35% | 303 2% | 273 -8% |
| Brightness | 281 | 309 10% | 207 -26% | 372 32% | 287 2% | 273 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 80 -5% | 83 -1% | 86 2% | 83 -1% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.45 -96% | 0.2 13% | 0.62 -170% | 0.25 -9% | 0.26 -13% |
| Contrast | 1291 | 754 -42% | 1150 -11% | 649 -50% | 1212 -6% | 1050 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.19 | 6.88 -214% | 5.62 -157% | 5.6 -156% | 4.38 -100% | 3.52 -61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.81 | 9.99 -108% | 10.24 -113% | 9.8 -104% | 7.42 -54% | 6.34 -32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.31 | 6.57 -402% | 4.54 -247% | 4.7 -259% | 5.96 -355% | 3.11 -137% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.04 108% | 2.36 93% | 2.14 103% | 2.31 95% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6464 101% | 8608 76% | 6625 98% | 7519 86% | 6247 104% | 6999 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 54 -8% | 88 49% | 53.7 -9% | 87 47% | 76 29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 82 -10% | 100 10% | 82.2 -10% | 100 10% | 100 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.09 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-61% | -83% /
-58% | -38% /
-52% | -47% /
-42% | -11% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5779 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4524 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X7 DT v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 26% | 7% | -5% | 57% | -63% | |
| Seq Read | 2182 | 1971 -10% | 2599 19% | 1752 -20% | 2746 26% | 511 -77% |
| Seq Write | 1342 | 1494 11% | 588 -56% | 735 -45% | 1673 25% | 425.7 -68% |
| 4K Read | 23.28 | 48.93 110% | 37.57 61% | 35.61 53% | 45.58 96% | 14.07 -40% |
| 4K Write | 89.9 | 149.1 66% | 104.4 16% | 113.4 26% | 154.2 72% | 38.34 -57% |
| Score Read | 1058 | 1353 28% | 1414 34% | 831 -21% | 1711 62% | 417 -61% |
| Score Write | 981 | 665 -32% | 676 -31% | 858 -13% | 1558 59% | 254 -74% |
| Score Total | 2539 | 2695 6% | 2715 7% | 2072 -18% | 4093 61% | 881 -65% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20577 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 177420 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39020 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18006 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 141 | 71.4 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 128 | 100 | ||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 130 | 121 | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 156 | 141 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 115 | 96.4 | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 104 | 72.8 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 165 | 144 | ||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 36 / 41 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H | Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | 5% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 28.6 1% | 30 -3% | 28.2 3% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 32.2 8% | 30 14% | 35.6 -2% | 32 9% | 32 9% | 25.5 ? 27% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 35.2 2% | 31 14% | 35.6 1% | 33 8% | 33 8% | 27.2 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 41 | 35.2 14% | 33 20% | 35.7 13% | 35 15% | 34 17% | 30.4 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 51.7 -20% | 43 -0% | 50.2 -17% | 50 -16% | 41 5% | 42.7 ? 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 55 -4% | 50.2 5% | 52 2% | 50 6% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 55.7 -3% | 58 -7% | 50.2 7% | 56 -4% | 54 -0% | 53.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
| Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H | Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -13% | 0% | 4% | -3% | 0% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 45.4 11% | 53 -4% | 49.6 3% | 55 -8% | 47 8% | 46.2 ? 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 63 | 58.2 8% | 53 16% | 56 11% | 56 11% | 49 22% | 49.1 ? 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 27.4 -1% | 35 -30% | 29.6 -10% | 25 7% | 32 -19% | 31.3 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 27.2 3% | 37 -32% | 29.2 -4% | 26 7% | 34 -21% | 32.3 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X7 DT v8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade Pro 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 1.2 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 23 / 33 / 37 Watt |
| Carga |
115 / 281 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H | Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -7% | -11% | 29% | 25% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 31.5 -37% | 31 -35% | 37.5 -63% | 13 43% | 15 35% | 13.5 ? 41% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 33.9 -3% | 36 -9% | 37.6 -14% | 19 42% | 20 39% | 18.9 ? 43% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 34.6 6% | 44 -19% | 37.6 -2% | 26 30% | 26 30% | 26.7 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 115 | 205.6 -79% | 107 7% | 122.4 -6% | 95 17% | 97 16% | 106.3 ? 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 225 | 212 6% | 180.3 20% | 179 20% | 186 17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 281 | 250.8 11% | 258 8% | 277.4 1% | 220 22% | 239 15% | 249 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, 94.24 Wh | Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 94 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 66 Wh | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 51 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -9% | -14% | 15% | -23% | 54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 296 | 182 -39% | 253 -15% | 276 -7% | 397 34% | 303 2% | 565 ? 91% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 228 | 144 -37% | 197 -14% | 181 -21% | 218 -4% | 186 -18% | 375 ? 64% |
| Load | 80 | 94 18% | 81 1% | 69 -14% | 91 14% | 38 -52% | 85.6 ? 7% |
| H.264 | 204 | 222 | 193 | 409 ? |
Pro
Contra
O AORUS X7 DT v8 continua a tradição da Gigabyte de produzir portáteis para jogos de alto desempenho e design inteligente.
O X7 DT v8 pontua bem pela sua robusta carcaça de metal, sua seleção decente de dispositivos de entrada e pelo seu alto contraste, 144 Hz, e tela IPS Full HD.
A combinação de uma GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M, uma tela de 144 Hz e Nvidia G-Sync garante uma experiência de jogo fluente que pouco portáteis podem alcançar. O processador hexa-core Intel Core i7 2617M deve oferecer muito poder por muitos anos, enquanto os 16 GB de RAM DDR4 e o SSD NVMe garantem que o X7 DT v8 tenha um desempenho fluente, independentemente do aplicativo utilizado.
Esses componentes de alto desempenho vêm com um custo nas temperaturas da superfície, ruído dos ventiladores e duração da bateria. O X7 DT v8 sente-se quente ao toque sob uso intenso, com os ventiladores ficando correspondentemente barulhentos. Esse alto consumo de energia e a falta de tecnologia de comutação de gráficos resultam em uma duração de bateria medíocre, mesmo com a enorme bateria de 94 Wh. A qualidade do alto-falante também é de segunda categoria e deveria ser melhor, dado o preço do X7 DT v8.
No geral, o AORUS X7 DT v8 é um excelente portátil para jogos que merecidamente ficará na nossa lista dos Top 10. A Gigabyte fez apenas o suficiente para que nós avaliemos X7 DT v8 melhor que o GeForce GTX 1080 Alienware 17 R4, e o Razer Blade Pro 4K e o GTX 1070 Schenker XMG Pro 17 e MSI GE73 8RF.
Aorus X7 DT v8
- 07/10/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
