Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200: O dispositivo híbrido deixa uma boa impressão, apesar de seu teclado flexível
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 394 cd/m²
Contraste: 1432:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Dell Latitude 7200 SHP14A3 LQ123N1, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -5% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.6 | 68.1 -5% 67.8 -5% | 67.5 -6% | 67.1 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.4 0% 99.1 0% | 96.7 -3% | 95.5 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.6 | 69.9 -4% 69.3 -5% | 68.2 -6% | 67.9 -6% |
| Response Times | -7% | 18% | 427% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 47.2 ? 9% | 47 ? 10% | 43 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.8 ? | 42.4 ? -22% | 26 ? 25% | 25 ? 28% |
| PWM Frequency | 1645 ? | 22000 ? 1237% | ||
| Screen | -30% | -51% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 401 | 474 18% | 452 13% | 484 21% |
| Brightness | 385 | 418 9% | 412 7% | 473 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 76 -14% | 85 -3% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.33 -18% | 0.48 -71% | 0.33 -18% |
| Contrast | 1432 | 1436 0% | 942 -34% | 1467 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.2 -78% | 4.05 -125% | 4.29 -138% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 6.1 -79% | 6.64 -95% | 6.46 -90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 1.56 -42% | 1.34 -22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 4.5 -181% | 4.87 -204% | 4.3 -169% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.07 106% | 2.71 81% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6702 97% | 5881 111% | 7160 91% | 7315 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.6 | 64 -4% | 62 -7% | 62 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 99.4 0% | 97 -2% | 95 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-19% | -13% /
-34% | 129% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1645 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1645 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1645 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3392 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4858 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3782 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 7200 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -2% | 9% | -29% | 7% | |
| Write 4K | 131.9 | 95.4 -28% | 91 -31% | 83.2 -37% | 138.5 ? 5% |
| Read 4K | 45.47 | 39.19 -14% | 36.84 -19% | 43.84 -4% | 44.2 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 1021 | 1197 17% | 636 -38% | 1265 ? 24% | |
| Read Seq | 1085 | 1705 57% | 900 -17% | 1237 ? 14% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 444.9 | 399.2 -10% | 355.8 -20% | 192.9 -57% | 404 ? -9% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 366.6 | 260.7 -29% | 256.9 -30% | 247.4 -33% | 421 ? 15% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1458 | 1287 -12% | 1222 -16% | 861 -41% | 1491 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1640 | 3025 84% | 3460 111% | 1615 -2% | 1741 ? 6% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1992 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7916 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1071 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 67.6 | 34.6 | 29.2 | 9.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16.4 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73 | 43.3 | 19.9 | 17.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.9 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22.1 | 14.7 | 13.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.1 / 30.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.8 °C / -5 F).
Dell Latitude 7200 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.74 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 5.8 / 6.5 Watt |
| Carga |
37 / 51.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -25% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.8 -45% | 4.9 -48% | 3.2 3% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 9 -55% | 8.9 -53% | 8.7 -50% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 10.5 -62% | 11 -69% | 10.4 -60% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 42.8 -16% | 32 14% | 29.2 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.3 | 57.8 -13% | 36 30% | 40.8 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7200 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 6% | 23% | 36% | |
| H.264 | 489 | 523 7% | 389 -20% | 776 ? 59% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 417 | 395 -5% | 459 10% | 509 22% | 587 ? 41% |
| Load | 106 | 83 -22% | 137 29% | 131 24% | 115.6 ? 9% |
| Reader / Idle | 790 | 781 | 1083 | 1304 ? |
Pro
Contra
Um clone do Surface? A Dell provavelmente ficaria longe dessa descrição para o 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 7200, mesmo que seja adequada para o dispositivo. A Dell adapta o princípio básico do Microsoft Surface Pro 6 com suas fortalezas e fraquezas.
Um dos pontos fortes dessa categoria de dispositivo é definitivamente a tela, que também no caso do 2-em1 Dell Latitude 7200 possui o confortável formato 3:2 e uma alta cobertura de espaço de cores. A desvantagem, no entanto, é a superfície brilhante e o brilho mais baixo em comparação com os concorrentes, mesmo que o computador Dell certamente não tenha um desempenho tão ruim aqui. Um ponto fraco, no entanto, é o teclado. A falta de estabilidade da tampa do teclado tem um efeito muito negativo na experiência de digitação. Esses dois pontos representam a separação mais óbvia de portáteis "de verdade", como o Dell Latitude 7300.
Na classe de tablets conversíveis, o Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 impressiona com sua boa conectividade e boa capacidade de manutenção. Também classificamos como positiva a operação quase silenciosa, a carcaça de alta qualidade, o touchpad confortável e a ampla garantia do Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1. O rápido leitor de cartões microSD e a WWAN embutida também são vantagens. Negativo, a nosso ver, é o desempenho da CPU, pior que o do Microsoft Surface Pro 6, por exemplo.
A Dell não comete erros aqui, e é por isso que podemos dizer em sã consciência: O Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 é recomendado.
Em conclusão, podemos recomendar o Dell Latitude 7200 2-em-1 como um tablet empresarial muito bom. Como comprador, é claro, você deve estar ciente de suas prioridades. Se você colocar uma ênfase maior na tela, um tablet poderá ser uma solução melhor. Se for o teclado, você provavelmente se sairia melhor com um portátil normal como o Dell Latitude 7300.
Dell Latitude 7200
-
09/26/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig