Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do OnePlus 8: Ótimo smartphone mesmo na versão não pro

Plus 5G.

Com o OnePlus 8, outro bom e acessível smartphone 5G entrou no mercado. Embora a cobertura ainda seja bastante limitada, há muitas boas razões para a compra deste smartphone. Em nossa análise, vamos analisar quais são essas razões.
OnePlus 8 (8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
12 GB 
Pantalha
6.55 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 232 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM 2G (850/900/1800/1900), WCDMA/CDMA 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B9/B19/BC0), LTE FDD/TDD 4G: (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n28/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 160.2 x 72.9
Bateria
4300 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.75, 25mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 16MP (ultra wide, f/2.2, 13mm) + 2MP (macro, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1/3", 1.0µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante + fones, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, agulha SIM, capa de silicone, Oxygen OS 10.5.6IN21BA, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0,86 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1,27 W/kg, fanless
peso
180 g, Suprimento de energia: 140 g
Preço
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
04/2020
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.20"3200x1440
87.8 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
11/2019
Google Pixel 4 XL
SD 855, Adreno 640
193 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.30"3040x1440
OnePlus 8
OnePlus 8
OnePlus 8
OnePlus 8
OnePlus 8

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.4 mm 75.1 mm 8.2 mm 193 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s +38%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (847min - 902max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s -7%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (159min - 363max) MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s +1%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (791min - 846max) MBit/s -7%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
631 (579min - 653max) MBit/s -29%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
OnePlus 8; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (864-925)
OnePlus 8; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø921 (466-960)
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - OnePlus 8
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraUltraweitZoom (5-fach)LowLight
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8: 9.14 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 21.51 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.4 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8: 21.53 ∆E min: 9.96 - max: 27.68 ∆E
779
cd/m²
788
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
763
cd/m²
775
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 799 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 782.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 778 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2"
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Google Pixel 4 XL
P-OLED, 3040x1440, 6.3"
Screen
-75%
-55%
-4%
-112%
Brightness middle
778
583
-25%
745
-4%
786
1%
557
-28%
Brightness
783
593
-24%
740
-5%
791
1%
555
-29%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
97
2%
96
1%
95
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
3.03
-237%
2.67
-197%
1.1
-22%
3.9
-333%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
5.33
-142%
4.52
-105%
2.2
-0%
6.1
-177%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
2
-18%
2
-18%
1.8
-6%
3.5
-106%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.301 96%
2.092 105%
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
CCT
6481 100%
6621 98%
6240 104%
6315 103%
6127 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
552 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +8%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points -3%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2164 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -3%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3606 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)
7481 Points +149%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2693 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2411 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)
7952 Points +199%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points -9%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12760 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10335 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points +4%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
80296 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105430 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
43773 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points -3%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7507 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points +6%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9141 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points -13%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4618 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points -14%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7963 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 11492, n=22)
9645 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9995 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 16809, n=22)
12921 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points -27%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4652 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=22)
5138 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5734 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6163 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4612 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6404 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8947, n=23)
8073 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6950 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 11999, n=22)
9501 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5024 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4733 - 5780, n=22)
5319 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4970 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points -11%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3452 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points -28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps +50%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
136 fps -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps +37%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps +47%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +26%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
82 fps -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=23)
123.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps +34%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps +25%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
27 fps -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +9%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
53 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps +35%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps +4%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps -4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps +37%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps -4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
80.3 fps +49%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps -6%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.6 fps +21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
32.3 fps +62%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
426757 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points +3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5243 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +7%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8417 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +2%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points +8%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6387 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9356 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +47%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points -15%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1502 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +5%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points +24%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.6 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.9 Points +5%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.3 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.9 Points -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)
113.1 Points +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points +38%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.2 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.5 Points +18%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
84.4 Points +7%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.1 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min +26%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min +11%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min 0%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
106.7 Points +8%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
100 Points +1%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points -2%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +136%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
24044 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points +40%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points +15%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511 ms * +1%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
2398 ms * +6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2104 ms * +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * +20%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 8Huawei P40Samsung Galaxy S20Xiaomi Mi 10Google Pixel 4 XLAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-3%
-5%
-44%
-11%
45%
Sequential Read 256KB
1707
1592
-7%
1542
-10%
1498
-12%
871
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
748
212.9
-72%
670
-10%
680
-9%
197.4
-74%
575 ?(387 - 915, n=22)
-23%
Random Read 4KB
215
189.4
-12%
205.3
-5%
207
-4%
142.2
-34%
Random Write 4KB
203.9
197
-3%
228.1
12%
215.9
6%
164.2
-19%
188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22)
-8%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus 8; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.8 (57-61)
OnePlus 8; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (49-61)
OnePlus 8; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60.2 (55-61)
OnePlus 8; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60.2 (58-61)
Carga Máxima
 31.7 °C32 °C29.2 °C 
 31.4 °C30.5 °C29.1 °C 
 30.9 °C31.4 °C29.3 °C 
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
27.9 °C29.7 °C31.9 °C
28.1 °C29 °C31.2 °C
27.2 °C28.8 °C30.1 °C
Máximo: 31.9 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  22.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.542.12529.430.33122.827.94025.322.95030.227.96323.328.18021.925.4100192412519.633160194620016.148.325018.954.831516.658.440014.361.25001563.563015.265.280014.369.8100014.371.1125014.273.3160014.878.8200014.879.5250014.482.2315014.379.5400014.678.9500014.778.2630014.974.6800014.9741000014.672.91250014.862.71600015.452SPL26.889.4N0.973.7median 14.8median 71.1Delta0.711.232.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.61.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 8Xiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.29 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 2.3 / 2.33 Watt
Carga midlight 3.5 / 7.68 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-8%
18%
8%
-21%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1
-11%
0.9
-0%
0.53
41%
0.83
8%
1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22)
-26%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.9
17%
1.5
35%
1.46
37%
1.24
46%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
2.4
-3%
2
14%
1.52
35%
1.25
46%
Load Average *
3.5
3.5
-0%
4.8
-37%
3.83
-9%
4.98
-42%
5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22)
-50%
Load Maximum *
7.68
6.9
10%
11.5
-50%
8.89
-16%
9.09
-18%
9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 48min
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
Battery Runtime
16%
16%
8%
-40%
Reader / Idle
1374
2063
50%
2105
53%
1789
30%
H.264
1096
1052
-4%
809
-26%
1126
3%
WiFi v1.3
1045
806
-23%
726
-31%
662
-37%
623
-40%
Load
168
236
40%
279
66%
226
35%

Pro

+ Suporte para 5G
+ Boa qualidade da câmera
+ Slot dual SIM
+ Tela de 90-Hz
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem conector de áudio de 3,5-mm
- Sem leitor de cartões MicroSD
- O brilho máximo cai com bastante rapidez

Veredicto - Bom Smartphone Aguarda Melhor Cobertura 5G

In review: OnePlus 8. Test device courtesy of: OnePlus Germany
In review: OnePlus 8. Test device courtesy of: OnePlus Germany

Em nossa análise, o OnePlus 8 resultou ser um smartphone bem feito, em geral. O fato de também suportar 5G quase se torna secundário. Os resultados dos testes de desempenho do sistema e as características da câmera são convincentes. A experiência do usuário tem sido totalmente tranquila, os aplicativos se iniciam rapidamente e não houve atrasos na navegação na web. Dado que a configuração top implementa 12 GB de RAM e 256 GB de armazenamento interno, a falta de um slot de cartão microSD não é um problema particularmente perceptível.

Com uma configuração de memória generosa, bom desempenho de câmera e um sistema muito fluente em geral, o OnePlus 8 é um ótimo smartphone. Quando a cobertura 5G se tornar mais ampla, os compradores poderão aproveitar ao máximo os pontos fortes do smartphone.

A julgar pelas medidas brutas e resultados de benchmark, o OnePlus 8 também pertence ao topo da sua classe. O OxygenOS não inclui aplicativos desnecessários e as velocidades Wi-Fi são boas. Nossa principal crítica em relação à tela OLED é a redução agressiva do brilho, embora esta seja provavelmente uma medida de segurança projetada para proteger a tela de 90-Hz de altas temperaturas. A câmera ganha muitos elogios devido à sua capacidade de produzir imagens deslumbrantes que tendem a parecer melhores do que os resultados de muitos concorrentes.

Assim, nossa configuração do OnePlus 8 oferece muito bom hardware por um preço razoável que seria justificado mesmo sem o suporte adicional de 5G. No entanto, como este último também está incluído, o preço atual do smartphone de cerca de US$ 800 é mais do que justo. Os potenciais compradores com menor demanda podem economizar cerca de US$ 100 comprando o smartphone 5G com 8 GB de RAM/128 GB de armazenamento interno.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

OnePlus 8 - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
52 / 70 → 74%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
93%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 64 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
82 / 86 → 95%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
74%
Médio
82%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do OnePlus 8: Ótimo smartphone mesmo na versão não pro
Mike Wobker, 2020-06-21 (Update: 2020-06-22)