Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Microsoft Surface Pro 7: Uma atualização i7 com Desempenho de GPU Extra
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.1 kg | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
| 89.6 % v6 (old) | 08/2017 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 1.1 kg | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Chuwi UBook Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Chuwi UBook Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1359:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.49
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Chuwi UBook Pro BOE TV123WAM-ND0, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 8% | -1% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.7 | 66 4% | 69.9 10% | 63.3 -1% | 67.1 5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.8 | 93.8 -2% | 99.2 4% | 94 -2% | 95.5 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 66.9 2% | 71.5 9% | 65.1 -1% | 67.9 3% |
| Response Times | 2846% | 292% | 14% | 2901% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 34.8 ? 13% | 47.6 ? -19% | 30.8 ? 23% | 43 ? -8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 26.4 ? 6% | 29.2 ? -4% | 26.8 ? 4% | 25 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21550 ? 8520% | 2500 ? 900% | 22000 ? 8700% | |
| Screen | -92% | -16% | -90% | -58% | |
| Brightness middle | 435 | 480.4 10% | 549.8 26% | 867.6 99% | 484 11% |
| Brightness | 422 | 485 15% | 520 23% | 818 94% | 473 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 83 -8% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.48 -50% | 0.39 -22% | 0.78 -144% | 0.33 -3% |
| Contrast | 1359 | 1001 -26% | 1410 4% | 1112 -18% | 1467 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.18 | 5 -324% | 2.12 -80% | 4.64 -293% | 4.29 -264% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.27 | 7.72 -240% | 3.66 -61% | 9.22 -306% | 6.46 -185% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | 2.44 30% | 1.37 61% | 2.31 34% | 1.34 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.12 | 5.9 -427% | 2.6 -132% | 6.1 -445% | 4.3 -284% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6502 100% | 7805 83% | 6884 94% | 7346 88% | 7315 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60.3 1% | 65.4 9% | 59 -2% | 62 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 93.2 -3% | 99.7 4% | 93.7 -2% | 95 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 918% /
443% | 95% /
43% | -26% /
-61% | 949% /
475% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3660 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3440 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4367 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -5% | -16% | -39% | -13% | |
| Write 4K | 131.3 | 118.5 -10% | 131.6 0% | 83.2 -37% | 112.1 ? -15% |
| Read 4K | 52.4 | 54.1 3% | 43.34 -17% | 43.84 -16% | 50.6 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 1613 | 1166 -28% | 905 -44% | 636 -61% | 961 ? -40% |
| Read Seq | 1613 | 1676 4% | 985 -39% | 900 -44% | 1562 ? -3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 411.6 | 330.5 -20% | 421.6 2% | 192.9 -53% | 299 ? -27% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 415.6 | 393.1 -5% | 498.9 20% | 247.4 -40% | 359 ? -14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2340 | 1569 -33% | 970 -59% | 861 -63% | 1366 ? -42% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1568 | 2390 52% | 1670 7% | 1615 3% | 2170 ? 38% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 410.9 | 380 ? -8% | |||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1033 | 852 ? -18% | |||
| AS SSD | -31% | -275% | -60% | -23% | |
| Seq Read | 1881 | 1590 -15% | 1070 -43% | 1154 -39% | 1752 ? -7% |
| Seq Write | 703 | 714 2% | 171 -76% | 393.6 -44% | 720 ? 2% |
| 4K Read | 52.3 | 50.7 -3% | 41 -22% | 34.42 -34% | 47.3 ? -10% |
| 4K Write | 154.1 | 109.4 -29% | 0.2 -100% | 68.9 -55% | 118.6 ? -23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1048 | 924 -12% | 1015 -3% | 494.1 -53% | 866 ? -17% |
| 4K-64 Write | 703 | 294.6 -58% | 34 -95% | 171.3 -76% | 402 ? -43% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.069 | 0.066 4% | 0.04 42% | 0.213 -209% | 0.1034 ? -50% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.221 | 0.697 -215% | 7.6 -3339% | 0.3 -36% | 0.3076 ? -39% |
| Score Read | 1288 | 1133 -12% | 1164 -10% | 644 -50% | 1088 ? -16% |
| Score Write | 927 | 475 -49% | 52 -94% | 280 -70% | 592 ? -36% |
| Score Total | 2826 | 2157 -24% | 1774 -37% | 1225 -57% | 2197 ? -22% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1160 | 1177 1% | 1036 -11% | 985 -15% | 926 ? -20% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 454.7 | 406 -11% | 386 -15% | 143.1 -69% | 372 ? -18% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 991 | 923 -7% | 582 -41% | 676 -32% | 714 ? -28% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-21% | -146% /
-181% | -50% /
-52% | -18% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4504 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14315 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2833 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 793 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rocket League | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 112.5 | 72.8 | 60.2 | 21.96 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 49.16 | 30 | 15.97 | 12.56 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 95.7 | 67.5 | 44.7 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 33 | 14 | 13 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.4 / 33.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-11.3 °C / -20.3 F).
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.4 / 8.7 / 9.6 Watt |
| Carga |
44 / 61 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 0% | -1% | 26% | 12% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.2 27% | 4.2 5% | 4.5 -2% | 2.6 41% | 3.91 ? 11% | 5.26 ? -20% |
| Idle Average * | 8.7 | 8.7 -0% | 10.1 -16% | 9.2 -6% | 5.3 39% | 7.33 ? 16% | 8.18 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 10.4 -8% | 14 -46% | 9.6 -0% | 7 27% | 9.16 ? 5% | 11.2 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 29.2 34% | 37.4 15% | 42 5% | 43.1 2% | 39.2 ? 11% | 45.9 ? -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 61 | 40.8 33% | 34 44% | 63.5 -4% | 49 20% | 49.8 ? 18% | 67 ? -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | 11% | -8% | 47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 690 | 1336 94% | 1344 ? 95% | ||
| H.264 | 403 | 614 52% | 773 ? 92% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 586 | 597 2% | 489 -17% | 537 -8% | 589 ? 1% |
| Load | 115 | 116 1% | 112 -3% | 114.9 ? 0% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 | 90 ? |
Pro
Contra
Após nossa extensa análise inicial do SKU i5 do Breve Análise do Microsoft Surface Pro 7: (Core i5, 8 GB) agora também pudemos analisar o modelo mais poderoso e percebemos rapidamente que o modelo mais rápido não é muito diferente do irmão mais acessível. Especialmente ao analisar os recursos sustentados de carga de trabalho da CPU. O desempenho da GPU, por outro lado, foi um grande sucesso, pois melhorou significativamente. Além disso, nem as baixas temperaturas nem a duração da bateria precisavam ser sacrificadas pelo ganho extra.
A questão é: vale a pena?
O Surface Pro 7 equipado com Intel Core i7 foi projetado para usuários avançados que precisam de um pouco mais de desempenho, especialmente quando se trata de potência gráfica.
Como pudemos provar em nossos benchmarks de sistema, não é o desempenho da CPU que diferencia o SKU i7. O desempenho gráfico é onde realmente brilha e o custo extra gera o retorno mais óbvio do investimento. Para mais detalhes sobre a série Surface, consulte nossa análise anterior.
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
- 02/20/2020 v7 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Price comparison
