Breve Análise do Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5: Mais como um Surface Pro 6.5
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.1 kg | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2018 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 10/2018 | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 7.9 mm | 13.00" | 3000x2000 | |
83.3 % v6 (old) | 03/2018 | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 9.9 mm | 12.20" | 1920x1200 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Chuwi UBook Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Chuwi UBook Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 480.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1001:1 (Preto: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.44
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 10", 1800x1200 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 SEC3542, IPS, 12", 2160x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 67.1 2% | 66.5 1% | 66.6 1% | 66.9 1% | 63.6 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.8 | 95.5 2% | 97.5 4% | 96.5 3% | 97.5 4% | 88.8 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 67.9 1% | 67.5 1% | 67.8 1% | 68.6 3% | 65.6 -2% |
Response Times | -6% | -39% | 1% | -42% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.8 ? | 43 ? -24% | 44 ? -26% | 37 ? -6% | 48.4 ? -39% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 25 ? 5% | 25.6 ? 3% | 25 ? 5% | 35.6 ? -35% | |
PWM Frequency | 21550 ? | 22000 ? 2% | 1020 ? -95% | 22130 ? 3% | 10420 -52% | |
Screen | 17% | 30% | 7% | 21% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 480.4 | 484 1% | 456 -5% | 482 0% | 436.7 -9% | 355.3 -26% |
Brightness | 485 | 473 -2% | 426 -12% | 466 -4% | 433 -11% | 338 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 88 -3% | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.33 31% | 0.31 35% | 0.395 18% | 0.326 32% | 0.33 31% |
Contrast | 1001 | 1467 47% | 1471 47% | 1220 22% | 1340 34% | 1077 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 4.29 14% | 1.3 74% | 4 20% | 1.82 64% | 4.72 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.72 | 6.46 16% | 3 61% | 7.2 7% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.44 | 1.34 45% | 1.1 55% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 4.3 27% | 1.4 76% | 5.7 3% | 1.44 76% | 6.53 -11% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.51 88% | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 7805 83% | 7315 89% | 6687 97% | 7950 82% | 6560 99% | 6707 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.3 | 62 3% | 62.3 3% | 62 3% | 62.3 3% | 59.37 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.2 | 95 2% | 96.8 4% | 96 3% | 97.5 5% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
10% | -2% /
13% | 3% /
5% | -6% /
5% | -4% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21550 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 21550 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21550 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3537 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4639 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4163 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -45% | -77% | -101% | -10% | -18% | |
Seq Read | 1590 | 1154 -27% | 289.8 -82% | 1070 -33% | 1312 -17% | 1122 -29% |
Seq Write | 714 | 393.6 -45% | 126.7 -82% | 171 -76% | 274.8 -62% | 514 -28% |
4K Read | 50.7 | 34.42 -32% | 18.29 -64% | 41 -19% | 33.47 -34% | 34.98 -31% |
4K Write | 109.4 | 68.9 -37% | 35.07 -68% | 0.2 -100% | 89.2 -18% | 96.8 -12% |
4K-64 Read | 924 | 494.1 -47% | 40.27 -96% | 1015 10% | 1280 39% | 492 -47% |
4K-64 Write | 294.6 | 171.3 -42% | 44.48 -85% | 34 -88% | 268.7 -9% | 339.9 15% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.213 -223% | 0.151 -129% | 0.04 39% | 0.047 29% | 0.056 15% |
Access Time Write * | 0.697 | 0.3 57% | 0.233 67% | 7.6 -990% | 0.036 95% | 0.11 84% |
Score Read | 1133 | 644 -43% | 88 -92% | 1164 3% | 1445 28% | 639 -44% |
Score Write | 475 | 280 -41% | 92 -81% | 52 -89% | 385 -19% | 488 3% |
Score Total | 2157 | 1225 -43% | 225 -90% | 1774 -18% | 2518 17% | 1434 -34% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1177 | 985 -16% | 99.1 -92% | 1036 -12% | 409.9 -65% | 828 -30% |
Copy Program MB/s | 406 | 143.1 -65% | 44.34 -89% | 386 -5% | 209.8 -48% | 200.5 -51% |
Copy Game MB/s | 923 | 676 -27% | 76.5 -92% | 582 -37% | 273.9 -70% | 387.4 -58% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 13031 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3485 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 699 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Fortnite | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 247.2 | 29.9 | 29.8 | 16.5 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 87.3 | 50.8 | 42.9 | 15.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 39.4 | 24.5 | 12.6 | 6.7 |
Overwatch (2016) | 54.6 | 33.8 | 17.7 | 12.7 |
Rocket League (2017) | 45.9 | 29.8 | 20.3 | |
Fortnite (2018) | 39.5 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 18 | |||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 25.3 | 8.3 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-11.3 °C / -20.3 F).
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.21 / 0.65 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.5 / 9.2 / 9.6 Watt |
Carga |
42 / 63.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | 46% | 2% | 29% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 3.2 29% | 2.88 36% | 4.2 7% | 3.6 20% | 4.9 -9% |
Idle Average * | 9.2 | 8.7 5% | 4.8 48% | 10.1 -10% | 8.1 12% | 8.9 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 10.4 -8% | 7.5 22% | 14 -46% | 8.7 9% | 11 -15% |
Load Average * | 42 | 29.2 30% | 16.9 60% | 37.4 11% | 25.5 39% | 32 24% |
Load Maximum * | 63.5 | 40.8 36% | 23.8 63% | 34 46% | 23.5 63% | 36 43% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 6650U, Iris Graphics 540, 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 4300U, HD Graphics 4400, 42 Wh | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -4% | -45% | -6% | -16% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1336 | 1083 -19% | 771 -42% | 654 -51% | 1096 -18% | 781 -42% | 1054 -21% |
WiFi v1.3 | 597 | 509 -15% | 448 -25% | 293 -51% | 459 -23% | 744 25% | |
Load | 116 | 131 13% | 180 55% | 79 -32% | 124 7% | 137 18% | 168 45% |
WiFi | 504 |
Pro
Contra
Se você é um proprietário contente de um Surface Pro 5 ou Surface Pro 6, então não há muitos motivos para atualizar para o Surface Pro 7. É difícil recomendar a iteração mais recente da Microsoft quando ela oferece exatamente a mesma tela do Surface Pro 5 de dois anos e aproximadamente o mesmo desempenho da CPU do Surface Pro 6 Core i7. Tudo se resume a quanto você valoriza a porta USB Type-C integrada e o desempenho gráfico integrado mais rápido da Iris Plus G4 ou G7. Esse último, em particular, certamente pode ajudar em tarefas leves de edição de fotos e processamento de imagens, mas se sua intenção é usar o tablet principalmente para processamento de texto, email, navegação ou transmissão de vídeo, os SKUs Surface Pro 6 Core i5 ou Core i7 podem oferecem essencialmente a mesma experiência por menos.
A série numerada Surface Pro parece estagnada desde o Surface Pro 5 de 2017. Embora esses SKUs ainda sejam alguns dos melhores tablets Windows do mercado, estamos cruzando os dedos do que o 2020 Surface Pro será mais uma evolução para a série do que mais uma iteração marginal.
O Surface Pro 7 parece mais um SKU Surface Pro 6 do que um sucessor numerado. Suas atualizações são pequenas e quase imperceptíveis para a maioria dos usuários interessados apenas em tarefas básicas de escritório, como processamento de texto, navegação e transmissão de vídeo.
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
-
11/19/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo