Breve Análise do Microsoft Surface Laptop Go: Um netbook superfaturado
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 (Surface Laptop Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-1035G1 4 x 1 - 3.6 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, 27.20.100.8280
Memória
8 GB
, LPDDR4x, 1866 MHz, 20-20-20-45, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
12.40 polegadas 3:2, 1536 x 1024 pixel 149 PPI, Capacitiva de 10-pontos, LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
peso
1.11 kg, Suprimento de energia: 218 g
Preço
900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.1 kg | 15.69 mm | 12.40" | 1536x1024 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 13.90" | 3300x2200 | |
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 92.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1374 (1205-1438)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1089 (539-1219)
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP125WX112403 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 361.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 353.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.57 cd/m²iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 354.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1222:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, 12.4", 1536x1024 | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA AU Optronics B139KAN01.0, IPS, 13.9", 3300x2200 | HP EliteBook 830 G7 Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.5", 2256x1504 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 JDI LPM139M422A, LTPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen APPA03D, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 97.7 52% | 65.7 2% | 65.7 2% | 66.6 3% | 98.8 53% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.6 | 99.8 5% | 97.4 3% | 98.6 4% | 99.4 5% | 99.9 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 87.9 34% | 67.4 3% | 67.8 3% | 68.6 4% | 86.4 32% |
| Response Times | -48% | -8% | -38% | -5% | 125% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.8 ? | 56.4 ? -62% | 46.8 ? -34% | 59.2 ? -70% | 49.6 ? -43% | 46 ? -32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 38.8 ? -33% | 32 ? -10% | 41.6 ? -42% | 30.8 ? -5% | 32.4 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 21930 ? | 26600 ? 21% | 21740 ? -1% | 29070 ? 33% | 113600 ? 418% | |
| Screen | -42% | -26% | 9% | 12% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 354.3 | 444.1 25% | 454.5 28% | 403.4 14% | 557 57% | 512 45% |
| Brightness | 353 | 423 20% | 435 23% | 397 12% | 532 51% | 491 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 89 -6% | 91 -4% | 89 -6% | 87 -8% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.37 -28% | 0.27 7% | 0.34 -17% | 0.33 -14% | 0.32 -10% |
| Contrast | 1222 | 1200 -2% | 1683 38% | 1186 -3% | 1688 38% | 1600 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.41 | 2.94 -109% | 3.12 -121% | 0.94 33% | 1.4 1% | 1.7 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.96 | 7.37 -149% | 4.85 -64% | 2.92 1% | 2.5 16% | 3.4 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.44 | 3.05 -112% | 1.97 -37% | 0.99 31% | 0.7 51% | 1 31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.9 -142% | 3.1 -158% | 0.9 25% | 2 -67% | 1.9 -58% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.01 109% | 2.13 103% | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6600 98% | 6766 96% | 6902 94% | 6620 98% | 6689 97% | 6817 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.2 | 78.2 30% | 61.5 2% | 62.3 3% | 62.5 4% | 77.4 29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.4 | 99.8 6% | 97 3% | 98.7 5% | 99.5 5% | 99.9 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-29% | -10% /
-18% | -9% /
-0% | 4% /
8% | 54% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21930 Hz | ≤ 51 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21930 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 51 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21930 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø470 (466.1-527.11)
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø414 (401.76-534.64)
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø442 (415.92-573.64)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit; Ultra-Performance: Ø526 (443.49-666.89)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit; Optimized: Ø528 (367.46-659.7)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3469 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2647 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3474 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Apple SSD SM0512F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 73% | 4% | 182% | -15% | |
| Seq Read | 1347 | 1405 4% | 1387 3% | 2737 103% | 1300 -3% |
| Seq Write | 491 | 1062 116% | 504 3% | 2530 415% | 1518 209% |
| 4K Read | 38.08 | 50.8 33% | 42.35 11% | 54 42% | 14.09 -63% |
| 4K Write | 98.2 | 124.9 27% | 120 22% | 152.5 55% | 24.25 -75% |
| 4K-64 Read | 483.1 | 590 22% | 497.4 3% | 2011 316% | 725 50% |
| 4K-64 Write | 350.9 | 840 139% | 354.9 1% | 1260 259% | 169.6 -52% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.041 28% | 0.055 4% | 0.066 -16% | 0.172 -202% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.105 | 0.118 -12% | 0.093 11% | 0.024 77% | 0.155 -48% |
| Score Read | 656 | 781 19% | 678 3% | 2339 257% | 869 32% |
| Score Write | 498 | 1071 115% | 525 5% | 1666 235% | 346 -31% |
| Score Total | 1458 | 2251 54% | 1520 4% | 5191 256% | 1667 14% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 765 | 1459 91% | 764 0% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 299.6 | 600 100% | 256.1 -15% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 371.5 | 1411 280% | 368.4 -1% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 53% | 14% | 113% | 29% | |
| Write 4K | 87.6 | 129.5 48% | 112.3 28% | 165.6 89% | 28.16 -68% |
| Read 4K | 40.41 | 54 34% | 42.13 4% | 50.2 24% | 17.5 -57% |
| Write Seq | 601 | 1265 110% | 630 5% | 1905 217% | 1195 99% |
| Read Seq | 1033 | 1410 36% | 1023 -1% | 1669 62% | 1470 42% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 269.1 | 420.3 56% | 336.6 25% | 474.6 76% | 205 -24% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 261.4 | 357.7 37% | 399.6 53% | 508 94% | 692 165% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 818 | 1799 120% | 821 0% | 3007 268% | 1475 80% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2025 | 1616 -20% | 2030 0% | 3556 76% | 1920 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 63% /
65% | 9% /
8% | 148% /
153% | 7% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2025 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
818 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
261.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
269.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1033 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
601 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
40.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
87.6 MB/s
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10013 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1635 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 505 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 78.1 | 40.1 | 23.5 | 21.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 15.1 | 7.49 | 5.21 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 17.3 | 10.4 | 10.8 |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 0% | -7% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 26.4 | 26.9 -2% | 28.5 -8% | 29.6 -12% | 29.6 -12% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26.4 | 26.9 -2% | 28.5 -8% | 29.6 -12% | 29.6 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 26.4 | 29 -10% | 28.5 -8% | 29.6 -12% | 29.6 -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.4 | 31.1 -18% | 28.5 -8% | 30.3 -15% | 29.6 -12% |
| Load Average * | 36.9 | 37.7 -2% | 28.5 23% | 38 -3% | 34.4 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 38.1 14% | 40.4 9% | 38 14% | 42.1 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.2 | 40.4 | 38 | 36.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 26.4 / 26.4 / 26.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.9 / 44.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.16 / 0.41 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 6.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
37.2 / 51.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.4" | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 3300x2200, 13.9" | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD SM0512F, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | 2% | -20% | -39% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 3.6 -29% | 4.4 -57% | 4.3 -54% | 3.8 -36% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.5 -10% | 4.7 31% | 7.5 -10% | 8.5 -25% | 8.6 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 8.5 -6% | 5.1 36% | 7.8 2% | 12 -50% | 10.3 -29% |
| Load Average * | 37.2 | 36.8 1% | 33.3 10% | 41.9 -13% | 54.8 -47% | 52.1 -40% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.6 | 61.6 -19% | 70 -36% | 63.9 -24% | 61.5 -19% | 65.2 -26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.2 | 40.8 | 47.1 | 48.2 |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 39 Wh | Asus Zenbook S UX393JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 67 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 57.4 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 58 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | 43% | -1% | 27% | 51% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2102 | 2305 10% | 2078 -1% | 2064 -2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 495 3% | 692 44% | 495 3% | 622 29% | 728 51% |
| Load | 118 | 164 39% | 221 87% | 112 -5% | 146 24% |
Pro
+ Tempos de resposta de tela mais rápidos do que o Surface Laptop 3
+ Carregamento via USB-C e suporte para DisplayPort
+ ventilador silencioso durante cargas leves-médias
+ >95 por cento de cobertura sRGB
+ Preço inicial acessível
+ Tela bem calibrada
+ Tela táctil 3:2 viva
+ Pequeno e leve
+ Chassi de metal
Contra
- Os SKUs de gama baixa estão presos com 4 GB de RAM
- Sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost abaixo da média
- A facilidade de manutenção poderia ser mais amigável
- Sem Thunderbolt 3, HDMI ou leitor SD
- Os SKUs de gama superior são superfaturados
- Taxas de gravação do SSD NVMe lentas
- Desempenho gráfico lento
- As dobradiças poderiam ser mais rígidas
- Problema de conectividade do Wi-Fi 6
- Ruído agudo do ventilador
- Sem luz de fundo do teclado
- Sem obturador de webcam
- Sem câmera IV
O Surface Laptop Go é uma máquina desequilibrada. Por um lado, é um dos melhores portáteis de US$ 550 que você pode encontrar porque sua CPU Core i5 de 10ª geração, tela táctil 3:2 e design de metal são melhores do que qualquer outro nesta faixa de preço. Por outro lado, os 4 GB de RAM soldados, SSD de 64 GB, difícil manutenção, gráficos lentos e falta de opções de portas, são péssimos para os padrões de hoje. A Microsoft está cobrando um braço e uma perna por SKUs de ponta apenas para ter 8 GB de RAM decentes. Os recursos básicos e as especificações ridículas parecem um netbook Acer barato de meia década atrás.
Se você não se importa em ficar preso com apenas 4 GB de RAM, podemos ver o apelo dos SKUs de baixo custo porque você ainda obteria uma ótima tela e chassi. Caso contrário, vale a pena olhar outros Ultrabooks como o XPS 13, Spectre 13, ZenBook 13, ou o Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 todos com SKUs abaixo de $ 1000 semelhantes a um Surface Laptop Go totalmente equipado, mas com recursos mais úteis e pernas mais longas.
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
- 10/24/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
