Breve Análise do MacBook Pro 13 2020: O subportátil da Apple somente recebe a atualização obrigatória
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen (MacBook Pro 13 2020 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 4 x 2 - 3.8 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Memória
16 GB
, LPDDR4X-3733, Dual-Channel, soldada
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, APPA03D, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
Apple SSD SM0512F, 512 GB
, 471 GB livre
peso
1.384 kg, Suprimento de energia: 276 g
Preço
2129 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 88 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3840x2400 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
16.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPA03D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 512 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 490.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.4 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 510 cd/m²
Contraste: 1600:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 APPA03E, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -16% | -22% | -16% | -19% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.8 | 98.7 0% | 70.1 -29% | 64.5 -35% | 69.6 -30% | 65.7 -34% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 91.4 -9% | 98.9 -1% | 98.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.4 | 87.7 2% | 71.2 -18% | 66.6 -23% | 71.5 -17% | 67.8 -22% |
| Response Times | 8% | -39% | 16% | -23% | -46% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 43.2 ? 6% | 55 ? -20% | 41.6 ? 10% | 60.8 ? -32% | 59.2 ? -29% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.4 ? | 29.6 ? 9% | 31 ? 4% | 25.6 ? 21% | 36.8 ? -14% | 41.6 ? -28% |
| PWM Frequency | 113600 ? | 208 ? -100% | 21740 ? -81% | |||
| Screen | -14% | -38% | -49% | -58% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 512 | 518 1% | 474 -7% | 414 -19% | 447.4 -13% | 403.4 -21% |
| Brightness | 491 | 480 -2% | 426 -13% | 401 -18% | 420 -14% | 397 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 82 -10% | 94 3% | 85 -7% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.34 -6% | 0.29 9% | 0.28 12% | 0.31 3% | 0.34 -6% |
| Contrast | 1600 | 1524 -5% | 1634 2% | 1479 -8% | 1443 -10% | 1186 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.5 12% | 2.38 -40% | 3.06 -80% | 4.23 -149% | 0.94 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 2.8 18% | 5.88 -73% | 6.5 -91% | 9.34 -175% | 2.92 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 2.6 -160% | 2.69 -169% | 3.5 -250% | 1.32 -32% | 0.99 1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2 -5% | 3.75 -97% | 3 -58% | 6.1 -221% | 0.9 53% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.37 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.11 104% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6817 95% | 6898 94% | 6466 101% | 6840 95% | 6136 106% | 6620 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.4 | 78.4 1% | 65 -16% | 61.1 -21% | 64.8 -16% | 62.3 -20% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 91.4 -9% | 98.9 -1% | 98.7 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-8% | -31% /
-34% | -18% /
-36% | -32% /
-46% | -21% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 113600 Hz | ≤ 75 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 113600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 113600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Intel Core i5-1038NG7, Intel Core i5-1038NG7: Ø761 (725.23-768.15)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 Intel Core i5-8279U, Intel Core i5-8279U; macOS: Ø750 (744.32-757.06)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 Intel Core i5-8279U, Intel Core i5-8279U; Win10: Ø741 (717.66-745.63)
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø553 (544.51-599.88)
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø573 (480.43-760.86)
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø550 (504.6-640.68)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Core i5-1035G7: Ø609 (588.11-736)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1038NG7 () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3928 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5715 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2407 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3222 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Apple SSD SM0512F
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1920 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1475 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
692 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
205 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1470 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1195 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
17.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
28.16 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 17100 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4683 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 56619 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12647 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2680 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1329 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 932 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F: Ø33.1 (28-36)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 54.2 | 33.1 | 18 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.7 | 62.8 | 38.5 | 35.7 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.9 | 11.7 | 10.9 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 26 | 12 | ||
| F1 2019 (2019) | 62 | 27 | 25 | 21 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.4 / 42.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8279U, Apple SSD AP0512 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 4% | 0% | 7% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30.3 -2% | 29 2% | 28.5 4% | 28.5 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30.3 -2% | 29 2% | 28.5 4% | 28.5 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30.3 -2% | 29 2% | 28.5 4% | 28.5 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30.3 -2% | 29 2% | 28.5 4% | 28.5 4% |
| Load Average * | 34.4 | 33.9 1% | 31.7 8% | 33.5 3% | 28.5 17% | 28.5 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.1 | 40.5 -12% | 35.3 2% | 40.4 -12% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 42.1 | 41.8 1% | 32.7 22% | 40.5 4% | 35.3 16% | 40.4 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.05 / 0.32 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 8.6 / 10.3 Watt |
| Carga |
52.1 / 65.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD SM0512F, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 49% | 4% | 25% | 10% | 14% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 2.2 42% | 1.8 53% | 5.3 -39% | 3.9 -3% | 4.4 -16% | 3.91 ? -3% | 4.43 ? -17% |
| Idle Average * | 8.6 | 7.2 16% | 4.6 47% | 7.8 9% | 6.3 27% | 7.5 13% | 7.33 ? 15% | 7.58 ? 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 8.2 20% | 6.1 41% | 9.8 5% | 6.8 34% | 7.8 24% | 9.16 ? 11% | 9.43 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 52.1 | 54 -4% | 27.4 47% | 46 12% | 32.6 37% | 41.9 20% | 39.2 ? 25% | 45.8 ? 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.2 | 43 11% | 25.6 47% | 40.8 15% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 63.9 2% | 27 59% | 48.3 26% | 59 10% | 63.9 2% | 49.8 ? 24% | 68.7 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 58 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | -12% | -6% | -18% | -32% | 17% | |
| H.264 | 687 | 721 5% | 627 -9% | 917 ? 33% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 728 | 687 -6% | 620 -15% | 682 -6% | 594 -18% | 495 -32% | 729 ? 0% |
Pro
+ Excelente carcaça e qualidade de construção
+ Enorme trackpad com ótima precisão
+ Operação normalmente muito silenciosa e fria
+ Muito boa tela com dimensionamento perfeito
+ Alto-falantes muito bons
+ 4 Thunderbolt 3 com banda larga plena
Contra
- Sem Wi-Fi 6
- Nem USB-A nem HDMI
- Webcam ruim
- Muito caro – especialmente as atualizações
- A fonte de alimentação atinge seus limites
Veredicto – O MacBook Pro 13 é melhor com o novo teclado
O MacBook Pro 13 2020 é praticamente uma atualização obrigatória, porque foi o último MacBook com o velho teclado borboleta depois do MacBook Pro 16 e do MacBook Air já receberam uma atualização. Para ser honestos, a mudança para o processador Ice Lake não é realmente perceptível para o usuário. Você recebe mais desempenho da GPU, mas o desempenho da CPU permanece praticamente inalterado. Você pode ver claramente o problema da Intel quando compara os resultados com os novos processadores AMD Renoir.
No entanto, o MacBook Pro 13 ainda tem uma vantagem sobre muitos outros subportáteis no que diz respeito ao desempenho, porque não há uma grande queda mesmo sob cargas de trabalho contínuas O novo teclado Magic com as teclas com deslocamento maior provavelmente irão atrair mais clientes. Se você evitou um novo MacBook por causa do teclado, você deve definitivamente testar o novo modelo.
O MacBook Pro 13 com o novo teclado deve agradar a mais clientes e é também um produto melhor, em geral, do que o anterior. No entanto, você tem que pagar muito dinheiro e aceitar a miserável reparabilidade.
Para ser honestos, esperávamos mais, antes do lançamento (especialmente a mudança para o rumorado MacBook Pro 14) e não houve avanços/inovações reais nos últimos dois anos, mas o MacBook Pro 13 é um portátil muito bom. O ótimo chassi monobloco e a excelente tela ainda são dois destaques. A pontuação também se beneficia do novo teclado melhorado, mas tudo isso vem a um preço íngreme, pois nossa unidade de teste é muito cara, com 2.129 Euros (~$2.382).
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
- 06/01/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
