Breve Análise do MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE: Portátil de jogos elegante com tela de 240 Hz
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | 2.4 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.3 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 272 cd/m²
Contraste: 1007:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.188
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -4% | -7% | -42% | -41% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 69.5 3% | 65.3 -3% | 63 -7% | 38.8 -43% | 38.92 -42% | 63.3 -6% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 99.6 1% | 91.8 -7% | 90.1 -8% | 57.8 -41% | 58.5 -40% | 91.2 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.9 | 70.8 3% | 66.5 -3% | 64.1 -7% | 40.09 -42% | 40.22 -42% | 65 -6% |
Response Times | -5% | -36% | -58% | -90% | -157% | 14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12 ? | 14 ? -17% | 13.6 ? -13% | 20.4 ? -70% | 26 ? -117% | 34 ? -183% | 8.8 ? 27% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 9.6 ? 8% | 10 ? 4% | 10.8 ? -4% | 17 ? -63% | 24 ? -131% | 10.4 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 200 ? -99% | 198.4 ? -99% | ||||
Screen | 6% | -26% | -25% | -58% | -64% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 272 | 316 16% | 312.7 15% | 292 7% | 301 11% | 280 3% | 324 19% |
Brightness | 259 | 311 20% | 305 18% | 290 12% | 277 7% | 254 -2% | 296 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 90 -1% | 77 -15% | 77 -15% | 88 -3% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.21 22% | 0.27 -0% | 0.27 -0% | 0.26 4% | 0.15 44% | 0.27 -0% |
Contrast | 1007 | 1505 49% | 1158 15% | 1081 7% | 1158 15% | 1867 85% | 1200 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.42 | 3.03 -25% | 4.57 -89% | 3.99 -65% | 5.12 -112% | 5.89 -143% | 4.07 -68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.93 | 7.32 -6% | 6.81 2% | 6.11 12% | 8.86 -28% | 19 -174% | 6.39 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.88 | 1.1 -25% | 2.91 -231% | 3.02 -243% | 4.88 -455% | 4.79 -444% | 1.49 -69% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.9 13% | 4.3 4% | 3.3 27% | 3.47 23% | 4.08 9% | 4.01 11% |
Gamma | 2.188 101% | 2.42 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.37 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.6 85% |
CCT | 7369 88% | 7439 87% | 7098 92% | 7047 92% | 7062 92% | 7303 89% | 7350 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 69 | 65 -6% | 59.4 -14% | 58.1 -16% | 37 -46% | 37 -46% | 59 -14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 100 10% | 91.3 0% | 89.7 -1% | 57 -37% | 58 -36% | 91 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
4% | -22% /
-24% | -30% /
-28% | -63% /
-59% | -87% /
-72% | 0% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23580 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4539 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4314 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5908 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4984 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -20% | -21% | -18% | -14% | -4% | -14% | |
Write 4K | 156.3 | 142.1 -9% | 145.4 -7% | 219.8 41% | 102 -35% | 131.3 -16% | 135 -14% |
Read 4K | 47.65 | 46.43 -3% | 51.6 8% | 50.2 5% | 41.39 -13% | 45.84 -4% | 41.1 -14% |
Write Seq | 2374 | 1108 -53% | 1007 -58% | 979 -59% | 1649 -31% | 2370 0% | 1427 -40% |
Read Seq | 2045 | 1622 -21% | 1145 -44% | 1990 -3% | 1367 -33% | 1509 -26% | 1494 -27% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 431.3 | 467 8% | 468.4 9% | 516 20% | 379 -12% | 481.5 12% | 494.9 15% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 509 | 525 3% | 528 4% | 298.3 -41% | 401.2 -21% | 560 10% | 578 14% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2385 | 1203 -50% | 1381 -42% | 982 -59% | 3276 37% | 2392 0% | 1417 -41% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3505 | 2288 -35% | 2291 -35% | 1907 -46% | 3417 -3% | 3232 -8% | 3251 -7% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 981 | ||||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 300.9 | ||||||
AS SSD | -61% | -48% | -45% | -7% | -17% | -48% | |
Seq Read | 2612 | 1386 -47% | 2012 -23% | 1682 -36% | 2261 -13% | 1065 -59% | 1829 -30% |
Seq Write | 2368 | 1234 -48% | 1261 -47% | 904 -62% | 2393 1% | 2360 0% | 1315 -44% |
4K Read | 51.1 | 41.32 -19% | 43.66 -15% | 60.2 18% | 54.6 7% | 48.09 -6% | 51.3 0% |
4K Write | 135.9 | 128 -6% | 109.3 -20% | 164.8 21% | 118.4 -13% | 110.7 -19% | 106 -22% |
4K-64 Read | 1635 | 854 -48% | 851 -48% | 472.5 -71% | 1376 -16% | 1635 0% | 917 -44% |
4K-64 Write | 1831 | 721 -61% | 780 -57% | 845 -54% | 2299 26% | 1829 0% | 1212 -34% |
Access Time Read * | 0.042 | 0.098 -133% | 0.117 -179% | 0.087 -107% | 0.07 -67% | 0.071 -69% | 0.063 -50% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.095 -239% | 0.036 -29% | 0.02 29% | 0.031 -11% | 0.034 -21% | 0.104 -271% |
Score Read | 1947 | 1034 -47% | 1096 -44% | 701 -64% | 1657 -15% | 1790 -8% | 1152 -41% |
Score Write | 2204 | 973 -56% | 1016 -54% | 1101 -50% | 2657 21% | 2176 -1% | 1450 -34% |
Score Total | 5138 | 2536 -51% | 2643 -49% | 2143 -58% | 5175 1% | 4950 -4% | 3177 -38% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2334 | 1284 -45% | 1481 -37% | 675 -71% | 1539 -34% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 569 | 401.9 -29% | 467.5 -18% | 248.4 -56% | 513 -10% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1401 | 1013 -28% | 734 -48% | 535 -62% | 1150 -18% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -41% /
-46% | -35% /
-38% | -32% /
-35% | -11% /
-10% | -11% /
-12% | -31% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 18163 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36138 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14290 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6038 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti |
Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (65.8 - 146.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=102, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 High Settings | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 336 | 290 | 268.3 | 135.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 280.6 | 196.7 | 117.7 | 63.4 |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 128 | 96 | 90 | 86 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 114 | 93 | 86 | 77 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 140.9 | 69.9 | 53.4 | 42.2 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 143.9 | 97.3 | 80.8 | 70.7 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 118.5 | 81.9 | 54.9 | 35.1 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 209.2 | 136.9 | 124.6 | 121.9 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 243.5 | 144.4 | 95.9 | 62.8 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 230 | 150 | 131 | 93 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 146.6 | 102 | 93.1 | 91 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29 / 30 / 40 dB |
Carga |
| 51 / 54 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | 4% | 11% | 4% | 4% | -0% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 30 -20% | 28.5 -14% | 28 -12% | 30.7 -23% | 30.2 -21% | 30 -20% | 24 ? 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 32 -10% | 30.3 -4% | 28 3% | 30.7 -6% | 30.2 -4% | 30 -3% | 25.5 ? 12% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 34 -13% | 30.5 -2% | 28 7% | 30.7 -2% | 30.2 -1% | 31 -3% | 27.2 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 39 2% | 30.5 24% | 28 30% | 30.7 23% | 30.2 24% | 33 17% | 30.3 ? 24% |
Load Average * | 51 | 53 -4% | 41 20% | 28 45% | 36.6 28% | 40 22% | 48 6% | 42.5 ? 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 48 -0% | 48 -0% | 50.6 -5% | 47 2% | 49 -2% | 51 -6% | |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 53 2% | 51.9 4% | 50.6 6% | 50.9 6% | 49 9% | 51 6% | 53.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -0% | -17% | -3% | 8% | 9% | 2% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 53 -0% | 52 2% | 53 -0% | 46.3 13% | 42.9 19% | 48 9% | 46.1 ? 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 55 -4% | 52.2 2% | 57.6 -9% | 44.4 16% | 49.9 6% | 59 -11% | 49.2 ? 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 28 3% | 38 -31% | 27.4 6% | 28.1 3% | 27.8 4% | 27 7% | 31.2 ? -8% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29 -0% | 40.4 -39% | 31 -7% | 29.4 -1% | 27 7% | 28 3% | 32.2 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.5 / 1.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 7 / 18 / 31 Watt |
Carga |
107 / 186 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | -41% | 22% | 33% | 22% | 15% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 13 -86% | 18.7 -167% | 6.5 7% | 3.2 54% | 5.4 23% | 9 -29% | 13.5 ? -93% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 16 11% | 30.7 -71% | 10.6 41% | 8.3 54% | 10 44% | 12 33% | 18.9 ? -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 27 13% | 33.9 -9% | 11 65% | 8.7 72% | 10.5 66% | 18 42% | 26.8 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 107 | 109 -2% | 93.4 13% | 84.1 21% | 82 23% | 135 -26% | 86 20% | 106.7 ? -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 146 | 155 -6% | 158.9 -9% | 152.9 -5% | 151 -3% | 144 1% | 126 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 186 | 236 -27% | 195.3 -5% | 180.4 3% | 195 -5% | 147 21% | 173 7% | 249 ? -34% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 99.9 Wh | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 34% | 14% | -37% | 19% | 13% | -13% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 537 | 671 25% | 848 58% | 587 9% | 364 -32% | 614 14% | 505 -6% | 565 ? 5% | |
H.264 | 395 | 554 40% | 322 -18% | 408 ? 3% | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 381 | 372 -2% | 433 14% | 370 -3% | 216 -43% | 413 8% | 364 -4% | 330 -13% | 375 ? -2% |
Load | 69 | 87 26% | 84 22% | 116 68% | 44 -36% | 94 36% | 102 48% | 85.4 ? 24% |
Pro
Contra
O MSI GS66 possui uma carcaça de metal compacta e elegante que provou ser muito suscetível às digitais. Destro do chassi há um processador Core i7-8550U e um núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 2060, que juntos rodam todos os jogos de computador modernos sem problemas na tela mate Full HD. Configurações de qualidade altas a máximas sempre podem ser selecionadas.
O hardware tem acesso a 16 GB de RAM (modo de canal duplo). Uma atualização de até 64 GB seria possível. Um SSD NVMe rápido de 1 TB fornece o espaço de armazenamento necessário. Se o espaço de armazenamento acabar, o portátil pode ser expandido com um segundo SSD NVMe. As medidas de manutenção/atualização exigem a remoção da tampa inferior da carcaça.
O destaque do portátil é a tela IPS de 240 Hz.
A tela ganha pontos com tempos de resposta curtos, ângulos de visão estáveis, um bom contraste e uma ótima reprodução de cores. Por outro lado, o brilho máximo é baixo. Um portátil nessa faixa de preço deve oferecer mais a esse respeito.
Em princípio, as durações da bateria são mais do que adequadas para um portátil para jogos. Mas se você as vê em relação à capacidade da bateria (99,9 Wh), as coisas parecem diferentes. Os concorrentes obtêm tempos duração semelhantes ou parcialmente melhores com baterias que têm apenas metade da capacidade da bateria do GS66. O alto consumo de energia em uso ocioso e sob carga baixa é perceptível aqui.
O teclado chiclet (iluminação RGB) provou ser adequado para o uso diário. Além disso, a versátil configuração de portas inclui, entre outras coisas, uma porta Thunderbolt 3 que permite a conexão de soluções de docking extensas ou uma GPU externa. A bateria não pode ser carregada por meio das portas Thunderbolt 3 ou USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2. Conectamos um adaptador de alimentação de 45 watts, mas não conseguimos acionar um processo de carregamento com ele.process with it.
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
- 08/05/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck