Breve Análise do Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 - Com GPU Nvidia contra AMD
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.2 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 1700:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.98
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 N140HCG-EQ1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -5% | -39% | -44% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 71.7 8% | 64 -4% | 40.47 -39% | 37.2 -44% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.8 | 99.3 1% | 92 -7% | 60 -39% | 55.9 -43% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.4 | 72.9 7% | 65.3 -5% | 41.81 -39% | 38.43 -44% |
Response Times | 14% | 23% | 22% | 25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51.2 ? | 45.6 ? 11% | 37.6 ? 27% | 36.4 ? 29% | 41 ? 20% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 29.6 ? 16% | 28.8 ? 18% | 30.4 ? 14% | 25 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -33% | -71% | -120% | -119% | |
Brightness middle | 289 | 399.6 38% | 355.8 23% | 272.5 -6% | 269 -7% |
Brightness | 286 | 385 35% | 341 19% | 260 -9% | 244 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 88 -4% | 88 -4% | 83 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.37 -118% | 0.38 -124% | 0.42 -147% | 0.23 -35% |
Contrast | 1700 | 1080 -36% | 936 -45% | 649 -62% | 1170 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.2 -28% | 4.47 -79% | 4.65 -86% | 4.94 -98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 6.44 -37% | 9.12 -94% | 17.78 -278% | 20.37 -333% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1.73 -188% | 2.89 -382% | 4.34 -623% | 5.03 -738% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 4.7 -38% | 6.2 -82% | 4.4 -29% | 1.71 50% |
Gamma | 1.98 111% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 7005 93% | 7184 90% | 8072 81% | 6984 93% | 6535 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.6 | 66.3 6% | 59.3 -5% | 38.4 -39% | 35 -44% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.9 | 99.5 1% | 91.6 -7% | 59.8 -40% | 56 -43% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-20% | -18% /
-47% | -46% /
-87% | -46% /
-87% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4523 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6109 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5488 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4352 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 18% | -25% | -21% | -20% | 8% | |
Write 4K | 137 | 146.1 7% | 134.2 -2% | 121.2 -12% | 98.8 -28% | 164.3 ? 20% |
Read 4K | 48.71 | 47.18 -3% | 45.41 -7% | 49.91 2% | 32.44 -33% | 48.2 ? -1% |
Write Seq | 1785 | 2896 62% | 1080 -39% | 1090 -39% | 1582 -11% | 2096 ? 17% |
Read Seq | 2057 | 2754 34% | 1168 -43% | 1533 -25% | 1471 -28% | 2123 ? 3% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 436.9 | 425.8 -3% | 412.5 -6% | 393.3 -10% | 375.4 -14% | 451 ? 3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 389 | 514 32% | 357.2 -8% | 406 4% | 491.9 26% | 509 ? 31% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2708 | 2989 10% | 1457 -46% | 1225 -55% | 1574 -42% | 2551 ? -6% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3426 | 3568 4% | 1710 -50% | 2277 -34% | 2329 -32% | 3330 ? -3% |
AS SSD | 19% | -33% | -37% | -36% | 9% | |
Seq Read | 2703 | 1658 -39% | 1171 -57% | 1397 -48% | 1960 -27% | 2605 ? -4% |
Seq Write | 1104 | 2464 123% | 868 -21% | 783 -29% | 1547 40% | 1905 ? 73% |
4K Read | 46.41 | 59.5 28% | 39.06 -16% | 48.08 4% | 31.56 -32% | 45.8 ? -1% |
4K Write | 154.1 | 128.6 -17% | 130.6 -15% | 134.6 -13% | 116.6 -24% | 155.6 ? 1% |
4K-64 Read | 835 | 1576 89% | 815 -2% | 835 0% | 454.7 -46% | 1181 ? 41% |
4K-64 Write | 1138 | 1986 75% | 709 -38% | 734 -36% | 262.1 -77% | 1372 ? 21% |
Access Time Read * | 0.058 | 0.049 16% | 0.059 -2% | 0.081 -40% | 0.0801 ? -38% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.087 -211% | 0.077 -175% | 0.084 -200% | 0.034 -21% | 0.04195 ? -50% |
Score Read | 1151 | 1802 57% | 971 -16% | 1022 -11% | 682 -41% | 1488 ? 29% |
Score Write | 1402 | 2361 68% | 926 -34% | 947 -32% | 533 -62% | 1718 ? 23% |
Score Total | 3073 | 5133 67% | 2387 -22% | 2474 -19% | 1552 -49% | 3938 ? 28% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1626 | 1588 -2% | 1287 -21% | 1212 -25% | 974 -40% | 1718 ? 6% |
Copy Program MB/s | 568 | 550 -3% | 417 -27% | 374.3 -34% | 356.5 -37% | 536 ? -6% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1151 | 1329 15% | 1017 -12% | 829 -28% | 621 -46% | 1193 ? 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
19% | -29% /
-30% | -29% /
-31% | -28% /
-30% | 9% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 6362 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 82346 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3909 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1469 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.2 - 51.9, n=13) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.6 - 29.9, n=13) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.1 - 17.5, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
F1 2019 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (38 - 49, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (28 - 39, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (17 - 33, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 80.3 | 46.5 | 27.4 | 15.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116 | 112 | 84.8 | 76.9 | 29.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.8 | 65.1 | 59.1 | 29.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 59 | 30 | 25 | 21 | |
F1 2019 (2019) | 110 | 49 | 37 | 31 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 30.5 dB |
Carga |
| 41.5 / 41.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 GeForce MX350, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | 6% | 7% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 29.3 | 26.3 10% | 26.2 11% | 27.1 8% | 31.2 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 26.5 10% | 26.2 11% | 27.1 8% | 31.2 -6% |
Idle Average * | 29.3 | 26.5 10% | 27.2 7% | 27.1 8% | 31.2 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 26.5 13% | 27.2 11% | 27.1 11% | 31.2 -2% |
Load Average * | 41.5 | 31.8 23% | 41.5 -0% | 35 16% | 33.8 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 35.9 13% | 39.7 4% | 41.3 -0% | 36.3 13% |
Load Maximum * | 41.5 | 35.9 13% | 41.1 1% | 41.3 -0% | 33.5 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.3 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.58 / 0.72 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.7 / 5.7 / 8.2 Watt |
Carga |
57.1 / 82.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX350, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 18% | 19% | 28% | -12% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 4 -8% | 2.9 22% | 4 -8% | 2.8 24% | 3.97 ? -7% | 6.78 ? -83% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 6.3 -11% | 6.2 -9% | 6.4 -12% | 4.8 16% | 8.26 ? -45% | 11.3 ? -98% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 7.7 6% | 7 15% | 7 15% | 6.7 18% | 10.7 ? -30% | 13.4 ? -63% |
Load Average * | 57.1 | 48.3 15% | 47.1 18% | 34.6 39% | 28 51% | 55.2 ? 3% | 71.1 ? -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54 | 49 9% | 34.7 36% | 35 35% | 57 -6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 82.8 | 57.6 30% | 62.8 24% | 45.1 46% | 31 63% | 65.8 ? 21% | 117.3 ? -42% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX350, 61 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7, 42 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 40% | -19% | 25% | 8% | |
H.264 | 818 | 968 18% | 821 ? 0% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 593 | 619 4% | 440 -26% | 479 -19% | 715 21% | 628 ? 6% |
Load | 83 | 79 -5% | 171 106% | 114 37% | 97.8 ? 18% | |
Reader / Idle | 1623 | 966 | 1392 | 1168 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - O Yoga Slim 7 com AMD é o melhor polivalente
A Lenovo não faz muitas mudanças quando se trata das versões AMD e Intel de seu Yoga Slim 7. Com exceção da porta Thunderbolt 3 no Intel Yoga, tanto a carcaça quanto a conectividade são idênticas. O fabricante chinês instala uma GPU dedicada adicional da Nvidia para fornecer um melhor desempenho gráfico. Isso oferece uma ligeira vantagem, especialmente ao jogar, mas também leva ao aumento das emissões. A velocidade do ventilador aumenta muito rapidamente sob uso intenso, e fica comparativamente alta também. Além disso, as temperaturas da superfície são mais altas do que no modelo AMD.
O desempenho da CPU não é ruim para um processador quad-core, mas a AMD está claramente à frente com seus atuais processadores Ryzen, especialmente se você pode fazer uso dos núcleos de computação adicionais. Outras vantagens são as temperaturas mais baixas e o ruído do ventilador mais baixo.
Com a combinação Intel/Nvidia, o Yoga Slim 7 14 tem uma vantagem quando se trata de desempenho em jogos, mas no geral, o modelo AMD é muito melhor em todos os aspectos.
O Yoga Slim 7 com o Ryzen 7 4800U nos causou uma boa impressão no teste, mas o modelo com este processador atualmente é muito difícil de obter devido a gargalos no fornecimento. Como alternativa, o Slim 7 14 também está disponível com a Ryzen 7 4700U um pouco mais fraca e a iGPU Vega 7 mais lenta. Se você quer jogar muito, pode dar uma olhada no modelo Intel do Yoga Slim 7 14, mas os modelos AMD são os melhores polivalentes e, portanto, a melhor escolha para muitos usuários.
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05
- 10/22/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff