Breve Análise do Lenovo ThinkPad T495: portátil empresarial com processador AMD, longa duração da bateria, e boa tela
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 423 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 N140HCG-GQ2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 LP140WF9_SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -1% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 69.3 3% | 67.1 0% | 64.5 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 92.2 -6% | 97.6 -1% | 95.8 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.2 | 67.4 -3% | 68.5 -1% | 65.7 -5% |
Response Times | -140% | -123% | -60% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.4 ? | 74 ? -128% | 61.6 ? -90% | 44.8 ? -38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 45.6 ? -200% | 38.8 ? -155% | 27.6 ? -82% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 2451 ? -91% | ||
Screen | -39% | -9% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 420 | 418 0% | 391 -7% | 381 -9% |
Brightness | 391 | 400 2% | 389 -1% | 375 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 87 -1% | 94 7% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.24 17% | 0.23 21% | 0.24 17% |
Contrast | 1448 | 1742 20% | 1700 17% | 1588 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 4.7 -124% | 3.4 -62% | 4.6 -119% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 8.7 -58% | 4.7 15% | 8.5 -55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 2.1 -200% | 1.1 -57% | 1.2 -71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 5.9 -74% | 4 -18% | 5.1 -50% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.06 107% | 2.49 88% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 7168 91% | 7350 88% | 6809 95% | 7052 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | 59.9 -6% | 62.4 -2% | 60.7 -4% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.6 | 92.1 -7% | 97.4 -1% | 95.7 -3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -60% /
-50% | -44% /
-21% | -30% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4072 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4947 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4880 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3818 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Dell Latitude 7490 Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -12% | -33% | -61% | -34% | |
Write 4K | 137.7 | 126.6 -8% | 114.8 -17% | 79.4 -42% | 119.5 -13% |
Read 4K | 44.11 | 43.61 -1% | 41.33 -6% | 27.37 -38% | 31.9 -28% |
Write Seq | 2714 | 1342 -51% | 1271 -53% | 343.9 -87% | 351.1 -87% |
Read Seq | 2665 | 1251 -53% | 1171 -56% | 472.7 -82% | 1665 -38% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 251.2 | 297.7 19% | 218.4 -13% | 206 -18% | 268.4 7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 336.6 | 376.4 12% | 308.5 -8% | 188.3 -44% | 333.1 -1% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2994 | 2969 -1% | 1460 -51% | 343.3 -89% | 351.8 -88% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3547 | 3228 -9% | 1529 -57% | 533 -85% | 2705 -24% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1246 | 1208 | 356 | ||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1397 | 983 | 453.2 | ||
AS SSD | 5% | -51% | -74% | -79% | |
Seq Read | 2661 | 2571 -3% | 1224 -54% | 486.2 -82% | 1682 -37% |
Seq Write | 2330 | 2294 -2% | 1118 -52% | 294.9 -87% | 189 -92% |
4K Read | 48.28 | 52.8 9% | 42.46 -12% | 26.66 -45% | 26.77 -45% |
4K Write | 94.7 | 154.1 63% | 77.4 -18% | 79.2 -16% | 85.3 -10% |
4K-64 Read | 1475 | 1464 -1% | 559 -62% | 316.1 -79% | 420.5 -71% |
4K-64 Write | 1494 | 1350 -10% | 378.1 -75% | 248.1 -83% | 321.5 -78% |
Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.061 -33% | 0.081 -76% | 0.112 -143% | 0.172 -274% |
Access Time Write * | 0.041 | 0.026 37% | 0.049 -20% | 0.056 -37% | 0.061 -49% |
Score Read | 1790 | 1773 -1% | 724 -60% | 391 -78% | 615 -66% |
Score Write | 1822 | 1733 -5% | 567 -69% | 357 -80% | 426 -77% |
Score Total | 4514 | 4406 -2% | 1669 -63% | 947 -79% | 1288 -71% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1963 | 812 | 282.5 | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 440.5 | 209.4 | 212.2 | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1173 | 356.1 | 302.9 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-2% | -42% /
-43% | -68% /
-68% | -57% /
-60% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 3670 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 76723 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12398 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2141 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 779 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 107.1 | 70.8 | 59.3 | 19.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 69 | 64 | 38 | 35.2 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.8 | 19.9 | 18.6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 29.4 dB |
Carga |
| 29.9 / 31.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
desligado | 0.29 / 0.71 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.1 / 7.7 / 10.7 Watt |
Carga |
35.8 / 43.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 19% | -10% | 30% | 2% | -6% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 2.16 58% | 2.34 54% | 5.3 -4% | 2 61% | 4.9 4% | 5.68 ? -11% | 4.51 ? 12% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 5.04 35% | 5.22 32% | 8.3 -8% | 4.7 39% | 8.1 -5% | 8.75 ? -14% | 7.47 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 8.64 19% | 8.82 18% | 11.4 -7% | 5.7 47% | 10.6 1% | 10.1 ? 6% | 9.11 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 35.8 | 63.2 -77% | 35.8 -0% | 42 -17% | 38.4 -7% | 32.2 10% | 37.8 ? -6% | 42.4 ? -18% |
Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 67.5 -56% | 47.3 -9% | 48.8 -13% | 38.9 10% | 42.3 2% | 46.2 ? -7% | 60.5 ? -40% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | 21% | -40% | 1% | -24% | 9% | |
H.264 | 708 | 523 -26% | 677 -4% | 368 -48% | 426 -40% | 703 ? -1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 544 | 543 0% | 572 5% | 330 -39% | 548 1% | 394 -28% | 598 ? 10% |
Load | 100 | 75 -25% | 161 61% | 68 -32% | 95 -5% | 117.1 ? 17% |
Pro
Contra
O ThinkPad T495 é o primeiro portátil empresarial equipado com AMD da Lenovo. Ao contrário da série A, ela não vem com um conjunto enorme de compromissos quando comparada aos seus irmãos Intel. A carcaça e a tela são idênticas, exceto pela falta da opção WQHD HDR, e a duração da bateria também está finalmente no mesmo nível.
A única desvantagem real é a falta do Thunderbolt 3 e um desempenho geral da CPU ligeiramente reduzido. Infelizmente, este último parece ser uma restrição artificial imposta pelo fabricante, especialmente considerando que o T490 equipado com Intel pode consumir mais energia. No entanto, o quad-core do T495 permanece poderoso e rápido o suficiente, especialmente para um portátil de escritório.
Excelente tela, bateria de longa duração e bom desempenho. Dado o seu preço mais baixo, o ThinkPad T495 é uma ótima alternativa ao ThinkPad T490 equipado com Intel. A única desvantagem real é a porta Thunderbolt 3 ausente. Se isso é importante para você ou não, depende de como você pretende usá-lo, mas definitivamente não é obrigatório para um portátil de escritório.
Também gostamos muito da tela FHD LowPower. Com seu painel brilhante de alto contraste e sua alta precisão de cores, de fábrica, é muito adequado para edição de fotos no espaço de cores sRGB. Também consideramos o FHD uma resolução suficientemente alta para um painel de 14 polegadas e ajuda a minimizar os problemas de dimensionamento.
No geral, temos que admitir que o ThinkPad T495 é o melhor T490, especialmente considerando seu preço mais baixo.
Observe que recentemente atualizamos nosso sistema de pontuação, Veja mais detalhes aqui. Com o novo sistema de pontuação V7, o ThinkPad T495 obteve 89%. Com o antigo sistema de pontuação V6, ele teria marcado 90%.
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
-
09/12/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff