Breve Análise do Lenovo ThinkPad T14s: Portátil empresarial é melhor com AMD
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Dell Latitude 7410 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 19.3 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7410 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7410 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 403 cd/m²
Contraste: 1188:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 N140HCG-GQ2, IPS , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE B140HAN05.7, LTPS AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 B140HAN05.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7410 AU Optronics B140ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 BOE NE140FHM-N61, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -1% | 4% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 66.6 0% | 67 0% | 71.8 7% | 68.9 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.9 | 96.8 -1% | 96.8 -1% | 99.3 1% | 91.6 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69 | 67.6 -2% | 68.3 -1% | 72.4 5% | 67.1 -3% |
Response Times | -90% | -118% | -34% | -97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.4 ? | 63.2 ? -95% | 60.8 ? -88% | 39.2 ? -21% | 64.8 ? -100% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 28 ? -84% | 37.6 ? -147% | 22.4 ? -47% | 30.4 ? -100% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 2404 ? -91% | |||
Screen | -21% | -38% | -68% | -77% | |
Brightness middle | 404 | 404 0% | 380 -6% | 388.6 -4% | 422 4% |
Brightness | 371 | 397 7% | 381 3% | 365 -2% | 395 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 87 -1% | 82 -7% | 90 2% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.21 38% | 0.22 35% | 0.35 -3% | 0.27 21% |
Contrast | 1188 | 1924 62% | 1727 45% | 1110 -7% | 1563 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.1 -121% | 4 -186% | 4.04 -189% | 4.7 -236% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 4.7 -47% | 5.7 -78% | 9.2 -188% | 10 -213% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.3 -63% | 1.2 -50% | 1.25 -56% | 2 -150% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 3.4 -113% | 4.4 -175% | 6.4 -300% | 6.4 -300% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.38 92% | 2.54 87% | 2.3 96% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6480 100% | 7070 92% | 6963 93% | 6957 93% | 7106 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 61.8 -2% | 62.2 -1% | 66.4 5% | 59.5 -6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.9 | 96.6 -1% | 96.6 -1% | 99.4 2% | 91.5 -7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-26% | -52% /
-41% | -33% /
-50% | -59% /
-67% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (461 - 479, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (2935 - 3302, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (180 - 184, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (1287 - 1417, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (340 - 403, n=5) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (4413 - 4467, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (37081 - 42173, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (1117 - 1157, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (5456 - 6609, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (8.33 - 10.3, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (58.4 - 73.4, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (0.61 - 0.621, n=5) | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4640 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5813 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5570 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4890 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell Latitude 7410 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -7% | 1% | 2% | 14% | 10% | |
Write 4K | 108 | 117.5 9% | 142.3 32% | 133.4 24% | 185 71% | 139.9 ? 30% |
Read 4K | 39.82 | 40.81 2% | 46.69 17% | 51.3 29% | 50.6 27% | 44.5 ? 12% |
Write Seq | 2028 | 2031 0% | 1897 -6% | 1543 -24% | 2346 ? 16% | |
Read Seq | 1826 | 1970 8% | 2202 21% | 1509 -17% | 2102 ? 15% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 570 | 395.5 -31% | 268.3 -53% | 384.9 -32% | 488.8 -14% | 442 ? -22% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 401.5 | 361.4 -10% | 359.6 -10% | 318.7 -21% | 579 44% | 460 ? 15% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3091 | 2330 -25% | 3033 -2% | 2866 -7% | 2986 -3% | 3049 ? -1% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2872 | 2530 -12% | 3561 24% | 3122 9% | 3555 24% | 3285 ? 14% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1491 | 1012 ? | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1499 | 1300 ? | ||||
AS SSD | -20% | 8% | -28% | 23% | 2% | |
Seq Read | 2291 | 2631 15% | 2661 16% | 1837 -20% | 2659 16% | 2606 ? 14% |
Seq Write | 1343 | 1191 -11% | 2314 72% | 1438 7% | 2551 90% | 1935 ? 44% |
4K Read | 42.56 | 44.76 5% | 45.52 7% | 48.1 13% | 56.4 33% | 42.9 ? 1% |
4K Write | 132.2 | 124.7 -6% | 105.3 -20% | 132.1 0% | 158 20% | 129.1 ? -2% |
4K-64 Read | 850 | 756 -11% | 1806 112% | 660 -22% | 1317 55% | 1361 ? 60% |
4K-64 Write | 2262 | 1300 -43% | 1650 -27% | 1163 -49% | 1786 -21% | 1920 ? -15% |
Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.089 -78% | 0.04 20% | 0.059 -18% | 0.047 6% | 0.0689 ? -38% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.03 -7% | 0.041 -46% | 0.096 -243% | 0.024 14% | 0.06215 ? -122% |
Score Read | 1121 | 1064 -5% | 2118 89% | 891 -21% | 1640 46% | 1664 ? 48% |
Score Write | 2529 | 1544 -39% | 1986 -21% | 1439 -43% | 2199 -13% | 2242 ? -11% |
Score Total | 4185 | 3090 -26% | 5169 24% | 2780 -34% | 4682 12% | 4726 ? 13% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2546 | 1813 -29% | 1131 -56% | 2089 -18% | 2041 ? -20% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 428.6 | 524 22% | 267.1 -38% | 548 28% | 552 ? 29% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 943 | 350.5 -63% | 691 -27% | 1226 30% | 1183 ? 25% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-15% | 5% /
6% | -13% /
-17% | 19% /
19% | 6% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark Vantage P Result | 17399 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5705 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3267 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64.9 | 20.7 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 100 | 82.7 | 52.5 | 48.9 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 68.2 | 21.8 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.4 | 34.1 | 29.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 18 | 17 | |
F1 2020 (2020) | 81 | 40 | 30 | 21 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 30.2 / 32.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 Vega 10, R7 PRO 3700U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell Latitude 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -1% | -1% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 28.9 1% | 28.1 4% | 29.5 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 28.9 1% | 28.1 4% | 29.5 -1% |
Idle Average * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 28.9 1% | 28.1 4% | 29.5 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 29.3 1% | 28.9 2% | 28.1 5% | 29.5 -0% |
Load Average * | 30.2 | 30 1% | 31.5 -4% | 30 1% | 31.6 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.3 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 32.3 | 30 7% | 33.8 -5% | 39.3 -22% | 33.9 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.6 °C / -6.4 F).
desligado | 0.36 / 0.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.7 / 8.9 / 11 Watt |
Carga |
38.2 / 40.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, LTPS AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7410 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 4% | 3% | 5% | 4% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.7 | 2.6 54% | 4.7 18% | 3.7 35% | 2.96 48% | 4.66 ? 18% | 4.54 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 5.5 38% | 7.28 18% | 6.2 30% | 5.9 34% | 7.56 ? 15% | 7.49 ? 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 7.5 32% | 9.48 14% | 7 36% | 9.1 17% | 8.95 ? 19% | 9.14 ? 17% |
Load Average * | 38.2 | 28.2 26% | 35.3 8% | 43.2 -13% | 42.1 -10% | 38.7 ? -1% | 42.8 ? -12% |
Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 59.6 -48% | 55.5 -38% | 68.6 -71% | 65.1 -62% | 51.9 ? -29% | 61.3 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7410 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | 3% | 22% | -10% | -7% | |
H.264 | 792 | 880 11% | 750 -5% | 770 -3% | 704 ? -11% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 612 | 789 29% | 675 10% | 661 8% | 604 -1% | 600 ? -2% |
Load | 127 | 102 -20% | 172 35% | 95 -25% | 118.1 ? -7% | |
Reader / Idle | 1879 | 1300 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - AMD com muitas vantagens
O ThinkPad T14s da Lenovo agora vem com processadores AMD e Intel, por isso é muito interessante comparar os dispositivos. A carcaça e os (muito bons) dispositivos de entrada são idênticos em ambas as máquinas, assim como a boa tela LowPower 1080p. No entanto, mais uma vez temos que mencionar que a Lenovo usa quatro fornecedores diferentes para a tela e você não sabe qual delas obterá. A tela de 4K, por outro lado, é limitada para modelos Intel.
Também existem diferenças em termos de portas, porque o SKU AMD não tem Thunderbolt 3. No entanto, isso só deve ser importante se você quiser usar uma placa gráfica externa. O modelo AMD tem algumas vantagens em termos de recursos como HDMI 2.0, Bluetooth 5.1 e RAM mais rápida.
A maior diferença é o desempenho. Portáteis empresariais ainda estão usando os chips Comet-Lake-U da Intel devido ao suporte para vPro, então nem a CPU nem as GPUs integradas têm chance contra as novas CPUs móveis da AMD. Você obtém quase o dobro do desempenho da CPU e até mesmo alguns jogos são possíveis no ThinkPad.
Muito mais desempenho e mais barato: O ThinkPad T14s com o processador AMD deixa uma impressão geral melhor. O modelo educacional em particular é extremamente bem equipado e oferece uma ótima relação custo-benefício.
Existem mais duas desvantagens em comparação com o modelo Intel: O ventilador é um pouco mais barulhento sob uso intenso, e o consumo no modo inativo também é um pouco maior. Talvez o T14s AMD ainda precise de alguma otimização, o que poderia ser alcançado com as próximas atualizações do BIOS. Ainda assim, o tempo de duração da bateria não é ruim de forma alguma. Depois, está o preço, e é aí que a AMD definitivamente leva vantagem. As unidades TopSeller mais baratas têm uma diferença de preço de 150 euros (~$ 178), e a diferença fica maior quando você deseja obter um SKU Core i7. O modelo educacional que testamos com o Ryzen 7 Pro, 32 GB de RAM e um SSD PCIe de 1 TB, oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho por 1.399 Euros (~$ 1.657).
Se você não precisa do Thunderbolt 3 e pode viver com uma duração de bateria de 10 horas, será melhor com o ThinkPad T14s baseado em AMD. Graças ao teclado um pouco melhor e ao desempenho muito superior, também preferimos o T14s AMD sobre a geração ThinkPad X1 Carbon atual.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
- 08/11/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff