Breve Análise do Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H: Excelente entrega de energia e boa duração da bateria
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H (Legion 5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-10300H 4 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1200 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 192-Bits, Nvidia 451.48 (27.21.14.5148), Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-3200, Dual-Channel, dois bancos de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 120 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, 512 GB
, 427 GB livre
peso
2.46 kg, Suprimento de energia: 867 g
Preço
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | 2.4 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.8 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø878 (772-916)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (571-641)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1297-1511)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø566 (37-647)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (553-769)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1385 (1268-1486)
32.5 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
30 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
12 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 277.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²iluminação: 77 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299 cd/m²
Contraste: 1158:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.47 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.09% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 59% | 65% | 63% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.8 | 38.92 0% | 63 62% | 66.4 71% | 64.5 66% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.8 | 58.5 1% | 90.1 56% | 91 57% | 91.6 58% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.09 | 40.22 0% | 64.1 60% | 66.6 66% | 65.9 64% |
| Response Times | -36% | 29% | 56% | 54% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 34 ? -31% | 20.4 ? 22% | 7 ? 73% | 8.8 ? 66% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17 ? | 24 ? -41% | 10.8 ? 36% | 10.4 ? 39% | 10 ? 41% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | ||||
| Screen | -4% | 18% | 14% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 301 | 280 -7% | 292 -3% | 310 3% | 284 -6% |
| Brightness | 277 | 254 -8% | 290 5% | 310 12% | 277 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 77 | 88 14% | 77 0% | 86 12% | 87 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.15 42% | 0.27 -4% | 0.29 -12% | 0.3 -15% |
| Contrast | 1158 | 1867 61% | 1081 -7% | 1069 -8% | 947 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.12 | 5.89 -15% | 3.99 22% | 4.78 7% | 3.53 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.86 | 19 -114% | 6.11 31% | 8.1 9% | 6.11 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.88 | 4.79 2% | 3.02 38% | 2.36 52% | 1.81 63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.47 | 4.08 -18% | 3.3 5% | 4.78 -38% | 3.56 -3% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% | 2.43 91% | 2.47 89% |
| CCT | 7062 92% | 7303 89% | 7047 92% | 7739 84% | 7257 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 37 0% | 58.1 57% | 59 59% | 59 59% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 58 2% | 89.7 57% | 91 60% | 91 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-7% | 35% /
27% | 45% /
29% | 46% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø896 (889.24-899.4)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H; Ausbalancierter Modus: Ø880 (539.29-901.53)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H; Ruhemodus: Ø645 (535.74-677.48)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1845 (1564.03-1971.71)
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø707 (701.57-734.14)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1205 (1105.06-1307.79)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3984 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3770 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5319 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4887 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2291 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
528 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
468.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1145 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1007 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
51.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
145.4 MB/s
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Average Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 5% | 3% | -23% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 145.4 | 219.8 51% | 142.1 -2% | 105.4 -28% | 129.5 ? -11% |
| Read 4K | 51.6 | 50.2 -3% | 46.43 -10% | 33.24 -36% | 45.1 ? -13% |
| Write Seq | 1007 | 979 -3% | 1108 10% | 1029 2% | 1172 ? 16% |
| Read Seq | 1145 | 1990 74% | 1622 42% | 1098 -4% | 1496 ? 31% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 468.4 | 516 10% | 467 0% | 322.1 -31% | 448 ? -4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 528 | 298.3 -44% | 525 -1% | 352 -33% | 415 ? -21% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1381 | 982 -29% | 1203 -13% | 1036 -25% | 1397 ? 1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2291 | 1907 -17% | 2288 0% | 1606 -30% | 2307 ? 1% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 981 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 300.9 | ||||
| AS SSD | -7% | -13% | -20% | 3% | |
| Seq Read | 2012 | 1682 -16% | 1386 -31% | 1423 -29% | 1917 ? -5% |
| Seq Write | 1261 | 904 -28% | 1234 -2% | 958 -24% | 1061 ? -16% |
| 4K Read | 43.66 | 60.2 38% | 41.32 -5% | 33.2 -24% | 45.7 ? 5% |
| 4K Write | 109.3 | 164.8 51% | 128 17% | 80.7 -26% | 140.2 ? 28% |
| 4K-64 Read | 851 | 472.5 -44% | 854 0% | 816 -4% | 854 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 780 | 845 8% | 721 -8% | 708 -9% | 780 ? 0% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.117 | 0.087 26% | 0.098 16% | 0.1 15% | 0.1031 ? 12% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.02 44% | 0.095 -164% | 0.047 -31% | 0.03488 ? 3% |
| Score Read | 1096 | 701 -36% | 1034 -6% | 991 -10% | 1091 ? 0% |
| Score Write | 1016 | 1101 8% | 973 -4% | 885 -13% | 1027 ? 1% |
| Score Total | 2643 | 2143 -19% | 2536 -4% | 2365 -11% | 2643 ? 0% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1481 | 675 -54% | 1284 -13% | 1043 -30% | 1310 ? -12% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 467.5 | 248.4 -47% | 401.9 -14% | 252.7 -46% | 453 ? -3% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 734 | 535 -27% | 1013 38% | 483.6 -34% | 924 ? 26% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-3% | -5% /
-7% | -22% /
-21% | 2% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17255 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 178912 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30548 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13745 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5980 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Red Dead Redemption 2 | Far Cry 5 | Gears Tactics
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (119 - 156, n=17) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 High Settings | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.7 - 56.2, n=5) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (76 - 90, n=9) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU: Ø60.1 (55-65)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø58.6 (54-62)
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø43.4 (38-48)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00: Ø56.4 (47-63)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø56.5 (52-63)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 349.9 | 315.9 | 288.8 | 144.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 275.4 | 204.8 | 124.8 | 68.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 140.9 | 128.9 | 118.8 | 113.1 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 85.6 | 78.5 | 68.1 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 114 | 97 | 91 | 85 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 125 | 97 | 90 | 81 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 215.3 | 108.3 | 71.7 | 50.6 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 185 | 166 | 137 | 127 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 117.9 | 81.6 | 55.1 | 35.1 |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 204.9 | 140 | 126.9 | 126.1 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 228.8 | 151.8 | 99.3 | 68.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.6 / 50.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | 7% | -20% | -5% | -2% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 30.2 2% | 28 9% | 29 6% | 30 2% | 27.9 ? 9% | 24 ? 22% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 30.2 2% | 28 9% | 36 -17% | 30 2% | 29 ? 6% | 25.5 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * | 30.7 | 30.2 2% | 28 9% | 37 -21% | 32 -4% | 30 ? 2% | 27.2 ? 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 30.2 2% | 28 9% | 46 -50% | 34 -11% | 33 ? -7% | 30.3 ? 1% |
| Load Average * | 36.6 | 40 -9% | 28 23% | 50 -37% | 44 -20% | 44 ? -20% | 42.7 ? -17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 49 -4% | 50.6 -8% | 51 -9% | 48 -2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 50.9 | 49 4% | 50.6 1% | 57 -12% | 52 -2% | 51.6 ? -1% | 53.4 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -12% | 2% | -27% | -11% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.3 | 42.9 7% | 53 -14% | 44 5% | 47 -2% | 47.2 ? -2% | 46.1 ? -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.4 | 49.9 -12% | 57.6 -30% | 49 -10% | 60 -35% | 52.7 ? -19% | 49 ? -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.1 | 27.8 1% | 27.4 2% | 26 7% | 37 -32% | 31 ? -10% | 31.3 ? -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 27 8% | 31 -5% | 28 5% | 41 -39% | 32.9 ? -12% | 32.3 ? -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.2 / 8.3 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
82 / 195 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -26% | -114% | -132% | -113% | -144% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 5.4 -69% | 6.5 -103% | 14 -338% | 15 -369% | 11.5 ? -259% | 13.6 ? -325% |
| Idle Average * | 8.3 | 10 -20% | 10.6 -28% | 18 -117% | 20 -141% | 16.5 ? -99% | 19 ? -129% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 10.5 -21% | 11 -26% | 32 -268% | 33 -279% | 23.7 ? -172% | 26.8 ? -208% |
| Load Average * | 82 | 135 -65% | 84.1 -3% | 64 22% | 88 -7% | 107.5 ? -31% | 106.3 ? -30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 151 | 144 5% | 152.9 -1% | 123 19% | 128 15% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 195 | 147 25% | 180.4 7% | 193 1% | 213 -9% | 199.7 ? -2% | 249 ? -28% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57.48 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -10% | -51% | -50% | -2% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 848 | 587 -31% | 671 -21% | 349 -59% | 233 -73% | 661 -22% | 567 ? -33% |
| H.264 | 554 | 322 -42% | 234 -58% | 439 -21% | 413 ? -25% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 433 | 370 -15% | 372 -14% | 245 -43% | 192 -56% | 396 -9% | 376 ? -13% |
| Load | 84 | 116 38% | 87 4% | 49 -42% | 67 -20% | 120 43% | 85.7 ? 2% |
Pro
+ Tela IPS
+ Painel de 120-Hz
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ SSD NVMe
+ Espaço para um dispositivo de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas ou um segundo SSD NVMe
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Boa duração da bateria
Contra
- Cobertura baixa do espaço de cores
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Sem porta Thunderbolt 3
- Sem leitor de cartões de armazenamento
O Lenovo Legion 5 com sua combinação de um processador Core-i5-10300H com um chip gráfico GeForce-RTX-2060 roda todos os jogos de computador atuais sem problemas em sua tela de 120 Hz. A maioria dos jogos pode ser reproduzida em resolução Full HD e nas configurações de alta a máxima qualidade. A CPU e a GPU também conseguem manter suas altas velocidades por um longo tempo.
O Legion 5 permite que os usuários ativem e desativem a GPU integrada.
A UHD Graphics 630 integrada pode ser ativada e desativada com o clique de um botão. A duração da bateria é muito boa quando a iGPU está ativada, mas não dura tanto tempo se a exigente GeForce RTX 2060 estiver em funcionamento.
Se o armazenamento no SSD de 512 GB acabar, os usuários poderão expandir o dispositivo com uma unidade de 2,5 polegadas ou um segundo SSD NVMe (M.2 2280). A inserção do dispositivo de armazenamento requer a abertura do dispositivo, que não possui uma escotilha de manutenção.
A tela IPS Full-HD oferece ângulos de visão estáveis, uma superfície mate, tempos de resposta aceitáveis, uma boa taxa de contraste e cores decentes. No entanto, brilho máximo e a cobertura do espaço de cores são muito baixos. Esperamos mais de um portátil de $1.250.
A seleção de portas é boa em sua maior parte, apesar de sentirmos falta de uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Isso permitiria que os usuários conectassem GPUs externas, por exemplo. O Legion possui apenas uma porta USB Tipo C 3.2 Ger. 1 que suporta DisplayPort via USB C.
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
- 07/08/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
